RESUMO
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines for preoperative cardiac risk stratification in 1996. Although clinician practice may differ from the guidelines, it remains unclear whether deviation from these guidelines affects clinical outcomes. This study sought to determine if discordance between clinician practice and the ACC/AHA guidelines affects perioperative cardiac outcomes. Eight hundred twenty-three patients who underwent 864 consecutive preoperative evaluations performed from 1995 to 1997 at a tertiary care academic medical center were prospectively followed. Clinician recommendations for preoperative cardiac testing were compared with ACC/AHA guideline recommendations. Frequencies of perioperative cardiac complications were compared between concordant and discordant testing recommendations. There were 33 perioperative cardiac complications (3.8%). Overall, there was no difference in the frequency of complications when there was discordance with the ACC/AHA guidelines compared with concordance (4.1% vs 3.7%, p = 0.81). The ACC/AHA guidelines recommended cardiac testing for 236 patients (27.3%). Clinicians ordered testing in half of those cases (n = 112). There was a lower frequency of cardiac complications when clinicians did not perform testing as recommended by the ACC/AHA guidelines (3.2% vs 10.7%, p = 0.02). Conversely, clinicians ordered cardiac testing in 45 patients (7%) when not recommended by the guidelines. Patients in this group had a trend toward more cardiac complications (6.7% vs 2.4%, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the failure of clinicians to follow the ACC/AHA guidelines when perioperative testing was recommended did not result in a higher frequency of cardiac complications.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Testes de Função Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Washington/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the association between self-reported exercise tolerance and the risk of unanticipated postoperative nursing home placement in adults undergoing major surgery. METHODS: Consecutive community-dwelling adults (N = 586) referred to a medical clinic for evaluation before undergoing major nonemergent surgery at a tertiary care academic medical center were prospectively followed between 1995 and 1997. The main outcome measure was unanticipated postoperative nursing home placement. RESULTS: Overall, 12% (40/324) of patients with poor preoperative exercise tolerance (inability to walk four blocks and climb two flights of stairs without symptomatic limitation) had unanticipated nursing home placement compared with 4% (10/262) of patients with good exercise tolerance. Patient and surgical characteristics associated with nursing home placement in univariate analyses included poor preoperative exercise tolerance, increasing age, living alone, history of heart failure, taking five or more preoperative medications, longer anesthesia duration, and orthopedic surgery. Patients who were married were at lower risk. After adjusting for all other patient and surgical factors, poor preoperative exercise tolerance (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 6.2) and serious postoperative complications (OR = 4.7; 95% CI: 2.1 to 10.5) remained associated with postoperative nursing home placement. CONCLUSION: Poor preoperative exercise tolerance was an independent predictor of unanticipated nursing home placement following major nonemergent surgery.