RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome may often mimic pain generated from other sources. However, it is most commonly caused by gluteus medius and gluteus minimus tendinopathy or tear. The purpose of this technical report was to: 1) describe the ultrasound-guided fascial plane block technique targeting the superior gluteal nerve in the plane between gluteus medius/gluteus minimus to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome; 2) anatomically correlate the procedure with cadaveric dissections demonstrating the structures being imaged and the tissues along the needle trajectory; 3) demonstrate the feasibility of the technique with serial dissection of one cadaveric specimen following injection with color dye. TECHNIQUE DESCRIPTION: The ultrasound-guided fascial plane block targeting the superior gluteal nerve to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome has been outlined with supporting ultrasound scans and anatomical dissections. The cadaveric dissections are correlated to the ultrasound scans of a healthy volunteer and provide visualization of the tissues in the needle trajectory. The feasibility study in a cadaveric specimen showed adequate stain of the superior gluteal nerve without spread to the piriformis muscle belly, the sciatic nerve, or the inferior gluteal nerve. CONCLUSIONS: This ultrasound-guided fascial plane block is a feasible option for blocking the superior gluteal nerve without inadvertent involvement of the sciatic and inferior gluteal nerves. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary to assess the clinical efficacy of the gluteus medius/gluteus minimus fascial plane block to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
Assuntos
Bursite , Humanos , Correlação de Dados , Dor , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , CadáverRESUMO
PURPOSE: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a rapidly expanding field within neuromodulation; however, there is limited data on therapeutic efficacy. This study describes the indications and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing PNS for chronic pain states. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of adults undergoing PNS implantation from 2004 to 2017 at an academic medical center. The primary outcomes were changes in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid utilization in oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME), and self-reported patient functioning at 6 months postoperatively. Infectious and device-related complications were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients underwent PNS implantation, including 59 patients that received a preceding PNS trial (59/78; 76% progression rate) and 13 that did not receive a PNS trial. The most common indication for stimulation was occipital neuralgia (47%) followed by lower-extremity neuropathies (17%). PNS implantation was associated with 6-month reductions in pain scores (7 [6, 8] baseline vs. 4 [2, 5] 6 months; P < 0.001) and opioid utilization (eg, median 60 [31, 104] vs. 18 [0, 52] MME among those with baseline opioid use; P < 0.001). Median functional improvement was 73% (50%, 88%). Seven patients (10%) suffered a postoperative surgical site infection at a median of 50 (30, 124) days, of which five devices were removed. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve stimulation was associated with reduced pain scores, lower opioid utilization, and improved patient function at 6 months. These data support PNS as a potentially effective nonopioid analgesic modality in chronic pain, though prospective multicenter evaluation is warranted to evaluate longer-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Neuralgia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Adulto , Humanos , Neuralgia/terapia , Nervos Periféricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are 2 common modalities used in management of various pain conditions. RFA generates heat and an electromagnetic field that can theoretically interfere with the functionality and longevity of the SCS device. This is problematic for patients who need RFA and have previously undergone implantation of an SCS device. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a case highlighting the safe use of bipolar RFA in a patient who had previously undergone implantation of a cervical SCS device. DISCUSSION: We also present device-specific industry guidelines and recommendations for performing RFA in patients following SCS device implantation.
Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Eletrodos Implantados , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in clinical applications for the treatment of musculoskeletal disease is steadily increasing in office-based practice. The so-called "first generation" of MSCs is defined as autologous stem cells that have undergone minimal manipulation and are used for a homologous purpose. Systematic reviews of the clinical trials completed to date of such MSCs enable practitioners to better understand what is currently known about the outcomes and side effects of such treatments. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of human clinical studies of office-based MSC therapy for the treatment of painful degenerative musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: A search of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was conducted from 2006 through September 2016. Seven hundred sixty-one records were identified from database searching, and two records from reference review of included papers. Studies with human subjects that evaluated treatment of musculoskeletal disease with minimally manipulated MSCs were included. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this review based on selection criteria. A total of 941 patients were included, 841 of whom received cellular products, and no significant adverse events were reported. Symptomatology generally improved, though no differences were seen over controls where present. CONCLUSION: Support in the literature is strongest for the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee pain, but applications of the use of BMAC and peripheral blood-derived MSCs for the treatment of hip pain, tendon pain, and disc pain have all been reported. Further research is required, with large randomized controlled trials.
Assuntos
Artralgia/terapia , Dor nas Costas/terapia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Osteoartrite do Quadril/terapia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Assistência Ambulatorial , Artralgia/etiologia , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Articulação do Quadril , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Articulação do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Quadril/complicações , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Medicina Regenerativa , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the frequency and clinical indications associated with implantation of single vs. dual percutaneous lead spinal cord stimulator (SCS) systems and to look further into how these leads are utilized for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing SCS implantation between January 2001 and December 2013 with a minimum of 2 years of clinical follow-up was performed. Number of trial leads and implanted leads was recorded. For patients with dual-lead systems, it was noted if and when the second lead was used, along with the clinical indication for lead activation. RESULTS: In the 259-patient cohort, 15.8% (n = 41) patients underwent placement of a single-lead system, 83.0% (n = 215) underwent placement of a dual-lead system, and 1.2% (n = 3) underwent placement of 3-lead systems. Placement of dual-lead systems was similar among all indication groups. Of those patients with a dual-lead system in place, 88.1% utilized both leads and average time to programming of the second lead was 2.3 months. The most common reason to activate the second lead was inadequate stimulation coverage. Five of the 41 patients with single-lead systems underwent an additional surgery to implant a second lead due to inadequate stimulation with 1 lead. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first descriptive analysis of the frequency of single- and dual-lead SCS systems. This report indicates that dual-lead systems are most often placed and both leads are required for optimal patient therapy.
Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados , Manejo da Dor/instrumentação , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/instrumentação , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation is an evidence-based treatment for a number of chronic pain conditions. While this therapy offers improvement in pain and function it is not without potential complications. These complications include device failure, migration, loss of therapeutic paresthesia, and infection. This article looked to establish a modern infection rate for spinal cord stimulators, assess the impact of known risk factors for surgical site infections and to determine the impact of certain preventative measures on the rate of infection. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a multisite, retrospective review was conducted on 2737 unique implants or revisions of SCS systems. Patient demographics, risk factors including diabetes, tobacco use, obesity, revision surgery, trial length, implant location, implant type, surgeon background, prophylactic antibiotic use, utilization of a occlusive dressing, and post-operative antibiotic use were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The overall infection rate was 2.45% (n = 67). Diabetes, tobacco use, and obesity did not independently increase the rate of infection. Revision surgeries had a trend toward higher infection rate; however, this did not meet statistical significance. There was no difference in the rate of infection between implants performed by physicians of different base specialties, cylinder leads vs. paddle leads, or between different prophylactic antibiotics. Implants performed at academic centers had a higher rate of infection when compared to implants performed in nonacademic settings. When patients received an occlusive dressing or post-operative antibiotics they had a lower rate of infection. CONCLUSIONS: The infection rate (2.45%) reported in this study is lower than the previously reported rates (3-6%) and are on par with other surgical specialties. This study did not show an increased rate of infection for patients that used tobacco, had diabetes or were obese. It's possible that given the low overall infection rate a larger study is needed to establish the true impact of these factors on infection. In addition, this study did not address the impact of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (elevated hemoglobin A1c) vs. well-controlled diabetes. It can be concluded from this study that utilizing an occlusive dressing over the incision in the post-operative period decreases the rate of infection and should become the standard of care. This study also demonstrated the positive impact of post-operative antibiotics in decreasing the rate of infection. Studies in other surgical specialties have not shown this impact which would suggest that further research is needed.
Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados/tendências , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/tendências , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/instrumentação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection is a potential complication of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation. Current understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of these infections is based largely on small clinical studies, many of which are outdated. Evidence-based guidelines for management of SCS-related infections thus rely instead on expert opinion, case reports, and case series. In this study, we aim to provide a large scale retrospective study of infection management techniques specifically for SCS implantation. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of SCS implants performed over a seven-year period at 11 unique academic and non-academic institutions in the United States. All infections and related complications in this cohort were analyzed. RESULTS: Within our study of 2737 SCS implant procedures, we identified all procedures complicated by infection (2.45%). Localized incisional pain and wound erythema were the most common presenting signs. Laboratory studies were performed in the majority of patients, but an imaging study was performed in less than half of these patients. The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus and the IPG pocket was the most common site of an SCS-related infection. Explantation was ultimately performed in 52 of the 67 patients (77.6%). Non-explantation salvage therapy was attempted in 24 patients and was successful in resolving the infection in 15 patients without removal of SCS hardware components. DISCUSSION: This study provides current data regarding SCS related infections, including incidence, diagnosis, and treatment.
Assuntos
Contaminação de Equipamentos , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/instrumentação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Próteses e Implantes/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are indicated for the management of multiple pain states with strong evidence. Recent guidelines recommend discontinuing aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the described procedures. The goal of this investigation is to assess the rate of bleeding and neurologic sequelae in patients undergoing SCS trials and implantation. METHODS: This is a retrospective review from 2005 through 2014 of all patients 18 years or older undergoing the following procedures: Percutaneous SCS implantations, SCS revisions, and SCS trials. Baseline characteristics, antiplatelet and anticoagulation medications, coagulation parameters, and procedural details were extracted. The primary outcome was the presence of a bleeding complication within 31 days of the procedure requiring emergency medicine, neurology, or neurosurgical evaluation. The neurological complication was independently categorized for its potential relationship to procedural bleeding, and periprocedural red blood cell transfusion requirements were analyzed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 642 percutaneous SCS procedures were performed on 421 unique patients, including 346 SCS trials, 255 SCS implantations, and 41 revision surgeries. Patients had received aspirin or NSAIDs within 7 days of needle placement for 101 procedures (15.7%). There were no bleeding or neurological complications identified in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of epidural hematoma is low, the development of bleeding complications following SCS lead placement can be devastating. In the present investigation, we identified no cases of epidural hematoma following percutaneous SCS lead placement, including more than 100 patients receiving aspirin or NSAIDs. Future investigations with larger numbers are needed to better define the relationships between periprocedural aspirin and NSAID utilization and bleeding complications.
Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/etiologia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Eletrodos Implantados/tendências , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/tendênciasRESUMO
[Purpose] Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) nerve and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been increasingly utilized in patients for perioperative analgesia. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided II/IH nerve or TAP blocks for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing open inguinal surgery. [Subjects and Methods] A systematic search was conducted of 7 databases from the inception to March 5, 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided vs. landmark-based techniques to perform II/IH nerve and TAP blocks in patients with open inguinal surgery were included. We constructed random effects models to pool the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes and the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomized outcomes. [Results] Ultrasound-guided II/IH nerve or TAP blocks were associated with a reduced use of intraoperative additional analgesia and a significant reduction of pain scores during day-stay. The use of rescue drugs was also significantly lower in the ultrasound-guided group. [Conclusion] The use of ultrasound-guidance to perform an II/IH nerve or a TAP block was associated with improved perioperative analgesia in patients following open inguinal surgery compared to landmark-based methods.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) often produces pain that is difficult to control. Celiac neurolysis (CN) is performed with the goal of improving pain control and quality of life while reducing opioid-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether CN provides a survival advantage for PC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Single tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with unresectable PC who underwent CN over a 12-year period. Each patient was matched to 2 control patients with unresectable PC. INTERVENTION: CN, which included both celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac ganglia neurolysis (CGN). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Median survival in Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients underwent CN and were compared with 840 controls with PC. Baseline characteristics were similar except the CN group had greater weight loss and pain requiring opioids. A mean of 16.6 ± 5.8 mL of alcohol was administered. For patients who underwent CN, the median survival from the time of presentation was shorter compared with controls (193 vs 246 days; hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.54). There was no difference in survival with unilateral or bilateral injection. However, EUS-guided CN was associated with longer survival compared with non-EUS approaches, and those who received CPN had longer survival compared with CGN. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CN is an independent predictor of shortened survival in PC patients. A prospective study is needed to verify the findings and determine whether shortened survival results from CN or from other features such as performance status and tumor-related characteristics. It is also imperative to verify our finding that EUS-guided CN provides a survival advantage over other approaches and whether CPN prolongs survival compared with CGN.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo , Plexo Celíaco , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Gânglios Simpáticos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration, given current hardware and surgical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent spinal cord stimulator implantation with percutaneous leads at our institution from 2008 through 2011. We determined the number of patients who required surgical revision for clinically significant lead migration. RESULTS: Clinically significant lead migration requiring surgical revision occurred in three of 143 patients (2.1%) with primary SCS system implants utilizing percutaneous-type leads. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of lead migration observed in our practice was considerably lower than previously published estimates of clinically significant lead migration or revision for lead migration (13%-22%). However, our study did not determine the reason for the decreased rate, which may be influenced by current hardware and implant techniques.
