Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 101(3): 228-237, 2022 03.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058775

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The success of sialendoscopy depends on several factors. The 2008 introduced lithiasis-stenosis-dilatation (LSD) classification intended to describe more precise the stone-duct system. We investigated whether the LSD classification and additional pre- and intraoperative parameters could be used as prognostic factors for success. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients with primary sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis between September 2018 und March 2020. Among others, the outcome variables were the stone size, location and LSD classification. RESULTS: We included 37 patients. The success group included 12/37 (32 %) patients. The median stone size was 3.7 millimeters (mm) in the success group and 10.0 mm in the failure group (Mann-Whitney test; p < 0.0001). In the success group, 11/12 stones were distal in contrast to the failure group (13/25 stones proximal; Pearson's chi-square test; p = 0.010). We noted 10 L1S0D0 stones in the success group in contrast to the failure group (15 L3aS0D0 stones; Pearson chi-square test; p = 0.001). For distal stones smaller than 5 mm, the success rate was 100 % and for proximal stones larger than 4 mm, it was 0 %. For stones free in the duct lumen (L1S0D0), the success rate was 60-100 %. CONCLUSION: The distal stone location and the smaller stone size in a normal duct should be beneficial prognostic factors for success. Future studies should focus on the LSD classification, stone volume, stone duct orientation and stone distance from the papilla.


Assuntos
Cálculos das Glândulas Salivares , Endoscopia , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cálculos das Glândulas Salivares/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos das Glândulas Salivares/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 36(3): 599-604, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583188

RESUMO

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is used in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) for treatment-related mucositis. There is conflicting evidence as to whether LLLT leads to the proliferation of tumor cells and whether it interferes with the tumoricidal effect of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, if the tumor lies within the LLLT field. Using fuzzy matching, 126 HNC patients who had received LLLT including the tumor region and 126 matching HNC patients without LLLT (controls) treated at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, were identified. The overall survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Fuzzy matching yielded 2 patient samples well comparable in terms of risk of death. The survival did not significantly differ between patients with and without LLLT (p = 0.18). An increased risk of death in HNC patients who received LLLT covering the tumor region was not observed in our study.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosite/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA