Caregiver expectations of clinicians during the asthma diagnostic process in young children: thematic analysis of focus groups.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is difficult to diagnose in young children, and the subjective experience of caregivers varies. Clinicians' ability to meet caregiver expectations during the diagnostic process improves the caregiver-clinician relationship, and effectiveness of disease management strategies. METHODS: We performed thematic analysis of seven focus groups (FGs) with 38 caregivers of children 1-6 years old diagnosed with asthma in the preceding 12 months. Caregivers were classified as satisfied or dissatisfied with clinicians during the asthma diagnostic process. Differential themes in these two groups identified caregiver expectations that determined satisfaction with the diagnostic process. RESULTS: Caregiver expectations during the asthma diagnostic process included (1) provision of a diagnostic strategy, (2) acknowledgment of caregiver advocacy, (3) addressing caregiver's beliefs about treatment with asthma medications before a diagnosis was confirmed, and (4) discussing asthma specialist involvement in the diagnosis. Higher perceived severity of a child's illness made caregiver expectations more difficult to meet. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that clinicians considering an asthma diagnosis in young children must include a diagnostic strategy that is congruent with the caregiver's beliefs about the underlying illness, use of medication, and asthma specialist involvement. Perceived illness severity must also be accounted for when designing a diagnostic strategy.

Early treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis with epinephrine is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA) is potentially life threatening. Prompt administration of epinephrine is universally recommended by current treatment guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with early epinephrine treatment for FIA and to specifically examine the association between early epinephrine treatment and hospitalization. METHODS: A chart review study conducted at Hasbro Children's Hospital/Rhode Island Hospital. By using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, we identified all patients who presented to the emergency department with FIA between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009. Early epinephrine treatment was defined as receipt of epinephrine before arrival to the emergency department. The independent association between early epinephrine treatment and hospitalization was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 384 emergency department visits for FIA identified during the study period, 234 patients received epinephrine (61%). Among this subset, most (164 [70%]) received early epinephrine treatment, whereas a smaller number of patients (70 [30%]) first received epinephrine in the emergency department (late treatment). Patients who received early epinephrine treatment were older (7.4 vs 4.3 years; P = .008), were more likely to have a known food allergy (66% vs 34%; P < .001), and were more likely to own an epinephrine autoinjector (80% vs 23%; P < .001). Patients treated early were less likely to be hospitalized (17% vs 43%; P < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, and race, the patients who received early epinephrine treatment remained at significantly decreased risk of hospitalization compared with those who received late epinephrine treatment (odds ratio 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.49]). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, early treatment of FIA with epinephrine was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization. Accordingly, this study supports the benefit of prompt administration of epinephrine for the treatment of FIA.