Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma biomarkers: Towards early detection and personalized pharmacological treatments.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy originating from the biliary tree and is anatomically categorized as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar, and extrahepatic or distal. iCCA, the second most prevalent hepatobiliary cancer following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), constitutes 5-20 % of all liver malignancies, with an increasing incidence. The challenging nature of iCCA, combined with nonspecific symptoms, often leads to late diagnoses, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. The advanced phase of this neoplasm is difficult to treat with dismal results. Early diagnosis could significantly reduce mortality attributed to iCCA but remains an elusive goal. The identification of biomarkers specific to iCCA and their translation into clinical practice could facilitate diagnosis, monitor therapy response, and potentially reveal novel interventions and personalized medicine. In this review, we present the current landscape of biomarkers in each of these contexts. In addition to CA19.9, a widely recognized biomarker for iCCA, others such as A1BG, CYFRA 21-1, FAM19A5, MMP-7, RBAK, SSP411, TuM2-PK, WFA, etc., as well as circulating tumor DNA, RNA, cells, and exosomes, are under investigation. Advancing our knowledge and monitoring of biomarkers may enable us to improve diagnosis, prognostication, and apply treatments dynamically and in a more personalized manner.

Pain assessment and management in haemophilia: A survey among Italian patients and specialist physicians.

INTRODUCTION: Persons with haemophilia (PWH) experience recurrent joint bleeding which leads from early synovitis to irreversible joint damage. Pain strongly affects patients' quality of life, as PWH suffer from acute pain associated with haemarthroses and chronic pain due to arthritic and degenerative complications. AIM: To investigate pain issues among PWH and their treaters in Italy. METHODS: Persons with haemophilia and specialist physicians responded to a survey focused on pain characteristics, assessment, and management by phone call and online, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients (76% severe haemophilia, 61% ≥18 years) and 44 physicians were involved. Pain was reported by 61% of PWH; among those who did not experience pain, 70% were children on prophylaxis. Patients described pain as chronic (71%), acute (69%) or postoperative (8%), and rated it as severe in 65% of cases. Clinicians reported lower percentages of patients with pain (46%), classified as chronic (58%), acute (33%) or postoperative (21%), half using specific scales. Pain was systematically investigated by treaters according to 36% of patients. Paracetamol was largely the most prescribed first-line pain therapy (89%), as well the most employed analgesic by PWH (51%), who also used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (24%), cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (21%) or opioids (26%). To manage pain, 61% of clinicians stated to collaborate with other specialists. Physiotherapy was often suggested but less frequently used by PWH. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is under-recognized and unsatisfactorily addressed by haemophilia treatment centre (HTC) clinicians, with discrepant management compared to PWH responses. Education in systematic pain assessment and multidisciplinary treatment and development of management guidelines are highly needed.