Ten-year results of an international external quality control programme for measurement of anti-tuberculosis drug concentrations.

OBJECTIVES: Participation in an external (interlaboratory) quality control (QC) programme is an essential part of quality assurance as it provides laboratories with valuable insights into their analytical performance. We describe the 10 year results of an international QC programme for the measurement of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs. METHODS: Each year, two rounds were organized in which serum (or plasma) samples, spiked with known concentrations of anti-TB drugs, were provided to participating laboratories for analysis. Reported measurements within 80%-120% of weighed-in concentrations were considered accurate. Mixed model linear regression was performed to assess the effect of the measured drug, concentration level, analytical technique and performing laboratory on the absolute inaccuracy. RESULTS: By 2022, 31 laboratories had participated in the QC programme and 13 anti-TB drugs and metabolites were included. In total 1407 measurements were reported. First-line TB drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) represented 58% of all measurements. Overall, 83.2% of 1407 measurements were accurate, and the median absolute inaccuracy was 7.3% (IQR, 3.3%-15.1%). The absolute inaccuracy was related to the measured anti-TB drug and to the performing laboratory, but not to the concentration level or to the analytical technique used. The median absolute inaccuracies of rifampicin and isoniazid were relatively high (10.2% and 10.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 10 year results of this external QC programme illustrate the need for continuous external QC for the measurement of anti-TB drugs for research and patient care purposes, because one in six measurements was inaccurate. Participation in the programme alerts laboratories to previously undetected analytical problems.

Blood safety markers in Dutch donors after relaxation of deferral for men who have sex with men: re-emergence of syphilis and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use.

BACKGROUND: Less discriminatory donor selection policies for men who have sex with men (MSM) may impact transfusion safety in terms of higher residual risks for known transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs), increased vulnerability toward new TTIs that are also transmitted via sex, and HIV infections masked by pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: TTI trends in Dutch donors were studied over a 13-year period (2011-2023), characterized by successive relaxations of MSM deferral criteria. Structured posttest counseling was performed to determine risk factors in TTI-positive donors. PrEP drug levels were measured in 9977 donations from male donors living in urban areas and in 67 donors with active or resolved syphilis. RESULTS: HIV incidence (from 5.8 to 1.5 per 1,000,000 donor years (DY)) and HBV incidence (from 12.4 to 4.5 per 1,000,000 DY) in Dutch donors decreased with less stringent MSM deferral criteria, while syphilis prevalence (from 26.4 to 44.1 per 100,000 new donors) and syphilis incidence (from 18.3 to 46.3 per 1,000,000 DY) increased over time. The proportion of MSM-related syphilis rose from 2% to 32% in new donors and from 12% to 27% in repeat donors. PrEP was detected in 2 of 9977 (0.02%) donations from male donors living in urban areas, and in 1 of 39 (2.6%) male donors with syphilis. DISCUSSION: To date, phasing out donor deferral for MSM had no significant impact on transfusion safety in the Netherlands. However, rising syphilis rates and (recent) PrEP use in the blood donor population, albeit rare, suggest an influx of donors with higher sexual risk profiles and requires intensified TTI surveillance in donors.

Adverse drug events caused by three high-risk drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to intensive care units: A multicentre retrospective observational study.

AIMS: Knowledge about adverse drug events caused by drug-drug interactions (DDI-ADEs) is limited. We aimed to provide detailed insights about DDI-ADEs related to three frequent, high-risk potential DDIs (pDDIs) in the critical care setting: pDDIs with international normalized ratio increase (INR+ ) potential, pDDIs with acute kidney injury (AKI) potential, and pDDIs with QTc prolongation potential. METHODS: We extracted routinely collected retrospective data from electronic health records of intensive care units (ICUs) patients (≥18 years), admitted to ten hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and September 2019. We used computerized triggers (e-triggers) to preselect patients with potential DDI-ADEs. Between September 2020 and October 2021, clinical experts conducted a retrospective manual patient chart review on a subset of preselected patients, and assessed causality, severity, preventability, and contribution to ICU length of stay of DDI-ADEs using internationally prevailing standards. RESULTS: In total 85 422 patients with ≥1 pDDI were included. Of these patients, 32 820 (38.4%) have been exposed to one of the three pDDIs. In the exposed group, 1141 (3.5%) patients were preselected using e-triggers. Of 237 patients (21%) assessed, 155 (65.4%) experienced an actual DDI-ADE; 52.9% had severity level of serious or higher, 75.5% were preventable, and 19.3% contributed to a longer ICU length of stay. The positive predictive value was the highest for DDI-INR+ e-trigger (0.76), followed by DDI-AKI e-trigger (0.57). CONCLUSION: The highly preventable nature and severity of DDI-ADEs, calls for action to optimize ICU patient safety. Use of e-triggers proved to be a promising preselection strategy.

Effects of Plasmapheresis on Serum Lithium Levels in an ICU Patient with Bipolar Disorder: A Case Study.

ABSTRACT: This is a case description of a patient with bipolar disorder undergoing lithium therapy who received plasmapheresis for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Plasmapheresis resulted in lower and subtherapeutic serum lithium levels. Using therapeutic drug monitoring, a dose escalation of 80% was necessary to maintain therapeutic serum lithium levels. This underscores the importance of individualized therapy through therapeutic drug monitoring.

Busulfan Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program Revealed Worldwide Errors in Drug Quantitation and Dose Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of busulfan-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been improved by personalizing the doses to target narrow busulfan plasma exposure. An interlaboratory proficiency test program for the quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and busulfan dosing in plasma was developed. Previous proficiency rounds (ie, the first 2) found that 67%-85% and 71%-88% of the dose recommendations were inaccurate, respectively. METHODS: A proficiency test scheme was developed by the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories (SKML) and consisted of 2 rounds per year, with each round containing 2 busulfan samples. In this study, 5 subsequent proficiency tests were evaluated. In each round, the participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (ie, low and high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. Descriptive statistics were performed, with ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure. The dose recommendations were deemed accurate. RESULTS: Since January 2020, 41 laboratories have participated in at least 1 round of this proficiency test. Over the 5 rounds, an average of 78% of the busulfan concentrations were accurate. Area under the concentration-time curve calculations were accurate in 75%-80% of the cases, whereas only 60%-69% of the dose recommendations were accurate. Compared with the first 2 proficiency test rounds (PMID 33675302, October, 2021), the busulfan quantitation results were similar, but the dose recommendations worsened. Some laboratories repeatedly submit results that deviated by more than 15% from the reference values. CONCLUSIONS: The proficiency test showed persistent inaccuracies in busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations. Additional educational efforts have yet to be implemented; regulatory efforts seem to be needed. The use of specialized busulfan pharmacokinetic laboratories or a sufficient performance in busulfan proficiency tests should be required for HCT centers that prescribe busulfan.

Extracorporeal hemoadsorption with the CytoSorb device as a potential therapeutic option in severe intoxications: Review of the rationale and current clinical experiences.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Many severe intoxications occur with substances with no specific antidote, which is why methods of extracorporeal elimination represent a particularly useful and even critical component in their management. The purpose of this review is to summarize the accumulating evidence and clinical results from the application of CytoSorb hemoadsorption therapy in patients with severe intoxications. COMMENT: The technology represents a promising technique with an increasing number of publications in a variety of severe intoxication scenarios suggesting that early intervention might provide rapid substance removal with subsequent overall clinical improvement. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Given the tremendous challenges in performing prospective, randomized trials in this field, the strong safety profile of the device and the high acuity of these life-threatening situations, CytoSorb should be considered as a therapeutic option in severe intoxications, particularly when direct antidotes are not available. However, further clinical data are desirable to provide precise recommendations.

Quality Control of Busulfan Plasma Quantitation, Modeling, and Dosing: An Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program.

BACKGROUND: Personalizing busulfan doses to target a narrow plasma exposure has improved the efficacy and lowered the toxicity of busulfan-based conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic cell transplant. Regional regulations guide interlaboratory proficiency testing for busulfan concentration quantification and monitoring. To date, there have been no comparisons of the busulfan pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendation protocols used in these laboratories. Here, in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, a novel interlaboratory proficiency program for the quantitation in plasma, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing of busulfan was designed. The methods and results of the first 2 rounds of this proficiency testing are described herein. METHODS: A novel method was developed to stabilize busulfan in N,N-dimethylacetamide, which allowed shipping of the proficiency samples without dry ice. In each round, participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (one low and one high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. All participants were blinded to the answers; descriptive statistics were used to evaluate their overall performance. The guidelines suggested that answers within ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure and dose recommendation were to be considered accurate. RESULTS: Of the 4 proficiency samples evaluated, between 67% and 85% of the busulfan quantitation results were accurate (ie, within 85%-115% of the reference value). The majority (88% round #1; 71% round #2) of the dose recommendation answers were correct. CONCLUSIONS: A proficiency testing program by which laboratories are alerted to inaccuracies in their quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations for busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients was developed. These rounds of proficiency testing suggests that additional educational efforts and proficiency rounds are needed to ensure appropriate busulfan dosing.

Synthetic Cathinones and Their Potential Interactions with Prescription Drugs.

PURPOSE: Substance use disorder often coexists with other psychiatric disorders, resulting in the simultaneous use of recreational and prescription drugs. The authors aimed to identify potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between new psychoactive substances of the cathinone class and specific prescription drugs. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature review on interactions between synthetic cathinones (mephedrone, methylone, methylenedioxypyrovalerone, and alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone) and antidepressants (citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (atomoxetine, dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil) or HIV medications. RESULTS: Although no pharmacokinetic interactions have been reported in previous literatures, such interactions are likely to occur. Metabolic pathways of cathinones, antidepressants, and ADHD medications have been shown to overlap, including metabolism via cytochrome P450 enzymes and their inhibition. Consistent with this finding, interactions of bupropion (a cathinone) with antidepressants and ADHD medications have been found to increase their serum concentrations and half-lives. Additionally, limited pharmacodynamic interactions have been reported. However, as cathinones, antidepressants, and ADHD medications have been reported to increase the extracellular monoamine concentration by affecting reuptake transporters, interactions among these compounds are likely. Presumably, even higher monoamine concentrations could be observed when cathinones are combined with prescription drugs with a similar mode of action, as has been reported in animals exposed to duloxetine and bupropion. HIV medications have a different mode of action; thus, they have been reported to be less likely to have pharmacodynamic interactions with cathinones. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of possible interactions between synthetic cathinones and prescription drugs, which may increase the risk of drug toxicity or reduce the therapeutic efficacy of the drugs. Qualitative drug screening for cathinones using mass spectrometry methods may aid the early detection of these agents.

Novel Phenethylamines and Their Potential Interactions With Prescription Drugs: A Systematic Critical Review.

BACKGROUND: The novel phenethylamines 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine (2C-B) fall in the top 10 most used new psychoactive substances (NPSs) among high-risk substance users. Various phenethylamines and NPS are also highly used in populations with mental disorders, depression, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Moreover, NPS use is highly prevalent among men and women with risky sexual behavior. Considering these specific populations and their frequent concurrent use of drugs, such as antidepressants, ADHD medication, and antiretrovirals, reports on potential interactions between these drugs, and phenethylamines 4-FA and 2C-B, were reviewed. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature review on 4-FA and 2C-B interactions with antidepressants (citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, bupropion, venlafaxine, phenelzine, moclobemide, and tranylcypromine), ADHD medications (atomoxetine, dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil), and antiretrovirals. RESULTS: Limited literature exists on the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of 2C-B and 4-FA. Only one case report indicated a possible interaction between 4-FA and ADHD medication. Although pharmacokinetic interactions between 4-FA and prescription drugs remain speculative, their pharmacodynamic points toward interactions between 4-FA and ADHD medication and antidepressants. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of 2C-B also points toward such interactions, between 2C-B and prescription drugs such as antidepressants and ADHD medication. CONCLUSIONS: A drug-drug (phenethylamine-prescription drug) interaction potential is anticipated, mainly involving monoamine oxidases for 2C-B and 4-FA, with monoamine transporters being more specific to 4-FA.

Prospective Investigation of the Performance of 2 Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Tests: DrugCheck GHB Single Test and Viva-E GHB Immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is a recreational drug with central nervous system depressing effects that is often abused. A urine GHB point-of-care test can be of great diagnostic value. The objective of this prospective study was to determine the performance of the new DrugCheck GHB Single Test and the Viva-E GHB immunoassay for urine samples in emergency department patients. METHODS: Patients presented to the emergency department of the OLVG hospital in Amsterdam with a Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 and potential drug of abuse intoxication were included in the study. Between June 2016 and October 2017, 375 patients were included. Using the DrugCheck GHB Single Test (Express Diagnostics Int'l, Blue Earth, MN) and the Viva-E GHB immunoassay (Siemens Healthineers, The Hague, the Netherlands), patients' urine samples were tested for GHB (cutoff for a positive result, 10 or 50 mcg/mL GHB). To ensure quality, the results obtained were compared with those generated using a validated gas chromatography method. The tests were considered reliable if specificity and sensitivity were both >90%. Possible cross-reactivity with ethanol was investigated by analyzing ethanol concentrations in patients' samples. RESULTS: Seventy percentage of the included patients was men, and the median age was 34 years old. The DrugCheck GHB Single Test's specificity and sensitivity were 90.0% and 72.9%, respectively, and using 50 mcg/mL as a cutoff value, its specificity and sensitivity improved to 96.7% and 75.0%, respectively. Serum and urine ethanol levels in the false-positive group were significantly higher compared with those in the true-negative group. The specificity and sensitivity of the Viva-E GHB immunoassay (cutoff value of 50 mcg/mL and excluding samples with ethanol levels ≥2.0 g/L) were 99.4% and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DrugCheck GHB Single Test's specificity was sufficient, whereas its sensitivity was poor, making it unsuitable for use at point-of-care. Contrarily, using 50 mcg/mL as the cutoff value and excluding samples with ethanol levels ≥2.0 g/L, the Viva-E GHB immunoassay showed acceptable results to detect clinically relevant GHB intoxications.

The effect of rapid infusion of cisplatin on nephrotoxicity in patients with lung carcinoma.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The use of cisplatin in the treatment of lung carcinoma is limited by nephrotoxicity. The aim of this study was to determine whether the incidence of nephrotoxicity in patients with lung carcinoma is affected by the infusion rate of cisplatin (rapid infusion of cisplatin in 1 hour compared to regular infusion in 3 hours). METHODS: This observational, retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) or mesothelioma receiving a cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients were divided into two cohorts (infusion of cisplatin in 1 hour vs 3 hours) based on the starting date of the chemotherapy regimen. The primary objectives were the difference in renal function after three cycles of chemotherapy and the incidence of nephrotoxicity. To assess nephrotoxicity, both the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) grade 1 and the maximum decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were determined. RESULTS: A total of 230 lung carcinoma patients with a cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen were included. Baseline characteristics were similar for the rapid and regular infusion cohorts, except for type of lung carcinoma, chemotherapy regimen and prevalence of hypertension. There was no significant difference in renal function between rapid infusion of cisplatin and regular infusion of cisplatin (eGFR 86.1 mL/min [71.0-96.3] vs 87.9 mL/min [71.6-97.3]; P = 0.938). The incidence of AKI grade 1 was not significantly different between rapid and regular infusion of cisplatin (29.3% vs 29.8%; P = 0.932). The maximum decrease in eGFR was 14.8 mL/min in the rapid infusion cohort and 17.7 mL/min in the regular infusion cohort (P = 0.364). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The incidence of nephrotoxicity after repeated infusion of cisplatin was not affected by the infusion rate of cisplatin. Therefore, a 1-hour infusion of cisplatin is a safe and feasible method, which may potentially shorten duration of hospital admittance and enable treating patients in the outpatient setting.

Lack of Detection of New Amphetamine-Like Drugs Using Conventional Urinary Immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: The number of reports of serious adverse effects and intoxication after the use of the new drug 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) increases. At the Emergency Department of the OLVG-Oost Hospital in Amsterdam, an on-site drug test, the Triage TOX Drug Screen, is available to assist in a rapid diagnosis. In less urgent cases, an EMIT II Plus immunoassay is used to determine semiquantitatively the presence of drugs of abuse (DOA). The antibodies in these immunoassays are designed to detect classic DOA and its urinary metabolites. Amphetamine-like drugs that may cause serious toxicity or impairment may not cross-react with the available immunoassay kits, and therefore may stay undetected. The question arises as to whether 4-FA and paramethoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) are detectable in the toxicological screening procedures commonly used for testing in urine. METHODS: Synthetic urine was spiked with the drug under investigation to create spiking standards of 50, 100, 250, 500, 2500, and 5000 ng/mL. Urine drug screens were performed on the automated analyzer Biosite Triage MeterPro using the Triage TOX Drug Screen test and on a Siemens Drug Testing System Viva-E using the EMIT II Plus Ecstasy Assay and the EMIT II Plus Amphetamines Assay. RESULTS: In this concentration range, the EMIT II Plus did not screen positive for PMMA, but there was some cross-reactivity for PMMA on the EMIT II Plus Ecstasy assay. The Triage TOX Drug Screen did test positive for PMMA at a concentration of 2500 ng/mL. The EMIT II Plus Amphetamines did test positive for 4-FA at a concentration of 5000 ng/mL, whereas the Ecstasy [3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)] assay only showed low cross-reactivity for 4-FA. The Triage TOX Drug Screen did not test positive for 4-FA. CONCLUSIONS: The available immunoassays lack sensitivity to detect 4-FA and PMMA in lower urine concentrations. Awareness of the fact that novel DOA may lead to false-negative urinary drug tests is of great importance.

Editorial "Special Issue Clinical and Post Mortem Toxicology".

This Special Issue addresses the challenges faced in detecting the exposure and intoxications of various (recreative) drugs and novel active psychoactive drugs [...].

Insulin overdose with fatal outcome?: Two forensic cases.

Intentional overdose with insulin preparations is rare. However, fatal consequences due to severe hypoglycemia could occur. Postmortem toxicology screening of insulin is a challenge, given the chemical characteristics of this protein and the difficulty of distinguishing between endogenous and exogenous insulin in blood. Here, we describe two cases of patients with diabetes using insulin and oral anti-diabetics. The main question in both cases was whether or not disturbance in glucose metabolism contributed to death. In case A, there was strong evidence that self-poisoning with insulin and subsequent hypoglycemia caused the death. However, this could not be confirmed due to lack of adequate forensic toxicology tests. In case B, no hypoglycemia was observed. Though, compared with case A, additional forensic examination was performed to investigate whether glycemic disturbances could have contributed to the death. In this report, we focus on the most appropriate analytical methods for the detection of exogenous insulin in the human body and give recommendations for toxicology testing of glucose levels and insulin in postmortem specimens.

[Clinical drug research is shifting to low- and middle-income countries: is the economy winning over science and ethics?] / Geneesmiddelenonderzoek in lage- en midden-inkomenslanden.

'The shift of clinical drug trials for registration purposes from high-income countries to low- and middle-income countries has created a blind spot in assessing new drug safety and efficacy'. This was concluded by the authors of the article 'Participant Recruitment From Low- and Middle-Income Countries for Pivotal Trials of Drugs Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-Sectional Analysis' (published in Annals of Internal Medicine in 2022). Due to lacking transparency by sponsors, regulatory authorities have little insight into the inclusion numbers per location, quality of the standard of care and medical-ethical standards of participating countries. In this regard, economic interests seem to prevail above the quality and validity of clinical trials and the safety and integrity of patients. Are economics winning over science and ethics? Moreover, is this situation desirable?

Successful Use of Continuous Veno-Venous Haemodialysis in a Case of Potential Lethal Caffeine Intoxication.

Here we describe the case of a potentially lethal caffeine intoxication after the reported ingestion of 10 g of caffeine. Due to hemodynamic instability with tachycardia and hypertension with an insufficient effect of continuous labetalol infusion, the patient was started on continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (CVVHD). After successful treatment for 15 h, CVVHD could be discontinued, and the patient was discharged home the next day. This case report is the first to report the use of CVVHD as a haemodialysis modality in the case of caffeine intoxication and illustrate the effect on caffeine clearance. We stress the importance of an early recognition of caffeine intoxication, so that haemodialysis can be considered in the case of a potentially lethal intoxication.

Analysis of production time and capacity for manual and robotic compounding scenarios for parenteral hazardous drugs.

BACKGROUND: The increasing amount of hazardous preparations in combination with shortages leads to a call for more efficient compounding methods. This research aims to evaluate the required amount of time, production capacity and direct labour costs of the manual, manual software-supported and robotic compounding of parenteral hazardous drugs. METHODS: This multicentre study was conducted at the clinical pharmacy departments of three Dutch hospitals with different compounding methods: St Antonius hospital (manual software-supported compounding), Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) (both robotic compounding and manual compounding without software support) and OLVG (robotic compounding). Time measurements of individual hazardous drugs were performed in all three hospitals. At Amsterdam UMC and St Antonius hospital, the times per compounding phase, the production capacity and the direct labour costs per preparation were also determined. To reflect real-world situations, the combination of robotic and manual compounding was also studied. RESULTS: The total compounding process, including the actions before compounding and the release-time and cleaning time, lasted 6:44 min with robotic compounding and was faster than manual compounding with and without software support (6:48 and 9:48 min, respectively). The production capacity of one full-time equivalent (FTE) on 1 day (P1FTE1day) was 15 preparations per FTE per day with manual compounding with and without software support, and 57 preparations per FTE per day with only robotic compounding. If manual and robotic compounding were combined, the production capacity was 30 preparations per FTE per day. In this setting, the direct labour costs per preparation were €5.21, while these costs were €13.18 with only manual compounding. CONCLUSION: Compared with manual compounding, robotic compounding was faster over the total compounding process. A combination of manual compounding and robotic compounding could lead to 100% more preparations per FTE and 2.5 times lower direct labour costs compared with manual compounding.

Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU during Ganciclovir Treatment, an Observational Study.

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between ganciclovir exposure with TDM and the development of AKI in ICU patients. This retrospective single-center observational cohort study included adult ICU patients treated with ganciclovir who had a minimum of one ganciclovir trough serum level. Patients receiving less than two days of treatment and patients with fewer than two measurements of serum creatinine, RIFLE scores, and/or renal SOFA scores were excluded. Acute kidney injury incidence was assessed with the difference between the final and first values of the renal SOFA score, RIFLE score, and serum creatinine. Nonparametric statistical tests were performed. In addition, the clinical relevance of these results was evaluated. A total of 64 patients were included with a median cumulative dose of 3150 mg. The mean difference in serum creatinine during ganciclovir treatment was reduced by 7.3 µmol/L (p = 0.143). The RIFLE score decreased by 0.04 (p = 0.912), and the renal SOFA score was reduced by 0.07 (p = 0.551). This single-center observational cohort study showed that ICU patients using ganciclovir with TDM-guided dosing did not develop acute kidney injury as measured by serum creatinine, RIFLE score, and renal SOFA score.

Internet-Purchased Sodium Azide Used in a Fatal Suicide Attempt: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

There has been a significant increase in sodium azide intoxications since the 1980s. Intoxications caused by sodium azide are becoming increasingly prevalent in the Netherlands as a result of its promotion for the purpose of self-euthanasia. The mechanism of toxicity is not completely understood but is dose-dependent. The presented case describes a suicide by sodium azide of a young woman (26 years old) with a history of depression and suicide attempts. The decedent was found in the presence of prescription medicine, including temazepam, domperidone in combination with omeprazole, and the chemical preservative sodium azide. Quantitative toxicology screening of whole blood revealed the presence of 70 µg/L temazepam (toxic range > 1000 µg/L) and 28 mg/L sodium azide (fatal range: 2.6-262 mg/L). Whole blood qualitative analysis revealed the presence of temazepam, temazepam-glucuronide, olanzapine, n-desmethylolanzapine, and acetaminophen. In circles promoting sodium azide, it is recommended to use sodium azide in combination with medications targeting sodium azide's negative effects, such as analgesics, antiemetics, and anti-anxiety drugs. The medicines recovered at the body's location, as well as the results of the toxicology screens, were consistent with the recommendations of self-euthanasia using sodium azide.

A Systematic Evaluation of Cost-Saving Dosing Regimens for Therapeutic Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Expensive novel anticancer drugs put a serious strain on healthcare budgets, and the associated drug expenses limit access to life-saving treatments worldwide. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop alternative dosing regimens to reduce drug expenses. METHODS: We developed alternative dosing regimens for the following monoclonal antibodies used for the treatment of lung cancer: amivantamab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ramucirumab; and for the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan. The alternative dosing regimens were developed by means of modeling and simulation based on the population pharmacokinetic models developed by the license holders. They were based on weight bands and the administration of complete vials to limit drug wastage. The resulting dosing regimens were developed to comply with criteria used by regulatory authorities for in silico dose development. RESULTS: We found that alternative dosing regimens could result in cost savings that range from 11 to 28%, and lead to equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure with no relevant increases in variability in exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing regimens based on weight bands and the use of complete vials to reduce drug wastage result in less expenses while maintaining equivalent exposure. The level of evidence of our proposal is the same as accepted by regulatory authorities for the approval of alternative dosing regimens of other monoclonal antibodies in oncology. The proposed alternative dosing regimens can, therefore, be directly implemented in clinical practice.