Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rural Remote Health ; 22(2): 7128, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35658522

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 vaccination is widely recommended as a prevention strategy; however, vaccine uptake is disproportionately lower among rural Americans compared to their urban counterparts. Development of public health activities to address the rural-urban vaccine gap requires an understanding of determinants of vaccine hesitation. The present study explores perceptions of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among rural Oklahomans. METHODS: Between March and May 2021, 222 residents, unvaccinated for COVID-19, within rural Oklahoma counties completed a cross-sectional, online questionnaire to qualitatively assess perceptions, benefits, and concerns regarding getting vaccinated for COVID-19. RESULTS: Approximately two-fifths of rural respondents in the present study were hesitant to get vaccinated, even when a vaccine was made available to them. Major factors included limited knowledge and understanding about the vaccine, including potential side-effects and long-term complications, as well as skepticism surrounding COVID-19 vaccine development and efficacy. Among the potential perceived benefits of vaccination were protecting the health of vulnerable individuals and the ability to return to normal day-to-day activities. CONCLUSION: Increases in COVID-19 cases and deaths in rural areas are expected to continue as new variants are introduced within communities. The present findings highlight the need for the development of culturally tailored vaccine information, to be disseminated by local leaders within rural communities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , População Rural , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Hesitação Vacinal
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 48(8): 583-588, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: College students residing in rural areas of the United States have limited access to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening programs; yet, have increased rates of infection. METHODS: Students (N = 326), attending a state university located within a rural community, completed an online survey containing open-ended questions that gauged their perceptions and experiences with HIV/STI testing, amenability to at-home testing technology, and preferences for obtaining at-home testing kits. Inductive coding was used to create themes for each open-ended question. RESULTS: Students encounter a number of perceived barriers to accessing clinical HIV/STI testing venues including cost, utilization of parents' medical insurance, and stigma. Students desired screening paradigms that allow for a greater sense of privacy and the ability to be empowered through self-sampling methods. This includes the use of at-home testing kits, which could be accessed via mail, campus, or the local community. Although students were overwhelmingly amenable to using at-home testing, students discussed concerns with potential user error that could impact testing accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest the importance of developing less clinically oriented systems of HIV/STI screening, which allow students to choose from an array of screening options. Removing perceived barriers, notably access and privacy concerns, to HIV/STI testing by leveraging at-home testing is one potential method to increase screening uptake among this at-risk population.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , HIV , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Humanos , População Rural , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Estudantes , Estados Unidos
3.
Child Abuse Negl ; 122: 105335, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34592672

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) has shown deleterious effects throughout adulthood. Little attention, however, is given to specific ACE domains as they relate to mental health outcomes, as most studies use cumulative ACE score models. OBJECTIVE: The current study disaggregates ACEs domains to investigate their independent effect (while controlling for each other and other demographic covariates) on receiving a depression diagnosis as an adult. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS; N = 52,971). METHODS: To control and account for the numerical number of ACEs, separate models were run among each ACE score (e.g., those with an ACE score of exactly two, three, etc.). An aggregate model with all participants is also included. RESULTS: Across all ACE scores, those with a history of family mental illness had the highest likelihood of receiving a depression diagnosis. The second strongest association were those with sexual abuse. No other trends were found among the six other domains. Further, those with a combination of family mental illness and sexual abuse had the highest odds of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health providers should consider the numerical number of ACEs as well as the specific ACE domains (specifically, family mental illness and sexual abuse). Additionally, this provides evidence for a possible weighting schema for the ACEs scale.


Assuntos
Experiências Adversas da Infância , Maus-Tratos Infantis , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Criança , Depressão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Fatores de Risco
4.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep ; 1: 100002, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35156104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People who use drugs have been particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic because of their unique social, harm reduction, and treatment needs. These unique needs and challenges have significant influence on the severity of their substance use, mental health symptomatology, willingness to engage in treatment, and adherence to treatment options. This has included immense challenges related to the dissemination of COVID-19 messaging and the need for harm reduction and treatment service entities to adopt new formats to continue operation. METHODS: In-depth interview data were collected people who use drugs (N=24) residing in Oklahoma from November 2020 through February 2021 to assess perspectives on (1) their access to harm reduction, substance use prevention, and treatment programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) the perceived quality of such services and programs during this time, and (3) the perceived availability of tailored COVID-19 information. RESULTS: Several factors emerged related to accessing and quality of substance use services during COVID-19, including poor accessibility (e.g., internet access), diminished quality (i.e., lack of social support), and lack of tailored COVID-19 prevention and treatment messaging. CONCLUSIONS: Upticks in COVID-19 cases and deaths are expected to continue as new SARS-CoV-2 variants are introduced. The present findings highlight the need for tailored COVID-19 messaging (e.g., minimizing the sharing of substance use supplies that can spread COVID-19, mask wearing, COVID-19 vaccination), which is responsive to unique needs of substance using populations. Similarly, as prevention and treatment programs are delivered online, efforts are necessary to ensure equitable access and enhanced quality of services.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA