RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the management of patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in a paediatric population and review the long-term outcomes over a 5-year interval, with particular emphasis on the difference between patients with trisomy 21 and those without trisomy 21. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional, case review study included patients suffering from CNLDO at Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS foundation Trust. Patients were divided into two groups: Non-trisomy 21 and trisomy 21. Patients were followed-up for a 60-month interval. Patients aged <12 months at the time of surgery, patients with <60 months of follow-up data and patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were excluded. The main outcome measures were discharge rates in patients undertaking primary intervention with syringe and probe (S&P), number of patients requiring further treatment with lacrimal intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and overall symptom-free periods post-treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (142 eyes) were included. The mean number of surgical interventions was 1.53 ± 0.65. The mean interval between the 1st and 2nd intervention was 15.54 ± 16.33 months. There was a trend towards greater success rates non-trisomy 21 patients versus patients with trisomy 21 (p = 0.1352). The average symptom-free period after the final intervention was 44.31 ± 20.68 months, significantly longer in the non-trisomy 21 group compared to the trisomy 21 group (p = 0.0074). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate after primary S&P was 55.9%. Our results suggest that in trisomy 21 patients suffering from CNLDO, a one-stage intervention with primary monocanalicular intubation should be considered instead of sequential approach.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oliver McFarlane syndrome (OMS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterised by pigmentary chorioretinal atrophy with no previous reports of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe the history, findings of clinical examination, retinal imaging and electrodiagnostic studies, and the treatment of a patient with CNV secondary to OMS. CASE DESCRIPTION: CNV secondary to OMS was diagnosed in a ten-year-old white female who presented with reduced visual acuity and a macular haemorrhage in her right eye. CNV was confirmed on optical coherence tomography. She was initially treated with a single injection of intravitreal bevacizumab and 2 years later with an injection of intravitreal ranibizumab for a recurrence. Although macular scarring secondary to the CNV was observed, her vision has stabilised and she continues to be closely monitored. CONCLUSION: We report the first case of CNV secondary to OMS and its successful treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.