Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Alzheimers Dement ; 20(2): 769-782, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776210

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. study to protect brain health through lifestyle intervention to reduce risk (U.S. POINTER) is conducted to confirm and expand the results of the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) in Americans. METHODS: U.S. POINTER was planned as a 2-year randomized controlled trial of two lifestyle interventions in 2000 older adults at risk for dementia due to well-established factors. The primary outcome is a global cognition composite that permits harmonization with FINGER. RESULTS: U.S. POINTER is centrally coordinated and conducted at five clinical sites (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03688126). Outcomes assessments are completed at baseline and every 6 months. Both interventions focus on exercise, diet, cognitive/social stimulation, and cardiovascular health, but differ in intensity and accountability. The study partners with a worldwide network of similar trials for harmonization of methods and data sharing. DISCUSSION: U.S. POINTER is testing a potentially sustainable intervention to support brain health and Alzheimer's prevention for Americans. Impact is strengthened by the targeted participant diversity and expanded scientific scope through ancillary studies.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Idoso , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Cognição , Exercício Físico , Encéfalo
2.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 26(2): 135-43, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21229597

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) for identifying participants appropriate for trials of physical activity and cognitive training interventions. METHODS: Volunteers (N=343), ages 70-85 years, who were being recruited for a pilot clinical trial on approaches to prevent cognitive decline, were administered TICS and required to score ≥ 31 prior to an invitation to attend clinic-based assessments. The frequencies of contraindications for physical activity and cognitive training interventions were tallied for individuals grouped by TICS scores. Relationships between TICS scores and other measures of cognitive function were described by scatterplots and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Eligibility criteria to identify candidates who were appropriate candidates for the trial interventions excluded 51.7% of the volunteers with TICS<31. TICS scores above this range were not strongly related to cognition or attendance at screening visits, however overall enrollment yields were approximately half for participants with TICS=31 versus TICS=41, and increased in a graded fashion throughout the range of scores. CONCLUSIONS: Use of TICS to define eligibility criteria in trials of physical activity and cognitive training interventions may not be worthwhile in that many individuals with low scores would already be eliminated by intervention-specific criteria and the relationship of TICS with clinic-based tests of cognitive function among appropriate candidates for these interventions may be weak. TICS may be most useful in these trials to identify candidates for oversampling in order to obtain a balanced cohort of participants at risk for cognitive decline.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/prevenção & controle , Cognição/fisiologia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Exercício Físico/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Esforço Físico , Consulta Remota/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Telefone
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(4): 679-686, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29601076

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of serious adverse events (SAEs) involving syncope, hypotension, and falls, with particular attention to age, in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Academic and private practices across the United States (N = 102). PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 50 and older with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 to 180 mmHg at high risk of cardiovascular disease events, but without diabetes, history of stroke, symptomatic heart failure or ejection fraction less than 35%, dementia, or standing SBP less than 110 mmHg (N = 9,361). INTERVENTION: Treatment of SBP to a goal of less than 120 mmHg or 140 mmHg. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were SAEs involving syncope, hypotension, and falls. Predictors were treatment assignment, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, baseline measurements, and baseline use of cardiovascular medications. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two (1.8%) participants had SAEs involving syncope, 155 (1.6%) hypotension, and 203 (2.2%) falls. Randomization to intensive SBP control was associated with greater risk of an SAE involving hypotension (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-2.32, P = .002), and possibly syncope (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.98-1.79, P = .07), but not falls (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.75-1.29, P = .90). Risk of all three outcomes was higher for participants with chronic kidney disease or frailty. Older age was also associated with greater risk of syncope, hypotension, and falls, but there was no age-by-treatment interaction for any of the SAE outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Participants randomized to intensive SBP control had greater risk of hypotension and possibly syncope, but not falls. The greater risk of developing these events associated with intensive treatment did not vary according to age.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipotensão/etiologia , Síncope/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Acad Radiol ; 14(5): 603-12, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17434074

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The rates of enrollment of volunteers for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies vary by demographic and clinical characteristics. We use data from a large MRI study to identify factors associated with differential enrollment and to examine potential biases this may produce in study results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from recruitment of 1,431 women into the MRI substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS-MRI) are described. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate the degree of bias associated with missing data on estimates of risk factor relationships. RESULTS: Of 2,345 women contacted from an established cohort of women older than 70 years of age, 72% consented to undergo screening for WHIMS-MRI. Scanning was ultimately completed on 61%. Completion rates varied according to a range of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics that may be related to study outcomes. Plausible levels of selective enrollment in magnetic resonance imaging studies may produce moderate biases (< +/-20%) in characterizations of risk factor relationships. Adverse events, such as claustrophobia, occurred during 1.7% of the attempted scans and, in 0.8% of instances, led to lost data. CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment of older women into brain imaging studies is feasible, although selection biases may limit how well study cohorts reflect more general populations.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Seleção de Pacientes , Saúde da Mulher , Idoso , Transtornos Cognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Modelos Logísticos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA