Tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan: Results of the Canagliflozin in Ramadan Tolerance Observational Study (CRATOS).

AIMS: There is a large population of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are Muslim and fast during Ramadan. Changes in the pattern and amount of meal and fluid intake during Ramadan, in addition to the long fasting hours, may increase the risk of hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and dehydration. The Canagliflozin in Ramadan Tolerance Observational Study (CRATOS) evaluated the tolerability of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, compared with sulphonylureas among patients with T2DM who fast during Ramadan. METHODS: This non-randomised, parallel-cohort, prospective, comparative, observational study was conducted in the Middle East during Ramadan and enrolled patients who were taking canagliflozin (n=162) or any sulphonylurea (n=159) added to metformin±dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor. The proportion of patients who experienced hypoglycaemia events was assessed as the primary end-point. Between-cohort comparisons were adjusted using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: During Ramadan, fewer patients experienced symptomatic hypoglycaemia with canagliflozin vs sulphonylurea (adjusted odds ratio: 0.273 [95% CI: 0.104, 0.719]). Of hypoglycaemia events for which blood glucose was measured, two of six with canagliflozin and 27 of 37 with sulphonylurea were confirmed by blood glucose <3.9 mmol/L. More patients treated with canagliflozin experienced volume depletion events compared with sulphonylurea (adjusted odds ratio: 3.5 [95% CI: 1.3, 9.2]). Missed fasting days were few and medication adherence was high in both groups. No patients treated with canagliflozin and 9.4% treated with sulphonylurea adjusted their medication dose near the beginning of Ramadan. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, with low rates of adverse events and no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings support the use of canagliflozin for the treatment of adults with T2DM who fast during Ramadan. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02737657.

Insulin Detemir in Combination with Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Improves Glycemic Control in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes in Near East Countries: Results from the Lebanese Subgroup.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of insulin detemir treatment as add-on therapy in a real-world setting of Lebanese insulin naïve persons, with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). METHODS: Our study was a prospective, observational study representing the Lebanese arm of the multinational prospective and observational study involving 2,155 persons across Near East countries, Lebanon, Pakistan, Israel and Jordan. Effectiveness endpoints were changes in HbA1c, fasting and post-prandial glucose (FPG, PPG) after 24 weeks of treatment with insulin detemir in eligible persons. Safety endpoints were number of hypoglycemic events, incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious ADRs, adverse events, and body weight change between baseline and end of treatment. RESULTS: 868 persons were included (mean age: 59.5 ± 10.4 years, men: 55.3%). Glycemic control improved with significant reduction in mean HbA1c from 9.7 ± 1.6% to 7.2 ± 1% (P<.0001). The percentage of persons who achieved the target of HbA1c<7% increased from .7% at baseline to 39% at week 24. Mean FPG decreased significantly from 213.7 ± 60.1 mg/dL to 120.3 ± 25.7 mg/dL (P<.001), and mean PPG from 271 ± 65.3 mg/dL to 158.1 ± 36.4 mg/dL (P<.0001). The rate of major hypoglycemic episodes decreased from .1498 at baseline to .0448 at week 24. Three adverse events but no ADR or serious ADR were reported. Body weight decreased from 80.4±13.2 Kg to 79.9±12.5 Kg (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Initiating insulin detemir in a clinical health care setting among Lebanese with type 2 diabetes mellitus on OADs improves glycemic control with no increase in hypoglycemia, adverse events or weight compared with baseline.

Insulin glargine versus sitagliptin in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin (EASIE): a multicentre, randomised open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: In people with type 2 diabetes, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is one choice as second-line treatment after metformin, with basal insulin recommended as an alternative. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of insulin glargine and sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, in patients whose disease was uncontrolled with metformin. METHODS: In this comparative, parallel, randomised, open-label trial, metformin-treated people aged 35-70 years with glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of 7-11%, diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, and body-mass index of 25-45 kg/m(2) were recruited from 17 countries. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 24-week treatment with insulin glargine (titrated from an initial subcutaneous dose of 0·2 units per kg bodyweight to attain fasting plasma glucose of 4·0-5·5 mmol/L) or sitagliptin (oral dose of 100 mg daily). Randomisation (via a central interactive voice response system) was by random sequence generation and was stratified by centre. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to study end. Efficacy analysis included all randomly assigned participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one on-treatment assessment of any primary or secondary efficacy variable. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00751114. FINDINGS: 732 people were screened and 515 were randomly assigned to insulin glargine (n=250) or sitagliptin (n=265). At study end, adjusted mean reduction in HbA(1c) was greater for patients on insulin glargine (n=227; -1·72%, SE 0·06) than for those on sitagliptin (n=253; -1·13%, SE 0·06) with a mean difference of -0·59% (95% CI -0·77 to -0·42, p<0·0001). The estimated rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes was greater with insulin glargine than with sitagliptin (4·21 [SE 0·54] vs 0·50 [SE 0·09] events per patient-year; p<0·0001). Severe hypoglycaemia occurred in only three (1%) patients on insulin glargine and one (<1%) on sitagliptin. 15 (6%) of patients on insulin glargine versus eight (3%) on sitagliptin had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event. INTERPRETATION: Our results support the option of addition of basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin. Long-term benefits might be expected from the achievement of optimum glycaemic control early in the course of the disease. FUNDING: Sanofi.

Recommendations for Early and Comprehensive Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Related Cardio-Renal Complications.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global health problem accompanied by an elevated risk of complications, the most common being cardiac and renal diseases. In Lebanon, the prevalence of T2D is estimated at 8-13%. Local medical practice generally suffers from clinical inertia, with gaps in the yearly assessment of clinical manifestations and suboptimal screening for major complications. The joint statement presented here, endorsed by five Lebanese scientific medical societies, aims at providing physicians in Lebanon with a tool for early, effective, and comprehensive care of patients with T2D. Findings from major randomized clinical trials of antidiabetic medications with cardio-renal benefits are presented, together with recommendations from international medical societies. Optimal care should be multidisciplinary and should include a multifactorial risk assessment, lifestyle modifications, and a regular evaluation of risks, including the risks for cardiovascular (CV) and renal complications. With international guidelines supporting a shift in T2D management from glucose-lowering agents to disease-modifying drugs, the present statement recommends treatment initiation with metformin, followed by the addition of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists due to their CV and renal protection properties, whenever possible. In addition to the selection of the most appropriate pharmacological therapy, efforts should be made to provide continuous education to patients about their disease, with the aim to achieve a patient-centered approach and to foster self-management and adherence to the medical plan. Increasing the level of patient engagement is expected to be associated with favorable health outcomes. Finally, this statement recommends setting an achievable individualized management plan and conducting regular follow-ups to monitor the patients' glycemic status and assess their risks every 3-6 months.

Prevalence and risk factors of vascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from discover Middle East and Africa cohort.

Background: We evaluated the prevalence of vascular complications and associated risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy from the Middle East and Africa (MEA) cohort of the 3-year prospective DISCOVER study involving 15,992 patients in 38 countries. Methods: Baseline cross-sectional data collected from healthcare settings were used to assess micro and macrovascular complications prevalence as crude and age- and sex-standardised. The multi-variable analysis assessed factors associated with these complications. Results: Of 3,525 enrolled patients (mean age: 54.3 ± 10.8 years), >40% had hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Metformin monotherapy was the first-line therapy in 56.5%, followed by metformin+sulphonylurea (20.3%). Crude and standardised prevalence of microvascular complications were 17.7% and 16.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.77-16.98) and macrovascular complications were 10.7% and 8.7% (95% CI, 8.59-8.76). Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with micro and macrovascular complications (odds ratios [95% CI]) were age (1.24 [1.12-1.39] and 1.58 [1.35-1.84]), male sex (1.33 [1.04-1.70] and 1.71 [1.22-2.40]), hyperlipidaemia (1.33 [1.07-1.65] and 1.96 [1.46-2.63]) and hypertension (1.75 [1.40-2.19] and 2.84 [2.07-3.92]). Conclusion: A substantial burden of vascular complications with prominent risk factors in the MEA cohort calls for early preventive interventions.

Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Middle East and Africa Cohort of the DISCOVER Study Program: a Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and suboptimal glycemic control in the Middle East and Africa, comprehensive data on the management of T2D remain scarce. The main aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and treatment of patients with T2D initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy in these regions. METHODS: DISCOVER is a global, 3-year, prospective observational study of patients with T2D enrolled at initiation of second-line glucose-lowering therapy. Baseline characteristics and treatments are presented for patients from 12 countries divided into three regions: Mediterranean, Gulf Cooperation Council, and South Africa. RESULTS: Among 3525 patients (52.5% male, mean age 54.3 years), mean time since T2D diagnosis was 6.2 years [across-region range (ARR) 5.8-7.5 years] and mean glycated hemoglobin levels were 8.7% (72.0 mmol/mol) [ARR 8.6-9.0% (68-75 mmol/mol)]. At first line, metformin was prescribed for 88.1% (ARR 85.4-90.3%) of patients and a sulfonylurea for 34.4% (ARR 12.7-45.4%). Sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were prescribed at second line for 55.5% (ARR 48.6-82.5%) and 49.0% (ARR 3.7-73.8%) of patients, respectively. Main reasons for choice of second-line therapy were efficacy (73.2%; ARR 60.1-77.7%) and tolerability (26.8%; ARR 3.7-31.2%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate considerable inter-region variations in the management of T2D, likely affected by multiple factors (health system, physician behavior, and patient compliance), all of which should be addressed to optimize outcomes.

Current gaps in management and timely referral of cardiorenal complications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and African countries: Expert recommendations.

The upsurge of type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major public health concern in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Africa (AFR) region, with cardiorenal complications (CRCs) being the predominant cause of premature morbidity and mortality. High prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, lack of awareness among patients and physicians, deficient infrastructure, and economic constraints lead to a cascade of CRCs at a significantly earlier age in MENA and AFR. In this review, we present consensus recommendations by experts in MENA and AFR, highlighting region-specific challenges and potential solutions for management of CRCs. Health professionals who understand sociocultural barriers can significantly increase patient awareness and encourage health-seeking behavior through simple educational tools. Increasing physician knowledge on early identification of CRCs and personalized treatment based on risk stratification, alongside optimum glycemic control, can mitigate therapeutic inertia. Early diagnosis of high-risk people with regular and systematic monitoring of cardiorenal parameters, development of region-specific care pathways for timely referral to specialists, followed by guideline-recommended care with novel antidiabetics are imperative. Adherence to guideline-recommended care can catalyze utilization of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists with demonstrated cardiorenal benefits-thus paving the way for overcoming care gaps in a cost-effective manner. Leveraging digital technology like electronic medical records can help generate real-world data and provide insights on voids in adoption of newer antidiabetic medications. A patient-centric approach, collaborative care among physicians from different specialties, alongside involvement of policy makers are key for improving patient outcomes and quality of care in MENA and AFR.

Experts' opinion on the detection and management of prediabetes in Lebanon.

Given that the complications of type 2 diabetes can start at an early stage, early detection and appropriate management of prediabetes are essential. We aimed to develop an expert opinion on prediabetes in Lebanon to pave the way for national guidelines tailored for the Lebanese population in the near future. A panel of seven diabetes experts conducted a thorough literature review and discussed their opinions and experiences before coming up with a set of preliminary recommendations for the detection and management of prediabetes in Lebanon. Lebanese physicians employ multiple tests for the diagnosis of prediabetes and no national cut-off values exist. The panel agreed that prediabetes screening should be focused on patients exceeding 45 years of age with otherwise no risk factors and on adults with risk factors. The panel reached that fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c should be used for prediabetes diagnosis in Lebanon. FPG values of 100-125 mg/dL or HbA1c values of 5.7%-6.4% were agreed upon as indicative of prediabetes. For the management of prediabetes, a three-step approach constituting lifestyle modifications, pharmacological treatment and bariatric surgery is recommended. There should be more focus on research on prediabetes in Lebanon. This preliminary report will be further discussed with the Lebanese Society of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Lipids in 2021 in order to come up with the first Lebanese national guidelines for the detection and management of prediabetes in Lebanon.

Characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with type 2 diabetes in Lebanon: the DISCOVER study.

BACKGROUND: Lebanon is part of the global DISCOVER study, a global, noninterventional, multicentre, prospective study with 3-years of follow-up. AIMS: The aim of this study is to describe real-world clinical practice in terms of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disease management and treatment patterns within Lebanon. METHODS: Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were captured on a standardized case report form, according to routine clinical practice at each clinical site. RESULTS: We recruited 348 patients. At the initiation of second-line therapy, mean duration of diabetes was 6.7 [standard deviation (SD) 6.5] years; mean HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were 8.5% (SD 1.6%) and 178.7 (SD 56.5) mg/dL respectively. Almost half the patients were hypertensive (45.1%) or had dyslipidaemia (48.6%). Metformin monotherapy was used as first-line therapy in 56.9% of the patients and upfront dual therapy in 25%. The primary reason for changing firstline therapy was poor glycaemic control. The main factors in choosing the second-line therapy were efficacy, tolerability and hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSION: Clinical inertia was evident in this cohort of patients as they had suboptimal glycaemic control at the time of enrolment and the initiation of second-line therapy. Treatment intensification is required to reduce diabetes-related adverse outcomes.

Patterns of Diabetes Care Among People with Type 1 Diabetes During Ramadan: An International Prospective Study (DAR-MENA T1DM).

INTRODUCTION: To describe the characteristics and care of participants with type 1 diabetes during Ramadan in the Middle East and North Africa. METHODS: The DAR-MENA (Diabetes and Ramadan-Middle East and North Africa) study was a prospective, observational study of adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who were Muslim and did/did not intend to fast during Ramadan 2016. Baseline data were collected 6 weeks prior to Ramadan, with a follow-up visit 1-2 months after Ramadan. This is the analysis of the population with type 1 diabetes. Measurements included proportion who fasted, reasons for fasting and not fasting, changes in diabetes treatment, hypoglycemic events, and proportion with access to diabetes education. RESULTS: Of 136 participants with type 1 diabetes, 76.9% (100/130) fasted for at least 1 day, 72.3% (94/130) fasted for at least 15 days, and 48.5% (63/130) fasted for 30 days. The majority (63.0%, 63/100) reported personal decision as a reason to fast. Fear of diabetic complications (58.6%, 17/29) and previous complications related to fasting (48.3%, 14/29) were the most common reasons for not fasting. Adjustment of diabetic medication regimen occurred for 84.6% (115/136) of participants, and 72.8% (99/136) changed their treatment dose. The incidence and number of adverse events for confirmed and severe hypoglycemia were similar before and during Ramadan. Almost half of participants had access to diabetes education (45.6%, 62/136). CONCLUSION: The DAR-MENA study showed that despite the risks associated with fasting for people with type 1 diabetes, almost half fasted for the full 30 days of Ramadan with no significant change in hypoglycemia events. Since the current International Diabetes Federation and Diabetes and Ramadan guidelines do not endorse fasting for people with type 1 diabetes, it is important that those who insist on fasting work closely with their healthcare practitioner to avoid any complications.

Apolipoprotein E genetic polymorphism influence the susceptibility to nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: An association between Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) alleles and genotypes and diabetic nephropathy (DN) was suggested, but with inconsistent results. We tested the relationship between serum lipids, Apo E alleles and genotypes with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and DN pathogenesis. METHODS: Study subjects comprised 1389 normoglycemic controls, and 1422 T2DM patients, of whom 825 were normoalbuminuric (DWN), and 597 presented with nephropathy (DN). RESULTS: Significantly lower Apo ε2, and higher Apo ε4 allele frequencies was seen among T2DM patients than controls. Significantly higher frequency of ε3/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε4/ε4 carriers was seen among T2DM cases. Apo ε2-carrying individuals were more frequently found in controls than in patients, while significantly higher frequency of ε4-carrying genotypes was seen in T2DM cases. Significantly higher ε2, and lower ε3 allele frequencies were noted for DN group compared to DWN group. Significantly higher frequency of ε2-containing ε2/ε3 and ε2/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3 carriers was seen among DN cases. Apo ε3/ε3 was associated with higher total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in DN patients, and significantly higher triglyceride levels were seen in ε2/ε3-carrying DN patients. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of Apo ε3-containing ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε3/ε4, and Apo ε2-containing ε2/ε4 with DN, after controlling for key covariates. CONCLUSION: The results of this case-control study provide evidence that the ε2 and ε3 alleles of APOE modify lipid profile, and constitute independent risk factors of DN in type 2 diabetes. The molecular mechanisms underlying this risk is discussed.

The characteristics and pattern of care for the type 2 diabetes mellitus population in the MENA region during Ramadan: An international prospective study (DAR-MENA T2DM).

AIMS: We aimed to describe the characteristics and care of participants with diabetes during Ramadan in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, we analysed the number of fasted days, number of participants fasting, glycemic control, rate of hypoglycemic events, and lifestyle patterns for participants with T2DM during Ramadan 2016. RESULTS: The population included 1749 participants with T2DM. The mean (SD) duration of fasting was 27.7 (5.0) days, and 57.3% of participants fasted for the full duration of Ramadan. Following Ramadan, a significant improvement in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG was observed (p < 0.0001). Confirmed hypoglycemia increased significantly from before to during Ramadan (incidence: 4.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001; adverse events: 0.11 vs. 0.22 events/month/participant, p < 0.001) and was dependent on the treatment regimen. Severe hypoglycemia incidence was 0.2% before versus 0.9% during Ramadan (p = 0.031), whereas adverse events remained comparable (0.01 events/month/participant; p = 0.154). Most participants (97.4%) reported lifestyle changes during Ramadan. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study is the first to describe the characteristics and care of participants with T2DM during Ramadan in MENA, and can be utilized in the development of evidence-based care to ensure the safety of participants who fast.

Idiopathic Hypoparathyroidism and Severe Hypocalcemia in Pregnancy.

The objective of this study is to report a case of severe hypocalcemia secondary to hypoparathyroidism in a pregnant woman. We report a case of a 45-year-old woman who presented for tonico-clonic seizure in the third trimester of gestation. She was diagnosed with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism for the first time during pregnancy. She was successfully treated with calcium and calcitriol in the rest of her pregnancy with resolution of symptoms but her infant was born with hypercalcemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism due to the late maternal presentation. To the best of our knowledge, hypoparathyroidism is a disorder rarely observed during pregnancy, resulting in most cases from surgical thyroidectomy.

Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) before, during and after Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who fasted during Ramadan. METHODS: In this multinational, randomised, treat-to-target trial, patients with T2DM who intended to fast and were on basal, pre- or self-mixed insulin ±â€¯oral antidiabetic drugs for ≥90 days were randomised (1:1) to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) or BIAsp 30 BID. Treatment period included pre-Ramadan treatment initiation (with insulin titration for 8-20 weeks), Ramadan (4 weeks) and post-Ramadan (4 weeks). Insulin doses were reduced by 30-50% for the pre-dawn meal (suhur) on the first day of Ramadan, and readjusted to the pre-Ramadan levels at the end of Ramadan. Hypoglycaemia was analysed as overall (severe or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L [56 mg/dL]), nocturnal (00:01-05:59) or severe (requiring assistance of another person). RESULTS: During the treatment period, IDegAsp (n = 131) had significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates with similar glycaemic efficacy, versus BIAsp 30 (n = 132). During Ramadan, despite achieving significantly lower pre-iftar (meal at sunset) self-measured plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference: -0.54 mmol/L [-1.02; -0.07]95% CI, p = .0247; post hoc) with similar overall glycaemic efficacy, IDegAsp showed significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates versus BIAsp 30. CONCLUSIONS: IDegAsp is a suitable therapeutic agent for patients who need insulin for sustained glucose control before, during and after Ramadan fasting, with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, versus BIAsp 30, an existing premixed insulin analogue.

Triple combination of insulin glargine, sitagliptin and metformin in type 2 diabetes: the EASIE post-hoc analysis and extension trial.

AIM: We examined the effects of adding glargine to metformin-sitagliptin (MS+G) or sitagliptin to metformin-glargine (MG+S) therapy in type 2 diabetic persons uncontrolled after 24-week MS or MG dual therapy. METHODS: Subjects with A1c≥7% on MS or MG treatment were respectively given glargine (0.2U/kg starting dose) or sitagliptin (100mg daily) for 12weeks. The primary endpoint was number of subjects attaining A1c goal defined as <7%. RESULTS: After receiving 24-week MS or MG dual therapy in the original EASIE Study, 42% (104/248) on MS and 68% (152/224) on MG attained A1c<7% (p<0.0001). The reduction in A1c was negatively associated with baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) only in the MG group. Reduction in A1c was not related to baseline postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) in either the MG or MS group. Amongst 194 eligible patients, 57.7% (n=111) entered the 12-week extension trial [MS+G:74/131, 57.3%; MG+S:37/63, 58.7%) with 55 (51.9%) subjects attaining goal [MS+G:59.2%; MG+S:37.1%] at week 12. The final insulin dosage was similar in both groups [MS+G: 0.46U/kg; MG+S: 0.45U/kg] with a higher rate of hypoglycemia in the MG+S (6.5 events/patient-year) than the MS+G group (3.2 events/patient-year), although neither group had severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: In metformin-treated type 2 diabetes patients, high fasting BG predicted greater A1c reductions with the addition of glargine, but not with sitagliptin. In subjects uncontrolled with 6-month dual therapy of MS or MG, 50% attained A1c<7% with triple therapy of MS+G or MG+S in 12weeks. The increased rate of hypoglycemia with MG+S (but not with MS+G) underlines the need to take measures to avoid the hypoglycemia.

Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment goals among dyslipidemic individuals in the Levant: the CEntralized Pan-Levant survey on tHE Undertreatment of hypercholeSterolemia (CEPHEUS) study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies that evaluated achieving lipid goals have demonstrated an undertreatment of dyslipidemia. We evaluated the use and efficacy of lipid-lowering agents (LLAs) in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to recommended levels in the Levant region. DESIGN AND METHODS: A multi-center, cross-sectional survey enrolled 1002 dyslipidemic patients (August 2010 - January 2011) on LLAs for ≥3 months. Collection of data and blood samples was done over one visit. Physicians and patients filled out questionnaires pertaining to dyslipidemia diagnosis and treatment. LDL-C target levels were defined according to international guidelines. RESULTS: The full analysis set included 992 patients. Mean age was 58.0 ± 11.6 years (41% women, 65.7% diabetics and 51.5% had history of coronary heart disease). LLAs were prescribed for primary prevention or secondary prevention or familial hypercholesterolemia in 45.8% and 52.8% and 1.4% of patients; respectively. Overall, 64.0% and 56.8% of the patients attained their LDL-C goal recommended by the NCEP ATP III and TJETF guidelines, respectively. According to the 2004 NCEP ATP III updated guidelines, about 24.8% of the very high risk group attained their LDL goal of ≤70 mg/dL. Smoking, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, history of cardiovascular disease, increased waist circumference, and elevated pre-treatment LDL-C level were all associated with not reaching LDL-C goals. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study cohort was a relatively high risk group and might not be representative of the general population, we found that about 60% of enrolled individuals achieved the LDL-C treatment goals and 24.8% of the very high risk group achieved the recommended LDL-C targets of ≤70 mg/dl; national strategies and aggressive awareness campaigns to effectively control lipid levels to recommended target levels, especially in the high risk groups, are urgently needed.

Effectiveness and safety of aliskiren and aliskiren hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in a multiethnic, real-world setting.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of aliskiren and aliskiren hydrochlorothiazide (aliskiren HCT) single-pill combination therapy in patients with hypertension. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aliskiren-based therapy under daily life conditions in a multiethnic population. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, noninterventional study, conducted at 420 centers in Asia and the Middle East, included adult patients with hypertension who received treatment with aliskiren or aliskiren HCT as single or add-on therapy for a planned treatment period of at least 26 weeks. The main effectiveness assessments included the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic blood pressure (BP) goal (defined as systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP]<140/90 mmHg, or <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes) and BP response, and change in mean sitting BP from baseline to study end. RESULTS: Of 4,826 patients (mean age 51.4 years, 65.9% male, 64.5% Asian, 41.5% diabetic) included in the study, 3,473 received aliskiren and 1,353 received aliskiren HCT. Almost half the study population (48.1%) received aliskiren or aliskiren HCT as add-on therapy. The therapeutic BP goal was achieved in 49.5% of patients treated with aliskiren and 48.3% of patients receiving aliskiren HCT; attainment of BP goal increased to more than 70% when a classic BP target of <140/90 mmHg was applied for all patients. Reductions in mean sitting SBP/DBP were significantly lower versus baseline for both aliskiren (24.1/12.2 mmHg) and aliskiren HCT (27.6/14.1 mmHg) and BP response rates were consistently achieved in more than 80% of all patients during the study. Aliskiren treatment was well tolerated with only a small proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs; 2.1%) and serious AEs (0.3%). CONCLUSION: In this real-world, naturalistic setting, antihypertensive treatment with an aliskiren-based regimen was effective and well-tolerated in this multiethnic population with arterial hypertension.

A replication study of 19 GWAS-validated type 2 diabetes at-risk variants in the Lebanese population.

AIM: Recent genome-wide association scans (GWAS) and replication studies have expanded the list of validated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) susceptibility loci. We replicated T2DM association of 19 SNPs from 15 candidate loci in Lebanese Arabs. METHODS: Case-control association study, comprising 995 T2DM patients and 1076 control participants. We genotyped by the allelic discrimination method 19 SNPs in/near ADAM30, NOTCH2, THADA, TMEFF2, COL8A1, ADAMTS9-AS2, WFS1, JAZF1, SLC30A8, KCNQ1, LOC387761, ALX4, TSPAN8, FTO, and HNF1. RESULTS: Allele frequencies of the tested SNPs were comparable with those of Caucasians. COL8A1 rs792837 (P=2.9 × 10(-9)), KCNQ1 rs2237892 (P=1.8 × 10(-18)) and rs2237895 (P=0.002), ALX4 rs729287 (Pc=7.5 × 10(-5)), and HNF1 rs4430796 (P=0.003) were significantly associated with T2DM, with similar effect sizes to those of Europeans. While FTO rs8050136 and rs17817449, ADAMTS9 rs4607103, and WFS1 rs10010131 were initially associated with T2DM, this was lost upon multiple testing correction. The remaining variants were not associated with T2DM, possibly resulting from insufficient power to detect smaller allele effects. CONCLUSION: In addition to previous findings on the association of IGF2BP2, CDKAL1, TCF7L2 variants with T2DM among Lebanese, here we extend these by validating the association of five additional loci with T2DM in Lebanese Arabs.

Clinical experience with insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes from the near East countries.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at determining the clinical safety and efficacy of insulin detemir (IDet) in combination with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients from four Near East Countries (Israel, Jordan, Pakistan and Lebanon). METHODS: This prospective observational study included T2D patients previously on OADs and newly diagnosed patients initiating IDet with or without OADs, at the discretion of physicians. Safety objectives included evaluation of hypoglycemia and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from baseline to Week 24. Efficacy outcomes included baseline to Week 24 changes in glucose control parameters (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and post-breakfast post-prandial plasma glucose [PPPG]). Change in body weight during this period was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,155 patients (mean ± SD: age 57.1 ± 11.0 years, BMI 29.4 ± 5.1 kg/m(2), average diabetes duration 9.2 ± 5.4 years) were included. IDet dose at baseline was 0.20 ± 0.09 U/kg titrated up to 0.34 ± 0.14 U/kg by Week 24. From baseline to Week 24, the total number of hypoglycemic episodes increased from 1.30 to 1.37 events/patient-year, while major hypoglycemic episodes decreased from 0.15 to 0.02 events/patient-year. A total of 9 ADRs were reported, of which one event was a serious ADR. Statistically significant improvements in glucose control were reported from baseline to Week 24 (HbA1c: 9.6 ± 1.6% vs. 7.6 ± 1.1%; FPG: 201.5 ± 59.5 mg/dL vs. 124.9 ± 31.6 mg/dL; PPPG: 264.2 ± 65.7 mg/dL vs. 167.2 ± 36.8 mg/dL; all p < 0.0001). Body weight did not change significantly after 24 weeks of IDet therapy. CONCLUSION: IDet therapy in combination with OADs improved glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia or weight gain.

Replication study of common variants in CDKAL1 and CDKN2A/2B genes associated with type 2 diabetes in Lebanese Arab population.

We investigated the association of CDKAL1 (rs7754840 and rs7756992) and CDKN2A/2B (rs10811661) variants with T2DM. Higher MAF of rs7754840 and rs7756992 were seen in patients, and both were associated with T2DM under additive, dominant, and recessive models. CDKAL1 rs7754840 and rs7756992, but not CDKN2A/2B rs10811661, are associated with T2DM in Lebanese.