Recognising undernutrition in a community hospital: the nursing judgement is insufficient.

INTRODUCTION: Standardised nutritional screening methods improve the rate of recognising older patients with undernutrition, which is strongly encouraged in hospitals and residential settings. Therefore, our study compared the rates of identifying undernutrition before and after introducing the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) in a community hospital. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational before-after study. Participants were subjects aged 65 years or older, admitted to a community hospital from May 2018 to December 2020. The nursing assessment at admission included the MNA® from January 2020. The prevalence of undernutrition gathered by nursing diagnoses from 2018 to 2019 was compared with data obtained using the MNA® in 2020. Then, a confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare the prevalence of undernutrition in 2020 when both nursing diagnoses and the MNA® were used. RESULTS: We analysed data of approximately 316 patients (238 before and 78 after introducing the MNA®). Overall, results showed that 47.1% (n = 149) of the patients were undernourished. As observed, the prevalence of undernutrition was 38.6% (n = 92) in 2018-2019 and 73.1% (n = 57) in 2020 (p < 0.001). In 2020, however, 38.5% of patients (n = 30) were identified as undernourished using the MNA® but not using nursing diagnoses. Therefore, the correlation between these two methods was poor (Pearson's correlation 0.169, p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Identifying elderly patients with undernutrition significantly increased after introducing the MNA®. Undernutrition is a common condition that should be systematically screened using a validated tool to activate personalised nutritional interventions promptly.

Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence about the role of nurses in patient outcomes in several healthcare settings. However, there is still a lack of evidence about the transitional care setting. We aimed to assess the association between patient characteristics identified in a multidimensional nursing assessment and outcomes of mortality and acute hospitalization during community hospital stay. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on patients consecutively admitted to a community hospital (CH) in Loreto (Ancona, Italy) between January 1st, 2018 and May 31st, 2019. The nursing assessment included sociodemographic characteristics, functional status, risk of falls (Conley Score) and pressure damage (Norton scale), nursing diagnoses, presence of pressure sores, feeding tubes, urinary catheters or vascular access devices and comorbidities. Two logistic regression models were developed to assess the association between patient characteristics identified in a multidimensional nursing assessment and outcomes of mortality and acute hospitalization during CH stay. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 298 patients. The mean age was 83 ± 9.9 years; 60.4% (n = 180) were female. The overall mean length of stay was 42.8 ± 36 days (32 ± 32 days for patients who died and 33.9 ± 35 days for patients who had an acute hospitalization, respectively). An acute hospitalization was reported for 13.4% (n = 40) of patients and 21.8% (n = 65) died. An increased risk of death was related to female sex (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.10-4.62), higher Conley Score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.37) and having a vascular access device (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.82-7.27). A higher Norton score was associated with a decreased risk of death (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81). The risk for acute hospitalization was correlated with younger age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97), having a vascular access device (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.36), impaired walking (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.03-6.06) and it is inversely correlated with a higher Conley score (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.98). CONCLUSION: Using a multidimensional nursing assessment enables identification of risk of nearness of end of life and acute hospitalization to target care and treatment. The present study adds further knowledge on this topic and confirms the importance of nursing assessment to evaluate the risk of patients' adverse outcome development.