Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Virol ; 97(2): e0008923, 2023 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36700640

RESUMO

Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.


Assuntos
Pesquisa , Virologia , Viroses , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Disseminação de Informação , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Formulação de Políticas , Pesquisa/normas , Pesquisa/tendências , SARS-CoV-2 , Virologia/normas , Virologia/tendências , Viroses/prevenção & controle , Viroses/virologia , Vírus
2.
mBio ; 14(1): e0018823, 2023 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36700642

RESUMO

Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Respiratórias , Vírus , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Vírus/genética
3.
mSphere ; 8(2): e0003423, 2023 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36700653

RESUMO

Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vírus , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Antivirais
4.
Biochemistry ; 44(16): 5982-92, 2005 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15835887

RESUMO

Oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) catalyzes the cotranslational transfer of high-mannose sugars to nascent polypeptides during N-linked glycosylation in the rough endoplasmic reticulum lumen. Nine OST subunits have been identified in yeast. However, the composition and organization of mammalian OST remain unclear. Using two-dimensional Blue Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, we now demonstrate that mammalian OST can be isolated from solubilized, actively engaged ribosomes as multiple distinct protein complexes that range in size from approximately 500 to 700 kDa. These complexes exhibit different ribosome affinities and subunit compositions. The major complex, OSTC(I), had an apparent size of approximately 500 kDa and was readily released from ribosome translocon complexes after puromycin treatment under physiological salt conditions. Two additional complexes were released only after treatment with high salt: OSTC(II) ( approximately 600 kDa) and OSTC(III) ( approximately 700 kDa). Both remained stably associated with heterotrimeric Sec61alphabetagamma, while OSTC(III) also contained the tetrameric TRAP complex. All known mammalian OST subunits (STT3-A, ribophorin I, ribophorin II, OST48, and DAD1) were present in all complexes. In addition, two previously uncharacterized proteins were also copurified with OST. Mass spectrometry identified a 17 kDa protein as DC2 which is weakly homologous to the C-terminal half of yeast Ost3p and Ost6p. The second protein (14 kDa) was tentatively identified as keratinocyte-associated protein 2 (KCP2) and has no previously known function. Our results identify two potential new subunits of mammalian OST and demonstrate a remarkable heterogeneity in OST composition that may reflect a means for controlling nascent chain glycosylation.


Assuntos
Hexosiltransferases/química , Proteínas de Membrana/química , Fosfatase Ácida/química , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Cães , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Retículo Endoplasmático/enzimologia , Hexosiltransferases/genética , Hexosiltransferases/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Isoenzimas/química , Espectrometria de Massas , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Proteínas de Membrana/isolamento & purificação , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Peso Molecular , Complexos Multiproteicos , Pâncreas/enzimologia , Subunidades Proteicas , Proteômica , Puromicina , Canais de Translocação SEC , Sais , Homologia de Sequência de Aminoácidos , Fosfatase Ácida Resistente a Tartarato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA