Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 46(5): 435-40, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26864132

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pretreatment repeat biopsy of nasopharynx is associated with an impaired outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in an intensity-modified radiotherapy era. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data review of the association between pretreatment nasopharyngeal biopsy and outcomes for all nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated at our center between January 2007 and December 2011. Of the 720 patients enrolled, 693 (96.3%) were diagnosed after initial biopsy and 27 (3.7%) after repeat biopsy. Five-year cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival for the two groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the effects of repeat biopsy on the outcome. RESULTS: Five-year estimated cancer-specific survival (75.9 vs. 88.5%, P= 0.045) and disease-free survival (63.3 vs. 77.1%, P= 0.041) were significantly poorer in the repeat biopsy group than the initial biopsy group. After adjustment for other prognostic factors (age, gender, T and N stage), pretreatment biopsy remained independently associated with poorer both 5-year cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. The hazard ratios for cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival in the repeat biopsy group were 2.73 (95% confidence interval 1.09-6.82) and 2.22 (95% confidence interval 1.12-4.37) compared with the initial biopsy group (reference), respectively. The repeat biopsy group also had a higher risk of distant failure compared with the initial biopsy group (hazard ratio 2.82, 95% confidence interval 1.22-6.51, P= 0.015). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment repeat biopsy of nasopharynx has a detrimental effect on survivals of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, which may be partly due to an increased frequency of distant metastasis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Nasofaringe/diagnóstico por imagem , Nasofaringe/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 11 Suppl 2: C179-84, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26506872

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study and report the clinical outcomes and patterns of failure in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) staged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2011, 720 NPC patients without metastasis staged by MRI were treated with definitive IMRT at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The IMRT prescribed dose was 69 Gy to planning target volume (PTV) of gross disease in nasopharynx and 67.5 Gy to PTV of positive lymph nodes in 30 fractions, high risk, and low risk region PTV was 60 and 54 Gy in 30 fractions, respectively. The treatment outcomes and patterns of failure were observed. RESULTS: Using the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for NPC, the proportions of the 720 patients with Stages I, II, III, and IVa-b disease were 2.1% (15/720), 17.8% (128/720), 51.7% (372/720), and 28.5% (205/720), respectively. After the median follow-up period of 48 months (range: 3-89 months), a total of 146/720 (20.3%) patients had experienced failure: 37 (5.1%) at primary sites, 17 (2.4%) at regional sites, 79 (11.0%) at distant sites, and 13 (1.8%) at multiple sites. The 5-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis (DM) free survival were 86.1%, 88.1%, 76.6%, 90.8%, 93.6%, and 87.2%, respectively. LRFS of T1 to T3 was all >90% and has no significant difference. In addition to N stage, T category, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors for DM in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our long-term outcome of large NPC series supports the effectiveness of IMRT for excellent local-regional control though up to 20% patients would develop DM, which becomes the main pattern of failure. T4 disease remained difficult to be cured not only for local recurrence but distant failure. A taxane-based combination chemotherapy might be useful to reduce DM in the induction setting and worth further studying.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma , China , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA