[PSYCHO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF PRIMARY HEADACHES].

BACKGROUND: Primary headaches such as migraine and tension type headaches are extremely common and present a significant clinical challenge. These conditions involve a complex interaction between biological and psychological processes. As part of a "vicious cycle" effect, primary headaches can be deleterious to patients, causing stress, anxiety and catastrophization, while at the same time becoming exacerbated by those very same cognitive and emotional states. OBJECTIVES: Medications often have a limited effect in treating chronic primary headache. Additionally, there are a number of sub-populations for whom many common medications are contraindicated, such as: pregnant women, patients with sensitivities to medication and patients in danger of medication overuse. Mind-body therapies for reducing stress, such as relaxation training and biofeedback, as well as cognitive and behavioral therapies have been used to treat primary headache for the better part of the last four decades. These treatments have been shown to be efficacious in reducing symptoms as well as in improving patient functioning and quality of life. Treatment effects have been shown to continue even after termination of therapy, as patients are given tools to regulate their sympathetic arousal and taught to adopt more constructive coping behaviors and thought processes regarding their condition. Despite the plethora of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of mind-body and cognitive-behavioral therapies and despite recommendations made by various consensus groups, these therapies remain under-used in routine medical practice. DISCUSSION: In order to address this problem we propose a graded, integrative model currently being implemented in the "Functional Neurology Clinic" at 'Soroka' University Medical Center. This model contains a three-step treatment algorithm for quickly and effectively teaching patients self-relaxation techniques. The model is meant to be used in conjunction with pharmacological treatments for primary headaches and can be used in inpatient hospitalization, outpatient clinics or multi-disciplinary treatment centers.

['TESTED, BUT NOT TRIED' - WHY IS BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE RARELY IMPLEMENTED IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?].

BACKGROUND: Behavioral Medicine is an inter-disciplinary field concerned with the integration of behavioral and biomedical knowledge for the purposes of diagnosis, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of conditions pertaining to health and illness. Behavioral treatments (such as: hypnosis, relaxation training, meditation, biofeedback and cognitive-behavioral therapy) have been shown to be effective in reducing physical symptoms as well as improving health-related behaviors and quality of life across a wide variety of illnesses, such as: chronic pain, somatic symptoms, diabetes, inflammatory bowel diseases, coronary heart disease and more. The usefulness of behavioral techniques in modern medicine has been sufficiently proven so as to have been referred to as the "third therapeutic revolution" in treating human illness, after pharmacological and surgical treatments. THE PROBLEM: Despite the fact that the bio-psycho-social model is the dominant model in 21st century medicine and despite the plethora of studies demonstrating the efficacy of behavioral interventions, these tools are underused in today's medical system. The reasons for this have to do with a dichotomous view of mind and body rooted in the biomedical approach, which was the dominant paradigm in the medical world up until the latter half of the previous century. In accordance with this paradigm, diseases were "assigned" either to medicine (i.e. they are physiological) or to the mental health professions (i.e. they are psychological), but never to both fields simultaneously. As an extension of this position, behavioral medicine was not included in Israel's socialized health care plan, making the use of behavioral techniques largely impractical, so that even physicians who agree with and believe in the importance of the bio-psycho-social model are often untrained or unable to provide effective behavioral treatments which would address the psycho-social aspects of their patients' illness. DISCUSSION: In Israel today there exist a number of facilities which provide behavioral treatments, however, there is, as yet, no public body in charge of organizing and promoting the knowledge and use of behavioral medicine in Israel. For the sake of patients, physicians and the medical system itself, it is imperative that, in the future, medical and paramedical professionals, including students and interns, are exposed to and trained in the use of behavioral techniques. In addition, thought must be given as to the integration of such techniques in routine medical care. For that purpose, we propose a number of guiding principles for effectively implementing' behavioral techniques in the day-to-day practice of modern; medicine.

Hypnotic relaxation vs amitriptyline for tension-type headache: let the patient choose.

