Postoperative Opioid Pain Medication Usage Following Adult Tonsillectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if short-term, high-quantity opioid use following adult tonsillectomy in active duty military members results in opioid misuse, using a proxy measure of referrals to substance abuse rehabilitation programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review was performed of 741 active duty patients who underwent tonsillectomy between 2012 and 2017. Data collection included preoperative medications within 60 days of surgery, all postoperative opioid prescriptions up to 12 months following surgery, and referrals to substance abuse rehabilitation within a year of surgery. RESULTS: Out of 741 patients, 658 met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one percent were women and the average age was 26 years. Fifty-nine percent of patients received 5 mg/325 mg oxycodone/acetaminophen as their initial postoperative pain medication. The average number of opioid tablets prescribed was 70 ± 18. Ninety three percent of patients received at least 60 tabs. The refill rate within 30 days of tonsillectomy was 38.6%. In the year following surgery, 25.4% of patients received additional doses of outpatient opioids for other indications. Nineteen patients (2.9%) were referred for substance abuse treatment within 1 year of tonsillectomy: seventeen for alcohol abuse, one for marijuana, and one for alcohol/marijuana. There were no referrals for opiate misuse or abuse. CONCLUSION: Short-term, high-quantity opioid treatment of post-tonsillectomy pain in active duty adults does not result in long-term opioid misuse, as measured by substance abuse treatment program referrals within a year after surgery. This finding supports the appropriateness of adequate short-term narcotic medication treatment. The long-term readiness of these patients appears unaffected by long-term opioid misuse or abuse. Even with this finding, there is an institutional shift to multi-modality pain management and appropriate opioid reduction to further mitigate the risk of opioid misuse. Extrapolation of these findings to all adult tonsillectomy patients should be done with caution, as there are several protective factors in the active duty population such as stable full-time employment with mandatory random drug screening.

Performance on the DANA Brief Cognitive Test Correlates With MACE Cognitive Score and May Be a New Tool to Diagnose Concussion.

Nearly 380,000 U.S. service members between 2000 and 2017 were, and at least 300,000 athletes annually are, diagnosed with concussion. It is imperative to establish a gold-standard diagnostic test to quickly and accurately diagnose concussion. In this non-randomized, prospective study, we examined the reliability and validity of a novel neurocognitive assessment tool, the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA), designed to be a more sensitive, yet efficient, measure of concussion symptomatology. In this study, the DANA Brief version was compared to an established measure of concussion screening, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE), in a group of non-concussed service members. DANA Brief subtests demonstrated low to moderate reliability, as measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; values range: 0.28-0.58), which is comparable to other computerized neurocognitive tests that are widely-implemented to diagnose concussion. Statistically significant associations were found between learning and memory components of the DANA Brief and the diagnostic MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: CDD: R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.023; CDS: R 2 = 0.10, p = 0.010). However, a more robust relationship was found between DANA Brief components involving attention and working memory, including immediate memory, and the MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: GNG: R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.003; PRO: R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.002). These results provide evidence that the DANA Rapid version, a 5-min assessment self-administered on a hand-held portable device, based on the DANA Brief version, may serve as a clinically useful and improved neurocognitive concussion screen to minimize the time between injury and diagnosis in settings where professional medical evaluation may be unavailable or delayed. The DANA's portability, durability, shorter test time and lack of need for a medical professional to diagnose concussion overcome these critical limitations of the MACE.