Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Health ; 23(1): 7, 2024 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Climate change has been identified as one of the biggest threats to human health. Despite this claim, there are no standardized tools that assess the rigor of published literature for use in weight of evidence (WOE) reviews. Standardized assessment tools are essential for creating clear and comparable WOE reviews. As such, we developed a standardized tool for evaluating the quality of climate change and health studies focused on evaluating studies that quantify exposure-response relationships and studies that implement and/or evaluate adaptation interventions. METHODS: The authors explored systematic-review methodology to enhance transparency and increase efficiency in summarizing and synthesizing findings from studies on climate change and health research. The authors adapted and extended existing WOE methods to develop the CHANGE (Climate Health ANalysis Grading Evaluation) tool. The resulting assessment tool has been refined through application and subsequent team input. RESULTS: The CHANGE tool is a two-step standardized tool for systematic review of climate change and health studies of exposure-response relationships and adaptation intervention studies. Step one of the CHANGE tool aims to classify studies included in weight-of-evidence reviews and step two assesses the quality and presence of bias in the climate change and health studies. CONCLUSION: The application of the CHANGE tool in WOE reviews of climate change and health will lead to increased comparability, objectivity, and transparency within this research area.


Assuntos
Mudança Climática , Humanos , Viés
2.
J Pediatr ; 257: 113378, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889628

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential effect modification by health insurance coverage on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival among US children and adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 54 558 individuals diagnosed with cancer at ≤ 19 years between 2004 and 2010 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for analyses. An interaction term between race/ethnicity and health insurance type was included to examine racial/ethnic disparities in survival by each insurance status category. RESULTS: Racial/ethnic minorities experienced a 14%-42% higher hazard of death compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) with magnitudes varying by health insurance type (Pinteraction < .001). Specifically, among those reported as privately insured, the hazard of death was higher for non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.36-1.62), non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Natives (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.36-2.90), non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13-1.50), and Hispanics (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.40) vs NHWs. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival among those reported as covered by Medicaid were present for NHBs (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.19-1.43) but no other racial/ethnic minorities (HR ranges: 0.98∼1.00) vs NHWs. In the uninsured group, the hazard of death for NHBs (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.23) and Hispanics (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.61) was higher vs NHWs. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in survival exist across insurance types, particularly for NHB childhood and adolescent cancer patients vs NHWs with private insurance. These findings provide insights for research and policy, and point to the need for more efforts on promoting health equity while improving health insurance coverage.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Hispânico ou Latino , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca
3.
Health Expect ; 26(5): 1832-1842, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children are amongst the most susceptible groups to environmental exposures, for both immediate and life-course health outcomes. Despite their increased susceptibility, children's knowledge, experiences and voices are understudied. A deeper understanding of children's environmental health perceptions has the potential to better inform policy, develop targeted interventions and improve public health outcomes. METHODS: In this study, our community-academic partnership used the Photovoice research method to examine how urban children from low-income communities perceive environmental influences on their health. Twenty children, ages 10-12, took photographs and participated in focus group interviews regarding their perspectives on how the environment influences their health. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses revealed five major thematic categories: environmental exposures, environmental health sentiments, environmental health outcomes, interest in environmental health and environmental health solutions. We used the findings to develop an environmental health perspective theoretical framework that can inform future work designed to promote the environmental health and well-being of children from low-income communities in urban communities. CONCLUSION: Photovoice enabled children from low-income communities to capture and communicate their environmental health perceptions. These findings have the potential to inform and identify potential targets and opportunities for environmental health interventions and promotion in their communities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Partnerships with community-based organizations were central to the present study. By design, these community-based partners were involved in the conduct and procedures of the study.


Assuntos
Saúde Ambiental , Pobreza , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Grupos Focais
4.
Cancer ; 128(17): 3196-3203, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minority children and adolescents are more likely to have an advanced cancer diagnosis compared with non-Hispanic Whites, which may relate to the lack of consistent health care access. This study aims to describe racial/ethnic disparities in cancer diagnosis stage among children and adolescents and assess whether health insurance mediates these disparities. METHODS: Data on individuals ≤19 years of age diagnosed with primary cancers from 2007 to 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between race/ethnicity and cancer diagnosis stage were calculated using Poisson regression. Analyses addressing health insurance as a potential mediator were also performed. RESULTS: Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, racial/ethnic minorities had a higher prevalence of a distant cancer diagnosis, with PRs of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.23-1.40) for non-Hispanic Blacks, 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04-1.24) for non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09-1.21) for Hispanics. These associations were attenuated when adjusting for health insurance, with PRs of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.16-1.33) for non-Hispanic Blacks, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.21) for non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01-1.13) for Hispanics. Any Medicaid or no insurance at diagnosis mediated 49%, 22%, and 9% of the observed association with distant stage in Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks, and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in cancer diagnosis stage in racial/ethnic minority children and adolescents may be partially explained by health insurance coverage. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Criança , Doença Crônica , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Grupos Minoritários , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
J Urban Health ; 99(2): 208-217, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35352241

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted socioeconomic and racial health disparities in the USA. In this study, we examined the COVID-19 pandemic as a threat multiplier for childhood health disparities by evaluating health behavior changes among urban St. Louis, MO, children (ages 6-14) during the COVID-19 pandemic. From 27 October to 10 December 2020, 122 parents/guardians reported on their children's health behaviors (Eating, Sleeping, Physical activity, Time outside, Time with friends in-person, Time with friends remotely, Time using media for educational proposes, Time using media for non-educational proposes, and Social connectedness) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We ran K-means cluster analyses to identify distinct health behavior cluster profiles. Relative risks were determined to evaluate behavioral differences between the two clusters. Two distinct cluster profiles were identified: a High Impact profile (n = 49) and a Moderate Impact profile (n = 73). Children in the High Impact cluster had a greater risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19, developed worsened eating habits (RR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.50-2.93), spent less time sleeping, and spent less time outdoors (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.03-2.43) than the Moderate Impact cluster. The High Impact cluster was more likely to include Black children and children from single-adult households than the Moderate Impact cluster (both p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic may be a threat multiplier for childhood health disparities. Further research is needed to better understand the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's health.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Saúde da Criança , Humanos , Pandemias , Pais , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 44(2): 394-401, 2022 06 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33415330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nature experiences have been shown to promote physical, emotional, mental and overall health. However, low-income youth often face inequities in access to nature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 15-week nature-based education (NBE) intervention on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of low-income youth. METHODS: A total of 362 low-income youth (ages 9-15) in St. Louis, MO, USA, participated in this study. Study participants completed a pre- and post-intervention survey that included validated measures of six HRQoL domains (Physical Activity, Emotional Health Functioning, School Functioning, Social Functioning, Family Functioning and overall HRQoL). Random effects analysis of covariance was used to test for significant differences in HRQoL scores between the intervention and control groups, after adjusting for school, age, previous nature exposure, and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics capacity. RESULTS: After the intervention period, youth in the NBE intervention group experienced improvements in all HRQoL domain scores (P < 0.001), whereas youth in the control group experienced declines in HRQoL domain scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NBE may have a positive impact on the HRQoL of low-income youth. Further investigations examining the influence of nature-based activities on youth health outcomes are warranted.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Pobreza , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Environ Res ; 179(Pt B): 108844, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708169

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has examined relationships between neighborhood characteristics and exposure to air toxics in the United States. However, a limited number of studies have addressed neighborhood isolation, a measure of spatial segregation. We investigated the spatial distribution of carcinogenic air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area and tested the hypothesis that neighborhood isolation and sociodemographic characteristics are associated with exposure to carcinogenic air toxics. METHODS: We obtained lifetime air toxics cancer risk data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's National Air Toxic Assessment and sociodemographic data from the American Community Survey. We used geographic information systems to identify statistically significant clusters of census tracts with elevated all-site cancer risk due to air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area. Relative Risks (RR) were estimated for the association between neighborhood characteristics and air toxic hot spots. Using a local spatial isolation index to evaluate residential segregation, we also evaluated the association between neighborhood racial and economic isolation and air toxic hot spots. RESULTS: Approximately 14% (85 of the 615) of census tracts had elevated cancer risk due to air toxics (p < 0.01). These air toxic hot spots were independently associated with neighborhoods with high levels of poverty and unemployment and low levels of education. Census tracts with the highest levels of both racial isolation of Blacks and economic isolation of poverty were more likely to be located in air toxic hotspots than those with low combined racial and economic isolation (RR = 5.34; 95% CI = 3.10-9.22). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide strong evidence of unequal distribution of carcinogenic air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area. Study results may be used to inform public health efforts to eliminate sociodemographic inequalities in exposure to air pollutants.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Cidades/epidemiologia , Demografia , Humanos , Missouri/epidemiologia , Características de Residência , Medição de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Análise Espacial , Estados Unidos
8.
J Community Health ; 44(4): 656-660, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850951

RESUMO

Public health emergency preparedness can improve a community's ability to cope health outcomes associated with environmental disasters and complex emergencies. Previous studies of gender and preparedness have yielded mixed results. The objective of this study was to examine the association between gender and public health emergency preparedness among U.S. adults using data from the behavioral risk factors surveillance system (BRFSS). Data was analyzed from the 2006-2012 BRFSS for 96,137 adults from 10 states. Three self-reported preparedness behaviors were evaluated: household preparedness (3-day supply of water, 3-day supply of food, battery-operated radio, and flashlight), emergency evacuation plan, and 3-day supply of medication. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate associations between gender and each preparedness behavior. Gender-specific regression analyses were also conducted to identify determinants of public health emergency preparedness. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, women were less likely to report household preparedness (PR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.75) and a 3-day supply of medication (PR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) than men. Among women, being divorced, widowed or separated (PR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71, 1.00) and living in a household with children (PR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77, 0.92) was inversely associated with reported household preparedness. This study adds to the epidemiology literature regarding gender and preparedness behaviors in the United States. Future investigations are warranted to confirm these findings and inform practices aimed at improving public health emergency preparedness.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Planejamento em Desastres/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Emergências , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
9.
Cancer ; 124(9): 2026-2035, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29437204

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although cancer survivors are more likely to be unemployed than individuals without a cancer history, employment participation after treatment of early-stage breast cancer has not been widely studied to date. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate employment trajectories in a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer and age-matched controls from the time of diagnosis to the 2-year follow-up, and identify factors associated with diminished and emerging employment participation. METHODS: As part of a larger cohort study of 1096 patients with early-stage breast cancer and same-aged women without breast cancer, data from 723 working-age (aged 40-64 years) women (347 patients and 376 controls) were analyzed to evaluate 4 employment trajectories (sustained unemployment, diminished employment, emerging employment, and sustained employment). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with diminished employment versus sustained employment, and emerging employment versus sustained unemployment. RESULTS: Lower percentages of patients (71%) compared with controls (79%) reported full-time or part-time employment at enrollment (P<.01). Fatigue was a significant predictor of diminished employment for both patients (odds ratio [OR], 5.71; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.48-13.15) and controls (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.21-4.68). Among patients, African American race (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.57-10.28) and public/uninsured insurance status (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.34-12.38) were found to be associated with diminished employment. Among controls, high social support was associated with emerging employment (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.25-7.79). CONCLUSIONS: Fatigued patients, African American patients, and publicly insured/uninsured patients with cancer were more likely to experience diminished employment after 2 years of follow-up. Further investigation with longer follow-up is warranted to identify factors associated with these disparities in employment participation after treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Cancer 2018;124:2026-35. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(7): 501-506, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29599164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is growing use of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to provide exposure estimates in studies of work-related musculoskeletal disorders; few studies have examined the validity of such estimates, nor did compare associations obtained with a JEM with those obtained using other exposures. OBJECTIVE: This study estimated upper extremity exposures using a JEM derived from a publicly available data set (Occupational Network, O*NET), and compared exposure-disease associations for incident carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with those obtained using observed physical exposure measures in a large prospective study. METHODS: 2393 workers from several industries were followed for up to 2.8 years (5.5 person-years). Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes were assigned to the job at enrolment. SOC codes linked to physical exposures for forceful hand exertion and repetitive activities were extracted from O*NET. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to describe exposure-disease associations for incident CTS for individually observed physical exposures and JEM exposures from O*NET. RESULTS: Both exposure methods found associations between incident CTS and exposures of force and repetition, with evidence of dose-response. Observed associations were similar across the two methods, with somewhat wider CIs for HRs calculated using the JEM method. CONCLUSION: Exposures estimated using a JEM provided similar exposure-disease associations for CTS when compared with associations obtained using the 'gold standard' method of individual observation. While JEMs have a number of limitations, in some studies they can provide useful exposure estimates in the absence of individual-level observed exposures.

11.
Environ Health ; 17(1): 92, 2018 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591057

RESUMO

Fast fashion, inexpensive and widely available of-the-moment garments, has changed the way people buy and dispose of clothing. By selling large quantities of clothing at cheap prices, fast fashion has emerged as a dominant business model, causing garment consumption to skyrocket. While this transition is sometimes heralded as the "democratization" of fashion in which the latest styles are available to all classes of consumers, the human and environmental health risks associated with inexpensive clothing are hidden throughout the lifecycle of each garment. From the growth of water-intensive cotton, to the release of untreated dyes into local water sources, to worker's low wages and poor working conditions; the environmental and social costs involved in textile manufacturing are widespread.In this paper, we posit that negative externalities at each step of the fast fashion supply chain have created a global environmental justice dilemma. While fast fashion offers consumers an opportunity to buy more clothes for less, those who work in or live near textile manufacturing facilities bear a disproportionate burden of environmental health hazards. Furthermore, increased consumption patterns have also created millions of tons of textile waste in landfills and unregulated settings. This is particularly applicable to low and middle-income countries (LMICs) as much of this waste ends up in second-hand clothing markets. These LMICs often lack the supports and resources necessary to develop and enforce environmental and occupational safeguards to protect human health. We discuss the role of industry, policymakers, consumers, and scientists in promoting sustainable production and ethical consumption in an equitable manner.


Assuntos
Vestuário , Saúde Ambiental , Justiça Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Indústria Têxtil , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional , Política Pública , Desenvolvimento Sustentável , Resíduos
12.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(9): 795-804, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27582482

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although airborne respiratory irritants at the World Trade Center (WTC) site have been associated with asthma among WTC Ground Zero workers, little is known about asthma associated with work at the Staten Island landfill or barges. METHODS: To evaluate the risk of asthma first diagnosed among Staten Island landfill and barge workers, we conducted a survey and multivariable logistic regression analysis regarding the association between Staten Island landfill and barge-related work exposures and the onset of post-9/11 asthma. RESULTS: Asthma newly diagnosed between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2004 was reported by 100/1,836 (5.4%) enrollees. Jobs involving sifting, digging, welding, and steel cutting, enrollees with high landfill/barge exposure index scores or who were police and sanitation workers, and enrollees with probable posttraumatic stress disorder all had increased odds ratios for new-onset asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Post-9/11 asthma cumulative incidence among Staten Island landfill/barge workers was similar to that of other WTC disaster rescue and recovery workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:795-804, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Poeira , Exposição por Inalação/análise , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Navios , Instalações de Eliminação de Resíduos , Adolescente , Adulto , Recuperação e Remediação Ambiental , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Aplicação da Lei , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Soldagem , Adulto Jovem
13.
Int J Cancer ; 137(7): 1765-74, 2015 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25846061

RESUMO

We investigated the relationship between workplace chemical exposures and breast cancer risk among women enrolled in the Sister Study, a prospective cohort study of US and Puerto Rican women. A total of 47,640 participants reported work outside of the home. Workplace exposure to eleven agents (acids, dyes or inks, gasoline or other petroleum products, glues or adhesives, lubricating oils, metals, paints, pesticides, soldering materials, solvents and stains or varnishes) was characterized based on self-reports of frequency and duration of use. Approximately 14% of the study population reported exposure to only one agent and 11% reported working with two or more of the 11 agents in their lifetime. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each agent, adjusting for established breast cancer risk factors. During follow-up, 1,966 cases of breast cancer were reported. Although there were no significant associations between ever use of the eleven agents evaluated and breast cancer risk, women with cumulative exposure to gasoline or petroleum products at or above the highest quartile cutoff had an elevated risk of total (HR: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.1-4.9) and invasive (HR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.1-5.9) breast cancer compared with women in the lowest quartile group (ptrend = 0.03). Workplace exposure to soldering materials was associated with an increased risk of premenopausal breast cancer (HR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-3.0). Findings support the need for further studies to elucidate the role of occupational chemicals in breast cancer etiology.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 26(12): 1779-89, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26450605

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Physical activity has been associated with reduced breast cancer risk, but studies of occupational activity have produced inconsistent results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between occupational physical activity and breast cancer in a prospective study of women with a family history of breast cancer. METHODS: We studied breast cancer risk in 47,649 Sister Study participants with an occupational history. Information on occupational activity and breast cancer risk factors was collected during baseline interviews (2004-2009). Physical activity at each job was self-reported and categorized as mostly sitting, sitting and standing equally, mostly standing, and active. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate associations between lifetime occupational activity and incident breast cancer, after adjusting for established risk factors and recreational activity. RESULTS: During follow-up, a total of 1,798 breast cancer diagnoses were reported. Compared with women who did not spend any time in active jobs, women who spent a high proportion (≥75%) of their working years in active jobs had a reduced risk of breast cancer (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.98). Associations were strongest among overweight (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and postmenopausal (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.45-0.98) women. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational activity was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. Occupational activity is a domain of physical activity that should be further examined in studies of postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Additional research is necessary to better understand the mechanisms underlying the relationships between occupational activity, body size, and breast cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Atividade Motora , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sobrepeso/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Recreação , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato
15.
Prev Med ; 74: 93-6, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25773471

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the association between occupational physical activity and leisure-time physical activity among US women in the Sister Study. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 26,334 women who had been employed in their current job for at least 1 year at baseline (2004-2009). Occupational physical activity was self-reported and leisure-time physical activity was estimated in metabolic equivalent hours per week. Log multinomial regression was used to evaluate associations between occupational (sitting, standing, manually active) and leisure-time (insufficient, moderate, high) activity. Models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, income, geographic region, and body mass index. RESULTS: Only 54% of women met or exceeded minimum recommended levels of leisure-time physical activity (moderate 32% and high 22%). Women who reported sitting (prevalence ratio (PR)=0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.92) or standing (PR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.94) most of the time at work were less likely to meet the requirements for high leisure-time physical activity than manually active workers. Associations were strongest among women living in the Northeast and the South. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, low occupational activity was associated with lower leisure-time physical activity. Women who are not active in the workplace may benefit from strategies to promote leisure-time physical activity.


Assuntos
Atividades de Lazer , Equivalente Metabólico/fisiologia , Atividade Motora , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Geografia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Autorrelato , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
16.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 85: 102380, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37209483

