Bioavailability study of Enoxaparin Sodium Chemi (80 mg/0.8 mL) and Clexane (80 mg/0.8 mL) subcutaneous injection in healthy adults.

OBJECTIVE: The present study compared the bioavailability of subcutaneous (s.c.) Chemi Enoxaparin with Clexane (80 mg/0.8 mL) under fasting conditions in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-treatment period crossover study. We included healthy male and female subjects aged 18 - 55 years with a body mass index of 18 - 30 kg/m2. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoints were anti-FIIa and anti-FXa activity. Bioequivalence was achieved when the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric means of Cmax and AUC0-t was between 80.00 and 125.00%. RESULTS: 47 subjects were randomized for the treatment sequences. The 95% CI of the ratios of the geometric least squared means of anti-FXa activity was 96.28 - 102.65 IU/mL for Cmax and 100.67 - 105.15 h×IU/mL for the AUC0-t of Chemi Enoxaparin compared with those of Clexane, and for anti-FIIa activity, they were 86.65 - 96.73 IU/mL for the Cmax and 87.72 - 97.25 h×IU/mL AUC0-t, which met the criterion for bioequivalence. The number of subjects reporting at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was low, mostly of mild severity, and similar for both compounds. CONCLUSION: Chemi enoxaparin is bioequivalent to the reference enoxaparin, and both compounds show similar tolerability and safety profiles.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Tolerability, and Food Effect of Cenerimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator in Healthy Subjects.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and food effect of cenerimod, a potent sphingosine-1-phosphate subtype 1 receptor modulator, were investigated in three sub-studies. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised studies in healthy male subjects were performed. Cenerimod was administered either as single dose (1, 3, 10 or 25 mg; Study 1) or once daily for 35 days (0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg; Study 2). A two-period cross-over, open-label study was performed to assess the food effect (1 mg, Study 3). The pharmacokinetic profile of cenerimod was characterised by a tmax of 5.0-6.2 h. Terminal half-life after single and multiple doses ranged from 170 to 199 h and 283 to 539 h, respectively. Food had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of cenerimod. A dose-dependent decrease in lymphocyte count was observed after initiation of cenerimod and reached a plateau (maximum change from baseline: -64%) after 20-23 days of treatment. Lymphocyte counts returned to baseline values at end-of-study examination. One serious adverse event of circulatory collapse (25 mg dose group, maximum tolerated dose: 10 mg) and adverse events of mild-to-moderate intensity were reported. Treatment initiation was associated with transient decreases in heart rate and blood pressure at doses >1 and ≥10 mg, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of indacaterol and mometasone furoate delivered alone or in a free or fixed dose combination in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: QMF149 is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting ß2 agonist, indacaterol and the corticosteroid, mometasone furoate that is currently under development for treatment of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We describe here a study designed to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or biopharmaceutical interaction between indacaterol and mometasone furoate when administered via the Breezhaler(®) device, either alone or in a free or fixed combination (QMF149) in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, four-way crossover study, subjects were randomized to receive indacaterol acetate 150 µg, mometasone furoate 320 µg, alone and as free combination of the individual components, or QMF149 (indacaterol acetate 150 µg/mometasone furoate 320 µg) once daily for 14 days in each period, followed by a 7-day washout between periods. PK profiles were characterized on Day 14 up to 168 h post-dose. RESULTS: Indacaterol AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss after administration of QMF149 were 13% [ratio: 1.13; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.17] and 18% [ratio: 1.18; 90%CI: 1.12, 1.25] higher, respectively, than indacaterol monotherapy. Mometasone furoate AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss after administration of QMF149 were 14% [ratio: 1.14; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.20] and 19% [ratio: 1.19; 90%CI: 1.13, 1.26], higher, respectively than mometasone furoate monotherapy. The majority (three of four comparisons between QMF149 and monotherapy) of the 90% confidence intervals of the between-treatment ratios for AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss were within the 0.80 to 1.25 interval and therefore fulfilled bioequivalence criteria. The 90% confidence interval for Cmax,ss for MF for the QMF149 vs. monotherapy comparison was [1.13, 1.26]. Although no definitive data can be provided on the basis of the present study results, it is unlikely that the small observed differences in expsoure are clinically meaningful. Multiple inhaled doses of indacaterol and mometasone furoate, when administered alone, in free combination or as QMF149 were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The QMF149 fixed dose combination treatment showed comparable systemic exposure to the free combination and monotherapy treatments in terms of AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss for both indacaterol and mometasone furoate, indicating an absence of clinically relevant PK or biopharmaceutical interactions. These data support further development of QMF149 without dose adjustment.

Effect of dual bronchodilation with QVA149 on cardiac safety in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: QVA149 is a dual bronchodilator, containing a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting ß2-agonist indacaterol and long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium, for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here we assess the potential of QVA149 (440/200 µg) at 4-fold the therapeutic dose for causing cardiac pharmacodynamic (PD) effects. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized study estimated the time-matched largest heart rate (HR) change and average HR change (over 24 hours) from baseline for QVA149 vs. placebo in healthy subjects. Similar analyses were done for QVA149 vs. indacaterol 600 µg, glycopyrronium 200 µg, and salmeterol 200 µg. The time-matched and average change from baseline in QT interval corrected for HR using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), effects on serum potassium and blood glucose, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 50 subjects randomized, 43 completed the study. QVA149, when compared with placebo, showed the time-matched largest mean increase and decrease in HR of 5.69 bpm and -2.51 bpm, respectively, and average HR change from baseline of 0.62 bpm. QVA149 showed no tachycardic potential compared with indacaterol and no relevant tachycardic effect compared with glycopyrronium. No consistent differences were seen in the time-matched largest mean change and average change from baseline in QTcF for QVA149 vs. other treatments. There were no relevant effects of QVA149 on serum potassium and blood glucose. There was no apparent PK/PD relationship between the observed exposures to indacaterol and glycopyrronium in QVA149 on HR and QTcF. There were no deaths or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Overall, short-term administration of QVA149 showed a good cardiovascular safety and tolerability profile in healthy subjects.

Bioavailability of Triprolidine as a Single Agent or in Combination With Pseudoephedrine: A Randomized, Open-Label Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Antihistamines have been in clinical use for more than 70 years to treat allergic and nonallergic symptoms including relief from cold and flu symptoms. Despite their widespread use, pharmacokinetic (PK) data are sparse for older, first-generation antihistamines. This phase 1 single-center open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover trial evaluated the PK profiles of 2 doses of film-coated triprolidine caplets (2.5 and 5 mg) compared with a reference combination tablet (triprolidine 2.5 mg + pseudoephedrine 60 mg) in 24 healthy adults. Blood samples were collected predose and at specified intervals across a 24-hour period after administration, and triprolidine was quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Maximum plasma concentration of triprolidine for the 2.5 mg and dose-normalized 5 mg single-agent tablets were comparable (8.4 versus 7.1 ng/mL, respectively) and higher for the combination tablet (9.5 ng/mL). PK parameters, including time to maximum plasma concentration (∼1.5 hours) and elimination half-life (∼4 hours), were comparable between the 3 treatment arms. The safety profile of this sedating antihistamine was as expected; however, adverse effects were reported in a markedly higher proportion of women than men. There were no significant sex differences in any of the measured PK parameters.

A first-in-man phase I tolerability and pharmacokinetic study of the cyclin-dependent kinase-inhibitor AZD5438 in healthy male volunteers.

AZD5438 is a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with preclinical pharmacodynamic (PD) activity against a range of human tumour xenografts. A first-in-man tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) study involving single ascending doses of AZD5438 was conducted in healthy male volunteers. Single oral doses ranging from 5 to 160 mg were studied in 23 subjects. Dose-limiting nausea and vomiting occurred at 160 mg in the absence of prophylactic anti-emetics. The maximum tolerated dose (the dose at which no dose limiting toxicities occurred) was 80 mg, and the maximum well-tolerated dose was deemed to be 60 mg, which was associated with grade1 nausea but no vomiting. Tmax occurred between 0.5-3.0 hours with a relatively short plasma half-life of 1-3 h. The coefficient of variation of exposures within a dose level ranged from 22-71% (AUC) to 16-63% (C max), and exposure increased with increasing dose across the doses studied. <1% of the parent compound was excreted in the urine, suggesting metabolism as the major clearance mechanism. The maximum well-tolerated dose and a number of doses below this level will be taken forward into a PD study using normal tissue biomarkers in humans to determine proof of AZD5438's action on the cell cycle. The pharmacokinetic profile of AZD5438 determined within this study will be used to guide the time-points for PD analysis within the planned PD study.

Tolerance of ocular iontophoresis in healthy volunteers.

To evaluate ocular tolerance, healthy volunteers were iontophoresed transclerally using novel OcuPhor trade mark hydrogel drug delivery applicators filled with balanced salt solution. In this three-period crossover study in 24 male and female subjects, 16 subjects received 0 mA and two of the following DC currents: 0.1, 0.5., 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0 mA for 20 min; 6 subjects received 3 mA for 20 min and 1.5 mA for 40 min (both equivalent to 60 mAmin total charge). Safety and tolerance were determined by subjective VAS and objective ophthalmic assessments. Subjects were evaluated before and up to 22 hr after dosing. The applicators were well-tolerated and no clinically significant changes in symptomology or in ophthalmic assessments were seen following exposure to 0-3.0 mA for 20 min or 1.5 mA for 40 min. At 4.0 mA 2 of 4 subjects reported a burning sensation under the applicator during dosing which resolved by 22 hr post-dose; superficial changes in fluorescein staining were observed at 1 hr, but not at 22 hr. The OcuPhor trade mark system has promise for noninvasive drug delivery to the eye.

Systemic bioavailability, safety and tolerability of topical ozenoxacin in healthy adult volunteers.

A series of Phase I studies was conducted in healthy volunteers to examine the systemic bioavailability and safety of topical ozenoxacin. Study 1 examined increasing single doses (relating to quantity and body surface area) of ozenoxacin 1% ointment. Study 2 compared multiple doses of ozenoxacin 1% ointment and placebo applied for 7 days. Study 3 investigated multiple doses of ozenoxacin 2% cream and placebo applied for 7 days. Study 4 examined multiple doses of ozenoxacin 2% cream applied to intact and abraded skin for 8 days. No systemic absorption was observed in any study and ozenoxacin was well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events were application-site reactions (erythema and pruritus), but the differences in local tolerability between ozenoxacin and placebo were not clinically significant.

Skin tissue exposure of once- versus twice-daily topical ozenoxacin 2% cream: a Phase I study in healthy volunteers.

In this Phase I study, healthy volunteers (n = 24) were randomly allocated to receive either one or two 0.2-g applications per day (12 h apart) of ozenoxacin 2% cream on three different areas of the back for 3 consecutive days. Ozenoxacin concentrations were measured in tape stripping samples (from the stratum corneum) and in skin punch biopsy samples (from the epidermis and dermis) taken predose from selected dosing areas on study days 2, 3 and 4. Ozenoxacin concentrations were high in the stratum corneum and were approximately twofold greater for the twice- versus once-daily application. Ozenoxacin concentrations were low in the epidermis and were higher for the twice- versus once-daily application. Ozenoxacin concentrations in the dermis were below the limit of quantitation on most study days.