A Cross-sectional Survey to Assess Reasons for Therapeutic Inertia in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Preferred Strategies to Overcome It From the Perspectives of Persons With Diabetes and General/Family Practitioners: Results From the MOTION Study.

OBJECTIVES: Although multiple causes of therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been identified, few studies have addressed the behavioural aspects of treatment-intensification decisions among persons with type 2 diabetes (PwT2DM) and general practitioners/family practitioners (GPFPs). METHODS: A quantitative online survey was developed to capture from 300 PwT2DM and 100 GPFPs the following information: 1) perspectives on shared decision-making (SDM) related to treatment intensification, using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire---physician version; 2) intentions to intensify treatments, using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB); and 3) preferred strategies to overcome causes of therapeutic inertia in T2DM. Regression methods were applied post hoc to examine correlations with SDM scores, behavioural intentions and behaviours. RESULTS: SDM scores showed a significantly lower level of perceived involvement in decision-making related to treatment intensification among PwT2DM compared with GPFPs. The TPB identified that, for PwT2DM, attitudes, perceived behavioural control and age were associated with variation in intention to intensify treatment and, for GPFPs, perceived behavioural control and not being in a shared/group practice were associated with intentions to intensify treatment. PwT2DM behaviour, measured as hesitancy to intensify treatment, was associated with age. PwT2DM want more information to become more comfortable with the treatment decision-making process, whereas GPFPs desired support from other health professionals, and more time to address issues among PwT2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies directed at providing GPFPs with tools/approaches to increase PwT2DM involvement in the decision-making process, such as behavioural coaching, decision aids and goal setting, may increase acceptance of treatment intensification, leading to a reduction in therapeutic inertia in T2DM.

Persons With Diabetes and General/Family Practitioner Perspectives Related to Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Qualitative Focus Groups and the Theoretical Domains Framework: Results From the MOTION Study.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is the failure to receive timely treatment intensification as indicated according to T2DM treatment guidelines. Multifactorial causes of therapeutic inertia in T2DM have been documented at the level of persons with diabetes (PwD), health-care providers and health-care systems. METHODS: We developed a 3-part mixed-methods research program, called the Moving to Overcome Therapeutic Inertia Obstacles Now in T2DM (MOTION) study, to inform the development of strategies to address therapeutic inertia in T2DM. We present the results from focus groups with the following objectives: 1) understanding PwD and general practitioner/family practitioner (GPFP) determinants of behaviour related to treatment intensification using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); and 2) identifying the sources of behaviours contributing to therapeutic inertia in T2DM, as proposed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Two focus groups with PwD and 4 with GPFPs were conducted. Transcripts from the focus groups were coded independently by 2 investigators to identify themes, then mapped to TDF domains and linked using the BCW. RESULTS: For PwD, the most commonly coded TDF domains were intentions, goals, knowledge, beliefs about consequences and social influences. For GPFPs, the most common domains were intentions, environmental context and resources and social/professional role and identity. The BCW identified that PwD interventions should include reflective motivation, psychological capability and social opportunity; GPFP interventions should include physical opportunity, social opportunity and reflective motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive strategies that target both PwD and GPFP barriers would encourage a more collaborative approach toward treatment intensification decisions and reducing therapeutic inertia.

Association Between Patient and Physician Sex and Physician-Estimated Stroke and Bleeding Risks in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Physicians treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) assess stroke and bleeding risks when deciding on anticoagulation. The agreement between empirical and physician-estimated risks is unclear. Furthermore, the association between patient and physician sex and anticoagulation decision-making is uncertain. METHODS: We pooled data from 2 national primary care physician chart audit databases of patients with AF (Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation and Coordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Chart Audit) with a combined 1035 physicians (133 female, 902 male) and 10,927 patients (4567 female and 6360 male). RESULTS: Male physicians underestimated stroke risk in female patients and overestimated risk in male patients. Female physicians estimated stroke risk well in female patients but underestimated the risk in male patients. Risk of bleeding was underestimated in all. Despite differences in risk assessment by physician and patient sex, > 90% of patients received anticoagulation across all subgroups. There was modest agreement between physician estimated and calculated (ie, CHADS2 score) stroke risk: Kappa scores were 0.41 (0.35-0.47) for female physicians and 0.34 (0.32-0.36) for male physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to examine the association between patient and physician sex influences and stroke and bleeding risk estimation in AF. Although there were differences in agreement between physician estimated stroke risk and calculated CHADS2 scores, these differences were small and unlikely to affect clinical practice; further, despite any perceived differences in the accuracy of risk assessment by sex, most patients received anticoagulation.

Use of Evidence-Based Therapy for Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Canadian Outpatients With Atrial Fibrillation: From the Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (FREEDOM AF) and Co-ordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (CONNECT AF).

Using data collected from 2 national atrial fibrillation (AF) primary care physician chart audits (Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation [FREEDOM AF] and Co-ordinated National Network to Engage Physicians in the Care and Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [CONNECT AF]), we evaluated the frequency of, and factors associated with, the use of cardiovascular (CV) evidence-based therapies in Canadian AF outpatients with at least 1 CV risk factor or co-morbidity. Of the 11,264 patients enrolled, 9,495 (84.3%) were eligible for one or more CV evidence-based therapies. The proportions of patients with AF receiving all eligible guideline-recommended therapies were 40.8% of patients with coronary artery disease, 48.9% of patients with diabetes mellitus, 40.2% of patients with heart failure, 96.7% of patients with hypertension, and 55.1% of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Factors that were independently associated with nonreceipt of all indicated evidence-based therapies included sinus rhythm rather than AF at baseline and liver disease. In conclusion, although most Canadian outpatients with AF have CV risk factors or co-morbidities, a substantial portion of these patients did not receive all guideline-recommended therapies. These findings suggest that there is an opportunity to improve the quality of care for patients with AF in Canada.

The Risk Stratification and Stroke Prevention Therapy Care Gap in Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND: Canadian atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend that all AF patients be risk stratified with respect to stroke and bleeding, and that most should receive antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: As part of the Canadian Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (FREEDOM AF) chart audit, data were collected on 4670 patients ≥ 18 years old without significant valvular heart disease from the primary care practices of 474 physicians (February to September, 2011). RESULTS: Physicians did not provide an estimate of stroke and bleeding risk in 15% and 25% of patients, respectively. When risks were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in only 50% and 26% of patients, respectively. There were over- and underestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a large proportion of patients. Antithrombotic therapy included warfarin (90%); 24% of patients had a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) < 50%, 9% between 50% and 60%, 11% between 60% and 70%, and 56% had a TTR ≥ 70%. CONCLUSIONS: In a large Canadian AF population, primary care physicians did not provide a stroke or bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of their AF patients. When estimates were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in less than half of the patients. Furthermore, there was under- and overestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of patients. As many as 1 in 3 patients receiving warfarin have their TTR < 60%. These findings suggest an opportunity to enhance knowledge translation to primary care physicians.

Oral Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Canadian Practice: Stroke Prevention and Rhythm Interventions in Atrial Fibrillation (SPRINT-AF) Registry(.).

BACKGROUND: We explored patterns of and factors associated with the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in contemporary Canadian practice. METHODS: Phase 1 of the Stroke Prevention and Rhythm Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPRINT-AF) registry was a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF). From December 2012-July 2013, 936 consecutive patients with NVAF were enrolled in SPRINT-AF. Of the 782 patients treated with OAC, the proportion treated with warfarin and a new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was 53.2% and 46.8%, respectively. The rate of OAC use was 90.9% among patients with a CHADS2 (Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack) score ≥ 2. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, the 2 strongest factors associated with NOAC use (compared with warfarin use) were an improved side effect profile (as perceived by the patient) and improved efficacy (as perceived by the physician) (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.17; P < 0.01 and OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.76; P < 0.01, respectively). Lower cost was strongly associated with warfarin use (OR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.49-7.63; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary Canadian AF registry, the rate of guideline-concordant OAC use was high. About half of OAC-treated patients received NOACs. Patient- and physician-driven preferences, such as side effect profile, perceived greater efficacy, and cost, were strong determinants of NOAC use over warfarin use.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus management in Canada: is it improving?

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the current management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by Canadian primary care physicians. METHOD: A total of 479 primary care physicians from across Canada submitted data on 5123 type 2 diabetes patients whom they had seen on a single day on or around World Diabetes Day, November 14, 2012. RESULTS: Mean glycated hemoglobin (A1C) was 7.4%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) was 2.1 mmol/L and blood pressure (BP) was 128/75 mm Hg. A1C ≤7.0% was met by 50%, LDL-C ≤2.0 mmol/L by 57%, BP <130/80 mm Hg by 36% and the composite triple target by 13% of patients. Diet counselling had been offered to 38% of patients. Of the 87% prescribed antihyperglycemic agents, 18% were on 1 non-insulin antihyperglycemic agent (NIAHA) (85% of which was metformin), 15% were on 2 NIAHAs, 6% were on ≥3 NIAHAs, 19% were on insulin only and 42% were on insulin + ≥1 NIAHA(s). Amongst the 81% prescribed lipid-lowering therapy, 88% were on monotherapy (97% of which was a statin). Among the 83% prescribed antihypertensive agents, 39%, 34%, 21% and 6% received 1, 2, 3 and >3 drugs, respectively, with 59% prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and 35% angiotensin II receptor blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The Diabetes Mellitus Status in Canada survey highlights the persistent treatment gap associated with the treatment of type 2 diabetes and the challenges faced by primary care physicians to gain glycemic control and global vascular protection in these patients. It also reveals a higher use of insulin therapy in primary care practices relative to previous surveys. Practical strategies aimed at more effectively managing type 2 diabetes patients are urgently needed.

An integrated approach to improving appropriate use of anti-inflammatory medication in the treatment of osteoarthritis in Québec (Canada): the CURATA model.

CURATA is a multifaceted continuing medical education (CME) intervention, developed with input from 12 healthcare organizations to address the gap between current and recommended osteoarthritis (OA) treatment of general practitioners in Québec, Canada. Focusing on appropriate prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs), the intervention comprised small-group, case-based workshops modelled after the Script Concordance test, and a decision tool reflecting current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. A self-reported questionnaire measured knowledge of recommended OA treatment on an eight-point scale. Participants (n = 381) showed a mean 10.1% improvement in questionnaire score immediately following the workshop (15.2% improvement relative to mean pre-workshop score). Knowledge was maintained for three months post-workshop.