Mycotic aortic and left iliac ruptured aneurysm due to Escherichia Coli: a case report and literature overview.

Mycotic aneurysm is a life-threatening disease often caused by Salmonella, Staphylococci and Streptococci species. Interestingly, Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) is described as a rare causative agent. We report the case of a patient who developed a mycotic aortic and ruptured left iliac aneurysm due to E. Coli. The patient developed a secondary aortic graft infection due to a mesenteric ischemia with fecal peritonitis. A literature overview of the current knowledge on mycotic aortic aneurysms specifically due to E. Coli is discussed including the clinical characteristics of patients, the management of the disease and the post-operative outcomes.

Results of sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and proton pump inhibitors use evolution over time.

BACKGROUND: Although sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is associated with excellent results in the short term, it has been shown that it is plagued by weight regain and new onset or worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These 2 clinical conditions are currently the 2 most frequent indications for revisional surgery. To date, only a few studies have focused exclusively on GERD. In a selected series of patients complaining of GERD symptoms after SG as a main complaint, we analyzed the efficacy of conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), with a standardized surgical technique. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including all consecutive cases of SG to RYGB conversion for GERD not controlled by medical treatment. We excluded all patients undergoing conversion for weight regain without GERD. Quality of life and GERD symptoms were evaluated at outpatient's clinic visits before and after surgery with 2 standardized questionnaires (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Simplified Form 6). RESULTS: This study showed that 70% of patients had complete resolution of GERD symptoms and 60% had completely discontinued proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The conversion to RYGB resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of patients presenting daily symptoms of GERD and use of PPIs (10% and 16.6%, respectively; P < .019) and a dramatic increase in those without symptoms and no need for PPIs (70% and 60%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Conversion to RYGB is a good option for GERD complications after SG providing a high rate of symptom remission and PPI discontinuation. Conversion to RYGB in the setting of GERD complications after SG improves postoperative outcomes decreasing GERD symptoms and improving quality of life.

Banded versus non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short, mid, and long-term surgical outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered as one of the most effective treatments for people with obesity. A variant of this procedure, the banded-RYGB, may present several advantages over the standard technique. These potential benefits include enhanced weight loss, decreased recurrent weight gain, a lower incidence of dumping syndrome, and less distention of the jejunum below the gastrojejunostomy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical outcomes of RYGB procedures with a band (banded-RYGB) and without a band (RYGB) in the management of individuals with obesity. SETTING: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023439874). METHOD: The systematic review process led to the identification of 13 comparative studies involving 3230 patients who underwent banded-RYGB and 5302 who received RYGB, all of which were eligible for inclusion and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four studies reported data on 1-year postoperative percent excess weight loss (%EWL), demonstrating a significant increase of 6.03 %EWL in patients who underwent banded-RYGB. Four studies reported the 2-year postoperative %EWL, showing that patients who had banded-RYGB experienced a 5.32 greater %EWL compared to those who received RYGB, even if this was not statistically significant. For 5-year %EWL after bariatric surgery, 5 studies were included for continuous outcome meta-analysis. The average 5-years %EWL difference was 7.6 in favor of banded-RYGB. Patients who had banded-RYGB presented a nonsignificant 1.45 OR of developing postoperative complications compared to patients receiving RYGB. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that, compared to RYGB, patients who underwent banded-RYGB surgery showed a statistically significant increase in the %EWL at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Moreover, the banding procedure does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Remission of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis after bariatric surgery: a single referral center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which leads to an increased rate of primary liver cancers, cirrhosis, and decreased life expectancy. Metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) determines long-term weight loss and the resolution of obesity-related medical problems. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MBS on liver histologic features in individuals with obesity. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data on 37 patients undergoing MBS from a prospectively held database. All patients had a liver biopsy at the time of MBS and a second liver biopsy in case of further surgery or for NASH follow-up. Eighteen patients had NASH on the first liver biopsy. The primary endpoint was the resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis on the second liver biopsy. Secondary endpoints were the evolution of liver steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score, and biochemical parameters from the time of the first to the second liver biopsy. RESULTS: Fifteen (83.3%) patients had significant resolution of steatohepatitis (P < .001) without fibrosis worsening. There was a statistically significant improvement of all blood tests except for low-density lipoprotein, alkaline phosphatases, and bilirubinemia. The Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) index was significantly improved after MBS (P < .001), and circulating insulin and leptin concentrations were significantly reduced. Mean weight loss was 47 kg, with a 16.6 kg/m2 body mass index reduction and a % of total weight loss (%TWL) of 40.3 ±14% from the moment of MBS to the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: MBS is effective in determining NASH regression without fibrosis worsening and in reducing HOMA index and leptin and insulin concentrations.

Does Bariatric Surgery Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals with Morbid Obesity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bariatric surgery has shown to be effective in producing sustained weight loss and the resolution of obesity related medical problems. Recent research focused on the role of obesity and adipose tissue in tumorigenesis, finding a strong crosslink through different mechanisms and highlighting an increase in cancer incidence in individuals with obesity. The aim of this meta-analysis is to find if bariatric surgery reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with obesity. We performed a meta-analysis including 18 studies (PROSPERO ID: CRD4202235931). Bariatric surgery was found to be significantly protective toward colorectal cancer incidence in individuals with obesity (HR: 0.81, p = 0.0142). The protective effect persisted when considering women (RR: 0.54, p = 0.0014) and men (RR: 0.74, p = 0.2798) separately, although this was not significant for the latter. No difference was found when comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Bariatric surgery reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals with obesity independently from gender and surgical procedure. Prospective large cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Long-Term Results of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Individuals Older Than 60 Years with Morbid Obesity.

PURPOSE: An increasing Pnumber of individuals with obesity over the age of 60 years require bariatric surgery to treat obesity and its related medical problems. Sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass have already proven their efficacy in this population, but literature lacks reports of long-term results. The aim of this study is to compare long-term results of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in individuals older than 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, comparative study of 204 patients undergoing either sleeve gastrectomy (123, 60.3%) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (81, 39.7%) for morbid obesity with a mean follow-up of 44.5 ± 19.1 months and 54.6 ± 17.9 months, respectively. RESULTS: Total weight loss was significantly increased for patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy from 12 to 48 months after surgery, while no significant difference was found after 60 (30.39% vs. 27.63%) and 72 (27.36% vs. 23.61%) months. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated to a significant increased rate of early postoperative complications (22.2% vs. 4%; p < 0.0001), but no difference was found concerning late postoperative morbidity (6.2% vs. 1.6%). Both procedures were effective in obesity related medical problems. CONCLUSION: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass confers an increased weight loss than sleeve gastrectomy in patients over the age of 60 in the mid-term, but it is associated with more early postoperative complications. Sleeve gastrectomy can be considered a valid alternative as long-term weight loss results are superposable to those ensured by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Bariatric surgery reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with obesity before the age of 50 years: A nationwide administrative data study in France.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Bariatric surgery has demonstrated superior results in terms of weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities compared to medical and behavioral treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on pancreatic cancer incidence in individuals with obesity. METHOD: Individuals with a diagnosis of obesity were retrieved from the French national hospital discharge database. We conducted a cohort study comparing the risk to develop pancreatic cancer in individuals with obesity with and without history of bariatric surgery; the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was performed to assess the uncertainty around the results. Moreover, a subgroup analysis according to age at the time of bariatric surgery was performed to study its impact on the risk of pancreatic cancer. Finally, possible differences depending on the type of bariatric procedure (sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) were also explored. RESULTS: 160,129 (Bariatric Surgery group) and 1,263,804 (control group) patients with 5.2 ± 1.9 and 6.0 ± 1.9 years of follow-up respectively were included. A significant reduced risk to develop pancreatic cancer during follow-up was identified for the bariatric surgery group in the overall population (HR: 0.567). However, this reduced risk was only observed in the 18-50 years group. These results were furtherly confirmed after IPTW analysis. No difference was found between different bariatric procedures. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery has a protective effect against pancreatic cancer in the 18-50 years population. High-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Bioabsorbable Glycolide Copolymer is Effective in Reducing Staple Line Bleeding in Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bleeding from the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy occurs in 2-8% of patients and it is associated with increased length and cost of hospitalization and may demand reoperation to gain hemostasis. Reinforced staplers are used by bariatric surgeons to reduce the incidence of postoperative leak but can have a role in avoiding bleeding. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of reinforcement on the whole gastric staple line during sleeve gastrectomy on postoperative bleeding. METHODS: Four hundred forty-eight consecutive patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy from November 2012 to April 2019 were divided into two groups. In the Top-only group only the top staple shot was realized with reinforced material (GORE® SEAMGUARD®) while in the Bottom-to-Top group, patients received full staple line reinforcement. Statistical analysis focused on postoperative leak and bleeding, and length of stay; a propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce between-group characteristics imbalance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five (Top-only) and 303 (Bottom-to-Top) patients were included. Four (2.8%) patients in the Top-only group and none in the Bottom-to-Top group experienced severe bleeding (p = 0.004); the difference was still significant after propensity score matching. Length of stay was significantly shorter for the Bottom-to-Top group before and after propensity score matching (4 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Staple line buttressing reduces the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding when performed on the whole staple line, and it is associated with a shorter hospitalization.

Long-Term Results at 10 Years of Pouch Resizing for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Failure.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently one of the most performed bariatric procedures and it is associated with rapid weight loss. However, weight loss failure and weight regain after RYGB occurs in approximately 30% and 3−5% of patients, respectively, and represent a serious issue. RYGB pouch resizing is a surgical option that may be offered to selected patients with RYGB failure. The aim of this study is to assess long-term results of pouch resizing for RYGB failure. Materials and Methods: From February 2009 to November 2011, 20 consecutive patients underwent gastric pouch resizing for RYGB failure in our tertiary bariatric center. The primary outcome was the rate of failure (%EWL < 50% with at least one metabolic comorbidity) after at least 10 years from pouch resizing. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) was also assessed. Results: Twenty patients (18 women (90%)) were included and seventeen (85%) joined the study. The failure rate of pouch resizing was 47%. Mean %EWL and mean BMI were 47%, and 35.1 kg/m2, respectively. Some of the persistent co-morbidities further improved or resolved after pouch resizing. Seven patients (41%) presented GERD requiring daily PPI with a significantly lower GERD-HQRL questionnaire score after pouch resizing (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pouch resizing after RYGB results in a failure rate of 47% at the 10-year follow-up while the resolution of comorbidities is maintained over time despite a significant weight regain.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Bariatric Surgery Post Liver Transplantation: a Nationwide, Population-Based Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Prevalence of obesity in liver transplant recipients is increasing with the overall epidemic augmentation of severe obesity, the effects of immunosuppressive drugs, and lifestyle changes which are responsible for de novo obesity development or aggravation of pre-existing obesity. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, and hospitalization-related costs between patients undergoing bariatric surgery after liver transplantation and patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with history of liver transplantation who underwent bariatric surgery were analyzed from the French National Hospital Discharge Database. Overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, length of stay for bariatric procedure, and the costs of bariatric surgery hospitalization and eventual re-hospitalizations were compared to a group of 360,846 patients who underwent bariatric surgery alone from 2010 to 2019. Furthermore, a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Patients with a history of liver transplantation showed an increased risk of overall mortality (HR: 7.66, p = 0.0047) and increased costs of hospitalization for bariatric surgery (8250 ± 4822€ vs 5583 ± 3398€, p = 0.0005). No differences in length of stay, re-hospitalization rate, and costs were found after multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching analysis, a significant increased cost of hospitalization (8250 ± 4822€ vs 6086 ± 1813€, p = 0.0195) still resulted for the liver transplantation group. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery represents the best treatment for obesity and its related associated medical problems. Our study highlights an increased risk of overall all-cause mortality and increased costs of hospitalization in this population compared to patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone.

Challenges in Bariatric Surgery: Outcomes in Patients Having Three or More Bariatric Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last two decades, a progressive increase in failure rate of bariatric surgery (BS) has occurred in conjunction with an exponential increase in BS worldwide. Bariatric surgeons are confronted with challenging situations in patients with a complex bariatric history. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of revisional BS in patients with at least two or more previous bariatric procedures. METHODS: Data were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively held database of bariatric procedures performed at our tertiary referral bariatric center and included procedures done from February 2013 up to April 2019 by a single center. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent a third bariatric procedure. The median age was 40 (18-57) and 54 (27-69) years at the time of the first and the last procedures, respectively. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was the first procedure in 26 patients. The complication rate was 33%; no patient required additional surgery because of postoperative complications. A total weight loss of 29.6% and an excess loss of 53.4% were obtained at a mean follow-up of 61 months after the last redo bariatric procedure. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that redo BS either conversional or revisional is feasible and effective in patients with a complex bariatric history including two or more previous procedures. Careful patients' selection is mandatory and extensive information should be given on the increased risk of postoperative complications.