RESUMO
Consideration for blood products replacement in postpartum hemorrhage should be given when blood loss exceeds 1.5 L or when an estimated 25% of blood has been lost. In cases of massive hemorrhage, standardized transfusion protocols have been shown to improve maternal morbidity and mortality. Most protocols recommend a balanced transfusion involving a 1:1:1 ratio of packed red blood cells, platelets, and fresh frozen plasma. Alternatives such as cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen concentrate, and prothrombin complex concentrates can be used in select clinical situations. Although transfusion of blood products can be lifesaving, it does have associated risks.
Assuntos
Hemostáticos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Fibrinogênio/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Hemostáticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Managing pregnant individuals with acute respiratory disease secondary to COVID-19 has been a challenge. Most professional societies including the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommend keeping O2 saturation at ≥95% in pregnant individuals. Reaching this target has been increasingly difficult in some patients, especially during the latest wave of infections attributed to the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. In the absence of adequate supporting data, and in the setting of a reassuring fetal status, we propose that maternal O2 saturation should be maintained between 92% and 96% for admitted patients with acute respiratory failure who require supplemental O2. This may prevent unnecessary invasive interventions that might not hold maternal or fetal benefit, specifically at very preterm gestational ages.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Saturação de Oxigênio , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/terapia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance (IR) increases during pregnancy which can lead to hyperinsulinemia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and neonatal hypoglycemia (NH), especially in obese women. Glucose tolerance testing (GTT) is used clinically to evaluate IR in pregnancy. Quantose IR score index is a novel blood screen of IR validated in nonpregnant individuals. The score is generated using an algorithm that combines insulin and three biomarkers of fatty acid pathways (α-hydroxybutyrate, oleic acid, linoleoyl-glycerophospocholine). Our objective was to determine the validity of Quantose IR test (Metabolan Inc. Morrisville, NC) in assessing IR in pregnant obese women, as compared with the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and its ability to predict GDM and NH. STUDY DESIGN: Women between 100/7 and 136/7 weeks of gestation with a pre-pregnancy or early pregnancy body mass index more than 30 kg/m2, and no pregestational diabetes, were included. Fasting blood samples were collected at 100/7 to 136/7 (T1) and 240/7 to 280/7 (T2) weeks. Quantose IR and HOMA-IR were calculated. All women underwent an early (T1; indicated for women with obesity) and a T2 glucose tolerance tests. GDM was diagnosed using the two-step approach, and NH was defined as a neonatal glucose less than 40 mg/dL in the first 24 hours of life. Linear regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used for analysis. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 100 patients. Ten subjects (10%) were diagnosed with GDM in the second trimester and none in the first trimester. At T1, Quantose IR (R2 = 0.48), but not 1-hour glucose tolerance test (R2 = 0.07), correlated with HOMA-IR. Similar correlations were observed at T2. The 1-hour glucose tolerance test followed by HOMA-IR and Quantose IR (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.82, 0.68, and 0.62, respectively) were predictors of GDM. Quantose IR (AUC: 0.74) and 1-hour glucose tolerance test (AUC: 0.72) at T1 and T2 (AUC: 0.75; AUC: 0.93; respectively) were best predictors of NH. The best cut offs, sensitivities, and specificities for prediction of NH were determined. CONCLUSION: Similar to nonpregnant individuals, Quantose IR appears to be a valid measure of IR in obese pregnant women. First trimester Quantose IR is a predictor of GDM diagnosed in the second trimester and NH. Given that it requires a single blood draw and no glucose challenge, it may be a useful test to evaluate and monitor IR in pregnancy. Our findings may be used as pilot data to explore the potential use of Quantose IR in pregnancy further. KEY POINTS: · Traditional testing methods for insulin resistance in pregnancy are often performed late, are time consuming, and unpleasant to patients.. · The first trimester one-step Quantose IR test reflects insulin resistance in pregnancy and predicts GDM and neonatal hypoglycemia.. · This is the first known prospective clinical study validating Quantose IR score index in an obstetrical population at risk for developing GDM..
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Hipoglicemia , Resistência à Insulina , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Insulina , Obesidade/complicações , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant women ≥37 weeks scheduled for induction with unfavorable cervix (≤3 cm dilated and ≤60% effaced) were randomly assigned to 12 hours of either Foley balloon inflated with 60 mL saline or Dilapan-S for cervical ripening. If the cervix remained unfavorable, then 1 more round of the assigned dilator was used. Management following ripening was left up to the clinical providers. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery. A satisfaction survey was also obtained after the preinduction period. Sample size was based on a noninferiority margin of 10%, 90% power, and an estimated frequency of vaginal delivery of 71% in Foley balloon and 76% in Dilapan-S. RESULTS: From November 2016 through February 2018, 419 women were randomized (209 to Foley balloon; 210 to Dilapan-S). In the intent-to-treat analysis, vaginal delivery was more common in Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon (81.3% vs 76.1%), with an absolute difference with respect to the Foley balloon of 5.2% (95% confidence interval, -2.7% to 13.0%) indicating noninferiority for the prespecified margin. The difference was not large enough to show superiority. Noninferiority was confirmed in the per-protocol population (n = 204 in the Foley balloon, n = 188 in Dilapan-S), supporting the robustness of the results. Secondary outcomes were not different between groups, except for a longer time the device remained in place in Dilapan-S compared with the Foley balloon. Maternal and neonatal adverse events were not significantly different between groups. A priori interaction analyses showed no difference in the effect on vaginal delivery by cervical dilation at randomization, parity, or body mass index >30 kg/m2. Patients with Dilapan-S were more satisfied than patients with the Foley balloon as far as sleep (P = .01), relaxing time (P = .001), and performance of desired daily activities (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. Advantages of Dilapan-S over Foley include Food and Drug Administration approval, safe profile, no protrusion from the introitus, no need to keep under tension, and better patient satisfaction.
Assuntos
Cateterismo/instrumentação , Maturidade Cervical , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/instrumentação , Polímeros , Adolescente , Adulto , Cateterismo/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a congenital disorder characterized by uterine aplasia and aplasia of the upper part of the vagina. It presents with primary amenorrhea in a 46, XX individual. In this paper, we report the cases of two patients with MRKH syndrome treated with the laparoscopic modified Vecchietti technique using the optimized new instruments. A neovagina was successfully created in these two patients. This minimally invasive technique offers improvements in terms of operative time, complications, and functionality.
Assuntos
Transtornos 46, XX do Desenvolvimento Sexual/cirurgia , Anormalidades Congênitas/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Ductos Paramesonéfricos/anormalidades , Estruturas Criadas Cirurgicamente , Vagina/anormalidades , Vagina/cirurgia , Transtornos 46, XX do Desenvolvimento Sexual/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Anormalidades Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscópios , Ductos Paramesonéfricos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Paramesonéfricos/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/instrumentação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Multiple gestations are on the rise with the advent of artificial reproductive technologies. Even with ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate alone, the twinning rate can reach up to 9 percent. We report a case of recurrent twin gestation after treatment with clomiphene citrate, with the second pregnancy being heterotopic. We also review, using Medline and PubMed, previously reported cases of recurrent twin gestation after treatment with clomiphene citrate published before June 2014. Patients undergoing ovulation induction for oligoovulation, anovulation, or unexplained infertility should always be counseled about the possibility of multiple gestation prior to the treatment including the probability, although low, of a heterotopic pregnancy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the utility of using total peripheral systemic vascular resistance assessed using non-invasive cardiac monitor for individualizing the duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. STUDY DESIGN: Single center pilot randomized controlled trial in which singleton pregnant individuals with preeclampsia with severe features were randomized to 24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate per standard of care (control group) or individualized duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate based on reduction in post-delivery systemic vascular resistance (intervention group). Systemic vascular resistance was assessed with non-invasive cardiac monitoring using the Cheetah® system. A 30 % reduction (maintained for 1 h) from baseline post-delivery systemic vascular resistance was used as a cutoff for discontinuation of postpartum magnesium sulfate. Our primary outcome was duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate use in hours. Secondary outcomes included a composite of maternal morbidities associated with preeclampsia. RESULTS: Of 53 individuals enrolled, we excluded 6 from this analysis due to insufficient data to assess primary outcome. Baseline characteristics of the control (n = 26) and intervention (n = 21) groups were similar. Six (28.6 %) individuals in intervention group met the systemic vascular resistance criteria and had their postpartum magnesium sulfate discontinued before 24 h. The duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate infusion was shorter in the intervention group (21.6 ± 4.7 h; range: 7-24 h) compared with control group (24 h, p = 0.02). There was no difference in secondary outcomes between the two groups. There was no difference in adverse outcomes in individuals that had magnesium discontinued earlier than 24 h. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive monitoring of systemic vascular resistance can be a valuable tool to individualize the duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate for preeclampsia with severe features. These findings should be conformed in a larger trial.
Assuntos
Sulfato de Magnésio , Período Pós-Parto , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Resistência Vascular , Humanos , Feminino , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Adulto , Resistência Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Projetos Piloto , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodosRESUMO
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy affecting up to 8% of pregnancies. It is associated with significant neonatal and maternal morbidities and mortality. Although its pathogenesis is not completely understood, abnormal placentation resulting in imbalance in angiogenic factors, increased inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction are thought to be key pathways in the development of the disease. Administration of low-dose aspirin is recommended by professional societies for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk individuals. In this review, we summarize the evidence behind the use of low-dose aspirin and pravastatin in pregnant individuals at high risk of preeclampsia.
Assuntos
Hipertensão , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Pravastatina/uso terapêutico , Gravidez de Alto RiscoRESUMO
PROBLEM: Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from infected pregnant individuals to the fetus or newborn occurs from 1.2% to 4.3%. Our aim was to determine the rate of positivity among newborns delivered to infected mothers during epochs of different variants predominance. METHOD OF STUDY: This is a single academic center retrospective cohort study where we reviewed the electronic health records of pregnant individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and their newborns from March 2020 through January 2022. Infants born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers at the time of delivery or within 10 days of admission were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection at 24-36 h of age. RESULTS: A total of 195 mothers were positive at delivery or within 10 days of admission and had their newborns tested for SARS-CoV-2. Seven newborns (3.6%) were positive. All positive infants were asymptomatic and born to unvaccinated mothers. Newborn positivity for SARS-CoV-2 was highest during the Omicron epoch (9.4%, p = .01). CONCLUSION: Increasing positivity rate was seen during the Omicron variant predominance. This could be attributed to postnatal acquisition of the virus, as Omicron has been associated with higher transmissibility in older children and adults.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Adulto , Criança , Lactente , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feto , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Importance: Existing reports of pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease who require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited, with variable outcomes noted for the maternal-fetal dyad. Objective: To examine maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with ECMO used for COVID-19 with respiratory failure during pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective multicenter cohort study examined pregnant and postpartum patients who required ECMO for COVID-19 respiratory failure at 25 hospitals across the US. Eligible patients included individuals who received care at one of the study sites, were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or up to 6 weeks post partum by positive nucleic acid or antigen test, and for whom ECMO was initiated for respiratory failure from March 1, 2020, to October 1, 2022. Exposures: ECMO in the setting of COVID-19 respiratory failure. Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was maternal mortality. Secondary outcomes included serious maternal morbidity, obstetrical outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Outcomes were compared by timing of infection during pregnancy or post partum, timing of ECMO initiation during pregnancy or post partum, and periods of circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Results: From March 1, 2020, to October 1, 2022, 100 pregnant or postpartum individuals were started on ECMO (29 [29.0%] Hispanic, 25 [25.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 34 [34.0%] non-Hispanic White; mean [SD] age: 31.1 [5.5] years), including 47 (47.0%) during pregnancy, 21 (21.0%) within 24 hours post partum, and 32 (32.0%) between 24 hours and 6 weeks post partum; 79 (79.0%) had obesity, 61 (61.0%) had public or no insurance, and 67 (67.0%) did not have an immunocompromising condition. The median (IQR) ECMO run was 20 (9-49) days. There were 16 maternal deaths (16.0%; 95% CI, 8.2%-23.8%) in the study cohort, and 76 patients (76.0%; 95% CI, 58.9%-93.1%) had 1 or more serious maternal morbidity events. The largest serious maternal morbidity was venous thromboembolism and occurred in 39 patients (39.0%), which was similar across ECMO timing (40.4% pregnant [19 of 47] vs 38.1% [8 of 21] immediately postpartum vs 37.5% postpartum [12 of 32]; P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter US cohort study of pregnant and postpartum patients who required ECMO for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure, most survived but experienced a high frequency of serious maternal morbidity.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Insuficiência Respiratória , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos de Coortes , Período Pós-Parto , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/terapiaRESUMO
Remdesivir has been shown to shorten the time to recovery in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data on its use in pregnancy are limited. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, our objective was to determine whether early remdesivir use in pregnant individuals is associated with decreased risk of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Forty-one pregnant patients were included in this study, and outcomes were compared between those who received remdesivir less than 7 days (early group) and 7 or more days (late group) from onset of patient-reported symptoms. Early remdesivir administration was associated with improved clinical outcomes, including lower rates of ICU admission, decreased length of hospitalization, and decreased progression to critical disease in pregnant individuals hospitalized with COVID-19.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
PROBLEM: Since the start of the pandemic, Pregnant individuals have been disproportionately affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Vaccination has been shown to be protective against severe disease. However, data on effectiveness of vaccine in reducing disease severity are limited in pregnant individuals who later developed COVID-19. METHOD OF STUDY: This is a single academic center retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 from December 2020 through January 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups based on vaccination status. The primary outcome of our study was progression to severe or critical disease. A secondary analysis was performed based on the timeframes of predominance of different variants of SARS-CoV-2, to determine whether the effect of vaccination was different during these epochs. RESULTS: Our cohort included 472 patients among which 125 (26.5%) were vaccinated and 347 were unvaccinated. None of the patients in the vaccinated group who later developed COVID-19 progressed to severe or critical disease compared to 7.2% in the unvaccinated one (p < .01). Similarly, after adjusting for medical comorbidities, obesity, receipt of monoclonal antibodies, and trimester at diagnosis, vaccinated individuals who later developed COVID-19 were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (1.6% vs. 14.7%, aOR .14, 95% CI .22-.47) compared with unvaccinated ones. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant individuals who later develop a breakthrough infection, is associated with decreased progression to severe or critical COVID-19, and need for hospital and ICU admissions. Vaccination is specifically effective during the predominance of the more severe Delta variant.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Vacinas Virais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Treatment with monoclonal antibodies has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization and disease progression among high-risk patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Pregnant individuals were excluded from the original trials. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated whether monoclonal antibody treatment in pregnant individuals is associated with decreased risk of hospitalization. Outcomes of patients who received the treatment were compared with those who were eligible but did not receive the treatment. Analyses were stratified by vaccination status. Unvaccinated pregnant patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 who received outpatient monoclonal antibodies were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (4.2% vs 15.7%, odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.74), whereas among vaccinated patients, the treatment was not associated with a lower rate of hospitalization (2.3% vs 0%, P=.99).
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , COVID-19 , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665688.