Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation of neutropenia during phase I development of liposome-entrapped paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of liposome-entrapped paclitaxel easy-to-use (LEP-ETU) and to characterize the relationship between LEP-ETU concentrations and the time course of neutropenia in cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: LEP-ETU was administered to 88 patients and 63 were evaluable for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis following 1.5- and 3-h infusions every 3 weeks (q3w; dose range, 135-375 mg/m(2)). MTD was identified using a 3 + 3, up-and-down dose-finding algorithm. PK/PD modeling was done to describe the temporal relationship between paclitaxel concentrations and neutrophil count. Simulations assessed the influence of dose and schedule on neutropenia severity to help guide dose selection. RESULTS: The MTD of LEP-ETU was identified as 325 mg/m(2). DLTs occurring at 375 mg/m(2) consisted of febrile neutropenia and neuropathy. The C(max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of LEP-ETU were less than proportional with increasing dose. The PK/PD model showed that LEP-ETU inhibition of neutrophil proliferation was 9.1% per 10 mug/mL of total paclitaxel concentration. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia increased from 33% to 42% across the dose range of 275 to 325 mg/m(2) q3w. For a dose of 110 mg/m(2) given weekly, grade 4 neutropenia was estimated to be 16% compared with 42% for the same total dose administered q3w. CONCLUSIONS: LEP-ETU can be administered safely at higher doses than Taxol. Modeling and simulation studies predict that 325 mg/m(2) LEP-ETU q3w provides acceptable neutropenic events relative to those observed at 175 mg/m(2) Taxol q3w. A 275 mg/m(2) dose may offer an improved therapeutic index.

Phase I study of liposome-encapsulated c-raf antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide infusion in combination with radiation therapy in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: Raf proteins are key elements of growth-related cellular signaling pathways and are a component of cancer cell resistance to radiation therapy. Antisense oligonucleotides to c-raf-1 permit highly selective inhibition of the gene product and offer a strategy for sensitizing cancer cells to radiation therapy. In this dose escalation study, we evaluated the safety of combined liposomal formulation of raf antisense oligonucleotide (LErafAON) and radiation therapy in patients with advanced malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with LErafAON in a phase I dose escalation study while receiving palliative radiation therapy. Drug-related and radiation-related toxicities were monitored. Pharmacokinetics and expression of c-raf-1 mRNA and Raf-1 protein were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with palliative indications for radiation therapy were entered into this study. Thirteen patients received daily infusions of LErafAON and four received twice-weekly infusions. Radiation therapy was delivered in daily 300-cGy fractions over 2 weeks. Patients tolerated radiation, and no unexpected radiation-related side effects were observed. Drug-related reactions (grade > or =2), such as back pain, chills, dyspnea, fatigue, fever, flushing, and hypertension, were observed in most patients and were managed by premedication with corticosteroids and antihistamines. Serious adverse events occurred in five patients, including acute infusion-related symptoms, abnormal liver function tests, hypoxia, dehydration, diarrhea, esophagitis, fever, hypokalemia, pharyngitis, and tachypnea. Twelve of 17 patients were evaluable for tumor response at completion of treatment; four showed partial response, four showed stable disease, and four experienced progressive disease. The intact rafAON was detected in plasma for 30 minutes to several hours. Six patients with partial response or stable disease were evaluable for c-raf-1 mRNA and/or Raf-1 protein expression. Inhibition of c-raf-1 mRNA was observed in three of five patients. Raf-1 protein was inhibited in four of five patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the combined modality treatment using antisense oligonucleotides with radiation therapy in patients with advanced cancer. A dose of 2.0 mg/kg of LErafAON administered twice weekly is tolerated with premedication and does not enhance radiation toxicity in patients. The observation of dose-dependent, infusion-related reactions has led to further modification of the liposomal composition for use in future clinical trials.

Safety of intraparenchymal convection-enhanced delivery of cintredekin besudotox in early-phase studies.

OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is an increasingly used novel local/regional delivery method targeted directly to tissue. It relies on a continuous pressure gradient for distribution of therapeutic agents into the interstitial space, with administration of the infusate over a few days. Cintredekin besudotox (also known as IL13- PE38QQR) is a recombinant chimeric cytotoxin consisting of interleukin-13 and a truncated exotoxin produced by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterium, which targets malignant glioma cells. METHODS: Cintredekin besudotox was administered via intraparenchymal CED after resection of supratentorial recurrent malignant glioma. The safety and toxicity profile was reviewed for 53 patients in whom infusion catheters had been placed; 51 of them received CED of the study drug. Adverse events were categorized based on time of onset in relation to CED, and the causal relationship with catheter placement or delivery of cintredekin besudotox. Catheters were placed in 53 patients, although only 51 of them received cintredekin besudotox. Most adverse events related to catheter placement or the study drug originated from the central nervous system. Three symptomatic windows were defined: the first one was between surgical procedure and CED; the second was during CED and up to 1 week after its completion; and the third window was 2 to 10 weeks after treatment. Those windows generally reflected adverse events related to surgical procedures, mass effect from infusate, and drug effect on tumor-infiltrated and normal brain parenchyma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The symptomatic windows identified in this study apply to any CED clinical trials, particularly those in which chimeric cytotoxins are used, and will help to determine the most likely underlying pathophysiological process causing symptoms. This information, in turn, will help to prevent adverse events or minimize their severity. Those events also have implications for dose escalation and outcome measures.