Is the outcome of elective vs non-elective patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation different? Results of a single-centre, observational assessment of outcomes at a large university clinic.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can either be conducted as an elective (scheduled in advance) or a non-elective procedure performed during an unplanned hospital admission. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of elective and non-elective TAVI patients. METHODS: This single-centre study included 512 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI between October 2018 and December 2020; 378 (73.8%) were admitted for elective TAVI, 134 (26.2%) underwent a non-elective procedure. Our TAVI programme entails an optimized fast-track concept aimed at minimizing the total length of stay to ≤ 5 days for elective patients which in the German healthcare system is currently defined as the minimal time period to safely perform TAVI. Clinical characteristics and survival rates at 30 days and 1 year were analysed. RESULTS: Patients who underwent non-elective TAVI had a significantly higher comorbidity burden. Median duration from admission to discharge was 6 days (elective group 6 days versus non-elective group 15 days; p < 0.001), including a median postprocedural stay of 5 days (elective 4 days versus non-elective 7 days; p < 0.001). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 1.1% for the elective group and 3.7% for non-elective patients (p = 0.030). At 1 year, all-cause mortality among elective TAVI patients was disproportionately lower than in non-elective patients (5.0% versus 18.7%, p < 0.001). In the elective group, 54.5% of patients could not be discharged early due to comorbidities or procedural complications. Factors associated with a failure of achieving a total length of stay of ≤ 5 days comprised frailty syndrome, renal impairment as well as new permanent pacemaker implantation, new bundle branch block or atrial fibrillation, life-threatening bleeding, and the use of self-expanding valves. After multivariate adjustment, new permanent pacemaker implantation (odds ratio 6.44; 95% CI 2.59-16.00), life-threatening bleeding (odds ratio 4.19; 95% confidence interval 1.82-9.66) and frailty syndrome (odds ratio 5.15; 95% confidence interval 2.40-11.09; all p < 0.001, respectively) were confirmed as significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: While non-elective patients had acceptable periprocedural outcomes, mortality rates at 1 year were significantly higher compared to elective patients. Approximately only half of elective patients could be discharged early. Improvements in periprocedural care, follow-up strategies and optimized treatment of both elective and non-elective TAVI patients are needed.

Clinical Value of Using Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Before Elective CT Coronary Angiography to Reduce Heart Rate and the Need for Beta-Blockers.

The value of biofeedback before elective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to reduce patients' heart rates (HR) was investigated in the current work. Sixty patients who received CCTA to exclude coronary artery disease were included in our study and separated into two groups: with biofeedback (W-BF) and without biofeedback (WO-BF). The W-BF group used a biofeedback device for 15 min before CCTA. HR was determined in each patient at four measurement time points (MTP): during the pre-examination interview (MTP1), positioning on the CT patient table before CCTA (MTP2), during CCTA image acquisition (MTP3), and after completing CCTA (MTP4). If necessary, beta-blockers were administered in both groups after MTP2 until a HR of less than 65 bpm was achieved. Two board-certified radiologists subsequently assessed the image quality and analyzed the findings. Overall, the need for beta-blockers was significantly lower in patients in the W-BF group than the WO-BF group (p = 0.032). In patients with a HR of 81-90, beta-blockers were not required in four of six cases in the W-BF group, whereas in the WO-BF group all patients needed beta-blockers (p = 0.03). The amount of HR reduction between MTP1 and MTP2 was significantly higher in the W-BF compared to the WO-BF group (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between the W-BF and WO-BF groups regarding image quality (p = 0.179). By using biofeedback prior to elective CCTA, beta-blocker use could be decreased without compromising CT image quality and analysis, especially in patients with an initial HR of 81-90 bpm.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant mitral valve regurgitation - 5 years follow-up.

Objectives: To investigate the change in severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its effect on 5-year mortality. Background: There is inconsistency in literature on pre-existing MR influencing long-term survival in patients who undergo TAVR. Methods: Patients who underwent TAVR at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (USKH) Campus Kiel between March 2009 and February 2018 have been enrolled. Echocardiography determined the degree of MR before and within 7 days after TAVR. Patients were divided into two groups according to their MR at baseline: MR-grade ≤ 2 (non-relevant MR, nr-MR) and baseline MR-grade > 2 (relevant MR, r-MR). Primary endpoint was a composite of MR baseline influence on mortality and MR reduction and its' impact on mortality. Results: A total of 820 patients (642 nr-MR and 178 in r-MR) were included in this study. Of these, 167 patients showed an improvement in MR-grade. Thereof 106 (63.5 %) referred to r-MR with a significant decrease in mean MR-grade (p < 0.01). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) (p < 0.01) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.03) decreased in patients who had an improvement. There was no significant difference in 5-year mortality for MR at baseline (p = 0.35) or reduction in mortality for r-MR patients with an MR improvement compared to patients with worsening or equal MR status (p = 0.80). Conclusion: In patients undergoing TAVR, 63.5 % of patients with MR-grade ≥ 2 at baseline showed an improvement of grade of MR after TAVR with reduction of their sPAP and NT-proBNP values but there was no significant difference in mortality.

HFA-PEFF score: prognosis in patients with preserved ejection fraction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Many transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates have underlying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in addition to symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnosis of HFpEF is challenging. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology proposed the HFA-PEFF score as part of a novel diagnostic algorithm. This study assessed the prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score in patients with preserved ejection fraction after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre study included 570 consecutive TAVI patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥50%. Patients with an HFA-PEFF score of ≥5 [n = 239 (41.9%)] were compared with those with <5 points [n = 331 (58.1%)]. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure rehospitalization within 1 year after TAVI. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary outcome. Patients with an HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5 had higher rates of comorbidities commonly associated with HFpEF, a higher rate of new pacemaker implantation after TAVI, were at increased risk of the primary composite endpoint (25.5% vs. 10.0%, P < 0.001), and rehospitalization for heart failure (11.7% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed an HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5 as an independent risk factor for the composite endpoint [hazard ratio 2.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-4.28, P < 0.001] and for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% CI 1.46-4.53, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The HFA-PEFF score is associated with all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with preserved ejection fraction after TAVI. This practical tool can easily be incorporated into risk stratification algorithms for TAVI patients.

C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the serum C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) could be used for risk stratification of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Frailty is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients undergoing AS interventions. The CAR reflects key components of frailty (systemic inflammation and nutrition) and could potentially be implemented into assessment and management strategies for patients with AS. From March 1, 2010, through February 29, 2020, 1836 patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational TAVR database. Patients (prospective development cohort, n=763) were grouped into CAR quartiles to compare the upper quartile (CAR Q4) with the lower quartiles (CAR Q1-3). Primary end point was all-cause mortality. Results were verified in an independent retrospective cohort (n=1403). RESULTS: The CAR Q4 had a higher prevalence of impaired left ventricular function, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease and a higher median logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) vs CAR Q1-3. After median follow-up of 15.0 months, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in CAR Q4 vs CAR Q1-3 (P<.001). In multivariable analyses, risk factors for all-cause mortality were CAR Q4 (>0.1632; hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.00; P=.03), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide Q4 (>3230 pg/mL [to convert to ng/L, multiply by 1), high-sensitivity troponin T Q4 (>0.0395 ng/mL [to convert to µg/L, multiply by 1]), above-median logistic EuroSCORE (16.1%), myocardial infarction, Acute Kidney Injury Network stage 3, and life-threatening bleeding. CONCLUSION: Elevated CAR was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. The CAR, a simple, objective tool to assess frailty, could be incorporated into assessing patients with AS being considered for TAVR.

Calculated Plasma Volume Status Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Calculated plasma volume status (PVS) reflects volume overload based on the deviation of the estimated plasma volume (ePV) from the ideal plasma volume (iPV). Calculated PVS is associated with prognosis in the context of heart failure. This single-center study investigated the prognostic impact of PVS in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: A total of 859 TAVI patients had been prospectively enrolled in an observational study and were included in the analysis. An optimal cutoff for PVS of -5.4% was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization within 1 year after TAVI. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients had a PVS < -5.4% (no congestion), while 535 patients showed a PVS ≥ -5.4% (congestion). The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with a PVS ≥ -5.4% compared to patients with PVS < -5.4% (22.6% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, PVS was confirmed as a significant predictor of the primary endpoint (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.22, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PVS, as a marker of subclinical congestion, is significantly associated with all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization within 1 year after TAVI.

Procedural outcomes in patients with dual versus single antiplatelet therapy prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The impact of uninterrupted dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on bleeding events among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well studied. We conducted an analysis of 529 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR in our centre and were receiving either DAPT or single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) prior to the procedure. Accordingly, patients were grouped into a DAPT or SAPT group. Following current guidelines, patients in the SAPT group were switched to DAPT for 90 days after the procedure. The primary endpoint of our analysis was the incidence of bleeding events at 30 days according to the VARC-2 classification system. Any VARC-2 bleeding complications were found in 153 patients (28.9%), while major/life-threatening or disabling bleeding events occurred in 60 patients (11.3%). Our study revealed no significant difference between the DAPT vs. SAPT group regarding periprocedural bleeding complications. Based on multivariable analyses, major bleeding (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.64-12.83, p = 0.004) and life-threatening/disabling bleeding (HR 8.66, 95% CI 3.31-22.65, p < 0.001) events were significantly associated with mortality at 90 days after TAVR. Both pre-existing DAPT and SAPT showed a comparable safety profile regarding periprocedural bleeding complications and mortality at 90 days. Thus, DAPT can be safely continued in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR.

Elevated high-sensitivity troponin T levels at 1-year follow-up are associated with increased long-term mortality after TAVR.

BACKGROUND: Elevated pre-procedural high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) levels predict adverse outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). It is unknown whether elevated troponin levels still provide prognostic information during follow-up after successful TAVR. We evaluated the long-term implications of elevated hs-TnT levels found at 1-year post-TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 349 patients who underwent TAVR for severe AS from 2010-2019 and for whom 1-year hs-TnT levels were available. Any required percutaneous coronary interventions were performed > 1 week before TAVR. The primary endpoint was survival time starting at 1-year post-TAVR. Optimal hs-TnT cutoff for stratifying risk, identified by ROC analysis, was 39.4 pg/mL. 292 patients had hs-TnT < 39.4 pg/mL (median 18.3 pg/mL) and 57 had hs-TnT ≥ 39.4 pg/mL (median 51.2 pg/mL). The high hs-TnT group had a higher median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, greater left ventricular (LV) mass, higher prevalence of severe diastolic dysfunction, LV ejection fraction < 35%, severe renal dysfunction, and more men compared with the low hs-TnT group. All-cause mortality during follow-up after TAVR was significantly higher among patients who had hs-TnT ≥ 39.4 pg/mL compared with those who did not (mortality rate at 2 years post-TAVR: 12.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.010). Multivariate analysis identified 1-year hs-TnT ≥ 39.4 pg/mL (hazard ratio 2.93, 95% CI 1.91-4.49, p < 0.001), NT-proBNP level > 300 pg/mL, male sex, an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as independent risk factors for long-term mortality after TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated hs-TnT concentrations at 1-year after TAVR were associated with a higher long-term mortality.

Frailty in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prognostic value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a hallmark of frailty, is common among elderly patients, and is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a simple and well-established screening tool to predict the risk of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. In this study, we evaluated whether GNRI may be used in the risk stratification and management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Patients with symptomatic severe AS (n = 953) who underwent transfemoral TAVR at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Kiel, Germany, between 2010 and 2019 (development cohort) were divided into two groups: normal GNRI ≥ 98 (no nutrition-related risk; n = 618) versus low GNRI < 98 (at nutrition-related risk; n = 335). The results were validated in an independent (validation) cohort from another high-volume TAVR centre (n = 977). RESULTS: The low-GNRI group had a higher proportion of female patients (59.1% vs. 52.1%), higher median age (82.9 vs. 81.8 years), prevalence of atrial fibrillation (50.4% vs. 40.0%), median logistic EuroSCORE (17.5% vs. 15.0%) and impaired left ventricular function (<35%: 10.7% vs. 6.8%), lower median estimated glomerular filtration rate (50 vs. 57 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and median albumin level (3.5 vs. 4.0 g/dL) compared with the normal-GNRI group. Among peri-procedural complications, Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Stage 3 was more common in the low-GNRI group (3.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 21.1 months, all-cause mortality was significantly increased in the low-GNRI group compared with the normal-GNRI group (p < 0.001). This was confirmed in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). Low GNRI < 98 was identified as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.04, p = 0.043). Other independent risk factors included albumin level < median of 4.0 g/dL, high-sensitive troponin T in the highest quartile (> 45.0 pg/mL), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in the highest quartile (> 3595 pg/mL), grade III-IV tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary arterial hypertension, life-threatening bleeding, AKIN Stage 3 and disabling stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Low GNRI score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR, implying that this vulnerable group may benefit from improved preventive measures.

Prognostic implications of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers may significantly improve risk stratification algorithms for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). While N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is established as a biomarker in the context of heart failure, its prognostic implications in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing TAVI are unclear. METHODS: A total of 504 TAVI patients with normal LVEF were analyzed. Based on preprocedural NT-proBNP levels, patients were stratified into two groups comparing the upper quartile ("Q4", n = 126) with the lower three quartiles ("Q1-3", n = 378). The primary outcome of our study was survival. RESULTS: The "Q4" group included more men (46.8% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.017), had higher rates of atrial fibrillation (55.6% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001) and showed features of more advanced aortic stenosis (mean pressure gradient 49 mmHg vs. 40 mmHg, aortic valve area 0.6 cm2 vs. 0.7 cm2; p < 0.001, respectively). The "Q4" group was also characterized by more extensive cardiac remodeling including severe diastolic dysfunction (18.1% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001) and left atrial dilation (26.8% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated superior survival of the "Q1-3" group (median follow-up 22.1 months, log-rank test p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, preprocedural NT-proBNP emerged as a significant risk factor for all-cause mortality after TAVI (HR 1.87, CI 1.31-2.65, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP is associated with survival in TAVI patients with normal LVEF. In this patient group, preprocedural NT-proBNP levels do not only correlate with aortic stenosis, but reflect advanced cardiovascular dysfunction, including HFpEF, that might not be completely reversible after TAVI.

Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The implications of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are still controversial. The objective of our study was thus to investigate the incidence and prognostic impact of PPM after TAVI. METHODS: Our analysis included 613 TAVI patients in whom the indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) after TAVI was obtained in vivo using echocardiography. Prosthesis sizing was guided by pre-procedural ECG-gated computed tomography. Based on VARC-2 established criteria for significant PPM (iEOA ≤ 0.85 cm2/m2 in the setting of BMI < 30 kg/m2 and iEOA ≤ 0.7 cm2/m2 in the context of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), patients were attributed to a "No PPM" or a "PPM" group. RESULTS: We observed PPM after TAVI in 192 patients (31.3%) with moderate PPM being present in 150 subjects (24.5%) and severe PPM in 42 patients (6.9%). EuroSCORE, impaired LV function, and male gender were associated with PPM status. The "No PPM" group was characterized by higher rates of self-expandable valves (40.4% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis age > 81.2 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, impaired LV function, acute kidney failure stage 3 as well as periprocedural myocardial infarction emerged as independent risk predictors for all-cause mortality after TAVI. After a median follow-up of 12.2 months PPM failed to show a significant association with overall survival (79.2% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.692). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPM after TAVI seems to be substantially lower than after SAVR. PPM was less common using self-expandable valves. In our analysis, patients with PPM following TAVI did not have higher rates of all-cause mortality.

Periprocedural Changes of NT-proBNP Are Associated With Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Background Cardiovascular biomarkers constitute promising tools for improved risk stratification and prediction of outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We examined the association of periprocedural changes of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) with survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results NT-proBNP levels were measured in 704 patients before transcatheter aortic valve implantation and at discharge. Patients were grouped as responders and nonresponders depending on an NT-proBNP-based ratio (postprocedural NT-proBNP at discharge/preprocedural NT-proBNP). Overall, 376 of 704 patients showed a postprocedural decrease in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP ratio <1). Responders and nonresponders differed significantly regarding median preprocedural (2822 versus 1187 pg/mL, P<0.001) and postprocedural (1258 versus 3009 pg/mL, P<0.001) NT-proBNP levels. Patients in the nonresponder group showed higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (47.0% versus 39.4%, P=0.042), arterial hypertension (94.2% versus 87.5%, P=0.002), renal impairment (77.4% versus 69.1%, P=0.013), and peripheral artery disease (24.4% versus 14.6%, P=0.001). In contrast, patients in the responder group had higher prevalence of moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (17.3% versus 11.0%, P=0.017), lower calculated aortic valve area (0.7 versus 0.8 cm2, P<0.001), and higher mean pressure gradient (41 versus 35 mm Hg, P<0.001). Median follow-up was 22.6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly significant survival benefit for the responder group compared with the nonresponder group (log-rank test, P<0.001). Conclusions A ratio based on periprocedural changes of NT-proBNP is a simple tool for better risk stratification and is associated with survival in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

MicroRNA miR-301a is a novel cardiac regulator of Cofilin-2.

Calsarcin-1 deficient mice develop dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype in pure C57BL/6 genetic background (Cs1-ko) despite severe contractile dysfunction and robust activation of fetal gene program. Here we performed a microRNA microarray to identify the molecular causes of this cardiac phenotype that revealed the dysregulation of several microRNAs including miR-301a, which was highly downregulated in Cs1-ko mice compared to the wild-type littermates. Cofilin-2 (Cfl2) was identified as one of the potential targets of miR-301a using prediction databases, which we validated by luciferase assay and mutation of predicted binding sites. Furthermore, expression of miR-301a contrastingly regulated Cfl2 expression levels in neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (NRVCM). Along these lines, Cfl2 was significantly upregulated in Cs1-ko mice, indicating the physiological association between miR-301a and Cfl2 in vivo. Mechanistically, we found that Cfl2 activated serum response factor response element (SRF-RE) driven luciferase activity in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and in C2C12 cells. Similarly, knockdown of miR301a activated, whereas, its overexpression inhibited the SRF-RE driven luciferase activity, further strengthening physiological interaction between miR-301a and Cfl2. Interestingly, the expression of SRF and its target genes was strikingly increased in Cs1-ko suggesting a possible in vivo correlation between expression levels of Cfl2/miR-301a and SRF activation, which needs to be independently validated. In summary, our data demonstrates that miR-301a regulates Cofilin-2 in vitro in NRVCM, and in vivo in Cs1-ko mice. Our findings provide an additional and important layer of Cfl2 regulation, which we believe has an extended role in cardiac signal transduction and dilated cardiomyopathy presumably due to the reported involvement of Cfl2 in these mechanisms.

Osteopontin predicts clinical outcome in patients after treatment of severe aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

OBJECTIVE: Osteopontin (OPN) is an extracellular matrix protein that plays an integral role in myocardial remodelling and has previously been shown to be a valuable biomarker in cardiovascular disease. Because of the concentric myocardial hypertrophy associated with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), we hypothesised that OPN expression may have a prognostic value in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: We prospectively included 217 patients undergoing TAVI between February 2011 and December 2013 with a median follow-up of 349 days. Twenty healthy individuals from the same age range free from structural heart disease served as controls. The primary endpoint for the analysis was survival time. RESULTS: Median preprocedural OPN levels (675 ng/mL; IQR 488.5-990.5 ng/mL) were significantly higher in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis compared with healthy controls (386 ng/mL; IQR 324.5-458, p<0.001). Patients with increased OPN values showed at baseline a decreased 6 min walk test performance, increased rates of atrial arrhythmia, and an increased risk of death during follow-up (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.5 for the comparison of the highest vs lowest OPN quartile). Multiple Cox regression analysis demonstrated that OPN improves the prediction of an adverse prognosis further than N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: OPN levels at baseline are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with severe, symptomatic AS undergoing TAVI.