Perceived economic burden associated with an inherited cardiac condition: a qualitative inquiry with families affected by arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

PURPOSE: Significant gaps remain in the literature on the economic burden of genetic illness. We explored perceived economic burden associated with one inherited cardiac condition, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were held with individuals from families affected by ARVC. Data on the perceived financial and economic impacts of ARVC were used to identify emerging categories and themes using the method of constant comparison. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed four themes that described participants' perceptions of the economic impact ARVC had on them and their families: (i) economic impact during childhood, (ii) impact on current and future employment, (iii) impact on current and future financial well-being, and (iv) no perceived economic impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to explore the economic burden of ARVC from the perspective of affected families. It revealed a number of perceived burdens, from employment and career choices to worry about insurance for self and children, decreased household spending, and the need for childhood employment. Findings highlight potential areas of discussion for genetic counseling sessions, as well as areas for future research.Genet Med 18 6, 584-592.

A mixed-methods systematic review protocol to examine the use of physical restraint with critically ill adults and strategies for minimizing their use.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients frequently experience severe agitation placing them at risk of harm. Physical restraint is common in intensive care units (ICUs) for clinician concerns about safety. However, physical restraint may not prevent medical device removal and has been associated with negative physical and psychological consequences. While professional society guidelines, legislation, and accreditation standards recommend physical restraint minimization, guidelines for critically ill patients are over a decade old, with recommendations that are non-specific. Our systematic review will synthesize evidence on physical restraint in critically ill adults with the primary objective of identifying effective minimization strategies. METHODS: Two authors will independently search from inception to July 2016 the following: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, Joanna Briggs Institute, grey literature, professional society websites, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We will include quantitative and qualitative study designs, clinical practice guidelines, policy documents, and professional society recommendations relevant to physical restraint of critically ill adults. Authors will independently perform data extraction in duplicate and complete risk of bias and quality assessment using recommended tools. We will assess evidence quality for quantitative studies using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and for qualitative studies using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) guidelines. Outcomes of interest include (1) efficacy/effectiveness of physical restraint minimization strategies; (2) adverse events (unintentional device removal, psychological impact, physical injury) and associated benefits including harm prevention; (3) ICU outcomes (ventilation duration, length of stay, and mortality); (4) prevalence, incidence, patterns of use including patient and treatment characteristics and chemical restraint; (5) barriers and facilitators to minimization; (6) patient, family, and healthcare professional perspectives; (7) professional society-endorsed recommendations; and (8) evidence gaps and research priorities. DISCUSSION: We will use our systematic review findings to produce updated guidelines on physical restraint use for critically ill adults and to develop a professional society-endorsed position statement. This will foster patient and clinician safety by providing clinicians, administrators, and policy makers with a tool to promote minimal and safe use of physical restraint for critically ill adults. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015027860.