Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 392, 2024 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985346

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to prospectively evaluate the impact of previously failed SWL on subsequent URS outcomes in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2021 and May 2023, one hundred thirty-six patients with proximal ureteral stones < 1.5 cm and renal stones < 2.5 cm who were candidates for URS were prospectively assigned to a non-SWL group, which included patients without a history of failed SWL before URS, and a post-SWL group, which included patients with a history of failed SWL before URS. The success rate was the primary outcome. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The stone-free rate was 83.3% in the post-SWL group versus 81.3% in the non-SWL group, and 8.3% in the post-SWL group versus 9.4% in the non-SWL group had clinically insignificant residual fragments. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate or success rate between the groups. No significant differences in intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative time, intraoperative stone appearance, perioperative complications, or the presence of embedded fragments in the ureteral mucosa were detected between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with patients who underwent primary URS, patients who underwent salvage URS for upper urinary tract stones had similar stone-free rates, success rates, operative times, fluoroscopy times, and complication rates without any significant differences.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Litotripsia , Falha de Tratamento , Cálculos Ureterais , Ureteroscopia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Litotripsia/métodos , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso
2.
Prostate ; 79(11): 1221-1225, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31189024

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine the factors predicting the outcome of intraprostatic injection of Botulinum Toxin-A (BTX-A) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-induced lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Between September 2016 and May 2018, 45 Egyptian patients, with BPH-induced LUTS were included; the indication was a failure of medical treatment, unfit, or refusing surgical intervention. Measurements of prostate size by TRUS, total PSA level before and 12 weeks after injection. IPSS, uroflow, and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) were measured before injection, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks postinjection. 100 U BTX-A vial was diluted with 10 mL of saline then injected into the transition zone at base and midzone of the prostate by TRUS. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 64.4 ± 6.6 years. Mean baseline IPSS 24.06 decreased to 18.75 at 2 weeks and progressively decreased to 16.37 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001), Q max of 9.08 mL/s. increased to 10.44 at 2 weeks and 11.44 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001), mean prostate volume was 67.44cc; decreased to 66.06cc (P < 0.001) at 12 weeks and mean residual urine was 82.62 mL and decreased to 57.66 mL at 12 weeks. DISCUSSION: Intraprostatic injection of BTX-A as modality treatment of LUTS/BPH significantly improve IPSS, Q max , PVR, and decrease prostate volume. We can suspect better results with this line of treatment in patients with IPSS ≤ 22 and Q max ≤ 10 mL/min and prostate volume ≤ 56.5cc.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Próstata/efeitos dos fármacos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Agentes Urológicos/administração & dosagem
3.
Urol Ann ; 16(1): 104-107, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415230

RESUMO

Objective: The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m2 were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1st 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded. Results: Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1st session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2nd session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2). Conclusions: SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA