LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF THE DIFFERENT TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR RECURRENT AND PERSISTENT CUSHING DISEASE.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment alternatives for persistent and recurrent Cushing disease (CD) include pituitary surgical re-intervention, radiation therapy (RT), pharmacotherapy, and bilateral adrenalectomy (BA). The decision of which of these alternatives is better suited for the individual patient rests on clinical judgment and the availability of resources. This retrospective cohort study was performed at a referral center to evaluate the long-term efficacy of different secondary interventions for persistent and recurrent CD. METHODS: We evaluated the hospital charts of 84 patients (77 female, median age 34 years, median follow up 6.3 years) with CD diagnosed, treated, and followed at our multidisciplinary clinic according to a pre-established protocol. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients who were initially treated with transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), 61.7% had a long-lasting remission, 16% had persistent disease, and 22% achieved remission but relapsed during follow-up. The most frequently used secondary treatment was pituitary re-intervention, followed by ketoconazole, RT, and BA. Early remissions were observed in 66.6% of the re-operated and in 58.3% of the radiated patients; long-lasting remission was achieved in 33.3% and 41.6% of these patients, respectively. Nelson syndrome developed in 41.6% of the patients who underwent BA. Upon last follow-up, 88% of all the patients are in remission, and 9.5% are biochemically controlled with ketoconazole. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of treatment alternatives for recurrent or persistent CD varies considerably among patients and multiple interventions are often required to achieve long-lasting remission. ABBREVIATIONS: ACTH = adrenocorticotrophic hormone; BA = bilateral adrenalectomy; CBG = cabergoline; CD = Cushing disease; CV = coefficient of variation; DXM = dexamethasone; IQR = interquartile range; RT = radiation therapy; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; TSS = transsphenoidal surgery; UFC = urinary free cortisol; ULN = upper limit of normal.

Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas.

OBJECTIVES: Prolactin (PRL)-secreting macroadenomas usually measure between 10 and 40 mm. Giant (adenoma size ≥40 mm) PRL-tumors are not common, and larger prolactinomas (maximal diameter ≥60 mm) are rare, and their management outcomes have not been well characterized. METHODS: We have identified 18 subjects (16 men, 2 females) with giant PRL-adenomas (size ≥60 mm; PRL > 1000 ng/ml) and summarized their characteristics and response to treatment. RESULTS: Mean age was 36.3 ± 13.5 years (range 12-59 years). Mean adenoma size was 71.8 ± 10.2 mm (60-92 mm). Complaints at presentation included headaches in 11 patients, visual deterioration in 9, sexual dysfunction in 9 males, and behavioral changes in two. Fourteen (78 %) had visual field defects. Mean PRL at presentation was 28,465 ng/ml (range 1300-270,000). All patients were treated with cabergoline (3.9 ± 2.0 mg/week), except for one who received bromocriptine. Treatment achieved PRL normalization in 11/18 patients within a median interval of 20 months. Visual improvement occurred in 12/14 patients with pre-treatment visual abnormalities. Nine patients underwent surgery (transsphenoidal, 7; transcranial, 2). None of the seven patients with elevated PRL before surgery achieved remission post-operatively. After a follow-up of 7.8 ± 5.1 years, 15/18 patients had significant adenoma shrinkage. Eleven patients are normoprolactinemic, 3 are partially controlled (PRL < 3 × ULN), and 4 remain with significantly elevated PRL. Most patients reported disappearance or improvement of their complaints. CONCLUSIONS: These enormous PRL-adenomas are invasive but respond fairly well to medical treatment. Long-term therapy with high dose cabergoline together with a pituitary surgery in some patients was the key for their successful management, achieving biochemical and clinical remission in most patients.

HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH NONFUNCTIONING PITUITARY ADENOMAS UNDERGOING POSTOPERATIVE RADIATION THERAPY: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY.

OBJECTIVE: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) can be associated with significant morbidity including a compromised quality of life (QoL). Radiotherapy (RT) is listed as one of the contributing factors to QoL impairment in these patients, however the evidence supporting this association is scarce and conflicting. Here we evaluate health-related QoL (HRQoL) impairment in patients with NFPA and to what extent this is due to RT. METHODS: HRQoL was evaluated with the short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36), which explores 8 domains pertaining physical, emotional, and mental well being. We assessed 50 patients with NFPA subjected to RT after pituitary surgery, and their results were compared to those from 127 subjects who had undergone surgery but not RT. Both groups were matched for age, sex, and metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. The SF-36 was applied a median of 72 months after RT in the group of cases and 78 months after the last surgical procedure in the control group. RESULTS: Both groups scored equally low in the 8 areas explored by the survey. In a multiple linear regression model, age was significantly associated with worse physical health scores, whereas female sex was associated with worse general health perception and lower emotional role and physical role scores. The presence of a visual field defect was significantly associated with a worse social role functioning score. CONCLUSION: QoL in patients with NFPAs is significantly compromised in most scales evaluated by the SF-36 survey. However, RT itself does not affect QoL.

Efficacy of the treatment with dapagliflozin and metformin compared to metformin monotherapy for weight loss in patients with class III obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mexico has one of the highest prevalence rates of obesity worldwide. New pharmacological strategies that focus on people with class III obesity are required. Metformin and dapagliflozin are two drugs approved for the treatment of diabetes. Beyond its effects on glucose, metformin has been suggested by some studies to result in weight loss. Therapy with dapagliflozin is associated with a mild but sustained weight loss in patients with diabetes. The primary outcome of the study is to determine if the combined treatment with dapagliflozin and metformin is more effective than monotherapy with metformin for weight loss in patients with class III obesity and prediabetes or diabetes who are awaiting bariatric surgery (including those patients who do have surgery). We also aimed to assess the effect of this combined treatment on waist circumference, triglycerides, blood pressure, and inflammatory cytokines. METHODS: This randomized phase IV clinical trial will include patients with diabetes or prediabetes who are between the ages of 18 and 60 years and exhibit grade III obesity (defined as body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2). Patients using insulin will be excluded. Subjects will be randomized to one of two groups as follows: 1) metformin tablets 850 mg PO bid or 2) metformin tablets 850 mg PO bid plus dapagliflozin tablets 10 mg PO qd. The sample size required is 108 patients, which allows for a 20% dropout rate: 54 patients in the metformin group and 54 in the metformin/dapagliflozin group. All participants will receive personalized nutritional advice during the study. A run-in period of one month will be used to assess tolerance and adherence to treatment regimens. Anthropometric and biochemical variables will be recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. A serum sample to determine glucagon, ghrelin, adiponectin, resistin, interleukin 6, and interleukin 10 will be collected at baseline and before surgery, or at 12 months (whatever happens first). Adherence to treatment and adverse and secondary events will be recorded throughout the study. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used. DISCUSSION: Forty-six percent of the patients in our Obesity Clinic have been diagnosed with prediabetes (32%) or diabetes (14%). The use of dapagliflozin in this population could improve weight loss and other cardiovascular factors. This effect could be translated into less time before undergoing bariatric surgery and better control of associated comorbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03968224. Retrospectively registered on May 29, 2019.

Expression of the growth hormone receptor isoforms and its correlation with the metabolic profile in morbidly obese subjects.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Given the lipolytic effect of GH and its potential role in determining adipose tissue distribution, we evaluated the expression of the GH hormone receptor (GHR) isoforms in patients with morbid obesity seeking associations with metabolic parameters. METHODS: 262 morbidly obese subjects (mean age 42.5 ± 11 years, 75% women) underwent PCR-genotyping of the exon 3 GHR polymorphism. In 17 of these subjects, who proved to be heterozygous for the exon 3 genotype (+3/-3), subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue was obtained during bariatric surgery; total RNA was extracted, reversely transcribed, and the different isoforms of the GHR (exon 3 containing and lacking flGHR as well as the trGHR) were PCR-amplified using specific primers. RESULTS: 27% were +3/+3 homozygous, 20% -3/-3 homozygous and 53% were +3/-3 heterozygous. Compared to subjects homozygous for the +3 genotype, homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the -3 genotype were significantly heavier and tended to have a higher HOMA 2-IR. Expression of the flGHR and trGHR mRNA was demonstrated in all evaluated samples of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from the 17 patients. The exon 3+ isoform was expressed in all adipose tissue samples, whereas only six subjects expressed the 3- isoform as well. The only distinctive feature of these six patients was a higher HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: The heterozygous GHR +3/-3 genotype is more prevalent in subjects with morbid obesity. Patients expressing the exon +3 and exon -3 isoforms in adipose tissue had a higher HbA1c, than those expressing only the exon -3 isoform.

Treatment of multiresistant prolactinomas with a combination of cabergoline and octreotide LAR.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dopamine agonist (DA)-resistant prolactinomas are rare but they constitute a real challenge, since there are few therapeutic alternatives left for these patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Proof-of-concept study at a tertiary care, referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The studied population consisted of five patients (one female and four males, mean age at diagnosis 23.5 ± 19) with macroprolactinomas with persistent hyperprolactinemia and/or tumor mass despite high doses of cabergoline (CBG) and pituitary surgery, to whom 20 mg monthly of octreotide LAR was added for 6-13 months. Response was evaluated by measuring prolactin (PRL) levels and by magnetic resonance imaging. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for pituitary hormones, Ki-67, and somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 was (SSTR2 and 5) was available in two of the subjects. RESULTS: The addition of octreotide LAR to ongoing CBG treatment had no effect on either PRL levels or tumor size in three patients. In two of the five patients, combination treatment resulted in a significant reduction in PRL concentrations (from 7643 to 200 ng/mL and from 2587 to 470 ng/mL) as well as in adenoma size (93% reduction). IHC evaluation of tumor samples from two patients (a responder and a non-responder) revealed positive immunostaining for PRL and SSTR5 but not for other pituitary hormones or for SSTR2. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a somatostatin analog to ongoing CBG treatment may be effective in some patients with DA-resistant macroprolactinomas, independently of the adenoma's SSTR expression profile.

Current status and future directions of pharmacological therapy for acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disorder caused in the vast majority of cases by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma and resulting in significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The treatment of choice is the trans-sphenoidal resection of the adenoma, and although 80% of patients with microadenomas or confined macroadenomas achieve biochemical remission, the surgical success rate for patients harboring tumors with extrasellar extension is below 50%. Thus, a considerable proportion of patients will require some form of adjuvant treatment. Acromegaly can be approached pharmacologically by inhibiting GH secretion by the tumor (somatostatin analogues, dopamine agonists) or by antagonizing GH actions at its target tissues (GH receptor antagonists). The primary pharmacological treatment of acromegaly is increasingly gaining acceptance by both physicians and patients. The decision to use primary pharmacological treatment has to take into account the clinical characteristics of the patient (presence of comorbidities that significantly increase the surgical risk) and the biological nature of the adenoma (tumor size and location), as well as other aspects such as the availability of a pituitary surgeon and the cost of medications. This review provides a critical summary and update of the pharmacological treatment of acromegaly focusing both, on well-established agents and strategies as well as on novel compounds that are currently being developed.

Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas?

Giant prolactinomas (gPRLomas) are rare tumors of the lactotroph defined by an unusually large size (>4 cm) and serum PRL levels >1000 ng/mL. The purpose of this study is to characterize the clinical spectrum of gPRLomas comparing them with non-giant prolactinomas. This is a retrospective study at a large referral center. Data from patients harboring gPRLomas and macroprolactinomas were retrieved from medical records of the Prolactinoma Clinic. Analysis was focused on clinical, biochemical, and tumor volume characteristics, as well as on the response to treatment with dopamine agonists. Among 292 patients with prolactinomas followed between 2008 and 2015, 47 (16 %) met the diagnostic criteria for gPRLomas (42 males). The most common complaint was a visual field defect; headache was reported by 79 % and sexual dysfunction was present in over half of the patients. Median basal PRL level and tumor volume were 6667 ng/mL (3750-10,000) and 32 cm(3) (20-50), respectively; hypogonadotropic hypogonadism was documented in 87 %. Cabergoline treatment resulted in the normalization of PRL levels in 68 % and in the reduction of >50 % in tumor volume in 87 % of the gPRLoma patients. The composite goal of PRL normalization and >50 % tumor reduction was achieved by 55 % (n = 26) of patients with gPRL and by 66 % (n = 100) of patients with no giant macroprolactinomas (p = 0.19). Recovery of hypogonadism and improvement of visual fields defects occurred in 32 % and 68 % of the patients, respectively. Cabergoline treatment was equally effective in patients with gPRLoma and those with macroprolactinomas in regard of achieving treatment goals, although the median CBG dose was slightly higher in the gPRLoma group (2 vs. 1.5 mg/w). Six patients required surgery. Beyond their impressive dimensions and the huge amount of PRL they secrete, the clinical behavior of gPRLoma is not different from macroprolactinomas. These tumors are highly responsive to cabergoline treatment, and pituitary surgery is seldom required.

[Current diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia]. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento actual de la hiperprolactinemia.

Hyperprolactinemia is a frequent neuroendocrinological condition that should be approached in an orderly and integral fashion, starting with a complete clinical history. Once physiological causes such as pregnancy, systemic disorders such as primary hypothyroidism and the use of drugs with dopamine antagonistic actions such as metochlopramide have been ruled out, the most common cause of hyperprolactinemia is a PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma or prolactinoma. Prolactinomas are usually classified as microprolactinomas (less than 1 cm) or macroprolactinomas (larger than 1 cm), which can either be confined or invasive. The hormonal consequence of hypeprolactinemia is hypogonadism; in women, this is manifested as amenorrhea/oligomenorreha, anovulation and galactorrhea, whereas in men the main complaints are a diminished libido and erectile dysfunction. Macroprolactinomas can also present with symptoms and signs resulting form mass effect of the tumor, such as headaches and visual field defects. Other structural causes of hyperprolactinemia include non-functioning pituitary adenomas and infiltrative disorders, which can interrupt the inhibitory, descending dopaminergic tone. The primary treatment of prolactinomas is pharmacological with dopamine agonists such as cabergoline.

La hiperprolactinemia es uno de los trastornos neuroendocrinológicos más frecuentes y su abordaje debe hacerse de manera ordenada e integral, partiendo de una historia clínica completa. Una vez excluidas las causas fisiológicas, como el embarazo, enfermedades sistémicas (como el hipotiroidismo primario) y el uso de fármacos con acción antidopaminérgica (como la metoclopramida), la causa más común de la hiperprolactinemia es la presencia de un adenoma hipofisario productor de prolactina (PRL) o prolactinoma. Los prolactinomas se clasifican por su tamaño en microprolactinomas (menores de 1 cm) y macroprolactinomas (mayores de 1 cm), los cuales a su vez pueden ser intraselares o invasivos. La consecuencia hormonal de la hiperprolactinemia es el hipogonadismo; en la mujer, esto se manifiesta como amenorrea/oligomenorrea, anovulación y galactorrea, mientras que en el hombre la manifestación consiste en la disminución de la libido y disfunción eréctil. En el caso de los macroprolactinomas, no es infrecuente encontrar síntomas y signos de efecto de masa como cefalea y alteraciones en los campos visuales. Otras causas estructurales de hiperprolactinemia son los adenomas no funcionantes y las enfermedades infiltrativas de la hipófisis, las cuales interrumpen el tono dopaminérgico descendente. El tratamiento primario de los prolactinomas es farmacológico, a base de agonistas dopaminérgicos, como la cabergolina.

AIP mutations in young patients with acromegaly and the Tampico Giant: the Mexican experience.

Although aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations are rare in sporadic acromegaly, their prevalence among young patients is nonnegligible. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of AIP mutations in a cohort of Mexican patients with acromegaly with disease onset before the age of 30 and to search for molecular abnormalities in the AIP gene in teeth obtained from the "Tampico Giant". Peripheral blood DNA from 71 patients with acromegaly (51 females) with disease onset <30 years was analysed (median age of disease onset of 23 years) and correlated with clinical, biochemical and imaging characteristics. Sequencing was also carried out in DNA extracted from teeth of the Tampico Giant. Five patients (7 %) harboured heterozygous, germline mutations of the AIP gene. In two of them (a 9-year-old girl with gigantism and a young man with symptoms of GH excess since age 14) the c.910C>T (p.Arg304Ter), well-known truncating mutation was identified; in one of these two cases and her identical twin sister, the mutation proved to be a de novo event, since neither of their parents were found to be carriers. In the remaining three patients, new mutations were identified: a frameshift mutation (c.976_977insC, p.Gly326AfsTer), an in-frame deletion (c.872_877del, p.Val291_Leu292del) and a nonsense mutation (c.868A > T, p.Lys290Ter), which are predicted to be pathogenic based on in silico analysis. Patients with AIP mutations tended to have an earlier onset of acromegaly and harboured larger and more invasive tumours. A previously described genetic variant of unknown significance (c.869C > T, p.Ala299Val) was identified in DNA from the Tampico Giant. The prevalence of AIP mutations in young Mexican patients with acromegaly is similar to that of European cohorts. Our results support the need for genetic evaluation of patients with early onset acromegaly.

[Current diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly]. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento actual de la acromegalia.

Acromegaly is a rare condition characterized by the excessive secretion of growth hormone (GH), usually by a pituitary adenoma. The clinical manifestations of acromegaly include enlarged hands, feet and face, headaches, arthralgias, fatigue and hyperhydrosis. This condition is also associated with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes in a significant proportion of patients and frequently compromises life quality and life expectancy. The biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly rests on the demonstration of an autonomous secretion of GH by means of the measurement of glucose-suppressed GH levels and the serum concentration of insulin like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1). The localizing method of choice is magnetic resonance image of the selar area, which in 70 % of the cases reveals the presence of a macroadenoma. Even though the primary treatment is usually the transsphenoidal resection of the adenoma, the majority of patients require a multimodal intervention that includes radiotherapy, as well as pharmacological therapy with somatostatin analogs and dopamine agonists. The latter approach has resulted in a significant reduction in mortality and in an improvement in the quality of life.

La acromegalia es una entidad rara que se caracteriza por un incremento en la secreción de hormona de crecimiento (GH), generalmente resultado de un adenoma hipofisiario. Las manifestaciones clínicas incluyen acrocrecimiento de manos, pies y cara, cefalea, artralgias, fatiga e hiperhidrosis. Esta condición se asocia a comorbilidades como la hipertensión y la diabetes en una proporción importante de pacientes y resulta en una disminución en la esperanza y la calidad de vida. El diagnóstico bioquímico se basa en la demostración de una hipersecreción autónoma de GH mediante la prueba de supresión con glucosa y en la presencia de niveles elevados de factor de crecimiento insulinoide tipo 1 (IGF-1). El método de imagen de elección es la resonancia magnética nuclear (RMN) de silla turca, la cual muestra un macroadenoma en el 7 % de los casos. Si bien el tratamiento de elección es la cirugía transefenoidal, la mayoría de los pacientes requiere de un abordaje multimodal, que incluye radioterapia y manejo farmacológico con agonistas dopaminérgicos y análogos de la somatostatina. Este abordaje multimodal, aunado al tratamiento específico de las distintas comorbilidades ha resultado en una disminución significativa en la mortalidad y en una importante mejoría en la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of 485 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas.

Background. Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are the most common benign lesions of the pituitary gland. Objective. To describe our experience with the management of NFPA. Study Design and Methods. Retrospective evaluation of NFPA patients managed between 2008 and 2013. We analyzed data regarding clinical presentation, imaging diagnosis, hormonal status, surgical, radiotherapeutic, and pharmacological treatment, and outcome. Results. 485 patients (54% men, mean age 53 ± 14 years) were followed for a median of 6.5 years. Visual field abnormalities and headaches were the presenting complaints in 87% and 66%, respectively. The diagnosis of NFPA was made incidentally in 6.2%, and 8% presented with clinical evidence of apoplexy. All patients harbored macroadenomas, with a median volume of 10306 mm(3); 57.9% had supra- or parasellar invasion and 19.6% had tumors larger than 4 cm. Central hypothyroidism, hypogonadism, and hypocortisolism were present in 47.2%, 35.9%, and 27.4%, respectively. Surgical resection was performed at least once in 85.7%. Tumor persistence was documented in 27% and was related to the size and invasiveness of the lesion. In selected cases, radiotherapy proved to be effective in controlling or preventing tumor growth. Conclusions. The diagnosis and treatment of NFPA are complex and require a multidisciplinary approach.

The multimodal treatment of acromegaly: current status and future perspectives.

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disorder caused by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Active acromegaly results in a poor quality of life due to symptoms such as headache, fatigue, arthralgia, depression, sexual dysfunction and hyperhidrosis; an increased prevalence of co-morbidities like diabetes, hypertension as well as cancer risk and a reduced life expectancy. Appropriate, modern, multimodal treatment of acromegaly has led to a significant improvement in quality of life, an adequate control of co-morbidities and a drastic reduction in the mortality rates that used to prevail in the past. This multimodal strategy includes an adequate selection of patients who are likely to benefit from surgical treatment (which has to be performed by a skilled pituitary neurosurgeon), the use of pharmacological interventions such as somatostatin analogs and dopamine agonists, which target the pituitary adenoma; and pegvisomant, a GH mutant acting as a competitive antagonist of the GH receptor. Radiation therapy is an important tool, particularly in parts of the World where resources are limited. The ultimate outcome of the individual patient depends on the judicious use of all these treatment options, which are critically analyzed in this mini-review.