RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Combining family and career is increasingly taken for granted in many fields. However, the medical profession in Germany has inadequately developed structures. Little is known regarding the satisfaction of physicians working part-time (PT). METHODS: This Germany-wide on-line survey collected information on the working situation of PT employees (PTE) in gynecology. An anonymous questionnaire with 95 items, nine of which concerned PT work, was sent to 2770 residents and physicians undergoing further specialist training. RESULTS: Of the 481 participants, 104 (96 % female, 4 % male) stated they worked PT, which is greater than the national average. 94 % of all women and 60 % of all men would work PT for better compatibility between work and family life. The PTE regularly work night shifts (NS) (96 %) and weekends (98 %). The number of monthly NS (median 5-9) was not different between the full-time (FT) employees and the PTE who work >75 %. Only when the working hours are reduced by 25 % or more, there are fewer NS (median 1-4) PTE that have a desire for fewer NS. The classic PT model is seldom realized; over 70 % of PTE work whole days, while other working models do not play a major role in Germany. On-call models were subjectively declared to have the best family friendly work-life balance. OUTLOOK: The results obtained indicated that structures must be developed that to address the problem of childcare and the long working hours to ensure comprehensive medical care from specialists.
Assuntos
Emprego/tendências , Ginecologia , Obstetrícia , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ENTOG) is an organization representing trainees from 30 European member countries. Together with the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), it seeks to achieve the highest possible standards of training and consequently to improve the quality of medical care in the field of gynaecology and obstetrics. Every year, the ENTOG council meets and holds a scientific meeting in a different European country. To coincide with this, the host country arranges an exchange, to which each member country can send two trainees. This exchange allows trainees to gain insight into both daily clinical work and the structure of the health care system. METHODS: This article reports the experiences of participants in the May 2016 ENTOG exchange to Turin, Italy. The aim is to outline differences in training between Germany and Italy as well as some striking differences with other European countries. PERSPECTIVE: The participants' personal benefit from this unique experience was not only to get familiar with the Italian trainee programme and health care system, but also to exchange experiences among representatives from other European countries and build up a young gynaecological network within Europe.
Assuntos
Ginecologia/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Europa (Continente) , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Itália , MédicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some women of families at high risk of breast cancer (BC) choose prophylactic mastectomy (PM) in spite of ambiguous evidence for survival benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate counselees' characteristics, decisions on PM, and frequencies of different procedures to better understand how to tailor interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and forty-nine counselees who attended interdisciplinary consultation for genetic risk adjustment at the University Hospital Heidelberg between July 2009 and July 2011 received a tripartite questionnaire addressing sociodemographic characteristics, psychological parameters, behavioural questions, and medical data. RESULTS: Six hundred and twelve of the 849 counselees (72%) returned the questionnaire. Four hundred were classified as high risk of genetic BC (19.5% BRCA mutation carriers; 4% unclassified variant (UV); and 76.5% calculated as high risk by pedigree). Two hundred and thirteen out of 400 (53%) were diagnosed with BC. Fourteen out of 54 (27%) BRCA mutation carriers with BC chose contralateral PM (CPM) compared to 24/126 (14%) without a mutation but with a personal BC history (p = 0.2175). Of those without BC, 12/27 (44%) mutation carriers opted for bilateral PM (BPM) compared to none without a mutation (p < 0.0001). Women who received any PM (CPM and BPM) reported a higher emotional burden from partners (p = 0.003) and family (p = 0.008), more worries regarding children and family (p = 0.003) and were associated with positive mutation status and higher heterozygous and lifetime risk (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although evidence on survival benefit is unclear in several clinical situations, a relevant number of counselees opt for PM. Counselees may decide based on other reasons than survival benefit.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Tomada de Decisões , Mutação , Mastectomia Profilática/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mastectomia Profilática/psicologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer among women worldwide and in 5-10 % of cases is of hereditary origin, mainly due to BRCA1/2 mutations. Therefore, the German Consortium for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) with its 15 specialized academic centers offers families at high risk for familial/hereditary cancer a multimodal breast cancer surveillance program (MBCS) with regular breast MRI, mammography, ultrasound, and palpation. So far, we know a lot about the psychological effects of genetic testing, but we know little about risk-correlated adherence to MBCS or prophylactic surgery over time. The aim of this study was to investigate counselees' adherence to recommendations for MBCS in order to adjust the care supply and define predictors for incompliance. All counselees, who attended HBOC consultation at the University Hospital Heidelberg between July 01, 2009 and July 01, 2011 were eligible to participate. A tripartite questionnaire containing sociodemographic information, psychological parameters, behavioral questions, and medical data collection from the German consortium were used. A high participation rate was achieved among the study population, with 72 % returning the questionnaire. This study showed a rate of 59 % of full-adherers to the MBCS. Significant predictors for partial or full adherence were having children (p = 0.0221), younger daughters (p = 0.01795), a higher awareness of the topic HBOC (p = 0.01795, p < 0.0001), a higher perceived breast cancer risk (p < 0.0001), and worries (p = 0.0008)/impairment (p = 0.0257) by it. Although the current data suggest a good adherence of MBCS, prospective studies are needed to understand counselees' needs to further improve surveillance programs and adherence to them. Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening-a monocenter study in Germany.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Vigilância da População/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Alemanha , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Profiláticos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Advances in genetics and increased public awareness increased the demand for interdisciplinary genetic outpatient consultation (IOGC). Communicating cancer risk is complex, and ideally information transfer should be individualized. Although psychological experiences with genetic testing have been studied in detail, studies on long-term experiences with IOGC and information transfer are lacking. We assessed patients' understanding and satisfaction with IOGC in families at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) with the aim of informing best clinical practice, improving compliance and informed decision-making. METHODS: Female counselees referred for IOGC between July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2011 were eligible. Data were collected using a 47-item postal questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, psychological, behavioral parameters. Overall satisfaction and personal usefulness of IOGC were assessed with a five-point, and risk perception with a visual analog scale. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank, Wilcoxon U or Chi-squared test. RESULTS: 612 (72 %) of 849 women participated reported being highly satisfied (75 %, n = 430) and declared personal usefulness (73 %, n = 421) on average 3.5 years after IOGC. Women deemed "high risk" assessed their risk of developing BC as significantly higher than non-high-risk counselees (3.2 versus 3.0, p = 0.00484). Risk perception was lower in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers than in women with unclassified variants or no mutation (2.8 versus 3.5 and 3.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with an HBOC background have additional needs to achieve long-term satisfaction after IOGC. Prospective studies are required to optimize care for the increasing number of people who seek genetic consultation, particularly as the complexity of genetics knowledge increases.