Shared Loanword Recognition in German-English Bilinguals: The Role of Metrical Phonology.

The role of phonology in bilingual word recognition has focused on a phonemic level especially in the recognition of cognates. In this study, we examined differences in metrical structure to test whether first language (L1) metrical structure influences the processing of second language (L2) words. For that, we used words of Romance origin (e.g., reptile, signal), which both German and English have borrowed extensively. However, the existing metrical patterns are not identical nor are the borrowed vocabularies the same. Rather, those identical words differ systematically in their foot structure. We conducted a cross-modal form fragment priming EEG experiment (auditory-visual) with German native speakers who were highly proficient in English. Both behavioral and ERP results showed an effect of the native phonology and the loan status, that is, whether the loan exists only in the speaker's L2 or is shared across languages. Priming effects (RTs) were largest for nonshared loanwords indicating some interference from German (L1). This was also evident in a reduced N400 but only if the metrical structure aligned with German patterns for Germanic words, that is, two light syllables as in pigeon. If the words exist in both languages, metrical structure also mattered shown by the modulation of different ERP components across conditions. Overall, our study indicates that metrical phonology plays a role in loanword processing. Our data show that the more similar a word is in terms of its metrical phonology across L1 and L2, the more effortful the processing of a word within a priming paradigm indicating interference from the L1 phonology.

Composition decomposed: Distinct neural mechanisms support processing of nouns in modification and predication contexts.

Understanding language requires the ability to compose the meanings of words into phrase and sentence meanings. Formal theories in semantics have framed the hypothesis that all instances of meaning composition, irrespective of the syntactic and semantic properties of the expressions involved, boil down to a unique formal operation, that is, the application of a function to an argument, a view known as "Frege's Conjecture." We test the processing consequences of this idea using event-related potentials (ERPs) and a novel experimental paradigm where composition versus noncomposition of words from the same grammatical category (nouns) are compared in two different syntactic environments: predication and modification. We found that noun composition in a modification context, where the noun follows an adjective, elicits a reduced N400 component, whereas noun composition in a predication context, where the noun follows a verb, produces an enhanced LAN component. These data challenge the uniqueness thesis, central to formal semantics, and support instead linguistic theories and processing models that posit different composition operations for predicates and modifiers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).