BACKGROUND: Although both pharmacological and behavioral interventions may relieve tension-type headache, data are lacking regarding treatment preference, long-term patient compliance, and feasibility of behavioral intervention in a standard neurological outpatient clinic setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient choice, long-term compliance, and clinical outcome in a neurological clinic setting where patients are given the choice of the approach they wish to pursue. DESIGN: Patients presenting to the headache clinic with a diagnosis of tension-type headache that justified prophylactic therapy (frequent episodic tension-type headache or chronic tension-type headache) were given the choice of amitriptyline (AMT) treatment or hypnotic relaxation (HR), and were treated accordingly. Patients were given the option to cross-over to the other treatment group at each visit. HR was performed during standard length neurology clinic appointments by a neurologist trained to perform hypnosis (Y.E.). Follow-up interviews were performed between 6 and 12 months following treatment initiation to evaluate patient compliance, changes in headache frequency or severity, and quality-of-life parameters. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled, 92 agreed to receive prophylactic therapy of some kind. Fifty-three (57.6%) patients chose HR of which 36 (67.9%) actually initiated this treatment, while 39 (42.4%) chose pharmacological therapy with AMT of which 25 (64.1%) patients actually initiated therapy. Patients with greater analgesic use were more likely to opt for AMT (P= .0002). Eleven of the patients initially choosing AMT and 2 of the patients initially choosing HR crossed over to the other group. Seventy-four percent of the patients in the HR group and 58% of patients in the AMT group had a 50% reduction in the frequency of headaches (P= .16). Long-term adherence to treatment with HR exceeded that of AMT. At the end of the study period, 26 of 47 patients who tried HR compared with 10 of 27 who tried AMT continued receiving their initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HR treatment was a more popular choice among patients. Patients choosing HR reported greater symptom relief than those choosing AMT and were found to have greater treatment compliance. Patients receiving HR were less likely to change treatments. HR practiced by a neurologist is feasible in a standard neurological outpatient clinic setting; HR training should be considered for neurologists involved in headache treatment.

Sick of news? Television news exposure, collective stressful events and headache related emergency department visits.

Stress is a well-known trigger for primary headache yet its impact is difficult to demonstrate in large epidemiological studies. Israeli national TV news is often referred to as the "tribal fire", as many Israelis watch national news coverage following terror attacks or military operations. We examined the association between exposure to television news and their content with headache related Emergency Department visits. This retrospective cohort study included data on daily Emergency Department visits with a chief complaint of headache in Soroka University Medical Center, during 2002-2012. Data on daily television news viewership ratings were obtained from the Israeli Audience Research Board and its content from Channel 2 headlines, the highest rated TV news program. To estimate the short-term effects of news rating during the evening news on the number of daily headache visits, we applied generalized linear mixed models. 16,693 Emergency Department visits were included in the analysis. An increase in five units of daily rating percentages was associated with increase in Emergency Department visits the following day, relative risk (RR) = 1.032, (95% CI 1.014-1.050). This association increased with the age of the patients; RR = 1.119, (95% CI 1.075-1.65) for older than 60-year-old, RR = 1.044 (95% CI 1.010-1.078) for ages 40-60 and RR = 1.000 (95% CI 0.977-1.023) for younger than 40-year-old. We did not find a specific content associated with ED visit for headache. Higher television news ratings were associated with increased incidence of Emergency Department headache related visits. We assume that especially among older persons, news viewership ratings provide an indirect estimate of collective stress, which acts as a headache trigger for susceptible subjects.

Characteristics and economic burden of frequent attenders with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Frequent Attenders with Medically Unexplained Symptoms (FA/MUS) are common in primary care, though challenging to identify and treat. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare FA/MUS to FA with organic illnesses (FA/OI) and the general clinic population (Non-FA) to understand their demographic characteristics and healthcare utilisation patterns. METHODS: For this retrospective, observational study, Electronic Medical Records (EMR) were obtained from Clalit Health Services, regarding the population of a sizeable primary care clinic in Be'er-Sheva, Israel. Electronic medical records were screened to identify the top 5% of FA. FA were stratified based on whether they had OI. FA without OI were then corroborated as having MUS by their physicians. Demographics, healthcare utilisation and costs were analysed for FA/OI, FA/MUS and Non-FA. RESULTS: Out of 594 FA, 305 (53.6%) were FA/OI and 264 (46.4%) were FA/MUS. FA/OI were older (69.1 vs. 56.4 years, p<.001) and costlier (ILS27693 vs. ILS9075, p<.001) than FA/MUS. Average costs for FA/MUS were over four times higher than Non-FA (ILS9075 vs. ILS2035, p<.001). The largest disparities between FA/OI and FA/MUS were in hospitalisations (ILS6998 vs. ILS2033) and surgical procedures (ILS8143 vs. ILS3175). Regarding laboratory tests, differences were smaller between groups of FA but significantly different between FA and Non-FA. CONCLUSION: FA/MUS are more costly than Non-FA and exhibit unique healthcare utilisation and costs patterns. FA/OI had more severe illnesses necessitating hospitalisations and surgical interventions, while FA/MUS had more investigations and tests, attempting to find an explanation for their symptoms.

