Editorial Commentary: Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation May Be Superior to Reconstruction for Proximal or Distal Tears With Good- Quality Tissue.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in the elbow have been rising in recent years, most specifically in baseball players. Although many of these tears occur in professional (minor and major league) baseball pitchers, there has been a dramatic rise in UCL injuries in adolescents, at a rate of 9% per year. Although some UCL tears can be treated conservatively, those that fail conservative treatment often require surgical intervention to allow players to return to sport. Although UCL reconstruction has been the gold standard in surgical treatment for many years, UCL repair with suture augmentation has grown in popularity. Initial results of UCL repair with suture augmentation have been promising, and a recent review comparing UCL repair with suture augmentation from both a biomechanical and clinical outcome perspective confirms that UCL repair may be superior to reconstruction for patients with proximal or distal tears and good quality UCL tissue for repair.

Posterior Shoulder Instability, Part II-Glenoid Bone Grafting, Glenoid Osteotomy, and Rehabilitation/Return to Play-An International Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: To establish consensus statements on glenoid bone grafting, glenoid osteotomy, rehabilitation, return to play, and follow-up for posterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A consensus process on the treatment of posterior shoulder instability was conducted, with 71 shoulder/sports surgeons from 12 countries participating on the basis of their level of expertise in the field. Experts were assigned to 1 of 6 working groups defined by specific subtopics within posterior shoulder instability. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement. RESULTS: All of the statements relating to rehabilitation, return to play, and follow-up achieved consensus. There was unanimous consensus that the following criteria should be considered: restoration of strength, range of motion, proprioception, and sport-specific skills, with a lack of symptoms. There is no minimum time point required to return to play. Collision athletes and military athletes may take longer to return because of their greater risk for recurrent instability, and more caution should be exercised in clearing them to return to play, with elite athletes potentially having different considerations in returning to play. The relative indications for revision surgery are symptomatic apprehension, multiple recurrent instability episodes, further intra-articular pathologies, hardware failure, and pain. CONCLUSIONS: The study group achieved strong or unanimous consensus on 59% of statements. Unanimous consensus was reached regarding the criteria for return to play, collision/elite athletes having different considerations in return to play, indications for revision surgery, and imaging only required as routine for those with glenoid bone grafting/osteotomies at subsequent follow-ups. There was no consensus on optimal fixation method for a glenoid bone block, the relative indications for glenoid osteotomy, whether fluoroscopy is required or if the labrum should be concomitantly repaired. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears in 2023: Evaluation and Management.

The ulnar collateral ligament, also called the medial collateral ligament of the elbow, is the primary stabilizer against valgus loads. This ligament can be traumatically torn, such as in an elbow dislocation, or can tear through attritional damage with overhead sports. Although baseball pitching is the most common contributor, these injuries also occur with volleyball, gymnastics, and javelin throwing. Patients most commonly report a history of medial elbow pain with associated loss of command, control, and throw velocity. The ulnar nerve lies directly superficial to the posterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament and ulnar neuritis is commonly associated with ulnar collateral ligament pathology. Nonsurgical treatment, including rest from activity, flexor-pronator strengthening, and possible platelet-rich plasma injections, can be considered for partial-thickness tears. Surgical treatment can be considered for patients in whom nonsurgical treatment fails and full-thickness tears. Historically, surgical treatment involved reconstruction of the ligament with a tendon graft. Ipsilateral palmaris longus autograft has been the most commonly used graft, but contralateral palmaris, autograft hamstring tendons, and allograft tendon have also been used. This procedure has a high rate of return to play and a low complication rate, but most athletes require 12 to 18 months to fully return. More recently, repair of the ligament, with the addition of a biologic ingrowth ligament augmentation suture, has demonstrated similarly high rates of return to play and low complication rates, with a full return to play in 6 months.

Similar return to sport between double cortical button and docking techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball players.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: A double cortical button technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has advantages including significant control over graft tensioning, less concern about graft length, and minimized risk of bone tunnel fracture compared with traditional UCLR techniques. This double cortical button technique was recently found to be noninferior in mechanical performance to the traditional docking technique regarding joint strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain. However, clinical outcomes have not been compared between these UCLR techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether baseball players who underwent UCLR with a double cortical button (double button) technique have similar return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes to baseball players who underwent UCLR with the traditional docking (docking) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseball players who underwent primary UCLR from 2011 to 2020 across 2 institutions were identified. Included patients were contacted to complete a follow-up survey evaluating reoperations, RTS, and functional outcome scores. Functional outcome surveys include the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, the Conway-Jobe score, the Andrews-Timmerman elbow score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. RESULTS: Overall, 78 male baseball players (age: 18.9 ± 2.4 years) with an average follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.4 years were evaluated, with 73 of the players being baseball pitchers. Players in the double button group more frequently received palmaris longus autografts (78% vs. 30%) and less frequently received gracilis autografts (22% vs. 58%) compared with players in the docking group (P = .001); however, all other demographic factors were similar between the groups. All players in the double button group were able to RTS in 11.1 ± 2.6 months, whereas 96% of players in the docking group were able to RTS in 13.5 ± 3.4 months (P > .05). All postoperative outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were statistically similar between the groups and remained similar after isolating pitchers only and after separating partial-thickness from full-thickness UCL tears (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: RTS and other postoperative outcomes may be similar between baseball players who underwent UCLR with the double button technique and the docking technique. Although future research may be necessary to strengthen clinical recommendations, these findings provide the first clinical outcomes in light of a recent cadaveric study finding similar elbow strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain compared with the docking technique.

Analysis of reasons for failure to return to sport after Latarjet surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to identify Shoulder Instability Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) scores in athletes who underwent open Latarjet surgery, determine the reasons why athletes failed to return to play (RTP) after Latarjet surgery, and compare SIRSI scores of those who did vs. did not RTP. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, the PubMed, SportDiscus, and Ovid MEDLINE databases were queried to identify studies evaluating return to sport after Latarjet surgery. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Studies were included if RTP after Latarjet surgery and a psychological factor were evaluated, with potential psychological factors including readiness to RTP and reasons for failure to RTP. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, 10 of level III evidence and 4 of level IV evidence, with 1034 patients were included. A total of 978 athletes were eligible to RTP. Of these, 792 (79%) successfully returned to play and 447 (56.4%) returned to play at their previous level of play. Mean RTP time was 6.2 months. Postoperative SIRSI scores averaged 71.2 ± 8.8 at a mean of 21 months' follow-up. Postoperative SIRSI scores for those able to RTP was 73.2, whereas athletes unable to RTP scored an average of 41.5. Mean postoperative SIRSI scores for those in contact sports was 71.4, whereas those in noncontact sports was 86.5. There were 31 athletes with a documented reason why they did not RTP, with postoperative shoulder injury being the most common reason (54.5%). Fear of reinjury and feeling "not psychologically confident" each represented 6.5% of the total. CONCLUSION: Athletes who RTP have higher average SIRSI scores than those who are unable to RTP. Of the athletes who documented why they did not RTP, more than half cited a shoulder injury as their reason for not returning to play, whereas fear of reinjury and lack of psychological readiness were other common reasons.

Predraft elbow magnetic resonance imaging in Major League Baseball pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Prior to the Major League Baseball (MLB) draft, some pitchers undergo predraft magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to evaluate pre-draft elbow MRI on baseball pitchers who were entering the MLB draft to determine the presence or absence of pathology, the associations between these pathologies and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears, and interobserver reliability regarding common MRI pathology. METHODS: Predraft elbow MRI performed on prospective MLB pitchers between 2011 and 2017 were deidentified and then reviewed by two separate authors. The authors graded the MRI on several factors including presence or absence of: UCL ossification, UCL appearance (heterogeneous or not), UCL thickening (and location), UCL tear (partial vs. full thickness and location), muscle strain, flexor tendon tear, posteromedial osteophyte, sublime tubercle enthesophyte, and osseous stress reactions. RESULTS: Overall, 245 predraft elbow MRI were reviewed. MRI abnormalities were found in 70% (171/245) of pitchers. UCL thickening was found in 20% (50/245) of pitchers. Regarding UCL tears, 3% had a full thickness tear and 24% had a partial thickness tear. Of full thickness tears, 86% were distal and 1 was midsubstance. Of partial thickness tears, 41% (24/58) were distal, 12% (7/58) were midsubstance, and 47% (27/58) were proximal. Periligamentous edema was present in 36% of pitchers while 14% had a flexor pronator muscle strain. CONCLUSION: The majority (70%) of pitchers entering the MLB draft had abnormal findings on their MRI, most commonly involving changes to the UCL. Interobserver reliability was acceptable following the definition of pathology when reading predraft elbow MRI on MLB prospects.

Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A Modified Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: To establish consensus statements on the treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and to investigate whether consensus on these distinct topics could be reached. METHODS: A modified consensus technique was conducted among 26 elbow surgeons and 3 physical therapists/athletic trainers. Strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement. RESULTS: Of the 19 total questions and consensus statements 4 achieved unanimous consensus, 13 achieved strong consensus, and 2 did not achieve consensus. CONCLUSIONS: There was unanimous agreement that the risk factors include overuse, high velocity, poor mechanics, and previous injury. There was unanimous agreement that advanced imaging in the form of either magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arthroscopy should be performed in a patient presenting with suspected/known UCL tear that plans to continue to play an overhead sport, or if the imaging study could change the management of the patient. There was unanimous agreement regarding lack of evidence for the use of orthobiologics in the treatment of UCL tears as well as the areas pitchers should focus on when attempting a course of nonoperative management. The statements that reached unanimous agreement for operative management were regarding operative indications and contraindications for UCL tears, prognostic factors that should be taken into consideration in when performing UCL surgery, how to deal with the flexor-pronator mass during UCL surgery, and use of an internal brace with UCL repairs. Statements that reached unanimous agreement for return to sport (RTS) were regarding portions of the physical examination should be considered when determining whether to allow a player to RTS; unclear how velocity, accuracy, and spin rate should be factored into the decision of when players can RTS and sports psychology testing should be used to determine whether a player is ready to RTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between patients with vs. without elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

PURPOSE: It is unclear if an elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a risk factor for poor outcomes following ACLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with an elevated TT-TG have an increased risk of retear following primary ACLR compared to controls with a normal TT-TG. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary ACLR between July 2018 and June 2019 with an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were eligible for inclusion. TT-TG distance was measured on preoperative MRI scans by two independent investigators. Clinical outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and Lysholm scores were compared between patients with a TT-TG < 12.5 mm (normal) and those with a TT-TG ≥ 12.5 mm (elevated). RESULTS: Overall, 159 patients were included, 98 with normal TT-TG distance and 61 with elevated TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated TT-TG distance had worse post-operative Lysholm scores than patients with a normal TT-TG distance (83.0 vs. 95.0, p = 0.010). In patients who received a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft, an elevated TT-TG distance was associated with higher rates of subjective instability (13.0% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.041), reoperation (13.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.012), and post-operative complications (25.0% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.026), as well as lower ACL psychological readiness scores (324.1 vs. 446.7, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance have worse Lysholm scores than patients with normal TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance who underwent ACLR with BTB grafts had significantly higher rates of subjective instability, reoperation, and post-operative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Increased rates of subjective shoulder instability after Bankart repair with remplissage compared to Latarjet surgery.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to the ideal management of young active patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss and an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, and the Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage are effective surgical options. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of recurrent instability and reoperation, as well as patient-reported outcome measures, between Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage surgery patients. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in rates of recurrent instability, reoperation, and postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent Latarjet surgery and patients who underwent Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent primary shoulder stabilization for shoulder instability from 2014 to 2019 were screened. Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients were included if arthroscopic surgery was performed in response to anterior shoulder instability. Recurrent instability, revision, shoulder range of motion, return to sport (RTS), and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Shoulder Instability, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form scores) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 43 Latarjet patients (age: 29.8 ± 12.1 years, 36 males 7 females) and 28 Bankart repair with remplissage patients (age: 28.2 ± 8.8 years, 25 males 3 females) were included with a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.9 years. Patients who underwent Latarjet surgery had larger amounts of bone loss (19% vs. 11%, P < .001), a lower rate of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (47% vs. 82%, P < .001), and more frequently had a history of chronic shoulder dislocations (88% vs. 43%, P < .001) compared to Bankart repair with remplissage patients. Latarjet patients less frequently reported feeling subjective shoulder instability after surgery (21% vs. 50%, P = .022), which was defined as feeling apprehension or experiencing a shoulder subluxation or dislocation event. There were no differences in rates of postoperative dislocation, revision, reoperation, or RTS, as well as patient-reported outcome scores, between groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite differences in osseous defects, Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients had similar rates of clinical, patient-reported, and RTS outcomes at a mean of 3.3 years postoperatively. Latarjet surgery patients may be less likely to experience subjective shoulder instability postoperatively than patients who undergo Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage.

What are the indications for medial ulnar collateral ligament surgery in baseball players? An MRI case-based study.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. When nonoperative management fails; reconstruction or repair may be necessary to restore physical function. There is no clear consensus regarding the indications for surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear characteristics or the indications for selecting repair over reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to define the indications for UCL surgery based on MRI and to elucidate indications for UCL repair vs. reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons who treat baseball players were surveyed. Forty-five MRIs were reviewed: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intraoperatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with full-thickness tears. Factors investigated included ligament characteristics (periligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcification, partial or full-thickness tearing) and location (proximal, midsubstance, or distal). Surgeons were given a clinical scenario and asked whether 1) surgery was indicated and 2) whether repair or reconstruction was recommended. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) helped identify significant predictors for both queries. RESULTS: The odds of recommending surgical treatment compared to nonoperative treatment were 2.4× more likely for a proximal partial-thickness tear, 3.2× for distal partial-thickness tear, 5.1× for distal full-thickness tear, and 7.0× for proximal full-thickness tear (P < .001). Significant indications for repair included distal partial (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0, 2.1, P < .001) and full-thickness tears (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1, 2.3, P < .001). Repair was 3× less likely recommended for midsubstance full-thickness tears (OR = 3.0, 95% CI -5.0, -1.0, P = .004). Ultrasound stress testing was requested in 78% of partial tears. CONCLUSIONS: Among surgeons surveyed, the highest odds for recommending operative treatment were proximal full-thickness tears, then distal full-thickness, distal partial-thickness, and proximal partial-thickness tears. Repair was most appropriate for partial and full-thickness distal tears, but relatively contraindicated for complete midsubstance UCL tears. Ultrasound stress testing was frequently requested for partial tears. Given the lack of consensus among surgeons, future prospective registries are necessary to determine whether these factors associate with clinical outcomes.

Outcomes following arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection and risk of future ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite successful return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes after posteromedial osteophyte resection, one possible consequence of osteophyte removal is increased stress on the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), leading to a UCL injury. It is currently unknown how often overhead athletes who undergo isolated posteromedial osteophyte resection subsequently require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report outcomes following arthroscopic resection of posteromedial osteophytes in overhead athletes and determine whether overhead athletes who underwent arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection for posteromedial impingement went on to require UCL surgery. We hypothesized that there would be a high rate of RTS following osteophyte resection and that players who underwent arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection would have a >10% risk of requiring subsequent UCLR or UCL repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy from 2010-2020 at a single institution were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent isolated arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection without concomitant UCL surgery, were overhead athletes at the onset of posteromedial impingement symptoms, and had no history of elbow surgery. Primary outcomes included RTS rate, complications, and subsequent shoulder and/or elbow injury and surgery, as well as several patient-reported outcome measures (Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, Timmerman-Andrews elbow score, and Conway-Jobe score). RESULTS: Overall, 36 overhead athletes were evaluated at 5.1 ± 3.4 years postoperatively, including 28 baseball pitchers, 3 baseball catchers, 3 softball players, 1 tennis player, and 1 volleyball player. Of the overhead athletes, 77% were able to RTS; the mean Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic and satisfaction scores were 70 and 75, respectively; and 89% of athletes had either excellent (73%) or good (16%) Conway-Jobe scores at long-term follow-up. Subsequent UCLR was required in 18% of baseball pitchers (n = 5) at a median of 13 months postoperatively. Of the 5 UCLRs, 3 were performed shortly after posteromedial osteophyte resection (6, 7, and 13 months postoperatively) whereas the other 2 were performed at 6.2 and 7.5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Following arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection, 77% of athletes were able to RTS. Baseball pitchers who undergo arthroscopic resection of posteromedial osteophytes for posteromedial impingement have an 18% risk of subsequent UCLR.

Biomechanical comparison of novel ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with internal brace augmentation vs. modified docking technique.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) is a common surgery among baseball pitchers. UCL repair combined with augmentation using high-strength tape, referred to as an internal brace, was developed as an alternative to UCLR in select patients with the benefit of allowing these athletes to return to sport (RTS) faster. A combined UCLR with an internal brace may allow players indicated for a UCLR to RTS more expeditiously. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric elbows were divided into 3 groups: 12 specimens into the modified docking (MD) group, 6 into the double-docking (DD) group, and 6 into the double docking with internal brace augmentation (DDA) group. This allowed a 1:1 comparison of the MD to the DD and the MD to the DDA. Valgus cyclic testing of native and reconstructed specimens was executed at 90° elbow flexion. After preconditioning, all specimens were cycled between 2 and 10 Nm for 250 cycles. Reconstructed specimens continued to a torque test to catastrophic failure step. Outcome data included intracyclic stiffness, maximum cyclic rotational displacement, gap formation, and failure torque. RESULTS: Cyclic stiffness of the constructs remained constant throughout the entirety of the torque-controlled cycling phase. The DDA group resulted in a 38% increase in cyclic stiffness from native testing (not statistically significant) and a statistically significant 54% increase from the MD (P = .002). The DDA mean cyclic stiffness was significantly greater than the Native (P < .001), DD (P = .025), and MD (P < .001) groups. Between reconstruction groups, mean gap formation was greatest among the MD group (2.51° ± 1.59°) and least for the DDA group (1.01° ± 0.57°) but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Tape augmentation to the modified UCLR (DDA group) improved cyclic stiffness and reduced gap formation compared with the MD group.

Is there a difference in outcomes between the first and second surgical procedures in patients who have bilateral shoulder operations?

BACKGROUND: Some patients who have shoulder surgery on 1 shoulder go on to have surgery on their contralateral shoulder. It is unclear whether the clinical improvements following the second surgical procedure are as significant as the improvements after the first surgical procedure. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery on both shoulders performed by a single surgeon between March 2013 and June 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years for both shoulders. Scores were then compared based on hand dominance and which shoulder was treated first. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients (210 surgical procedures) were included. Of the patients, 66 underwent bilateral open shoulder surgery and 39 underwent bilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery. There was a significant reduction in VAS scores from preoperative to postoperative levels following surgery (5.9 before surgery vs. 1.7 after surgery). We found no difference in VAS scores at any time point when comparing whether the dominant or nondominant shoulder was operated on first. Significantly higher VAS scores were observed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following the first shoulder operation compared with the second; by 6 months and beyond, there was no longer a difference. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo bilateral shoulder surgery have more pain in the first 3 months following their first shoulder operation compared with their second. However, there is no difference in pain scores at 6 months and beyond between shoulders.

Is workload associated with latissimus dorsi and teres major tears in professional baseball pitchers? An analysis of days of rest, innings pitched, and batters faced.

BACKGROUND: Latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) tears have become increasingly recognized injuries in professional baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether workload, as measured by the number of days of rest between outings, number of innings pitched, number of batters faced, and being a starting pitcher, is associated with an increased risk of sustaining an LD-TM tear in professional baseball pitchers. METHODS: All professional baseball pitchers who sustained an LD-TM tear between 2011 and 2017 were identified using the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System. A separate player-usage data set was used to determine workload. We then compared workload variables between pitcher-games 2, 6, 12, and >12 weeks prior to a documented LD-TM tear and pitcher-games from a non-LD-TM tear control group. In a paired analysis, we compared the acute workload (2, 6, and 12 weeks) prior to injury and the injured pitchers' non-acute workload >12 weeks prior to injury. RESULTS: A total of 224 unique LD-TM tears were documented in the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System database. In most periods, player-games with more innings pitched and more batters faced were associated with a higher incidence of subsequent LD-TM tears. The number of days of rest was not a significant predictor of an LD-TM tear in the acute workload setting, but pitchers who sustained an LD-TM injury averaged fewer days of rest over the previous ≥12 weeks than controls (P < .001). Pitchers who faced >30 batters per game showed a 1.57-fold increase in the percentage of pitchers with a subsequent LD-TM tear as compared with pitchers who faced ≤5 batters per game. Significantly more starting pitchers were in the case group that sustained LD-TM tears over multiple time points than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Having a greater pitcher workload and being a starting pitcher were associated with an increased risk of sustaining LD-TM tears in professional baseball players. The average number of days of rest was only a risk factor for LD-TM tears over a 3-month or longer period.

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in javelin throwers: an analysis of return to play rates and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although results after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) in baseball players have been well documented, the literature is replete regarding the outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. PURPOSE: To report outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. HYPOTHESIS: UCLR in javelin throwers will result in a high rate of return to play similar to that of previously published studies from athletes of other sports. METHODS: All patients who were identified preoperatively as javelin throwers and underwent UCLR between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Patients were assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score, Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score, Conway-Jobe score, patient satisfaction, return to sport rate questionnaire, and the occurrence of any postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Complete follow-up was available in 16 (88.9%) patients. The average age at surgery was 21.2 ± 2.0 (range, 18.6-24.9) years. At the final follow-up, the average Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score and Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score were 77.3 (range, 18.7-98.4) and 91.8 (range, 70.0-100.0), respectively. Outcomes on the Conway-Jobe scale were as follows: excellent (n = 6; 37.5%), good (n = 4; 25%), fair (n = 6; 37.5%). Ten (62.5%) patients returned to play at an average of 12.2 ± 3.6 (range, 6.0-18.0) months after surgery. Two (12.5%) patients sustained a shoulder injury postoperatively; however, neither required surgery. CONCLUSION: UCLR in javelin throwers results in good outcomes with a low rate of reinjury/reoperation. However, the return to play rate (62.5%) and good/excellent outcomes per the Conway-Jobe scale (68.8%) are lower than what has been previously reported in baseball players and javelin throwers. Further investigation regarding outcomes in javelin throwers after UCLR is warranted.

A comprehensive evaluation of the association of radiographic measures of lateralization on clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has excellent reported outcomes and satisfaction, patients often have postoperative limitations in range of motion (ROM), specifically internal rotation. Increased lateralization is thought to improve ROM following RTSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between radiographic measurements of lateralization and postoperative ROM and clinical outcome scores following RTSA. The authors hypothesized that increased radiographic lateralization would be associated with improved postoperative ROM, specifically internal rotation, but have no significant association with clinical outcome scores. METHODS: Patients who underwent RTSA with a 135° neck-shaft angle prosthesis and minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up were included and retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for several lateralization measurements including the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), distance from the lateral border of the acromion to the lateral portion of the glenosphere, distance from the glenoid to the most lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity, and the distance from the lateral aspect of the acromion to the most lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the independent association of each radiographic measurement of lateralization on forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) index score at 2 years postoperation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to identify significant thresholds of each radiographic lateralization measurement. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included. For internal rotation, a greater LSA (P = .007), shorter acromion to glenosphere distance (meaning more glenoid lateralization) (P = .005), and a greater acromion to greater tuberosity distance (with the tuberosity more lateral to the acromion) (P = .021) were associated with improved internal rotation. Overall, ROC analysis demonstrated very little significant data, the most notable of which was the LSA, which had a significant cutoff of 82° (sensitivity 57%, specificity 68%, P = .012). CONCLUSION: Of the numerous radiographic measures of lateralization after RTSA, the LSA is the most significantly associated with outcomes, including improved internal rotation and a decrease in forward flexion and ASES score. The clinical significance of these statistically significant findings requires further study, as the observed associations were for very small changes that may not represent clinical significance.

Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning with commercially available imaging software in shoulder arthroplasty may allow for improved decision-making and more accurate placement of the glenoid component. METHODS: A total of 81 consecutive shoulder computed tomography scans obtained for preoperative planning purposes for shoulder arthroplasty were analyzed by commercially available software from 4 companies (Blueprint: Wright Medical, Memphis, TN, USA; GPS: Exactech, Gainesville, FL, USA; Materialise: DJO, Vista, CA, USA; and VIP: Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) and by 5 fellowship-trained sports medicine/shoulder surgeons. Inclination, version, and subluxation of the humerus were measured in a blinded fashion on axial and coronal sequences at the mid-glenoid. Surgeon measurements were analyzed for agreement and were compared with the 4 commercial programs. RESULTS: Surgeon reliability was acceptable for version (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.876), inclination (ICC: 0.84), and subluxation (ICC: 0.523). Significant differences were found between surgeon and commercial software measurements in version (P = .03), inclination (P = .023), and subluxation (P < .001). Software measurements tended to be more superiorly inclined (average -2° to 2° greater), more retroverted (average 2°-5° greater), and more posteriorly subluxed (average 7°-10° greater) than surgeon measurements. In comparing imaging software measurements, only Blueprint was found to produce significantly different version measurements than surgeon measurements (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning software for shoulder arthroplasty has limited agreement in measures of version, inclination, and subluxation measurements, whereas surgeons have high inter-reliability. Surgeons should be cautious when using commercial software planning systems and when comparing publications that use different planning systems to determine preoperative glenoid deformity measurements.

Outpatient vs. inpatient reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an effective treatment option for many shoulder conditions. Historically, this surgical procedure was performed on an inpatient basis. There has been a recent trend to perform RTSA on an outpatient basis in proper candidates. METHODS: All patients who underwent outpatient RTSA performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic information and clinical outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores), as well as data on complications, readmission, and revision surgery, were recorded. This group of patients was then compared with a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA in the inpatient setting during the same period. RESULTS: Overall, 241 patients (average age, 68.9 years; 52.3% female patients) underwent outpatient RTSA and were included. Patients who underwent outpatient RTSA showed significant improvements in all clinical outcome scores at both 1 and 2 year postoperatively (all P < .0001). The control group of patients who underwent RTSA as inpatients consisted of 373 patients (average age, 72 years; 66% female patients). Significantly more controls had diabetes (P = .007), and controls had a higher body mass index (P = .022). No significant differences existed in improvements in clinical outcome scores between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Complication rates were significantly lower for outpatient cases than for inpatient controls (7.0% vs. 12.7%, P = .023). CONCLUSION: RTSA performed in an outpatient setting is a safe and reliable procedure that provides significant improvements in clinical outcome scores with fewer complications compared with inpatient RTSA.

Eclipse stemless shoulder prosthesis vs. Univers II shoulder prosthesis: a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty is an accepted treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The Arthrex Eclipse shoulder prosthesis is a stemless, canal-sparing humeral prosthesis with bone ingrowth capacity on the trunnion, as well as through the fenestrated hollow screw, that provides both diaphyseal and metaphyseal load sharing and fixation. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2018, 16 sites in the United States enrolled 327 patients (Eclipse in 237 and Arthrex Univers II in 90). All patients had glenohumeral arthritis refractory to nonsurgical care. Strict exclusion criteria were applied to avoid confounding factors such as severe patient comorbidities, arthritis not consistent with osteoarthritis, and medical or prior surgical treatments that may have affected outcomes. Patients were randomized to the Eclipse or Univers II group via block randomization. RESULTS: In total, 149 Eclipse and 76 Univers II patients reached 2-year follow-up (139 Eclipse patients [93.3%] and 68 Univers II patients [89.5%] had complete data). The success rate using the Composite Clinical Success score was 95% in the Eclipse group vs. 89.7% in the Univers II group. No patient exhibited radiographic evidence of substantial humeral radiolucency, humeral migration, or subsidence at any point. Reoperations were performed in 7 patients (3.2%) in the Eclipse group and 3 (3.8%) in the Univers II group. CONCLUSION: The Arthrex Eclipse shoulder prosthesis is a safe and effective humeral implant for patients with glenohumeral arthritis at 2-year follow-up, with no differences in outcomes compared with the Univers II shoulder prosthesis.

Performance and return to sport following rotator cuff surgery in professional baseball players.

BACKGROUND: While many injuries to the rotator cuff in professional baseball players can be managed nonoperatively, recovery fails to occur with nonoperative treatment in some players and surgery on the rotator cuff is performed in an attempt to return to sport (RTS). METHODS: All professional baseball players who underwent rotator cuff surgery between 2010 and 2016 were included by use of the Major League Baseball injury database. Demographic and performance data (before and after surgery) for each player were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative performance metrics were then compared. RESULTS: Overall, 151 professional baseball players underwent rotator cuff débridement (n = 130) or rotator cuff repair (n = 21). In the rotator cuff repair group, 6 (28.6%) underwent single-row repair, 5 (23.8%) underwent double-row repair, and 10 (47.6%) underwent side-to-side repair. Among the 11 players who underwent either single- or double-row repair, the average number of anchors used per repair was 2.09 ± 1.1 (range, 1-4). Most performance metrics declined following rotator cuff débridement. For players who underwent débridement, the RTS rate was 50.8% (42.3% at the same level or a higher level and 8.5% at a lower level). For players who underwent repair, the RTS rate was 33.3% (14.3% at the same level or a higher level and 19% at a lower level). Most players underwent at least 1 concomitant procedure at the time of rotator cuff surgery. CONCLUSION: Rotator cuff débridement is significantly more common than repair in professional baseball players, with 86% of all rotator cuff surgical procedures reported as débridement. RTS rates following débridement and repair are disappointing, at 50.8% and 33.3%, respectively. For players who do return, performance declines after surgery.