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although treatment advances have increased childhood and adolescent cancer survival, whether patient subgroups have benefited equally from these improvements is unclear. METHODS: Data on 42,865 malignant primary cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2019 in individuals ≤ 19 years were obtained from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer-specific mortality by age group (0-14 and 15-19 years), sex, and race/ethnicity were estimated using flexible parametric models with a restricted cubic spline function in each of the periods: 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014 and 2015-2019, versus 1995-1999. Interactions between diagnosis period and age group (children 0-14 and adolescents 15-19 years at diagnosis), sex, and race/ethnicity were assessed using likelihood ratio tests. Five-year cancer-specific survival rates for each diagnosis period were further predicted. RESULTS: Compared with the 1995-1999 cohort, the risk of dying from all cancers combined decreased in subgroups defined by age, sex and race/ethnicity with HRs ranging from 0.50 to 0.68 for the 2015-2019 comparison. HRs were more variable by cancer subtype. There were no statistically significant interactions by age group (Pinteraction=0.05) or sex (Pinteraction=0.71). Despite non-significant differences in cancer-specific survival improvement across different races and ethnicities (Pinteraction=0.33) over the study period, minorities consistently experienced inferior survival compared with non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial improvements in cancer-specific survival for childhood and adolescent cancer did not differ significantly by different age, sex, and race/ethnicity groups. However, persistent gaps in survival between minorities and non-Hispanic Whites are noteworthy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Programa de SEER , Etnicidade , Grupos Raciais , Brancos
17.
Environ Int ; 181: 108266, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37847981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite strong evidence of the association of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure with an increased risk of lung cancer mortality, few studies had investigated associations of multiple pollutants simultaneously, or with incidence, or using causal methods. Disparities were also understudied. OBJECTIVES: We investigated long-term effects of PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), warm-season ozone, and particle radioactivity (PR) exposures on lung cancer incidence in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with Medicare beneficiaries (aged ≥ 65 years) continuously enrolled in the fee-for-service program in the contiguous US from 2001 to 2016. Air pollution exposure was averaged across three years and assigned based on ZIP code of residence. We fitted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for lung cancer incidence, adjusted for individual- and neighborhood-level confounders. As a sensitivity analysis, we evaluated the causal relationships using inverse probability weights. We further assessed effect modifications by individual- and neighborhood-level covariates. RESULTS: We identified 166,860 lung cancer cases of 12,429,951 studied beneficiaries. In the multi-pollutant model, PM2.5 and NO2 exposures were statistically significantly associated with increased lung cancer incidence, while PR was marginally significantly associated. Specifically, the HR was 1.008 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005, 1.011) per 1-µg/m3 increase in PM2.5, 1.013 (95% CI: 1.012, 1.013) per 1-ppb increase in NO2, and 1.005 (0.999, 1.012) per 1-mBq/m3 increase in PR. At low exposure levels, all pollutants were associated with increased lung cancer incidence. Men, older individuals, Blacks, and residents of low-income neighborhoods experienced larger effects of PM2.5 and PR. DISCUSSION: Long-term PM2.5, NO2, and PR exposures were independently associated with increased lung cancer incidence among the national elderly population. Low-exposure analysis indicated that current national standards for PM2.5 and NO2 were not restrictive enough to protect public health, underscoring the need for more stringent air quality regulations.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Poluentes Ambientais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medicare , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Poluentes Ambientais/análise
18.
Am J Public Health ; 102(10): 1964-73, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22897552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We have described the epidemiology of co-occurring lower respiratory symptoms (LRS) and probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 5 to 6 years after exposure to the 9/11 disaster. METHODS: We analyzed residents, office workers, and passersby (n = 16,363) in the World Trade Center Health Registry. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined patterns of reported respiratory symptoms, treatment sought for symptoms, diagnosed respiratory conditions, mental health comorbidities, quality of life, and unmet health care needs in relation to comorbidity. RESULTS: Among individuals with either LRS or PTSD, 24.6% had both conditions. The odds of comorbidity was significantly higher among those with more severe 9/11 exposures. Independent of 9/11 exposures, participants with LRS had 4 times the odds of those without it of meeting criteria for PTSD, and those with PTSD had 4 times the odds of those without it of meeting criteria for LRS. Participants with comorbidity had worse quality of life and more unmet mental health care needs than did all other outcome groups. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory and mental illness are closely linked in individuals exposed to 9/11 and should be considered jointly in public health outreach and treatment programs.


Assuntos
Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(6): 476-481, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761424

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between multimorbidity and subsequent 2-year employment outcomes among middle-aged United States (US) cancer survivors. In addition, we examined whether the relationship differed by survivor characteristics. METHODS: Data of 633 cancer survivors (ages 51 to 64) from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study were used to identify multimorbidity profiles and evaluate associations between multimorbidity and prolonged unemployment during follow-up. RESULTS: Approximately 64% of cancer survivors met the criteria for multimorbidity. Latent class analysis revealed three distinct multimorbidity profiles distinguished by the presence or absence of psychiatric disorders. We observed a significant association between high psychiatric multimorbidity and prolonged unemployment after 2-year follow-up (relative risk = 2.78, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.28 to 6.00), with the effect more pronounced among low-income survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric multimorbidity was associated with prolonged unemployment among middle-aged cancer survivors, particularly among low-income survivors.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Emprego , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimorbidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Desemprego , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 16(4): 1537-1544, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304752

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Weather extremes are increasing with climate change and associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Promotion of social connections is an emerging area of research and practice for risk reduction during weather extremes. This study examines the practice of checking on neighbors during extreme summer heat and extreme winter weather. Objectives are to (1) describe the extent of neighbor checking during these extremes, and (2) examine factors associated with neighbor checking. METHODS: We analyze survey data (n = 442) from a primarily low- and moderate- income study sample in a Southeastern U.S. city, using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: About 17.6% of participants checked on neighbors during extreme summer heat, and 25.2% did so during extreme winter weather. Being middle or older aged and having more adverse physical health impacts were positively associated with neighbor checking, for both extremes. For winter only, having less education was positively associated with neighbor checking. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based partnerships for reducing risk during weather extremes may consider people who are older or have experienced their own adverse health impacts as initial target groups for promoting neighbor checking. Future research should also examine the motivations for, details about, and impacts of neighbor checking in greater depth.


Assuntos
Mudança Climática , Tempo (Meteorologia) , Humanos , Estações do Ano , Cidades , Previsões
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA