The effect of parity, breastfeeding history, and duration on clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients.

Background/aim: The study is aimed to determine the relationship between the delivery and breastfeeding history of the patients and the clinicopathological properties of breast cancer. Materials and methods: A questionnaire was utilized for the study, which included the age of diagnosis, the number of children at the time of diagnosis, the age of the children, and the breastfeeding period of each child. Results: The study included 828 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 47 years for parous women and 42 years for nonparous women (p < 0.001). The tumor size of the patients diagnosed within the breastfeeding period was significantly larger compared to the other patients. Estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity were lower in patients diagnosed during breastfeeding. Additionally, the mean number of positive lymph nodes, dissected lymph nodes, and positive lymph node/dissected lymph node ratio in parous and breastfed patients with a nonmetastatic disease were statistically significantly higher in multivariable analysis than those patients who were nulliparous and have not breastfed. Conclusion: Breast cancer is seen at a later age in patients who are parous than those who have never given birth. Patients who are parous and have breastfed tend to present with a higher stage of the disease.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Who Had Developed Brain Metastasis in the Treatment Process.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are at risk for developing brain metastases. Different anti-HER2 treatments can be used in the management of the disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognosis and the factors affecting the prognosis in brain metastatic patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Clinical and pathological features of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients and magnetic resonance imaging features at the onset of brain metastasis were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: Analyses of the study were performed by including 83 patients. The median age was 49 (25-76). All patients had HER2 receptor-positive tumors. Thirty-five (42.2%) patients had a hormone-positive disease. Thirty-two (38.6%) patients had de novo metastatic disease. Brain metastasis sites were found to be bilateral - 49.4%, right brain - 21.7%, left brain - 12%, and unknown - 16.9%, respectively. The median brain metastasis largest size was 16 mm (range 5-63). The median follow-up time from the post-metastasis period was 36 months. Median overall survival (OS) was found as 34.9 months (95% CI, 24.6-45.2). In multivariate analysis for factors affecting OS, estrogen receptor status (p = 0.025), number of chemotherapy agents used with trastuzumab (p = 0.010), number of HER2-based therapy (p = 0.010), and the largest size of brain metastasis (p = 0.012) were found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated the prognosis in brain metastatic patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. When the factors affecting the prognosis were evaluated, we determined that the largest size of brain metastasis, estrogen receptor positivity, and the use of TDM-1 and lapatinib plus capecitabine consecutively during the treatment process affected the prognosis of the disease.

The effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Turkish Oncology Group study.

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the pathological response rates and side effect profile of adding pertuzumab to the treatment of HER2+ locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage breast cancer. This study was conducted by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) with data collected from 32 centers. Our study was multicentric, and a total of 364 patients were included. The median age of the patients was 49 years (18-85 years). Two hundred fifteen (60%) of the cases were hormone receptor/HER2+ positive(ER+ or PR+, or both), and 149 (40%) of them were HER2-rich (ER and PR negative). The number of complete responses was 124 (54%) in the docetaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm and 102 (45%) in the paclitaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm, and there was no difference between the groups in terms of complete response. In 226 (62%) patients with complete response, a significant correlation was found with DCIS, tumor focality, removed lymph node, and ER status P < 0.05. Anemia, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, alopecia, and mucosal inflammation were significantly higher in the docetaxel arm, P < 0.05. In our study, no statistical difference was found between the before-after echocardiography values. DCIS positivity in biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor focality; the number of lymph nodes removed and ER status were found to be associated with pCR. In conclusion, we think that studies evaluating pCR-related clinicopathological variables and radiological imaging features will play a critical role in the development of nonsurgical treatment approaches.

Does nutritional status affect treatment tolerability, chemotherapy response and survival in metastatic gastric cancer patients? Results of a prospective multicenter study in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: The possible impact of malnutrition on the efficacy and tolerability of modern chemotherapy for metastatic gastic adenocarcinoma (mGC) patients is unclear. With this study, we aimed to represent the possible impact of malnutrition on the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy, and also on the overall survival of mGC patients. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, we collected demographic, oncological and nutritional data of our mGC patients. The nutritional status of patients were assessed with the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight loss percentage within 21-day period, between the chemotherapy cycles. All of these parameters along with toxicity assessment were evaluated after each courses of chemotherapy in order to determine inter-treatment weight loss. NRIs were calculated with a formula as follows; [1.519 × serum albumin level(g/L) + 41.7 × current weight/basic weight]. Patients were classified as having 'no malnutrition' (NRI > 97.5), 'moderate malnutrition' (97.5 ≥ NRI ≥ 83.5) or 'severe malnutrition' (NRI < 83.5). Drug-induced toxicities and treatment responses were evaluated via National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 and RECIST Criteria 1.1, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen mGC patients were enrolled into the study. Median age was 60 years with range 32-83. Primary location of the tumor was antrum in 40% of the patients and of which 24% had undergone primary tumor resection. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had WHO performance status 0 or 1. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 67% of the patients and was severe in 31% of them. All patients received chemotherapy as first-line setting. Severe malnutrition was not associated with chemotherapy responses (p = 0.57). Moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with more cytopenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, neuropathy, (p < 0.05 for all parameters). Moderate/severe malnutrition is associated with worser non-hematological toxicities (p = 0.038). Forty-one percent of patients died during the follow up period (Median: 138 days, range: 21-378). Malnutritional level was associated with significantly reduced overall survival. Severe malnutrition was associated with shorter median overall survival (74 days (95% CI, 20.7-111.0) vs. 237 (95% CI, 148.4-325.6) in none/moderate groups, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In mGC patients, moderate/severe malnutrition is associated with worse non-hematological toxicities. Severe malnutrition is also associated with reduced overall survival.

The relationship between clinicopathological parameters and PD-L1 expression level in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: Clinicopathological parameters related to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels have been investigated in several studies. However, the results of these studies are conflicting and vary in different populations. This study aimed to investigate the relation of clinicopathological parameters with PD-L1 expression level in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled, retrospectively. The data of clinicopathological parameters was collected. Clinicopathological parameters in relation to PD-L1 expression levels (0%, 1-50%, and >50%) were analyzed as univariable and multivariable. Result: In total, 384 patients were enrolled. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was between 1-50%, and >50% in 41.4%, and 23.4% of patients, respectively. There was no PD-L1 expression in 35.2% of the patients. In univariable analysis, we found that the parameters associated with PD-L1 expression levels revealed that metastatic site number, the subtype of cancer, diagnostic material type, platelet number, and LDH level were statistically significant. Adenocarcinoma frequency was higher in tumors that had PD-L1 expression >50% than in tumors that did not express PD-L1 and the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.04, coefficient= 0.3, 95% CI 0.09-0.94). Cytology as diagnostic material was significant in PD-L1 level 1-50% comparing to >50% (p= 0.02, coefficient= 2.2, 95% CI= 1.08-4.46). Conclusions: According to the results of our study, many of the clinicopathological parameters are not related to the PD-L1 level. The histological subtype and diagnostic material may affect the level of PD-L1 expression.

Efficacy and tolerability of vismodegib treatment in locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: Retrospective real-life data.

The study aims to evaluate the vismodegib treatment in local advanced (laBCC) and metastatic (mBCC) basal cell carcinoma. The data of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and histopathological features of the patients and adverse events of vismodegib were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range: 1.6-57.3), and the median age at diagnosis 73 years (range: 39-88). The most common disease location was head and neck (86.2%), and the most common non-skin sites of disease were lymph nodes (13.8%), bone (13.8%), lung (6.9%), and brain (6.9%). Three (10.3%) patients had Gorlin's syndrome. The number of metastatic patients was 5 (17.2%). With vismodegib treatment, the complete response rate was 27.6%, partial response 55.2%, and stable response 10.3%. Treatment responses were most frequently seen within 2 months from the beginning of vismodegib. The median OS was 43.3 ± 9.0 months (25.6-61.1) for all patients. The median PFS in the laBCC was 15.7 ± 1.8 months (12.2-19.3), and 12.1 ± 4.6 months (2.9-21.2) in the mBCC. In the univariable analysis for the OS, only the treatment after the vismodegib was statistically significant, showing chemotherapy was better comparing to no treatment or surgery. The most common adverse events were fatigue-58.6%, muscle spasms-48.3%, alopecia-13.8%, and weight loss-13.8%. This real-life data study shows that vismodegib treatment in locally advanced and metastatic BCC was well tolerated and effective.

Does nutritional status affect treatment tolarability, response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients? Results of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of modern cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in malnourished metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malnutrition on efficacy and tolerability of cytotoxic chemotherapy and overall survival in mCRC patients. METHODS: In this multicenter study, demographic, oncologic and nutritional data were collected prospectively from mCRC patients. Nutritional status of the patients were evaluated on the basis of NRI (Nutritional Risk Assessment), BMI (Body Mass Index) and WL (Weight Loss) before the first chemotherapy, after the first and second chemotherapy during 2 cycles of chemotherapy every 15 days. To determine the inter-treatment weight loss toxicity assessment was included to theese parameters after each chemotherapy. NRI calculation was performed as [1.51xserum albumin level (g/L)+41.7xcurrent weight/basic weight]. NRIs were examined in 3 categories as 'no malnutrition' (NRI >97.5), 'moderate malnutrition' (97.5 ≥NRI ≥83.5) or 'severe malnutrition' (NRI <83.5). Response to treatment and drug-induced toxicities were assessed based on Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 respectively. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-seven mCRC patients were prospectively included. Median age was 48 (range 18-83). Primary location was colon in 66% of patients and 84% of their primary source was left colon. Malnutrition was detected in 39% of the cases. Response rate to treatment was twenty four percent. While there was no significant relationship between chemotherapy response and moderate/severe malnutrition (p = 0.24), moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with multipl site of metastases, WHO PS (World Health Organization Performance Status) of 1, over the median value of CEA/CA 19-9 (carcinoembryonic antigen/carbohydate antigen 19-9) levels (p = 0.003, p = 0.03, p < 0.001, and p = 0.02; respectively). Hypoalbuminemia and moderate/severe malnutrition were associated with all types of toxicity (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea following chemotherapy predominately, (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04; respectively). In moderate/severe malnutrition group median overall survival was prominently shorter than those with no malnutrition [6.6 moths (95%CI, 5.6-7.6) vs 11.9 moths (95% CI, 11.1-12.7) respectively, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that moderate/severe malnutrition in mCRC patients was associated with decreased overall survival and increased chemotherapy toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in adult metastatic osteosarcoma patients.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the efficacy of targeted therapy in metastatic osteosarcoma. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of sorafenib in adult patients with heavily pretreated metastatic osteosarcoma. METHOD: Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma aged more than 18 years were assessed retrospectively. The patients' clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data were collected. For survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier models were used. RESULTS: The research involved 15 patients. The ratio of male and female patients was 2/1, with a median age of 25 years (range: 19-64 years). The most common primary tumor localization was the extremities (66.6%). Fourteen (93.3%) patients had previously received palliative chemotherapy and six (40%) patients had palliative radiotherapy. The median progression-free survival was found as 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.7). A stable response was observed in seven (46.6%) patients and progressive disease in eight (53.4%) patients. Grade 1-2 toxicities were detected in 50% of the patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 14.3% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated real-life results of sorafenib for disease management in pretreated adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma in the study. Sorafenib was effective for disease control and well tolerated in the patients. Sorafenib may be a treatment option for disease control after the disease progresses with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma.

Single-agent temozolomide as salvage therapy in heavily pretreated metastatic sarcoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic sarcoma are limited. The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of temozolomide in pretreated patients with soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: We recorded the pathological, clinical, and treatment data of the patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma retrospectively. We evaluated the efficacy and side effects of temozolomide in this patient group. RESULTS: This study involved 16 patients. The average age was detected as 48 (21-73) years. Six (37.5%) patients had de-novo metastatic disease at diagnosis. Primary of tumors had originated from intra-abdominal (43.7%), extremity (31.3%), head-and-neck (12.5%), and intrathoracic (12.5%) regions. The patients previously had received at least two different chemotherapy regimens (75%), pazopanib (50%) and palliative radiotherapy (31.3%). Temozolomide-related median progression-free survival time was found as 3.5 (95% CI, 2.6-4.3) months. One patient (6.3%) had a partial response, while four patients (25%) had stable disease. Nine individuals (56.3%) had grade 1-2 adverse events, while one patient (6.3%) had grade 3-4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that temozolomide was well tolerated but had limited efficacy in the treatment of metastatic sarcoma patients. In patients with extensively pretreated soft tissue sarcoma, temozolomide may be considered a therapeutic option as a single-agent.

Rechallenge of Trastuzumab-based Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients who Progressed Under TDM-1.

Data on rechallenges of HER2 targetted agents in breast cancer patients is limited. The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of trastuzumab-based therapy in patients who progressed under trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1). The study was designed as a retrospective observational study. Survival plots were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Fifteen patients were involved in the study. The average age was 45 (range, 30-66). De novo metastatic patient number was six (40%), and the average number of metastatic sites was 2 (range, 1-4) at diagnosis. Fourteen patients (92.3%) had undergone breast surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy). All patients previously had been treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and TDM-1. Also, nine (60%) patients had received endocrine therapy, and nine (60%) patients had palliative radiotherapy. After progression under TDM-1, patients received trastuzumab with chemotherapy (73.3%) or alone (26.7%). The overall response ratio was 66.7%. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-15.3). The median OS duration was 24.2 (95% CI, 13.5-34.9) months. Toxicity in all grades was observed in ten (66.7%) patients, and grade 3-4 toxicity (anemia and neutropenia) in two patients (13.3%). This study showed that rechallenge trastuzumab-based therapy was effective and good-tolerated in heavily pretreated patients who had progressed under TDM-1.

Efficacy of Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine After TDM-1 in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Different targeted therapy options exist for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the lapatinib plus capecitabine combination after TDM-1 in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients' data. The patients who progressed after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and TDM-1 were included in the study. We used the Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis. Eighteen patients were involved in the study. The average age was 48 (range 31-65). De novo metastatic patient's number was 5 (27.8%). The most common metastatic sites were liver (50%), lung (44.4%), and brain (44.4%), respectively. All patients were previously treated with trastuzumab + chemotherapy and TDM-1. Also, seven (38.9%) patients received hormonotherapy and twelve (66.7%) patients received palliative radiotherapy. The complete response ratio was 5.6%, partial response 11.8%, and stable response 29.4%. Median progression-free survival was found as 5.5 (95% CI, 3.2-7.7) months. The hematological and non-hematological toxicity ratio was 41.2% and 52.9%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea, anemia, and mucositis) was observed in four (22.2%) patients. The median OS duration was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.0). Treatment options are limited in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite a small number of patients, this study showed that the lapatinib plus capecitabine combination was effective and well-tolerated in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients after TDM-1.

Outcomes of the patients with metastatic male breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this research is to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of men with metastatic breast cancer (mMBC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the data of 28 patients was conducted. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS) and prognostic variables. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 57 years (range 26-86). The most prevalent pathological subtype was invasive ductal carcinoma (92.6%). HER2 positivity was 21.6% in patients, with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity at 96.4% and 71.4%, respectively. Bone-75%, lung-39.3%, brain-21.4%, and adrenal gland-10.7% were the most prevalent metastatic sites. Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy was given to six patients. During the study period, 14 patients (or half) died. All patients had a median OS of 42.6 months (range: 21.6-63.7). The OS rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.7%, 54.2%, and 36.6%, respectively. The number of metastatic locations (P = 0.045), brain metastasis (P = 0.033), and a history of regular alcohol intake (P = 0.008) were all shown to be statistically significant factors affecting OS in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis did not support the findings. In addition, we discovered that trastuzumab-based therapy and de-novo metastatic disease had no effect on OS for mMBC. CONCLUSIONS: The data on mMBC is restricted because of its rarity. The prognosis of mMBC was shown to be poor in this investigation. Despite the small number of patients, we discovered that in univariate analysis, having brain metastases, the number of metastatic locations, and a history of alcohol intake may be prognostic factors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Assessment of the performance and the agreement of iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy has become more widely accepted and used by medical oncologists. Radiologists face challenges in assessing tumor response and becoming more involved in the management of treatment. We aimed to assess the agreement between immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), and immune RECIST (iRECIST) to correlate the response measured by them with overall survival (OS), and to determine the confirmation rate of progressive disease (PD). METHODS: A total of 43 patients (28 men, 15 women; average age = 54.6 ± 15.7 years) treated with immunotherapy were included in this study. Pairwise agreements between iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST were calculated using Cohen's kappa statistics. The correlation of the criteria-based response and OS was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A confirmation rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated in patients with PD. RESULTS: The kappa values between iRECIST and irRC, iRECIST and irRECIST, and irRC and irRECIST were 0.961 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), 0.961 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), and 0.922 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test showed for each criterion a statistically significant correlation with OS (P < 0.05). The confirmation rates of PD for irRC, irRECIST, and iRECIST were 95% (19/20; 95% CI = 76.4-99.1%), 90% (18/20; 95% CI = 69.9-97.2%), and 90.5% (19/21; 95% CI = 71.1-97.4%), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was an almost perfect and statistically significant agreement between iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST. The measurements performed with them significantly correlated with the OS; their confirmation rates were similar. iRECIST and irRECIST might be favored over irRC because of their relative ease of use.

Clinical factors predicting objective response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapies are commonly administered in the treatment of patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the factors that predict the objective response to bevacizumab-based therapies in cases of advanced and recurrent EOC. METHODS: The retrospective data of 264 patients with EOC from the current study were collected between 2009 and 2022 at our clinic. Survival analyses were conducted utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the factors predicting the objective response. RESULTS: A predominant subset of patients (83%) presented with serous adenocarcinoma, exhibiting a high-grade differentiation at 87%. The vast majority (80%) of the cohort experienced disease recurrence. Three-fourths of the cases received bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, clinical factors such as a disease recurrence (P=0.031), upfront tumor debulking surgery before bevacizumab (P=0.009), doublet chemotherapy (P=0.003), and the presence of malignant pleural effusion (P=0.024) emerged as significant determinants influencing the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients undergoing bevacizumab-based therapy. The ORR was 67.5% (N.=178), comprising 15.2% complete responses (N.=40) and 52.1% partial responses (N.=138). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated at 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.60-11.9) and 20.1 months (95% CI, 16.0-24.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The responses to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies could be predict by the presence of malignant pleural effusion, disease recurrence, upfront tumor debulking surgery and doublet regimen of chemotherapy.

Disease characteristics and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer patients with bone metastasis: A real-world data from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastasis is rarely seen in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and there is insufficient data available regarding such cases. The study aimed to identify the prognostic factors and characteristics associated with overall survival in patients with bone metastatic CRC. METHOD: Data from bone metastatic CRC patients referred to a high-volume tertiary cancer center in Turkey, between January 2018 and April 2021, were retrospectively collected. The records of 150 consecutive patients treated for bone metastases due to CRC were reviewed. Overall survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median age was 55 years (19-86 years). Bone metastases were more common in men and those with metachronous metastases. The axial skeleton was the most commonly involved site, and patients were frequently presented with single bone metastasis. Peritoneal metastases were significantly correlated with extra-axial metastases (P = 0.002), and radiotherapy was applied to axial metastases significantly, more frequently (P = 0.02). Lung metastasis was also more prevalent in K-RAS mutated patients (P = 0.008). The median survival time from diagnosis of bone metastasis was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-10.6), and the three-year survival rate was 76.9% (95% CI, 69.8-84.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that brain metastases, right-sided colon tumor, high serum ALP, and Ca 19-9 levels were independent poor prognostic factors (P = 0.01, 0.02, <0.001, and 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The location of CRC correlates significantly with the site of bone metastasis; the prognosis of CRC patients with bone metastasis is very poor, and the significant poor prognostic factors are brain metastases, right-sidedness, high serum ALP, and Ca 19-9 levels. More attention should be paid to bone metastasis in CRC patients.

Is there any diagnostic value of serum caveolin-1 levels on the determination of pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Caveolin-1 (CAV-1) is a vital component in cancer pathogenesis, as its expression determines the survival of patients with cancer. This study investigates CAV-1 serum levels in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) patients and their role in tumor progression and prognostic factors. METHOD: The trial included 33 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer (PC). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was used to measure the concentrations of CAV-1 in the blood. The study also included 20 healthy subjects. The statistical analysis was two-sided, and a P value of ≤ 0.05 was determined as statistically significant. RESULTS: The median age of the subjects was 59 years (32-84 years) at the time of diagnosis. There were 13 (39%) female participants. In 21 (63%) patients, the primary focus was the pancreatic head. In 23 stage IV patients, hepatic metastasis (n = 19, 83%) was observed. Only one patient (3%) was still alive at the end of the study period. Palliative chemotherapy (CTx) was provided, with 39% of the 23 patients responding to it. The overall survival (OS) rate in this cohort was 41.3 ± 8.3 weeks at a 95% confidence interval (CI), after 25-58 weeks. Serum baseline CAV-1 values among patients with PA were significantly higher compared with controls (p = 0.009). Patients with poor performance status, a pancreatic head tumor, lower albumin levels, higher serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and higher CA 19.9 levels had significantly higher serum CAV-1 levels (p = 0.01, P = 0.05, P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.04, respectively). However, CAV-1 did not show any prognostic value (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Although serum CAV-1 is a useful diagnostic marker in PC patients, it is not a prognostic or predictive marker.

Investigation of the potential of miRNA candidates as non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and follow-up of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and despite advances in treatment, molecular biomarkers are needed for both early diagnosis and prognosis monitoring. It is known that microRNAs (miRNA), one of the epigenetic mechanisms, are effective in the initiation and development of cancer by regulating the activity of tumor suppressors and/or oncogenes. In this study, the potential of the molecules let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a, which are known to play a role in cellular processes, as biomarkers for colorectal cancer and their molecular mechanisms were investigated in this model. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive utility of the target miRNAs in colorectal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The expression changes of miRNAs let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a were investigated by miRNAs isolation and cDNA synthesis from the serum samples of 60 patients diagnosed with CRC or from the serum samples of 20 healthy individuals. The calculation was performed using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method to determine the expression level. The results were compared with clinical parameters. RESULT: An 8-fold decrease in the expression of let-7 and miRNA125b and a 60-fold decrease in the expression of miRNA30a were found in the serum samples of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the healthy group. A decrease in let-7 was observed in 53.3%, miRNA125b in 58.3%, and miRNA30a in 55% of patients. A significant correlation was found between the reduced expression status and the stage, lymph nodes, local recurrence, and metastasis (p < 0.05). The ROC analysis showed that the miRNA30a level could be a diagnostic biomarker for CRC (p < 0.001). No significant impact of target miRNA expression changes on overall disease survival was observed. CONCLUSION: It is thought that the target miRNA30a can be used for early diagnosis and screening and that the target miRNA let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a can be used as non-invasive biomarkers for disease follow-up, with larger patient studies being conducted on CRC patients.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of 5-FU or capecitabine combined with cisplatin and docetaxel (mDCF and mDCX) as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in her 2-negative metastatic gastric cancer patients: A retrospective study.

The prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) is poor, with a median survival time of less than a year. Capecitabine is a prodrug, metabolized by thymidine phosphorylase to its cytotoxic metabolite (5-FU). Few studies have compared capecitabine and 5-FU in mGC. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of modified DCF (mDCF) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU) and modified DCX (mDCX) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine) regimens for first-line treatment in patients with mGC. The study included 112 mGC patients treated with either mDCF (n = 69) or mDCX (n = 43) between 2010 and 2021. Demographic data, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated. The complete response rate in the mDCF group was 10.1%, whereas the complete response rate in the mDCX group was 2.3%. The partial response rate for mDCF and mDCX were 29% and 37%, respectively. The 2 treatment arms of the study had the same objective rate of response and disease control rate (DCR). PFS and OS rates were comparable between the 2 groups. The median PFS in the mDCF and mDCX arms were 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.87-7.14) and 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.10-5.90) respectively (P = .08). The median OS in the mDCF and mDCX arms were 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.53-10.47) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.87-11.11) respectively (P = .07). Neutropenia, asthenia, stomatitis, and nausea/vomiting were the most frequently reported grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs). The rates of grade 3/4 AEs and dose reduction were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no treatment discontinuation due to grade 3 to 4 AE. As a first-line treatment for patients with mGC, mDCX and mDCF regimens have comparable efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Comparative analysis of doublet chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Among all gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer is the predominant cause of mortality. Hence, various chemotherapy protocols have been established for managing metastatic ovarian cancer cases. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of dual chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in patients diagnosed with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. This was a retrospective observational study. Data on the clinical, pathological, radiological, and treatment characteristics of the patients were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted. Data of a total of 198 patients with a median follow-up duration of 18.7 months after bevacizumab treatment were analyzed. Serous carcinoma was found to be the most common pathological subtype in the analyzed patients, accounting for 85.8% of all cases. In total, 46.5% (n = 92), 38.4% (n = 76) and 15.2% (n = 30) patients had received gemcitabine plus carboplatin, paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC), and gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with bevacizumab, respectively. The complete response rate was 18.7%, partial response rate was 56.1%, stable disease rate was 6.6%, and progressive disease rate was 18.7%. The patients received bevacizumab treatment at a median of 9 cycles and doublet chemotherapy at a median of 7 cycles. The median progression-free survival was 11.9 (95% CI: 9.2-14.5) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 (95% CI: 19.9-29.4) months. The results showed that a history of surgery prior to bevacizumab treatment was a significant factor affecting OS (P = .006). Patients who had received gemcitabine plus carboplatin with bevacizumab (28 months) had significantly better OS than patients who had received paclitaxel plus carboplatin (20.1 months) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (17 months) (P = .009). Doublet chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab are safe and effective against recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin with bevacizumab was superior to other treatment regimens in terms of OS outcomes.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with driver mutant non-small cell lung cancer and de novo brain metastases.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be seen at a rate of 30% in advanced stages for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Growing evidence indicates the predictive roles of driver gene mutations in the development of brain metastases (BM) in recent years, meaning that oncogene-driven NSCLC have a high incidence of BM at diagnosis. Today, 3rd generation targeted drugs with high intracranial efficacy, which can cross the blood-brain barrier, have made a positive contribution to survival for these patients with an increased propensity to BM. It is important to update the clinical and pathological factors reflected in the survival with real-life data. A multi-center, retrospective database of 306 patients diagnosed with driver mutant NSCLC and initially presented with BM between between November 2008 and September 2022 were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 12.25 months (95% CI, 10-14.5). While 254 of the patients received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 51 patients received chemotherapy as first line treatment. The median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.8-22.2). The median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI, 25.2-33.0). It was found that having 3 or less BM and absence of extracranial metastases were significantly associated with better mOS and iPFS. The relationship between the size of BM and survival was found to be non-significant. Among patients with advanced NSCLC with de novo BM carrying a driver mutation, long-term progression-free and overall survival can be achieved with the advent of targeted agents with high CNS efficacy with more conservative and localized radiotherapy modalities.