Arthroscopic Shaver-based Harvest of Minced Cartilage Results in Reduced Chondrocyte Viability and Reduced Quality of Cartilaginous Repair Tissue Compared With Open Harvest and Conventional Fragmentation.

PURPOSE: To characterize and compare the quality of regenerative cartilage tissue (ReCT) after conventional minced cartilage (CMC) and arthroscopic minced cartilage (AMC), in terms of cell viability, gene expression, and matrix synthesis and to investigate the influence of different shaver types. METHODS: Chondral tissue was harvested from the knees of 8 porcine donors. Porcine specimens were euthanized one day before harvest. AMC was created with 2 shaver blades in 2 operating modes (oscillating vs forward) and compared with a scalpel-fragmented CMC control. Before histologic analysis, 50% of the tissue was digested to prevent dedifferentiation of chondrocytes to fibroblasts. Cells were cultured and analyzed for cell viability, gene expression of cartilage-specific markers (aggrecan [ACAN], collagen type II, alpha1 [COL2A1], collagen type I, alpha1 [COL1A1], fibronectin-1 [FN1]), and matrix synthesis (Alcian-blue). RESULTS: AMC tissue contained fewer viable chondrocytes (41%-54% vs 91%; P = .001-.048) compared with CMC. After culture, CMC showed greater expressions of ACAN (27 virtual copy numbers [VCN]/housekeeping gene) and COL2A1 (30 VCN) compared with AMC (ACAN 2-9 VCN, COL2A1 2-7 VCN, P = .001-.039). AMC presented greater expressions of COL1A1 (9-21 VCN) and FN1 (12-17 VCN) than CMC (1 and 6 VCN, P = .001-.050). The signal intensity of the cartilage matrix formed by CMC (86/mm2) was greater than by AMC (7-10 mm2, P = .001-.032). CONCLUSIONS: CMC contained high numbers of viable chondrocytes, resulting in high-quality, hyaline-like ReCT. In contrast, AMC showed impaired chondrocyte quantity and viability, showing greater expressions of fibroblast markers and a decreased formation of mature cartilage matrix in porcine samples. The high chondrogenic potential of CMC to form hyaline-like ReCT was not confirmed for AMC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of our findings, arthroscopic harvest of minced cartilage leads to reduced chondrocyte viability and ReCT quality. Accordingly, CMC and AMC cannot be regarded as synonymous techniques, as arthroscopic techniques seem to be less efficacious.

Cortical bone thickness on preoperative CT scans as predictor of bone quality in distal femur fractures: a retrospective study in Caucasians.

AIM: Distal femur fractures (DFF) are rare, but associated with high complication rates and mortality, particularly in patients with osteoporosis. To improve preoperative assessment, we analyzed if cortical bone thickness on CT and AP radiographs is associated with clinical parameters of bone quality. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of adult patients presenting at a level-one trauma center, with a DFF between 2011 and 2020. Clinical parameters for bone quality, such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), energy impact level of trauma, and known history of osteoporosis, were assessed. Mean cortical bone thickness (CBTavg) on AP radiograph was determined using a previously published method. Cortical thickness on CT scan was measured at 8 and 14 cm proximal to the articular surface of the lateral condyle. RESULTS: 71 patients (46 females) between 20 and 100 years were included in the study. Cortical thickness determined by CT correlated significantly with CBTavg measurements on AP radiograph (Spearman r = 0.62 to 0.80; p < 0.001). Cortical thickness was inversely correlated with age (Spearman r = - 0.341 to - 0.466; p < 0.001) and significantly associated with trauma impact level and history of osteoporosis (p = < 0.001). The CT-based values showed a stronger correlation with the clinical parameters than those determined by AP X-ray. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that cortical thickness of the distal femur correlates with clinical parameters of bone quality and is therefore an excellent tool for assessing what surgical care should be provided. Interestingly, our findings indicate that cortical thickness on CT is more strongly correlated with clinical data than AP radiograph measurements.

ACL reconstruction demonstrates better stability compared to ACL repair for patients with Schenck III and IV knee dislocations.

PURPOSE: This study compared mid-term outcomes of two anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) restoration techniques within an early total surgical care of acute knee dislocation: repair with additional internal bracing (ACLIB) and reconstruction with autograft (ACLR). Initial results at 12 months demonstrated that ACLR offered superior stability compared to ACLIB. METHODS: Retrospective clinical study of patients with acute type III or IV KD. ACLIB or ACLR procedures were performed accompanied by simultaneous suture and internal bracing of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and repair with lateral augmentation of the medial and lateral complex injuries utilizing Arciero's reconstruction technique. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), instrumental stability assessment via the Rolimeter-Test, and stress radiographs were analyzed. RESULTS: The study involved 20 patients (5 IIIM, 5 IIIL, and 10 IV injuries) with an average follow-up of 35.2 ± 7.4 months. Notable differences in anterior tibial translation on stress radiography favouring ACLR persisted at 24-month follow-up in side-to-side difference (SSD) (ACLIB 2.8 ± 2.5 mm vs. ACLR 0.3 ± 2.6 mm; p = 0.0487), but Rolimeter test variance diminished (SSD ACLIB 2.5 ± 0.9 mm vs. ACLR 1.8 ± 1.7 mm). Both groups showed excellent PROMs (Lysholm Score: ACLIB 84.4 ± 15.8 vs. ACLR 89.9 ± 9.0; IKDC Score: ACLIB 77.1 ± 16.2 vs. ACLR 77.7 ± 8.6). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate improved anterior stability at 12 months, which persisted at 24 months after ACL reconstruction compared with ACL repair by stress radiography. Both groups showed favourable patient-reported outcomes throughout the follow-up period. Notable rates of postoperative knee stiffness were observed in both groups. These were successfully managed with early, one-time arthroscopic arthrolysis within the first seven months of treatment, resulting in no major range of motion limitations at the 24-month follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, III.

Arthrofibrosis is a common but poorly defined complication in multiligament knee injuries: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to systematically review multiligament knee injury (MLKI) outcome studies to determine definitions of arthrofibrosis (AF) and provide information about incidence, management as well as potential risk factors. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed (PubMed and Cochrane library) following the PRISMA guidelines of operatively treated MLKI (Schenck II-IV) studies reporting the incidence of AF. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Injury pattern, timing of surgery, surgical technique, treatment of AF, rehabilitation programs and PROMS were inquired. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Coleman methodological score. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a total of 709 patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 4.8 years were included and followed 47.2 ± 32.0 months. The majority of studies (22/25) used imprecise and subjective definitions of AF. A total of 86 patients were treated for AF, resulting in an overall prevalence of 12.1% (range 2.8-57.1). Higher-grade injuries (Schenck III-IV), acute treatment and ROM (range of motion) limiting rehabilitation programs were potential risk factors for AF. The time from index surgery to manipulation anesthesia (MUA) and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) averaged at 14.3 ± 8.8 and 27.7 ± 12.8 weeks. Prior to MUA and LOA, the ROM was 51.7° ± 23.5 and 80.2° ± 17.0, resulting in a total ROM gain after intervention of 65.0° ± 19.7 and 48.0° ± 10.6, respectively; with no reports of any complication within the follow-up. The overall methodological quality of the studies was poor as measured by the Coleman score with average 56.3 ± 12.5 (range 31-84) points. CONCLUSIONS: AF is a common but poorly defined complication particularly in high-grade MLKI. Early postoperative and intensified physiotherapy is important to reduce the risk of AF. MUA and LOA are very effective treatment options and result in good clinical outcome. Prospective studies with bigger study population are needed to optimize treatment algorithms of further patients after MLKI. The protocol of this systematic review has been prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021229187, January 4th, 2021).

Long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a minimum 21-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Early osteoarthritis (OA) due to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a known indication for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Though screening tools and joint-preserving procedures have been established successfully, there still is a relevant number of patients suffering DDH. Due to the lack of long-term outcome studies, we like to close this gap and present the results of a highly specialized center. METHODS: The study included 126 patients, who were treated in our institution with primary THA for DDH between January 1997 and December 2000. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 23 years postoperatively, 110 patients (121 hips) were clinically evaluated using the Harris-Hip Score. In addition, complication and surgical revision rates were assessed. We collected surgery-related data like implant choice and special surgical features such as autologous acetabular reconstruction or femoral osteotomies. Additionally, the severity of preoperative DDH was measured radiographically according to Crowe classification. RESULTS: There were 91 female (83%) and 19 male (17%) patients with an average age of 51 ± 9.5 years (range 21-65) included. Mean follow-up was 23 ± 1.3 years (21-25), with a minimum of 21 years being necessary for inclusion. Using revision for any indication as primary endpoint, the Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.3% at 10 years and 81.8% at final follow-up. The overall revision rate was 18% (22 cases), which were split up as follows: 20 (17%) implant failures (loosened or broken components), one (1%) periprosthetic infection and one (1%) periprosthetic fracture. Regarding complications, we observed nine (7%) dislocations and one case (1%) with severe heterotopic ossification that required surgical excision. The mean Harris-Hip score at latest follow-up was 78 ± 14 points (32-95). CONCLUSIONS: Though implants and surgical techniques have improved over time, our results suggest THA in patients suffering DDH to be seriously challenging with relatively high overall complications in long-term observation and fair clinical outcome after 21 years postoperatively. There is evidence that prior osteotomy might be associated with a higher revision rate.

Surgically treated acute knee dislocations with knee stiffness perform equally as well as non-stiff knees when treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis.

PURPOSE: Postoperative knee stiffness is a common issue in multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs). This study aims to compare outcomes between MLKI patients who underwent postoperative arthroscopic lysis of arthrofibrosis (LOA) for limited range of motion (ROM) and those who did not. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (10 IIIM, nine IIIL and 12 IV) were included in this retrospective clinical study with acute type III or IV knee dislocations, while two patients were lost to follow up. Thirteen patients underwent LOA at a mean of 18.7 ± 8.4 weeks (Group A), while 18 did not require this intervention (Group B). Patient-reported outcome measures (IKDC, Lysholm, VAS) and ROM were evaluated. RESULTS: The average follow up period was 31.0 ± 10.2 months. The mean time to LOA was 19.4 ± 7.6 weeks and a significant increase in ROM was observed after LOA (flexion: before LOA: 83.8° ± 19.2, after LOA: 119.6° ± 9.9; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical scores (Lysholm: Group A 85.0 ± 13.4, Group B 84.6 ± 14.5; IKDC: Group A 74.3 ± 10.8, Group B 76.7 ± 14.7) and ROM (flexion: Group A 118.6° ± 9.8, Group B 124.3° ± 12.8). There were no complications regarding LOA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, whether undergoing LOA or not, performed equally well in terms of ROM and clinical scores at final follow up, while timing of LOA appears less critical. LOA is a simple, durable and safe method of treating ROM deficits in patients treated for acute knee dislocation, with very good results.

Total knee arthroplasty and patelloplasty in a patient with phocomelia caused by thalidomide.

The treatment of osteoarthritis in patients with phocomelia with total knee arthroplasty is challenging due to the unusual anatomy and severe deformities. The authors present a case of phocomelia caused by thalidomide with end-stage osteoarthritis and grossly medialized patella. The patient was treated with a cemented constrained non-hinged prosthesis and patelloplasty. Six months later, the patient had complete relief of pain and was able to walk without walking assistance. To our knowledge, total knee replacement in a patient with phocomelia caused by thalidomide has not been described in literature.

Comparison of Onlay Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Fixation for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis During Revision ACL Reconstruction.

Background: There is evidence on the clinical effectiveness of the Lemaire technique for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the best fixation technique is unknown. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of 2 fixation techniques after revision ACLR: (1) onlay anchor fixation, which would avoid tunnel conflict and physis injury, and (2) transosseous tightening and interference screw fixation. Pain at the area of LET fixation was also assessed. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a retrospective 2-center study of patients with first-time revision ACLR and either LET with anchor fixation (aLET) with a 2.4-mm suture anchor or LET with transosseous fixation (tLET). Outcomes at minimum 12-month follow-up were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale for pain at the LET fixation area, Tegner score, and anterior tibial translation (ATT). A subgroup analysis within the aLET group investigated passing the graft over or under the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). Results: In total, 52 patients were included (26 patients in each group); the mean ± SD follow-up was 13.7 ± 3.4 months. No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups with respect to patient-reported outcome scores, clinical examination, or instrumented testing (side-to-side difference in ATT at 30° of flexion; aLET, 1.5 ± 2.5 mm; tLET, 1.6 ± 1.7 mm). Clinical failure was detected in 1 patient with aLET and none with tLET. Subgroup analysis revealed a small, nonsignificant flexion deficit in knees in which the iliotibial band strand was passed under (n = 42) or over (n = 10) the LCL. No clinically relevant tenderness was detected at the area of LET fixation in any group (aLET, 0.6 ± 1.3; tLET, 0.9 ± 1.7; over the LCL, 0.2 ± 0.6; under the LCL, 0.9 ± 1.6). Conclusion: Onlay anchor fixation and transosseous fixation of the LET were equivalent with respect to outcome scores and instrumented ATT testing. Clinically, there were minor differences in passage of the LET graft over or under the LCL.