Perioperative kidney injury in liver transplantation: a prospective study with renal histology and measured glomerular filtration rates.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent after liver transplantation (LT), with impact on graft function, morbidity and mortality. Although multifactorial, the pathophysiology of perioperative kidney injury remains unclear. Our aims were to analyze the frequency, evolution and risk factors for kidney impairment during the peri- and early post-operative period. METHODS: In a prospective, single-center study of 27 adult patients undergoing first single-organ LT, we analyzed measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) pre-transplant, at post-operative day (POD) 10, and at 1, 3, 12 and 36 months. Kidney and liver graft biopsies were performed during LT. RESULTS: A median mGFR decline of 45% was detected from pre-transplant to POD 10, correlating strongly with the mGFR evolution from baseline to 12 months (rs = 0.80, p<.001) and baseline to 36 months (rs = 0.82, p<.001). AKI occurred in 59% of recipients within 48 h of LT, notably before the introduction of calcineurin inhibitors on POD 3. AKI was strongly associated with mGFR at 12 and 36 months. Kidney and liver graft biopsies showed only minor histological changes. Donor and recipient body mass index, recipient age, model of end-stage liver disease score, diagnosis of hepatitis C, donor cause of death, as well as bleeding, transfusions and duration of the anhepatic phase correlated with early kidney dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The greatest decline in mGFR was evident within 10 days and AKI within hours of LT, irrespective of baseline mGFR and before introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Very early post-LT kidney injury has substantial consequences for long-term kidney function.

Liver Graft Proteomics Reveals Potential Incipient Mechanisms behind Early Renal Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent after liver transplantation (LT) and correlates with later development of chronic kidney disease. Its etiology is multifactorial and combines pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors. Additionally, the liver graft itself seems an important element in the development of AKI, yet the detailed mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that grafts of LT recipients developing significant early AKI may show distinct proteomic alterations, and we set out to identify proteome differences between LT recipients developing moderate or severe AKI (n = 7) and LT recipients without early renal injury (n = 7). Liver biopsies obtained one hour after reperfusion were assessed histologically and using quantitative proteomics. Several cytokines and serum amyloid A2 (SAA2) were analyzed in serum samples obtained preoperatively, 2−4 h, and 20−24 h after graft reperfusion, respectively. LT induced mild histological alterations without significant differences between groups but uniformly altered liver function tests peaking on postoperative day 1, with a trend towards more severe alterations in patients developing AKI. Global quantitative proteomic analysis revealed 136 proteins differing significantly in their expression levels (p < 0.05, FC 20%): 80 proteins had higher and 56 had lower levels in the AKI group. Most of these proteins were related to immune and inflammatory responses, host defense, and neutrophil degranulation. No differences between the studied pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines or SAA2 between groups were found at any moment. Our results suggest that grafts of LT patients who develop early AKI reveal a distinct proteome dominated by an early yet prominent activation of the innate immunity. These findings support the hypothesis that AKI after LT may be favored by certain graft characteristics.

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism of CYP3A5 Impacts the Exposure to Tacrolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacogenetic Substudy of the TWIST Trial.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) are highly variable. An impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the genes coding for enzymes and transporters involved in the pharmacokinetics of TAC and/or MPA is intuitively conceivable. Accordingly, we sought to analyze the influence of different SNPs on TAC and MPA exposure in pediatric renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A subpopulation of 37 patients (median age: 12.8 years, range 2.2-18.3 years) participating in the TWIST study was included in the analysis of SNPs of CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1), ABCG2, SLCO1B3 (coding for OATP2), ABCC2 (coding for cMOAT), and UGT1/2. TAC trough concentrations and abbreviated area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) of MPA were measured on days 7, 28, 91, and 183 after transplant. Both of these were adjusted to the respective dose the patient received. RESULTS: The allele frequencies of analyzed SNP's were comparable to those reported previously for white populations. Dose-adjusted trough concentrations of TAC were approximately 60% lower in patients with the CYP3A5*1/*3 allele as compared with the CYP3A5*3/*3 allele (P = 0.004). Steroid-free patients in CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*1/*3 carrier subgroups had comparable dose-adjusted TAC concentrations to the subgroup on steroids (P = 0.13). Patients younger than 10 years had a significantly lower median dose-adjusted TAC C0 concentration than patients older than 10 years; this age effect was comparable in heterozygous and homozygous CYP3A5 carriers as well as in patients on and off steroid medication. As for MPA, the genetic variability of transporters or enzymes had no impact on dose-adjusted MPA-AUC due to the low allele frequencies. Patients off steroids had a higher dose-adjusted MPA-AUC (0.18 mg·h/L per mg/m, 0.012-0.27) compared with patients on steroids (0.12 mg·h·L·mg, 0.09-0.19; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability of CYP3A5 has an impact on TAC metabolism in pediatric renal transplant recipients, contributing partly to the variability of TAC exposure. Therefore, adjusting initial TAC dosing to the genotype of CYP3A5 might be of clinical benefit.

Liver transplantation in the Nordic countries - An intention to treat and post-transplant analysis from The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry 1982-2013.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry (NLTR) accounts for all liver transplants performed in the Nordic countries since the start of the transplant program in 1982. Due to short waiting times, donor liver allocation has been made without considerations of the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. We aimed to summarize key outcome measures and developments for the activity up to December 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The registry is integrated with the operational waiting-list and liver allocation system of Scandiatransplant (www.scandiatransplant.org) and accounted at the end of 2013 for 6019 patients out of whom 5198 were transplanted. Data for recipient and donor characteristics and relevant end-points retransplantation and death are manually curated on an annual basis to allow for statistical analysis and the annual report. RESULTS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis, acute hepatic failure, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are the five most frequent diagnoses (accounting for 15.3%, 10.8%, 10.6%, 9.3% and 9.0% of all transplants, respectively). Median waiting time for non-urgent liver transplantation during the last 10-year period was 39 days. Outcome has improved over time, and for patients transplanted during 2004-2013, overall one-, five- and 10-year survival rates were 91%, 80% and 71%, respectively. In an intention-to-treat analysis, corresponding numbers during the same time period were 87%, 75% and 66%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The liver transplant program in the Nordic countries provides comparable outcomes to programs with a MELD-based donor liver allocation system. Unique features comprise the diagnostic spectrum, waiting times and the availability of an integrated waiting list and transplant registry (NLTR).

Immunosuppression after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis influences activity of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We studied the progression of IBD in patients with PSC who have undergone liver transplantation. We also studied risk factors, including medical therapy, that could influence on IBD disease activity. METHODS: In a longitudinal multicenter study, we analyzed data from the Nordic Liver Transplant Group on 439 patients with PSC who underwent liver transplantation from November 1984 through December 2006; 353 had IBD at the time of transplantation. We compared IBD activity before and after liver transplantation. Two hundred eighteen patients who had an intact colon and had undergone pretransplant and post-transplant colonoscopies were characterized further. RESULTS: Macroscopic colonic inflammation was more frequent after liver transplantation than before liver transplantation (153 vs 124 patients; P < .001). The degree of inflammation decreased in 37 patients (17%), was unchanged in 93 patients (43%), and increased in 88 patients (40%) (P < .001). The rate of relapse after transplantation was higher than that before transplantation (P < .001), and overall clinical IBD activity also increased (P < .001). Young age at diagnosis of IBD and dual treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were significant risk factors for increased IBD activity after transplantation, whereas combination treatment with cyclosporin A and azathioprine had protective effects. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression affects IBD activity after liver transplantation in patients with PSC; a shift from present standard maintenance treatment of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin A and azathioprine should be considered for these patients.

Liver transplantation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in normal livers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The role of liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in livers without fibrosis/cirrhosis (NC-HCC) is unclear. We aimed to determine selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with NC-HCC. METHODS: Using the European Liver Transplant Registry, we identified 105 patients who underwent liver transplantation for unresectable NC-HCC. Detailed information about patient, tumor characteristics, and survival was obtained from the transplant centers. Variables associated with survival were identified using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. RESULTS: Liver transplantation was primary treatment in 62 patients and rescue therapy for intrahepatic recurrences after liver resection in 43. Median number of tumors was 3 (range 1-7) and median tumor size 8 cm (range 0.5-30). One- and 5-year overall and tumor-free survival rates were 84% and 49% and 76% and 43%, respectively. Macrovascular invasion (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.34 to 4.86), lymph node involvement (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.28), and time interval between liver resection and transplantation < 12 months (HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.96 to 4.67) were independently associated with survival. Five-year survival in patients without macrovascular invasion or lymph node involvement was 59% (95% CI 47-70%). Tumor size was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported series of patients transplanted for NC-HCC. Selection of patients without macrovascular invasion or lymph node involvement, or patients ≥ 12months after previous liver resection, can result in 5-year survival rates of 59%. In contrast to HCC in cirrhosis, tumor size is not a predictor of post-transplant survival in NC-HCC.

Impact of donor histology on survival following liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a Scandinavian single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is affected by several factors. The aims of this single-center study were to evaluate survival from 1992 to 2006 in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients and to identify factors influencing patient and graft survival, with particular focus on donor liver histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survival among 84 patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the above period was evaluated. Median follow-up time was 57 months (range 28-87). A perioperative liver biopsy from the donor liver graft was available in 68 cases. Biopsies were assessed for fibrosis, necroinflammatory activity, and degree of steatosis. Patient and graft survival according to relevant factors including donor histopathology were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We found an association between donor liver fibrosis and patient survival (p = 0.016) as well as between graft survival and portal inflammation in the donor liver (p = 0.026). Both these associations remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.007 and 0.017 respectively). Moreover, recipient age over 60 was found predictive of patient survival and repeated steroid boluses or steroid-resistant rejection of graft survival. Donor age was high throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Histopathological features, especially portal inflammation and stage of fibrosis, in the donor liver may deleteriously affect graft and patient survival following HCV-related liver transplantation. Thus, pretransplant evaluation of donor histopathology may be of value in the selection of donors for transplantation of HCV-positive individuals, especially among donors older than 60 years.

Colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing liver transplantation: a Nordic multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have implicated primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) as an additional risk factor for colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some reports have indicated that the risk is even higher in PSC-IBD patients after liver transplantation (Ltx), but this issue is controversial. We aimed to compare the risk of colorectal neoplasia in PSC-IBD patients before and after Ltx and to identify risk factors for colorectal neoplasia post-transplant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a multicenter study within the Nordic Liver Transplant Group, we assessed the risk of colorectal neoplasia by using the competing risk regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 439 PSC patients included, 353 (80%) had IBD at the time of Ltx and 15 (3%) patients developed de novo IBD post-Ltx. The median duration of IBD was 15 (0-50) years at the time of Ltx and follow-up after Ltx was 5 (0-20) years. Ninety-one (25%) PSC-IBD patients developed colorectal neoplasia. The cumulative risk of colorectal neoplasia was higher after than before Ltx (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.9, p = 0.002). A multivariate analysis demonstrated aminosalicylates and ursodeoxycholic acid as significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia post-Ltx. Duration and activity of IBD did not significantly affect the risk of neoplasia. CONCLUSION: The even higher risk of colorectal neoplasia in PSC-IBD patients after when compared with that of before Ltx underscores the importance of regular surveillance colonoscopies post-Ltx. The association of aminosalicylates and ursodeoxycholic acid to the development of colorectal neoplasia after Ltx should be further investigated.

Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: selection is essential for acceptable results.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is considered a contraindication for liver transplantation by most liver transplant centers. The aim of this study has been to report our results as well as to explore factors that influence patient survival after liver transplantation for CCA. PATIENTS: All transplant patients with CCA in Norway, Sweden and Finland during 1984-2005 were included (n = 53). Thirty-three patients (62%) had intrahepatic CCA. Twenty-one patients (40%) had a more advanced tumor (>TNM stage 2). Thirty-four of the 53 recipients (64%) had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). RESULTS: Patients with TNM stage ≤ 2 transplanted after 1995 had a 5-year survival rate of 48%. The overall 5-year patient survival rate was 25%. There was no difference in survival between patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic CCA. The 5-year survival rate among patients with TNM stage ≤ 2 was 36%. Patients with TNM stage >2 had a 10% 5-year survival rate; the difference was significant at p < 0.01. Patients transplanted after 1995 had a significantly better 5-year survival rate than pre-1995 patients (38% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Patients transplanted after 1995 with TNM ≤ 2 and CA 19-9 ≤ 100 had the 5-year survival of 58%. CONCLUSION: By selecting CCA patients with TNM stage ≤ 2 and a CA 19-9 ≤ 100 a reasonable 5-year survival rate is possible. We think that CCA in selected cases can be an acceptable indication for liver transplantation.

Long-term, Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: 5-year Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the DIAMOND Study.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is reportedly associated with risk of renal impairment in liver transplant recipients. It is believed that this can be mitigated by decreasing initial exposure to CNIs or delaying CNI introduction until 3-4 d posttransplantation. The ADVAGRAF studied in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab in liver transplantation (DIAMOND) trial evaluated different administration strategies for prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T). METHODS: DIAMOND was a 24-wk, open-label, phase 3b trial in de novo liver transplant recipients randomized to: PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d (Arm 1); PR-T 0.15-0.175 mg/kg/d plus basiliximab (Arm 2); or PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d delayed until day 5 posttransplant plus basiliximab (Arm 3). In a 5-y follow-up, patients were maintained on an immunosuppressive regimen according to standard clinical practice (NCT02057484). Primary endpoint: graft survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis). RESULTS: Follow-up study included 856 patients. Overall graft survival was 84.6% and 73.5% at 1 and 5 y post transplant, respectively. Five-year rates for Arms 1, 2, and 3 were 74.7%, 71.5%, and 74.5%, respectively. At 5 y, death-censored graft survival in the entire cohort was 74.7%. Overall graft survival in patients remaining on PR-T for ≥30 d was 79.1%. Graft survival in patients who remained on PR-T at 5 y was 87.3%. Patient survival was 86.6% at 1 y and 76.3% at 5 y, with survival rates similar in the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of the 24-wk initial study and 5 y posttransplant was 62.1 and 61.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and was similar between the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Overall, 18 (2.9%) patients had ≥1 adverse drug reaction, considered possibly related to PR-T in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the DIAMOND study patient cohort, renal function, graft survival, and patient survival were similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant.

Primary liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: a comparative analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry.

The principal aim of this study was to compare the probability of and potential risk factors for death and graft loss after primary adult and pediatric liver transplantation in patients undergoing transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) to those in patients undergoing transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; used as the reference group) or alcoholic cirrhosis (used as an example of a nonautoimmune liver disease). The 5-year survival of patients undergoing transplantation for AIH (n = 827) was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.77]. This was similar to that of patients undergoing transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis (0.74, 95% CI = 0.72-0.76, n = 6424) but significantly worse than that of patients undergoing transplantation for PBC (0.83, 95% CI = 0.80-0.85, n = 1588). Fatal infectious complications occurred at an increased rate in patients with AIH (hazard ratio = 1.8, P = 0.002 with PBC as the reference). The outcome of pediatric AIH patients was similar to that of adult patients undergoing transplantation up to the age of 50 years. However, the survival of AIH patients undergoing transplantation beyond the age of 50 years (0.61 at 5 years, 95% CI = 0.51-0.70) was significantly reduced in comparison with the survival of young adult AIH patients (0.78 at 18-34 years, 95% CI = 0.70-0.86) and in comparison with the survival of patients of the same age group with PBC or alcoholic cirrhosis. In conclusion, age significantly affects patient survival after liver transplantation for AIH. The increased risk of dying of infectious complications in the early postoperative period, especially above the age of 50 years, should be acknowledged in the management of AIH patients with advanced-stage liver disease who are listed for liver transplantation. It should be noted that not all risk factors relevant to patient and graft survival could be analyzed with the European Liver Transplant Registry database.

Stable long-term renal function after pediatric liver transplantation.

Long-term exposure to calcineurin inhibitors increases the risk of CKD in children after LT. The aims of this study were to study renal function by measuring GFRm before and yearly after LT, to describe the prevalence of CKD (stage III: GFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and to investigate if age and underlying liver disease had an impact on long-term renal function. Thirty-six patients with a median age of 2.9 years (0.1-16 yr) were studied. Median follow-up was 6.5 (2-14 yr). GFRm decreased significantly during the first six months post-transplantation with 23% (p < 0.001). Thereafter renal function stabilized. At six months, 17% (n = 5) of the children presented CKD stage III and at five yr the prevalence of CKD III was 18% in 29 children. However, in 13 children with a 10-year follow-up it was 0%. None of the children required renal replacement therapy after LT. When analyzing renal function of those children younger than two yr (n = 14) and older than two yr (n = 17) at the time of transplantation, we found that in both cohorts the filtration rate remained remarkably stable during the five-yr observational period. However, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference in the percentual decrease in GFRm between the groups during the first six months after LT 13% and 31%, respectively. Baseline GFRm according to diagnosis did not differ between the groups. During the first six months after LT, patients transplanted for hepatic malignancy (n = 6) and those with metabolic liver disease (n = 4) had a percentage loss of GFRm of 32% and 35%, respectively. The corresponding loss of GFRm in patients with other diseases was 10-19%. Six months post-transplantation mean GFRm in the group with malignant liver disease was 65 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and in the group with other diseases (n = 24) 82 +/- 17 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p < 0.05). At one, three and five yr post-transplantation there was no longer a statistically significant difference between these cohorts. Our findings suggest that there can be a long-term recovery of renal function after LT in children.

Liver transplantation for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy: impact on Swedish patients' survival.

Liver transplantation (LTx) for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) is an accepted treatment for this fatal disease. However, the long-term outcome with respect to that of nontransplanted patients has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term survival of Swedish LTx FAP patients with that of historical controls, especially with respect to the age at onset of the disease and gender. In order to evaluate the outcome of LTx as a treatment for FAP, survival was calculated from the onset of disease. One hundred forty-one FAP patients, 108 transplanted and 33 not transplanted, were included in the study. Significantly increased survival was noted for LTx patients in comparison with controls. The outcome was especially favorable for those with an early onset of the disease (age at onset < 50 years) in comparison with early-onset controls (P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference for late-onset cases (> or = 50 years) was found. Transplanted late-onset females had significantly improved survival in comparison with transplanted late-onset males (P = 0.02). We were unable to find significant differences in survival between patients with long (> or = 7 years) or short (<7 years) disease duration at transplantation. The survival of male patients with late-onset disease appeared not to improve with LTx. LTx is an efficacious treatment for improving the survival of early-onset FAP patients. Further studies are needed to analyze the cause of the poorer outcome for late-onset male patients.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: updated Swedish Consensus recommendations.

In a recent expert meeting, Swedish recommendations for the treatment of HCV infection were upgraded. The panel recommends vaccination against both hepatitis A and B in patients with HCV. Therapy for symptomatic acute HCV infection should be initiated if spontaneous resolution has not occurred within 12 weeks, whereas asymptomatic acute HCV should be treated upon detection. Patients with genotype 2/3 infection should generally be treated for 24 weeks. In patients with a very rapid viral response (vRVR), i.e. HCV RNA below 1000 IU/ml on d 7, treatment can be shortened to 12-16 weeks, provided that no dose reduction has been made. For genotype 1 patients with rapid viral response (RVR), 24 weeks treatment is recommended. For patients with a complete early viral response (cEVR), 48 weeks treatment is recommended, whereas 72 weeks treatment should be considered for patients with partial early viral response (pEVR). For patients with difficult-to-treat disease and with pronounced anaemia, erythropoietin can be used to maintain the ribavirin dose. In HCV-HIV coinfected patients, combination therapy for HCV should, if possible, be initiated before anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is indicated. For liver transplant patients pre-emptive therapy is not recommended; hence, treatment should be deferred until histological recurrence.

Chronic kidney disease--a common and serious complication after intestinal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease after organ transplantation is a serious complication that negatively impacts on long-term patient survival. We describe long-term renal function after intestinal transplantation by serial measurements of glomerular filtration rates (GFR) with Chromium EDTA clearance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with at least 6 months survival form the basis of this report. Glomerular filtration rate measurements were performed at baseline, 3 months posttransplantation, and yearly thereafter. Median follow-up time for the cohort was 1.5 years (0.5-7.8 years). Tacrolimus (Prograf) was discontinued in four patients because of impaired renal function. These four patients were switched to sirolimus (Rapamune) at 11, 18, 24, and 40 months posttransplantation. RESULTS: Median baseline GFR was 67 (22-114) mL/min/1.73 m. In the adult patients, GFR 3 months posttransplantation had decreased to 50% of the baseline. At 1 year, median GFR in the adult patients was reduced by 72% (n=5). Two patients developed renal failure within the first year and required hemodialysis. One of the pediatric patients fully recovered her renal function, the second pediatric patient lost 20% of her baseline GFR at 6 months posttransplantation. Glomerular filtration rate calculated with the modified diet in renal disease formula consistently overestimated GFR by approximately 30% compared with measured GFR. CONCLUSION: Chronic kidney disease and renal failure are common after intestinal transplantation. These two factors significantly contribute to poor long-term survival rates. Measurements of GFR may help to identify those individuals at risk for developing chronic kidney disease to implement renal sparing strategies.

Recipient Hyperbilirubinemia May Reduce Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury but Fails to Improve Outcome in Clinical Liver Transplantation.

Background. Exogenous bilirubin may reduce experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) due to its antioxidant properties. We studied if early graft exposure to high bilirubin levels in the recipient affects the early IRI and outcomes after liver transplantation (LTx). Methods. In 427 LTx patients, the AUROC curve based on bilirubin and AST at day 1 identified a cutoff of 2.04 mg/dL for the recipient pretransplant bilirubin. Recipients were grouped as having low (group L, n = 152) or high (group H, n = 275) bilirubin. Both groups had similar donor-related variables (age, preservation time, donor BMI > 28, and donor risk index (DRI)). Results. Alanine (ALT) and aspartate (AST) aminotransferase levels were higher in group L at day 1; ALT levels remained higher at day 2 in group L. LTx from high risk donors (DRI > 2) revealed a trend towards lower transaminases during the first two days after transplantation in group H. One month and 1-year patient survival were similar in groups L and H. High preoperative bilirubin did not affect the risk for early graft dysfunction (EGD), death, or graft loss during the first year after transplantation nor the incidence of acute rejection. LTx using donors with DRI > 2 resulted in similar rates of EGD in both groups. Conclusion. Increased bilirubin appears to reduce the early IRI after LTx yet this improvement was insufficient to improve the clinical outcome.

Strict Selection Alone of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Is Associated with Improved Survival.

Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) has regained attention since the Mayo Clinic reported their favorable results with the use of a neo-adjuvant chemoradiation protocol. However, debate remains whether the success of the protocol should be attributed to the neo-adjuvant therapy or to the strict selection criteria that are being applied. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of patient selection alone on the outcome of liver transplantation for hCCA. In this retrospective study, patients that were transplanted for hCCA between1990 and 2010 in Europe were identified using the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). Twenty-one centers reported 173 patients (69%) of a total of 249 patients in the ELTR. Twenty-six patients were wrongly coded, resulting in a study group of 147 patients. We identified 28 patients (19%) who met the strict selection criteria of the Mayo Clinic protocol, but had not undergone neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Five-year survival in this subgroup was 59%, which is comparable to patients with pretreatment pathological confirmed hCCA that were transplanted after completion of the chemoradiation protocol at the Mayo Clinic. In conclusion, although the results should be cautiously interpreted, this study suggests that with strict selection alone, improved survival after transplantation can be achieved, approaching the Mayo Clinic experience.

Early liver transplantation improves familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy patients' survival.

Since the first liver transplantation for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy was performed in 1990, it has become an accepted treatment for this systemic amyloid disorder. Liver transplantation halts the production of the mutated amyloidogenic transthyretin, and thereby amyloid formation, and also progression of the majority of symptoms. Improvement in survival from onset of disease in transplanted patients compared to non-transplanted subjects has of yet not been demonstrated, partly because of the natural relatively slow progression of the disease with an expected median survival of 13 years. In this retrospective study we compared the early initial series (n=34) of transplantations, where severely malnourished patients were accepted, with a later series (n=27) of transplants, as well as a control group (n=19) consisting of non-transplanted patients. For transplanted patients with an modified body mass index (mBMI) above 600 an improved survival was noted compared with that of non-transplanted historical controls. So far no difference in survival between the early and late series has been found. Our previous recommendation of selection of patients primarily according to their nutritional status appears to be well justified, since it is now possible to demonstrate an increased survival for the transplanted group of patients with a preserved nutritional status (mBMI > 600) compared to the control group of non-transplanted patients.

Application of human leukocyte antigen matching in the allocation of kidneys from cadaveric organ donors in the Nordic countries.

The Nordic organ exchange organization Scandiatransplant was founded in 1969. It covers a population of 24.41 million inhabitants in five countries: Denmark (5.45 million), Finland (5.19 million), Iceland (0.29 million), Norway (4.54 million), and Sweden (8.94 million). Initially, the purpose of Scandiatransplant was to establish and maintain a common waiting list for all Nordic patients with end-stage renal failure waiting for a cadaveric kidney transplant. The basis of maintaining a common Nordic waiting list was the recognition of the wide polymorphism of the human leukocyte antigen system, which demands a substantial pool of waiting patients to provide optimal histocompatibility matching between organ donor and recipient. Thus, one of the major tasks of the organization was and still is to specify rules for the exchange of kidneys between the participating transplant centers. Scandiatransplant includes the cooperation of all 10 Nordic kidney transplant centers in addition to eight immunology laboratories. Denmark has four transplant centers located in Copenhagen, Herlev, Odense, and Aarhus. Finland has one center in Helsinki. Norway has one center located in Oslo. Sweden has four kidney transplantation centers located in each of the university hospitals in Göteborg, Malmö, Stockholm, and Uppsala. The fifth Nordic country, Iceland, is participating fully in organ donation but has no individual transplant center. Organ transplantation in Icelandic patients is performed in other Nordic countries.

Liver transplantation for treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Liver transplantation can be considered a therapeutic option for patients with neuroendocrine tumors only metastatic to the liver. Important selection criteria are well-differentiated tumors and a low proliferation rate (Ki67 <10%). In this series, orthopic liver transplantation offered good relief of symptoms and long disease-free intervals with initial survival of grafts and patients as in benign disease. The experience with multivisceral transplantation is still limited.