Assuntos
Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapiaRESUMO
Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) are used to treat resistant pain states as well as intractable spasticity via medication delivery into the spinal fluid. Risks associated with implantation of these devices include infection, bleeding, intrathecal granuloma formation, and neurologic sequelae similar to other neuraxial procedures. Intrathecal catheter placement creates the additional risk of persistent spinal fluid leak, which can lead to postdural puncture headaches as well as seroma formation and may require subsequent surgical exploration or explantation. This retrospective case series examines 3 patients at a single institution with persistent spinal fluid leak after IDDS placement (and explantation in one case) resulting in headache and/or seroma formation that were treated with epidural fibrin glue. Three patients underwent IDDS implantation with baclofen for spasticity. In 1 patient, a cerebral spinal fluid leak developed at 1-week postoperatively. After several unsuccessful epidural blood patches and surgical exploration with a catheter revision, she was ultimately treated successfully with a fibrin glue patch. The second patient received an IDDS and did well until a seroma developed 1 year later. He was likewise treated with an epidural fibrin glue patch after 2 failed blood patches. In a third patient, a spinal fluid leak developed after explantation of an IDDS and was treated with an epidural fibrin glue patch as initial therapy.
Assuntos
Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/terapia , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Infusão Espinal/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Baclofeno/administração & dosagem , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/patologia , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relaxantes Musculares Centrais/administração & dosagem , Espasticidade Muscular/patologia , Espasticidade Muscular/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seroma/etiologia , Seroma/patologia , Seroma/terapiaRESUMO
Introduction: Cervical facet arthritis is a significant source of neck pain and impaired function that is amenable to treatment with medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN). Identifying appropriate patients for this treatment requires integration of information from the history, physical exam and diagnostic imaging, but the current diagnostic standard for facet-mediated pain is positive comparative medial branch blockade (MBB). SPECT-CT has recently been evaluated as a potential predictor of positive medial branch blocks with mixed results. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to determine if a relationship exists between increased uptake on SPECT-CT of a given cervical facet joint and a positive MBB. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients undergoing cervical MBB within 12 months after having a cervical SPECT-CT. Each procedure was categorized as either Concordant (all facet joints demonstrating increased 99mTc uptake on SPECT-CT were blocked) or Discordant (at least one facet joint demonstrating increased 99mTc uptake on SPECT-CT was not blocked or block was performed in a patient that had no increased uptake on SPECT-CT). Statistical analysis was performed to determine if concordance between facet joints demonstrating increased uptake on SPECT-CT and those undergoing MBB was associated with a positive block using cutoffs of 50% and 80% pain relief. Results: A total of 43 procedures were analyzed (25% Concordant, 75% Discordant) and both groups demonstrated improvement in pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. No significant association between concordance and positive MBB was identified at thresholds of 50% (p = .481) and 80% (p = 1.000) pain relief. Conclusion: SPECT-CT findings do not accurately predict positive cervical MBB but may provide valuable information that can be considered with other factors when deciding which joints to treat.
RESUMO
Introduction: Lumbar facet arthritis is a significant source of back pain and impaired function that is amenable to treatment with medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN). Identifying appropriate patients for this treatment requires integration of information from the history, physical exam, and diagnostic imaging, but the current diagnostic standard for facet-mediated pain is positive comparative medial branch blocks (MBBs). Lumbar SPECT-CT has recently been evaluated as a potential predictor of positive MBBs with mixed results. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to determine if the level of concordance between SPECT-CT uptake and facet joints targeted with MBB was associated with a positive block. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients undergoing lumbar MBB within 12 months after having a lumbar SPECT-CT. Each procedure was classified into one of four categories based on the level of concordance between facet joints demonstrating increased 99mTc uptake on SPECT-CT and those being blocked: 1) Complete Concordance (all joints demonstrating increased uptake were blocked and no additional joints blocked); 2) Partial Concordance (all joints demonstrating increased uptake were blocked, with at least one joint not demonstrating increased uptake blocked); 3) Partial Discordance (at least one but not all joints demonstrating increased uptake were blocked); 4) Complete Discordance (all blocks performed at joints not demonstrating increased uptake). Statistical analysis was performed to determine if the level of concordance between increased uptake on SPECT-CT and joints undergoing MBB was associated with a positive block using cutoffs of 50 % and 80 % pain relief. Results: A total of 180 procedures were analyzed (23 % Complete Concordance, 22 % Partial Concordance, 31 % Partial Discordance, 24 % Complete Discordance) and all groups demonstrated improvement in pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. There was no significant association between level of concordance and having a positive block using thresholds of 50 % pain relief, χ 2(3, N = 180) = 4.880, p = .181; or 80 % pain relief, χ 2(3, N = 180) = 1.272, p = .736. Conclusion: SPECT-CT findings do not accurately predict positive lumbar MBB but may provide valuable information that can be considered with other factors when deciding which joints to treat.
RESUMO
International concerns for another pandemic arose after emerging reports of an ongoing outbreak of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) in Europe and the United States in 2022. Severe pain is one of the most distressing complications for patients in the current outbreak, but there is a general paucity of relevant peer-reviewed medical literature from which to draw clear recommendations on appropriate pain therapies. The Centers for Disease Control recently published a letter in July 2022 urging providers to conduct further studies concerning pain management. Thus, a rapid literature search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of several databases from inception until August 19, 2022, was conducted. All published studies describing pain in patients who tested positive for MPXV with original data and written in English were included. Sixty-nine studies were initially identified for screening. After initial screening, 27 papers were considered for full-text review, and 15 papers met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1043 positive cases were included in this study. Most patients were men. Treatment options proposed by the authors include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, opioids, lidocaine gel, metamizole, and rectal suppositories containing emollients or steroids with oral laxatives for severe anal pain. Although most cases were mild requiring outpatient treatment, a considerable number of patients were admitted due to serious complications. Severe pain was often the reason to seek medical attention and hospital admission for pain control. Analgesic plans included oral and topical analgesia. In severe cases, pain was managed with opioids. To our knowledge, this rapid review is the first study to comprehensively summarize proposed treatments for pain associated with MPXV. Guidelines may be needed to help direct the best management to avoid morbidity in patients, particularly as adjuvants may play a key role but are not commonly utilized in published reports.
RESUMO
During the last two decades, with the advent of recent technology, peripheral nerve stimulation has become an appealing modality at the forefront of pain management. In this case series, we document the clinical rationale and technical considerations on three of the most challenging cases, refractory to previous interventions, that were treated by our team with an ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulator targeting the musculocutaneous, bilateral greater occipital and subcostal nerves. At the 6-month follow-up, all patients experienced greater than 50% relief of baseline pain, with a near-complete resolution of pain exacerbations. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first report of an ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique of a peripheral nerve stimulator targeting the musculocutaneous and subcostal nerves.
Peripheral nerve stimulation is a new tool used in the treatment of peripheral nerve pain. In this study, we share our experience using this technology in three unusual, difficult-to-treat chronic nerve pain presentations, targeting the musculocutaneous, bilateral greater occipital and subcostal nerves. All patients were asked about how pain levels had changed since the peripheral nerve stimulation device had been implanted. In every case, patients reported a decline in their pain level from day one. After 6 months of peripheral nerve stimulator use, all patients reported a greater than 50% pain relief.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Neuralgia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Humanos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Neuralgia/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuralgia/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Nervos Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the last decades, platelet-rich plasma has been studied for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, in addition to being employed in the enhancement of healing after tissue injury. OBJECTIVE: To establish a framework for future research regarding the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic tissue injuries. METHODS: Preclinical and clinical studies from 2000-2020 relevant to applications of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic pain conditions were extracted from PubMed and Medline databases. The studies were analyzed on the basis of the study population, type of intervention, method of platelet-rich plasma preparation, the number of treatments administered, the timeframe of injections, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Although several preclinical studies and double-blind, randomized trials have shown promising results in the application of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, various studies have also reported controversial results. Additionally, the methods employed for obtaining the platelet-rich plasma have not been standardized between studies, resulting in different concentrations of blood components between the preparations utilized. Moreover, differences between studies were also found regarding the number of injections administered per treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future research addressing the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic pain conditions should focus on shedding light on the following major questions: a) Is there a dose-effect relation between the platelet count and the clinical efficacy of the preparation?; b) What pathology determinants should be considered when selecting between leukocyte-enriched and leukocyte-depleted concentrates?; c) What is the role of platelet activation methods on the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; d) Is there an optimal number of injections and time frame for application of multiple injection treatment cycles?; e) Does the addition of local anesthetics affect the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; and f) Is there potential for future platelet-rich plasma applications for the treatment of neuropathic pain of peripheral origin?
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Neuralgia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Dor Crônica/terapia , Humanos , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas/fisiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologiaRESUMO
This article describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK) to diagnose an entrapment neuropathy of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient presenting with chronic neuropathic pain in the medial posterior compartment of the left knee, with a previous electromyography showing no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve neuropathy. After a positive sciatic nerve block, the patient was evaluated for a TN block, cancelled due to the presence of an abnormal leash of vessels wrapping around the nerve. For this reason, the patient was submitted to a diagnostic IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa was the most likely source of the symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN nerve at the popliteal fossa, the patient's symptoms decreased substantially.
Lay abstract This case report describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK), a technique in which local anesthetic is injected between the popliteal artery and the back side of the knee joint, to diagnose a compression of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient with chronic knee pain. A female adult patient presented for further evaluation of chronic pain in the inner side of the back of her left knee. A previous electromyography showed no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve disease. After a positive diagnostic block of the left sciatic nerve, the patient was evaluated for a left TN block, so as to ascertain whether a compression of this nerve at the back side of the knee could be the origin of the patient's symptoms. During the ultrasound scanning of the TN, a group of abnormal vessels was found wrapping around the nerve, which made it impossible to inject the TN in a safe manner, even with the guidance of ultrasound. For this reason, the patient was instead submitted to a diagnostic left IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the region behind the knee joint, was the most likely source of the patient's symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the patient's symptoms decreased substantially.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
Aim: This case report documents the use of peripheral nerve stimulation in the setting of entrapment of the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves, with pain rated by the patient as severe during exacerbation episodes. Materials & methods: Under ultrasound guidance, two permanent leads were implanted caudad to cephalad, along and superficial to the lateral aspect of the rectus abdominis, distal to the umbilicus (1 lead per side). Results: At the 6 month follow-up, the patient reported near complete resolution of baseline pain, as well as fewer, sporadic pain exacerbation episodes, rated as mild-to-moderate. Conclusion: This case report suggests that peripheral nerve stimulation might be a valuable treatment option for previously intractable abdominal pain due to entrapment of the anterior cutaneous branches.
Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is a peculiar, a largely disregarded pain condition. Current management algorithms rely mostly on local injections followed by surgical anterior neurectomy. This case report presents a case of longstanding, anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, unresponsive to first-line treatment, that was successfully treated with peripheral nerve stimulation technology targeting the anterior cutaneous branches.