Ethical issues encountered by French intensive care unit caregivers during the first COVID-19 outbreak.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the ethical issues encountered by health care workers during the first COVID-19 outbreak in French intensive care units (ICUs), and the factors associated with their emergence. METHODS: This descriptive multicentre survey study was conducted by distributing a questionnaire to 26 French ICUs, from 1 June to 1 October 2020. Physicians, residents, nurses, and orderlies who worked in an ICU during the first COVID-19 outbreak were included. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to identify the factors associated with ethical issues. RESULTS: Among the 4,670 questionnaires sent out, 1,188 responses were received, giving a participation rate of 25.4%. Overall, 953 participants (80.2%) reported experiencing issue(s) while caring for patients during the first COVID-19 outbreak. The most common issues encountered concerned the restriction of family visits in the ICU (91.7%) and the risk of contamination for health care workers (72.3%). Nurses and orderlies faced this latter issue more than physicians (adjusted odds ratio [ORa], 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87 to 4.76; P < 0.001 and ORa, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.08 to 9.12; P < 0.001, respectively). They also faced more the issue "act contrary to the patient's advance directives" (ORa, 4.59; 95% CI, 1.74 to 12.08; P < 0.01 and ORa, 10.65; 95% CI, 3.71 to 30.60; P < 0.001, respectively). A total of 1,132 (86.9%) respondents thought that ethics training should be better integrated into the initial training of health care workers. CONCLUSION: Eight out of ten responding French ICU health care workers experienced ethical issues during the first COVID-19 outbreak. Identifying these issues is a first step towards anticipating and managing such issues, particularly in the context of potential future health crises.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Notre objectif était de décrire les enjeux éthiques rencontrés par les personnels de santé lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19 dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI) françaises, ainsi que les facteurs associés à leur apparition. MéTHODE: Cette enquête multicentrique descriptive a été réalisée en distribuant un questionnaire à 26 unités de soins intensifs françaises, du 1er juin au 1er octobre 2020. Les médecins, les internes, le personnel infirmier et les aides-soignant·es qui travaillaient dans une unité de soins intensifs pendant la première éclosion de COVID-19 ont été inclus·es. Des modèles de régression logistique multiple ont été réalisés pour identifier les facteurs associés aux questions éthiques. RéSULTATS: Parmi les 4670 questionnaires envoyés, 1188 réponses ont été reçues, soit un taux de participation de 25,4 %. Dans l'ensemble, 953 personnes participantes (80,2 %) ont déclaré avoir éprouvé un ou des problèmes alors qu'elles s'occupaient de patient·es lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19. Les problèmatiques les plus fréquemment rencontrées concernaient la restriction des visites des familles dans les USI (91,7 %) et le risque de contamination pour les personnels de la santé (72,3 %). Le personnel infirmier et les aides-soignant·es étaient davantage confronté·es à ce dernier problème que les médecins (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCa], 2,98; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,87 à 4,76; P < 0,001 et RCa, 4.35; IC 95 %, 2,08 à 9,12; P < 0,001, respectivement), tout comme ils étaient davantage confrontées à la question d'« agir contrairement aux directives médicales anticipées du/de la patient·e ¼ (RCa, 4,59; IC 95 %, 1,74 à 12,08; P < 0,01 et RCa, 10,65; IC 95 %, 3,71 à 30,60; P < 0,001, respectivement). Au total, 1132 répondant·es (86,9 %) estimaient que la formation en éthique devrait être mieux intégrée à la formation initiale des personnels de santé. CONCLUSION: Huit travailleuses et travailleurs de santé français·es des soins intensifs sur dix ont été confronté·es à des problèmes éthiques lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19. L'identification de ces enjeux est une première étape vers leur anticipation et leur gestion, en particulier dans le contexte d'éventuelles crises sanitaires futures.

Assessing physicians' and nurses' experience of dying and death in the ICU: development of the CAESAR-P and the CAESAR-N instruments.

BACKGROUND: As an increasing number of deaths occur in the intensive care unit (ICU), studies have sought to describe, understand, and improve end-of-life care in this setting. Most of these studies are centered on the patient's and/or the relatives' experience. Our study aimed to develop an instrument designed to assess the experience of physicians and nurses of patients who died in the ICU, using a mixed methodology and validated in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: Physicians and nurses of patients who died in 41 ICUs completed the job strain and the CAESAR questionnaire within 24 h after the death. The psychometric validation was conducted using two datasets: a learning and a reliability cohort. RESULTS: Among the 475 patients included in the main cohort, 398 nurse and 417 physician scores were analyzed. The global score was high for both nurses [62/75 (59; 66)] and physicians [64/75 (61; 68)]. Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Nurse scores were absence of conflict with physicians, pain control handled with physicians, death disclosed to the family at the bedside, and invasive care not performed. As assessed by the job strain instrument, low decision control was associated with lower CAESAR score (61 (58; 65) versus 63 (60; 67), p = 0.002). Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Physician scores were room dedicated to family information, information delivered together by nurse and physician, families systematically informed of the EOL decision, involvement of the nurse during implementation of the EOL decision, and open visitation. They were also higher when a decision to withdraw or withhold treatment was made, no cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and the death was disclosed to the family at the bedside. CONCLUSION: We described and validated a new instrument for assessing the experience of physicians and nurses involved in EOL in the ICU. This study shows important areas for improving practices.

Complicated grief after death of a relative in the intensive care unit.

An increased proportion of deaths occur in the intensive care unit (ICU). We performed this prospective study in 41 ICUs to determine the prevalence and determinants of complicated grief after death of a loved one in the ICU. Relatives of 475 adult patients were followed up. Complicated grief was assessed at 6 and 12 months using the Inventory of Complicated Grief (cut-off score >25). Relatives also completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 3 months, and the Revised Impact of Event Scale for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months. We used a mixed multivariate logistic regression model to identify determinants of complicated grief after 6 months. Among the 475 patients, 282 (59.4%) had a relative evaluated at 6 months. Complicated grief symptoms were identified in 147 (52%) relatives. Independent determinants of complicated grief symptoms were either not amenable to changes (relative of female sex, relative living alone and intensivist board certification before 2009) or potential targets for improvements (refusal of treatment by the patient, patient died while intubated, relatives present at the time of death, relatives did not say goodbye to the patient, and poor communication between physicians and relatives). End-of-life practices, communication and loneliness in bereaved relatives may be amenable to improvements.

Changing use of noninvasive ventilation in critically ill patients: trends over 15 years in francophone countries.

PURPOSE: Over the last two decades, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been proposed in various causes of acute respiratory failure (ARF) but some indications are debated. Current trends in NIV use are unknown. METHODS: Comparison of three multicenter prospective audits including all patients receiving mechanical ventilation and conducted in 1997, 2002, and 2011 in francophone countries. RESULTS: Among the 4132 patients enrolled, 2094 (51%) required ventilatory support for ARF and 2038 (49 %) for non-respiratory conditions. Overall NIV use was markedly increased in 2010/11 compared to 1997 and 2002 (37% of mechanically ventilated patients vs. 16% and 28%, P < 0.05). In 2010/11, the use of first-line NIV for ARF had reached a plateau (24% vs. 16% and 23%, P < 0.05) whereas pre-ICU and post-extubation NIV had substantially increased (11% vs. 4% and 11% vs. 7%, respectively, P < 0.05). First-line NIV remained stable in acute-on-chronic RF, continued to increase in cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but decreased in de novo ARF (16% in 2010/11 vs. 23% in 2002, P < 0.05). The NIV success rate increased from 56% in 2002 to 70% in 2010/11 and remained the lowest in de novo ARF. NIV failure in de novo ARF was associated with increased mortality in 2002 but not in 2010/11. Mortality decreased over time, and overall, NIV use was associated with a lower mortality. CONCLUSION: Increases in NIV use and success rate, an overall decrease in mortality, and a decrease of the adverse impact NIV failure has in de novo ARF suggest better patient selection and greater proficiency of staff in administering NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01449331.

CAESAR: a new tool to assess relatives' experience of dying and death in the ICU.

PURPOSE: To develop an instrument designed specifically to assess the experience of relatives of patients who die in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The instrument was developed using a mixed methodology and validated in a prospective multicentre study. Relatives of patients who died in 41 ICUs completed the questionnaire by telephone 21 days after the death, then completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Inventory of Complicated Grief after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 600 relatives were included, 475 in the main cohort and 125 in the reliability cohort. The 15-item questionnaire, named CAESAR, covered the patient's preferences and values, interactions with/around the patient and family satisfaction. We defined three groups based on CAESAR score tertiles: lowest (≤59, n = 107, 25.9 %), middle (n = 185, 44.8 %) and highest (≥69, n = 121, 29.3 %). Factorial analysis showed a single dimension. Cronbach's alpha in the main and reliability cohorts was 0.88 (0.85-0.90) and 0.85 (0.79-0.89), respectively. Compared to a high CAESAR score, a low CAESAR score was associated with greater risks of anxiety and depression at 3 months [1.29 (1.13-1.46), p = 0.001], post-traumatic stress-related symptoms at 3 [1.34 (1.17-1.53), p < 0.001], 6 [OR = 1.24 (1.06-1.44), p = 0.008] and 12 [OR = 1.26 (1.06-1.50), p = 0.01] months and complicated grief at 6 [OR = 1.40 (1.20-1.63), p < 0.001] and 12 months [OR = 1.27 (1.06-1.52), p = 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: The CAESAR score 21 days after death in the ICU is strongly associated with post-ICU burden in the bereaved relatives. The CAESAR score should prove a useful primary endpoint in trials of interventions to improve relatives' well-being.

ICU physicians' and nurses' perceptions of terminal extubation and terminal weaning: a self-questionnaire study.

PURPOSE: Terminal extubation (TE) and terminal weaning (TW) are the methods available for withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Perceptions of TE and TW by intensive care unit (ICU) staff may influence bedside practices and the feasibility of studies comparing these methods. METHODS: From January to June 2013, 5 nurses and 5 physicians in each of 46 (out of 70, 65.7 %) French ICUs completed an anonymous self-questionnaire. Clusters of staff members defined by perceptions of TE and TW were identified by exploratory analysis. Denominators for computing percentages were total numbers of responses to each item; cases with missing data were excluded for the relevant item. RESULTS: Of the 451 (98 %) participants (225 nurses and 226 physicians), 37 (8.4 %) had never or almost never performed TW and 138 (31.3 %) had never or almost never performed TE. A moral difference between TW and TE was perceived by 205 (45.8 %) participants. The exploratory analysis identified three clusters defined by personal beliefs about TW and TE: 21.2 % of participants preferred TW, 18.1 % preferred TE, and 60.7 % had no preference. A preference for TW seemed chiefly related to unfavorable perceptions or insufficient knowledge of TE. Staff members who preferred TE and those with no preference perceived TE as providing a more natural dying process with less ambiguity. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-fifths of ICU nurses and physicians in participating ICUs preferred TW or TE. This finding suggests both a need for shared decision-making and training before performing TE or TW and a high risk of poor compliance with randomly allocated TW or TE.

Liver Trauma in the Kitchen: Preparing Whipped Cream with a Siphon Is Not without Risk.

We report the case of a 36-year-old woman suffering from liver injury caused by the malfunction of a whipped cream siphon. When this patient handled the whipped cream siphon, the screwed metallic upper part of the siphon was suddenly dissociated from its base and came violently striking her right hypochondrium. At first, the severity of injury was underestimated. Subsequently, due to the persistence of pain experienced by the patient, an abdominal CT scan was performed. It highlighted a severe liver injury with rupture of a branch of the hepatic artery. The evolution was favorable after completion of an embolization and a secondary capsular rupture.

End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?

BACKGROUND: Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti's law) regarding patients' rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review end of life issues, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) surveyed their members (doctors and paramedics) about various aspects of end of life in the ICU. METHODS: SRLF members were invited to respond to a questionnaire, sent by Email, designed to assess their knowledge of Leonetti's law and to determine how many caregivers would agree with the authorization of lethal drug administration in selected end of life situations. RESULTS: Questionnaires returned by 616 (23%) of 2,700 members were analyzed. Most members (82.5%) reported that they had a good knowledge of Leonetti's law, which most (88%) said they have often applied. One third of respondents had received 'assisted death' requests from patients and more than 50% from patients' relatives. One quarter of respondents had experienced the wish to give lethal drugs to end of life patients. Assuming that palliative care in the ICU is well-managed, 25.7% of the respondents would approve a law authorizing euthanasia, while 26.5% would not. Answers were influenced by the fear of a possible risk of abuse. Doctors and nurses answered differently. CONCLUSION: ICU caregivers appear to be well acquainted with Leonetti's law. Nevertheless, in selected clinical situations with suitable palliative care, one quarter of respondents were in favor of a law authorizing administration of lethal drugs to patients.

Effectiveness of SAPS III to predict hospital mortality for post-cardiac arrest patients.

PURPOSE: The mortality for patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac arrest (CA) remains high despite advances in resuscitation and post-resuscitation care. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III is the only score that can predict hospital mortality within an hour of admission to ICU. The objective was to evaluate the performance of SAPS III to predict mortality for post-CA patients. METHODS: This retrospective single-center observational study included all patients admitted to ICU after CA between August 2010 and March 2013. The calibration (standardized mortality ratio [SMR]) and the discrimination of SAPS III (area under the curve [AUC] for receiver operating characteristic [ROC]) were measured. Univariate logistic regression tested the relationship between death and scores for SAPS III, SAPS II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA) score. Independent factors associated with mortality were determined. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-four patients including 97 out-of-hospital CA were included. In-hospital mortality was 69%. The SAPS III was unable to predict mortality (SMRSAPS III: 1.26) and was less discriminating than other scores (AUCSAPSIII: 0.62 [0.51, 0.73] vs. AUCSAPSII: 0.75 [0.66, 0.84], AUCSOFA: 0.72 [0.63, 0.81], AUCOHCA: 0.84 [0.77, 0.91]). An early return of spontaneous circulation, early resuscitation care and initial ventricular arrhythmia were associated with a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS III did not predict mortality in patients admitted to ICU after CA. The amount of time before specialized CPR, the low-flow interval and the absence of an initial ventricular arrhythmia appeared to be independently associated with mortality and these factors should be used to predict mortality for these patients.