Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(12): 3123-3130, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28613436

RESUMO

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.


Assuntos
Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/economia , Rejeição de Enxerto/economia , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Doadores Vivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Am J Transplant ; 14(7): 1573-80, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913913

RESUMO

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/imunologia , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Doadores Vivos/provisão & distribuição , Adulto , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/diagnóstico , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/imunologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Transplant Proc ; 50(1): 142-144, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29407298

RESUMO

We report the first case of a ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) involving the gastrointestinal tract that was successfully treated with high-dose valganciclovir. A kidney transplant recipient developed drug-resistant CMV colitis which was initially treated with valganciclovir, but his CMV was found to have major resistance to ganciclovir and cidofovir due to UL97 and UL54 mutations. The patient was switched to intravenous foscarnet 40 mg/kg given every twelve hours. However, foscarnet had to be discontinued after 4 days of treatment due to acute kidney injury. Patient was restarted on valganciclovir at a higher target dose of 1800 mg twice a day based on the creatinine clearance. CMV became undetectable 2 weeks after valganciclovir treatment was completed. High-dose valganciclovir along with immune suppression reduction may be a treatment option for CMV colitis with ganciclovir resistance due to dual UL97 and UL54 gene mutations.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Colite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/tratamento farmacológico , Ganciclovir/análogos & derivados , Proteínas Virais/genética , Adulto , Cidofovir , Colite/virologia , Citomegalovirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Citosina/administração & dosagem , Citosina/análogos & derivados , DNA Polimerase Dirigida por DNA/genética , Farmacorresistência Viral/genética , Foscarnet/administração & dosagem , Ganciclovir/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Mutação , Organofosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Fosfotransferases (Aceptor do Grupo Álcool)/genética , Valganciclovir , Proteínas Virais/efeitos dos fármacos
6.
Am J Transplant ; 6(10): 2396-402, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16869806

RESUMO

There are limited data on the results of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) in African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients. We examined short-term transplant outcomes in a retrospective, non-concurrent cohort study of 40 AAs who did not (ESW group), and 33 who did [steroid maintenance (SM) group] receive maintenance steroids after day 4 post-transplant. Patients received thymoglobulin (ATG) induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus or sirolimus. Data were analyzed using survival analysis methods and regression models. Patients in the ESW group were older, had lower current panel reactive antibody and fewer re-transplants, and received fewer doses of ATG. One-year graft survival and acute rejection (AR) rates were 100% and 13% in the ESW group and 97% and 15% in the SM group. After controlling for confounders, at 1 year, ESW was not associated with higher risk of graft loss, AR, or worse graft function, but was associated with less weight gain. The SM group had higher cholesterol levels at 3 months and higher risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. We did not observe any cases of subclinical rejection. This study suggests that ESW under modern immunosuppression is safe over the short term in at least a subset of AA recipients with risk profiles similar to those studied herein, and could be associated with improved outcomes.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Diabetes Mellitus/etnologia , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Biópsia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Aumento de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA