RESUMO
Treatment of bone metastases is often palliative, aiming at pain control and stabilization or prevention of pathological fractures. However, a complete resection with healing purposes can be performed in selected cases. The aim of our work was to evaluate the survival of megaprostheses used for reconstruction after bone metastases. Between January 2001 and March 2015, we implanted 169 Megasystem-C® (Waldemar LINK® GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) after bone metastasis resection. Patients, 95 females and 74 males, were operated at an average age of 61 (12-87) years for proximal femoral resection in 135 (79.9%) cases, distal femur in 24 (14.2%), proximal tibia in 6 (3.6%), total femur in 3 (1.8%) and intercalary femur in 1 (0.6%). Mostly, breast cancer metastases (30.8%), kidney (17.8%) and lung (14.2%) were treated. At an average follow-up of 21 (1-150) months, we found a 99.4% overall limb salvage and a 96.1% overall survival rate at 1 year, 92.8% at 2 years, and 86.8% at 5 and 10 years. We found 9 (5.3%) mobilization cases of the proximal femoral implant, 3 needed surgical reduction; 2 (1.2%) cases of aseptic loosening of the prosthetic stem; 2 (1.2%) periprotetic infection cases, one requiring a 2-stage revision. Few literature studies have evaluated the survival of megaprosthetic implant in the treatment of bone metastases. Our data show how in this specific context the rate of complications is significantly lower than expected in general orthopedic orthopedic surgery. The use of modular prostheses is a valid reconstructive strategy after bone metastasis resection in selected patients. The rate of short-term complications is exceptionally low; further studies will have to confirm this in the longer term.
RESUMO
Osteoarticular allografts represent a reconstructive option after bone tumor resection around the knee in growing children. The major advantage is the chance to preserve the growth plate of the remaining bone, but the disadvantage is the high failure rate eventually requiring definitive prosthetic replacement at skeletal maturity. We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who underwent osteoarticular allograft reconstructions of the distal femur (16) or proximal tibia (6). There were 12 females and 10 males with an average age at surgery of 11 years (7-15). The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 19 cases and Ewing sarcoma in 3. All patients underwent pre- and post-operative chemotherapy. At an average follow-up of 103 months (12-167), 18 patients (82%) were alive and 4 had died (18%). We observed 10 allograft failures requiring prosthetic replacement, 6 in distal femur and 4 in proximal tibia reconstructions. At last follow-up 8 allografts (36%) were still in place. Overall allograft survival was 79.6% at five and 45.8% at ten years. In distal femur, allograft survival was 86.2% at five and 59.1% at ten years. In proximal tibia, allograft survival was 62.5% at 5 years and 31.2% at 67 months. Average limb shortening was 3 cm (0- 5) in 8 patients with the allograft still in situ and 2 cm (0-4) in 10 patients after prosthetic replacement. Average MSTS functional score of the whole series was 25 (83.7%). The MSTS score of patients after revision with prosthetic replacement was 24 (80%) while patients who still had the allograft retained had an average MSTS scores of 26.8 (89.3%). In conclusion, osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the knee after bone tumor resection in pediatric age can be considered a temporary solution with the aim to limit limb length discrepancy before definitive prosthetic replacement after skeletal maturity.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limb-sparing surgery in combination with radiation therapy is a well-established treatment for high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. But selection of cases and optimal sequence of irradiation and surgery still remain controversial. METHODS: 769 patients with a high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities, who underwent a limb-sparing surgery, were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 (N = 89) was treated with neo-adjuvant radiation therapy, group 2 (N = 315) with adjuvant irradiation and group 3 (N = 365) with surgery alone. RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 45 months 95 local recurrences occurred resulting in a local recurrence-free survival of 83.2% after 5 years and 75.9% after 10 years. Contaminated surgical margins (Odds ratio: 2.42) and previous inadequate surgeries (Odds ratio: 1.89) were identified as risk factors for failed local control. Neo-adjuvant radiation therapy provides the best local recurrence-free rate for 5 years (90.0%), whereas after 10 years (78.3%) adjuvant irradiation showed better local control. The metastatic-free rate was independent from achieved surgical margins (p = 0.179). Group 1 showed the highest rate of revision surgery (9.0%), followed by group 3 (5.5%) and group 2 (4.4%) (p = 0.085). However, the rate of irradiation-correlated side effects was higher in group 2 (15.2%) than in group 1 (11.2%) (p = 0.221). CONCLUSION: Surgery has to be effective for successful local control and remains the mainstay of the treatment in combination with neo-adjuvant as well as adjuvant irradiation. In really wide or even radical resections the benefit of radiation therapy can be discussed as the irradiation induced side effects are not negligible.