Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J STD AIDS ; 19(6): 385-92, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18595876

RESUMO

The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping in women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. A series of 248 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear were analysed with the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping test detecting 37 most frequent HPV types, and compared with hybrid capture II (HCII) assay for oncogenic (high-risk [HR] HPV) types as well as for p16INK4a expression using immunocytochemistry. All tests were performed in cervical samples collected in PreservCyt liquid media for liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep), and colposcopic biopsy and/or loop electro excision procedure cone biopsy was used as the gold standard. HPV16 was the single most frequent genotype (29/258; 11.7%), followed by HPV51 (4.4%), HPV66 (3.6%), HPV42, 52 and 56 (3.2% for all). Linear array genotyping test significantly predicts both abnormal colposcopy (odds ratio [OR] = 9.0; 3.12-25.93), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (OR = 9.6; 1.26-74.17) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3+ (OR = 29.3; 3.95-218.06). In detecting CIN3, linear array was equivalent (97.6%) to colposcopy in sensitivity (SE), both being superior to HCII (92.7%). Concordance between linear array and HCII was moderate (Cohen's kappa kappa = 0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.435-659). Specificity (SP) and positive predictive value (PPV) of linear array were significantly improved, if only HPV16 genotype was considered. Performance in the best balance is obtained, when linear array and colposcopy are combined, giving 82.9% SE, 93.9% SP, 73.9% PPV and 96.3% negative predictive value (NPV) as predictor of CIN3+ (OR 74.5; 95% CI: 27.36-202.72). In conclusion, linear array for HR-HPV is a highly sensitive test (97.6%) with high NPV (98.9%) in detecting CIN3+ lesions. HPV16 genotyping alone significantly improves SP and PPV of this test in management of women with abnormal cytology.


Assuntos
Colposcopia/métodos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Colo do Útero/patologia , DNA Viral/análise , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/métodos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 35(5): 521-7, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18434944

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the concordance and performance of 2 different assays in detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes among women with abnormal Pap smear. STUDY DESIGN: A series of 575 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear were analyzed with the Linear Array HPV Genotyping test detecting 37 HPV types and compared with Hybrid Capture II (HCII) assay for detection of carcinogenic HPV. Histologic outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or worse (CIN2+) and CIN3+ were the primary endpoints. Clinical performance, including receiver operating characteristics, was determined for both tests. RESULTS: HCII and linear array (LA) were concordant in 88.1% (433/491; 95% CI 85.3%-91.0%), having a substantial agreement with regular kappa (kappa = 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.77) and almost perfect agreement with weighted kappa (ICC = 0.82, 95% CI 0.7-0.85). In detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+, LA is 5% and 6% more sensitive but 9.5% and 8.7% less specific than HCII (area under ROC curve; P = 0.317 and P = 0.875, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of HCII and LA does not significantly differ in detecting CIN2+ or CIN3+.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Colposcopia , DNA Viral/análise , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/métodos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA