Neurological outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke receiving enoxaparin or heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: subanalysis of the Prevention of VTE after Acute Ischemic Stroke with LMWH (PREVAIL) study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Prevention of VTE after Acute Ischemic Stroke with LMWH (PREVAIL) study demonstrated that enoxaparin was superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in preventing venous thromboembolism in patients with ischemic stroke and was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in extracranial hemorrhage rates. In this PREVAIL subanalysis, we evaluate the long-term neurological outcomes associated with the use of enoxaparin compared with UFH. We also determine predictors of stroke progression. METHODS: Acute ischemic stroke patients aged >or=18 years, who could not walk unassisted, were randomized to receive enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or UFH (5000 U every 12 hours) for 10 days. Patients were stratified according to baseline stroke severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. End points for this analysis included stroke progression (>or=4-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), neurological outcomes up to 3 months postrandomization (assessed using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and modified Rankin Scale score), and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Stroke progression occurred in 45 of 877 (5.1%) patients in the enoxaparin group and 42 of 872 (4.8%) of those receiving UFH. Similar improvements in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale scores were observed in both groups over the 90-day follow-up period. Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was comparable between groups (20 of 877 [2.3%] and 22 of 872 [2.5%] in enoxaparin and UFH groups, respectively). Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, hyperlipidemia, and Hispanic ethnicity were independent predictors of stroke progression. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits associated with use of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke are not associated with poorer long-term neurological outcomes or increased rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with UFH.

The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised comparison.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin is recommended in acute ischaemic stroke, but which regimen provides optimum treatment is uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin with that of unfractionated heparin for patients with stroke. METHODS: 1762 patients with acute ischaemic stroke who were unable to walk unassisted were randomly assigned within 48 h of symptoms to receive either enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily or unfractionated heparin 5000 U subcutaneously every 12 h for 10 days (range 6-14). Patients were stratified by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (severe stroke > or =14, less severe stroke <14). The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or fatal pulmonary embolism. Primary safety endpoints were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, major extracranial haemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00077805. FINDINGS: In the efficacy population (ie, one or more dose received, presence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or assessment for venous thromboembolism), enoxaparin (n=666) and unfractionated heparin (669) were given for 10.5 days (SD 3.2). Enoxaparin reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism by 43% compared with unfractionated heparin (68 [10%] vs 121 [18%]; relative risk 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.76, p=0.0001; difference -7.9%, -11.6 to -4.2); this reduction was consistent for patients with an NIHSS score of 14 or more (26 [16%] vs 52 [30%]; p=0.0036) or less than 14 (42 [8%] vs 69 [14%]; p=0.0044). The occurrence of any bleeding was similar with enoxaparin (69 [8%]) or unfractionated heparin (71 [8%]; p=0.83). The frequency of the composite of symptomatic intracranial and major extracranial haemorrhage was small and closely similar between groups (enoxaparin 11 [1%] vs unfractionated heparin 6 [1%]; p=0.23). We noted no difference for symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage between groups (4 [1%] vs 6 [1%], respectively; p=0.55); the rate of major extracranial bleeding was higher with enoxaparin than with unfractionated heparin (7 [1%] vs 0; p=0.015). INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that for patients with acute ischaemic stroke, enoxaparin is preferable to unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in view of its better clinical benefits to risk ratio and convenience of once daily administration.

Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials.

BACKGROUND: Quick administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) after stroke improved outcomes in previous trials. We aimed to analyse combined data for individual patients to confirm the importance of rapid treatment. METHODS: We pooled common data elements from six randomised placebo-controlled trials of intravenous rt-PA. Using multivariable logistic regression we assessed the relation of the interval from stroke onset to start of treatment (OTT) on favourable 3-month outcome and on the occurrence of clinically relevant parenchymal haemorrhage. FINDINGS: Treatment was started within 360 min of onset of stroke in 2775 patients randomly allocated to rt-PA or placebo. Median age was 68 years, median baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 11, and median OTT 243 min. Odds of a favourable 3-month outcome increased as OTT decreased (p=0.005). Odds were 2.8 (95% CI 1.8-4.5) for 0-90 min, 1.6 (1.1-2.2) for 91-180 min, 1.4 (1.1-1.9) for 181-270 min, and 1.2 (0.9-1.5) for 271-360 min in favour of the rt-PA group. The hazard ratio for death adjusted for baseline NIHSS was not different from 1.0 for the 0-90, 91-180, and 181-270 min intervals; for 271-360 min it was 1.45 (1.02-2.07). Haemorrhage was seen in 82 (5.9%) rt-PA patients and 15 (1.1%) controls (p<0.0001). Haemorrhage was not associated with OTT but was with rt-PA treatment (p=0.0001) and age (p=0.0002). INTERPRETATION: The sooner that rt-PA is given to stroke patients, the greater the benefit, especially if started within 90 min. Our results suggest a potential benefit beyond 3 h, but this potential might come with some risks.

Comparison of the effects of acetyl L-carnitine and amantadine for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: results of a pilot, randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.

Treatment with acetyl L-carnitine (ALCAR) has been shown to improve fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, but there have been no trials on the effect of ALCAR for treating fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS). To compare the efficacy of ALCAR with that of amantadine, one of the drugs most widely used to treat MS-related fatigue, 36 MS patients presenting fatigue were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Patients were treated for 3 months with either amantadine (100 mg twice daily) or ALCAR (1 g twice daily). After a 3-month washout period, they crossed over to the alternative treatment for 3 months. Patients were rated at baseline and every 3 months according to the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary outcome variables were: Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Social Experience Checklist (SEC). Six patients withdrew from the study because of adverse reactions (five on amantadine and one on ALCAR). Statistical analysis showed significant effects of ALCAR compared with amantadine for the Fatigue Severity Scale (p = 0.039). There were no significant effects for any of the secondary outcome variables. The results of this study show that ALCAR is better tolerated and more effective than amantadine for the treatment of MS-related fatigue.

Distribution of potential cardiac sources of embolism in young and older stroke patients: implications for recurrent vascular events.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has improved the diagnostic evaluation of ischemic stroke patients, permitting detection of potential cardiac sources of embolism. The present study aimed to evaluate the distribution of potential cardioembolic sources in young versus older stroke patients and their clinical implication for recurrent vascular events. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with undetermined ischemic stroke were enrolled in the study. METHODS: All patients were submitted to transthoracic and to TEE examination. The mean follow-up period was 43 +/- 19 months. RESULTS: The overall detection of cardiac sources of embolism was significantly higher in younger than in older patients (P = 0.006). Atrial septal abnormalities were more prevalent in the younger than in the older population (P = 0.006), whereas complicated aortic plaques were detected more often in older patients. During the follow-up period of 4-5 years, we identified 40 recurrent stroke episodes or vascular deaths. As expected, there was a significant difference in recurrent vascular events and death of older patients compared to the younger ones (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that atrial septal abnormalities and aortic atheromas are the most prevalent echocardiographic findings in young and elderly stroke patients, respectively. Complicated aortic atheroma is strictly correlated with recurrent cerebral vascular events or death.

Corticotropin-releasing factor: effect on cerebral blood flow in physiologic and ischaemic conditions.

The expression of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors in cerebral arteries and arterioles suggests that CRF may modulate cerebral blood flow (CBF). In the present study, the effects of CRF, CRF-like peptides and the CRF broad spectrum antagonist DPhe-CRF on CBF have been investigated under normal physiologic conditions and in the margins of focal ischaemic insult. The experiments were carried out in anaesthetised and ventilated rats. Changes in CBF after subarachnoid microapplication of CRF and related peptides were assessed with a laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) probe. In the ischaemic animals, agents were injected approximately 60 minutes after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). Microapplication of CRF and related peptides in normal rats into the subarachnoid space produced sustained concentration-dependent increases in CBF. This effect was attenuated by co-application with DPhe-CRF, which did not alter CBF itself. A second microapplication of CRF 30 min after the first failed to produce increases in CBF in normal animals. Microapplication of CRF in the subarachnoid space overlying the ischaemic cortex effected minor increases in CBF whereas D-Phe-CRF had no significant effect on CBF. Activation of the CRF peptidergic system increases CBF in the rat. Repeated activation of CRF receptors results in tachyphylaxis of the vasodilator response. CRF vasodilator response is still present after MCAo in the ischaemic penumbra, suggesting that the CRF peptidergic system may modulate CBF in ischaemic stroke.

Fiblast (trafermin) in acute stroke: results of the European-Australian phase II/III safety and efficacy trial.

BACKGROUND: Trafermin (basic fibroblast growth factor) has been shown to reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke models, and to promote functional recovery and new synapse formation when given to animals with completed cerebral infarction. A previous study in acute stroke patients suggested that trafermin was safe and well tolerated when given over a 3-hour period over a wide dose range. METHODS AND RESULTS: Double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of a single 24-hour intravenous infusion of trafermin. Patients having onset of stroke symptoms within 6 h and a baseline score of >/=7 on the NIH Stroke Scale (>/=2 motor) were randomized to receive 5 or 10 mg of trafermin or placebo intravenously infused over 24 h. The primary efficacy outcome was a categorized combination of the Barthel and Rankin scales assessed at 90 days. A total of 286 patients had been enrolled at 55 sites in 11 countries when the sponsor directed that enrollment be stopped because an interim analysis of efficacy data predicted too small a chance of demonstrating a statistically significant benefit after recruitment of the planned 900 patients. The 5-mg group showed a slight but nonsignificant advantage over placebo (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.72-2.00, p = 0.48); the 10-mg group showed a nonsignificant disadvantage (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.22, p = 0.24). Mortality rates at 90 days were 17% in the 5-mg group, 24% in the 10-mg group and 18% in the placebo group. Treatment with trafermin was associated with an increased leukocytosis and a decrease in blood pressure: mean decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline was 19 mm Hg in the 5-mg group, 22 mm Hg in the 10-mg group and 8 mm Hg in the placebo group. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, patients in the 5-mg group treated more than 5 h after the onset of symptoms showed an apparent advantage over placebo (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.00-4.41, p = 0.044; after age adjustment: OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.91-4.13, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: With the proper treatment regimen, trafermin can likely be given safely to stroke patients. The 5-mg dose showed a trend toward a treatment advantage. The ideal time window for this agent may exceed 5 h. This may open new avenues for acute stroke therapy, aiming at enhancing recovery mechanisms rather than immediate neuroprotection.