Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of the Chinese version of the Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (CNDDI-E) with that of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (C-HADS-D) as screening tools for depression in the same patients with epilepsy (PWE). METHODS: A total of 213 consecutive PWE were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using the C-NDDI-E and C-HADS-D as predictors and the Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (C-MINI) as the gold standard. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for the C-NDDI-E was 0.870, and the optimal cutoff score was >11 (sensitivity 85.71%, specificity 79.78%); for the C-HADS-D, the AUC was 0.804, and the optimal cutoff score was >5 (sensitivity 85.71%, specificity 62.36%). The AUC for the C-NDDI-E was larger than the AUC for the C-HADS-D, but the comparison of the AUCs revealed no significant differences (P = 0.1444). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the C-NDDI-E and C-HADS-D have high validity and support the use of these screening tools for depression in PWE. Moreover, the C-NDDI-E is a better screening scale for diagnosing depression than the C-HADS-D according to the results of this study.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (C-PHQ-9) in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (C-PHQ-9) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A total of 213 consecutive adult patients with epilepsy were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using C-PHQ-9 and Chinese version of Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (C-PHQ-2) as predictors and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus Version 5.0.0 as the gold standard. RESULTS: The C-PHQ-9 was easily understood and quickly finished by the patients. According to the gold standard, the prevalence of current major depressive disorder in this population was 16.4%. Cronbach's α coefficient for the C-PHQ-9 was 0.860. The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.888 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.838-0.927). At a cutoff score of >6, the C-PHQ-9 had a sensitivity of 82.86%, a specificity of 84.27%, a positive predictive value of 50.9%, and a negative predictive value of 96.2%. The C-PHQ-2 at a cutoff score of >1 resulted in the greatest balance of sensitivity and specificity (77.14% and 75.28%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings support a high reliability and validity for the C-PHQ-9 as a screening tool for the detection of current major depression in Chinese patients with epilepsy.