The Four-Cluster Spectrum of Mind-Body Interrelationships: An Integrative Model.

Despite the shift toward a biopsychosocial paradigm of medicine, many physicians and mental health professionals (MHPs) find it difficult to treat patients with psycho-somatic disorders. This situation is particularly troublesome due to the high prevalence of these conditions. Although progress has been made over the last few decades in understanding mechanisms underlying the mind-body relationship, disparities remain between research and its clinical implementation. One possible reason for this is the lack of a comprehensive, agreed-upon model that incorporates a biopsychosocial framework and is rooted in an understanding of the various psychobiological pathways. Such a model would enable better communication between physicians and MHPs, allowing them to provide coordinated, stratified treatment. In this paper, four archetypal case studies, together with standard care options are presented to illustrate the current state of affairs. A four-tiered conceptual model of mind-body interrelationships based on pathophysiological and psychopathological mechanisms is suggested to help optimize the treatment of somatic complaints. This Four-Cluster model consists of: (1) Organic Conditions: Structural, or degenerative processes that can affect mood and psychological responses but are not clearly exacerbated by stress. (2) Stress Exacerbated Diseases: Biological disorders with a distinct pathophysiology, such as inflammatory or autoimmune diseases, whose progression is clearly exacerbated by stress. (3) Functional Somatic Syndromes: Conditions wherein heightened sensitivity to stimuli together with hyper-reactivity of the autonomic system form a "vicious cycle" of mutually enhancing learning processes. These processes involve biological mechanisms, such as central sensitization and psychological mechanisms such as catastrophization and selective attention. (4) Conversion Disorder: Physical manifestations of psychological distress, expressed somatically. Symptoms are solely an expression of problems in patients' psychic functioning and are not caused by biological pathology. Finally, suggested management of the aforementioned case studies is presented through the lens of the Four-Cluster model and a proposed integration of our model with existing theories is discussed. As it is rooted in an understanding of psychobiological pathways of illness, the proposed model enables a new way to discern which form of mind-body interaction is manifesting in different diseases and proposes a way to coordinate treatment plans accordingly, to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of care.

Quality assessment of primary health care in a military setting.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the quality of primary care in Israeli Defense Forces primary care clinics and physicians (PCPs) and to test the hypotheses that: (1) the quality of primary care provided in battalions is higher than that provided by other primary care providers and (2) the evaluation of a specific PCP within the framework of the quality assessment program results in an improved score during a second evaluation. METHODS: Teams of two physicians carried out the control process. Each primary care clinic is evaluated in a standardized manner by filling a prospectively established form. Five parameters are examined: (1) direct inspection of the PCP, (2) medical record audit, (3) high-risk patients' management evaluation, (4) evaluation of secondary health care characteristics, and (5) medical staff guidance evaluation. The various clinics and physicians evaluated were classified as: battalion clinics, division and brigade clinics, training center clinics, and home-front clinics. RESULTS: Between the years 1999 and 2001, 149 primary care clinics and 250 PCPs were evaluated. Seventy-four PCPs (29.6%) were evaluated twice. Battalion clinics scored higher than the other clinics. PCPs evaluated twice had significantly better quality assessment results at the second encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of primary health care is the highest in battalion troops clinics. We interpret the increase in quality assessment scores from one examination to the other as an index of improvement resulting from the feedback given to the providers.