Impact of Physician-Coordinated Intensive Follow-Up on Long-Term Medical Costs in Patients with Unstable Angina Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of professional physician-coordinated intensive follow-up on long-term expenditures after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in unstable angina (UA) patients. METHODS: In this study, there were 669 UA patients who underwent successful PCI and followed up for 3 years, then divided into the intensive follow-up group (N = 337), and the usual follow-up group (N = 332). Patients were provided with detailed discharge information and individualized follow-up schedules. The intensive group received the extra follow-up times and medical consultations, and all patients were followed up for approximately 3 years. RESULTS: At the 3-year mark after PCI, the cumulative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), recurrence of myocardial ischemia, cardiac death, all-cause death and revascularization in the intensive group were lower than in the usual group. Additionally, the proportion of good medication adherence was significantly higher than in the usual group (56.4% vs. 46.1%, p < 0.001). The hospitalization daytime, total hospitalization cost and total medical cost in the intensive group were lower. Multiple linear regression showed that diabetes, hypertension, intensive follow-up and good medication adherence were associated with emergency and regular clinical cost (p < 0.05), the re-hospitalization cost (p < 0.05) and the total medical cost (p < 0.05) of patient care. Intensive follow-up and good adherence were negatively correlated with the cost of re-hospitalization (standardized coefficients = -0.132, -0.128, p < 0.05) and total medical costs (standardized coefficients = -0.072, -0.086, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive follow-up can reduce MACE, improve medication adherence and save long-term total medical costs, just by increasing the emergency and regular clinical visits cost in UA patients after PCI.

Association between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and coronary artery disease as well as its extent and severity.

Patients with myocardial ischemia exhibit increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The study was to evaluate the relationship between LVEDP measured by left cardiac catheterization and coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as its extent and severity evaluated by coronary angiography (CAG). 912 patients who underwent CAG and left cardiac catheterization were enrolled. There were 313 patients without CAD and 599 with CAD according to CAG. The extent and severity of coronary artery was evaluated by number of vessels and Gensini score. Analyze the correlation of LVEDP and CAD as well as its extent and severity. LVEDP was significantly higher in CAD patients than non-CAD (9.58±5.78 mmHg vs 10.9±5.46 mmHg, P<0.001), and was correlated independently with the presence of CAD (OR = 0.11, per 5 mmHg increase, 95% CI 1.02-1.29, P = 0.02). LVEDP was increased with an increase of number of vessels. By linear regression analysis, LVEDP was significantly associated with Gensini score (standardized ß = 0.034, P = 0.001). In non-CAD group, LVEDP was only correlated with age (r = 0.123, P = 0.030). In conclusion, our findings suggest that elevated LVEDP was significantly associated with CAD as well as its extent and severity. LVEDP was only correlated with age in non-CAD patients. LVEDP measurement provides incremental clinical value for CAD and non-CAD patients.