Arthroscopic centralization reduces extrusion of the medial meniscus with posterior root defect in the ACL reconstructed knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of arthroscopic meniscal centralization reinforcement for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root defect on knee kinematics and meniscal extrusion in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) knee. The hypothesis was that the medial meniscus centralization would reduce extrusion and anterior laxity in ACLR knee with a medical meniscal defect. METHODS: Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic system under the following loading conditions: (a) an 89.0 N anterior tibial load, (b) 5.0 Nm internal and external rotational torques, (c) a 10.0 Nm valgus and varus loadings, and (d) a combined 7.0 Nm valgus moment and then a 5.0 Nm internal rotation torque as a static simulated pivot shift. The tested knee states included: (1) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with intact medial meniscus (MM Intact), (2) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus posterior root defect (MM Defect), (3) Anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization (MM Centralization). Medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization was performed using 1.4 mm anchors with #2 suture. The MM extrusion (MME) was measured using ultrasound under unloaded and varus loading conditions at 0° and 30° of flexion. RESULTS: Anterior tibial translation (ATT) increased significantly with MM posterior root defect compared to MM intact at all flexion angles. With MM centralization, ATT was not significantly different from the intact meniscus at 15° and 30° of flexion. Meniscus extrusion increased significantly with the root defect compared to intact meniscus and decreased significantly with meniscal centralization compared to the root defect at both flexion angles. CONCLUSIONS: In ACL reconstruction, cases involving irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Clinically, in ACL reconstruction cases with irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic meniscal centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Meniscal centralization decreases the extrusion of the MM and offers improvements in knee laxity.

The radiographic tibial spine area is correlated with the occurrence of ACL injury.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to reveal the possible influence of the tibial spine area on the occurrence of ACL injury. METHODS: Thirty-nine subjects undergoing anatomical ACL reconstruction (30 female, 9 male: average age 29 ± 15.2) and 37 subjects with intact ACL (21 female, 16 male: average age 29 ± 12.5) were included in this study. In the anterior-posterior (A-P) and lateral knee radiograph, the tibial spine area was measured using a PACS system. In axial knee MRI exhibiting the longest femoral epicondylar length, the intercondylar notch area was measured. Tibial spine area, tibial spine area/body height, and tibial spine area/notch area were compared between the ACL tear and intact groups. RESULTS: The A-P tibial spine area of the ACL tear and intact groups was 178 ± 34 and 220.7 ± 58mm2, respectively. The lateral tibial spine area of the ACL tear and intact groups was 145.7 ± 36.9 and 178.9 ± 41.7mm2, respectively. The tibial spine area was significantly larger in the ACL intact group when compared with the ACL tear group (A-P: p = 0.02, lateral: p = 0.03). This trend was unchanged even when the tibial spine area was normalized by body height (A-P: p = 0.01, lateral: p = 0.02). The tibial spine area/notch area of the ACL tear and intact groups showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The A-P and lateral tibial spine area was significantly smaller in the ACL tear group when compared with the ACL intact group. Although the sample size was limited, a small tibial spine might be a cause of knee instability, which may result in ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Sizing of potential autografts is essential to match the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) dimensions when performing ACL reconstruction (ACLR). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of the thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) assessments for the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft using preoperative ultrasound and MRI. METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 19.9 ± 5.0 years), who underwent ACLR using QT autograft, were included. The maximum thickness of the QT was assessed at 15 and 30 mm proximal using ultrasound with a long axis image, and at 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella using MRI with a sagittal image. The CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the medial-lateral QT width at 30 mm proximal using ultrasound with a short axis image, and at 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella using MRI with an axial image. Intraoperatively, QT autograft was harvested with a 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using ultrasound and MRI were good (Intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.720-0.941). Correlation coefficient with the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft was higher in ultrasound (R = 0.738-0.791, P < 0.001) than MRI (R = 0.449-0.543, P = 0.002-0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasound predicted the intraoperative diameter of the QT autograft more accurately than MRI. Ultrasound may be used clinically to assure a sufficiently large QT autograft diameter to match the diameter of the patient's native ACL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Two-fragment Segond fracture validates historical descriptions of independent soft tissue attachments.

This is a case report of a 26-year-old male who sustained a Segond fracture in the context of an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture incurred while downhill skiing. Further work-up revealed that the Segond fracture consisted of two distinct fragments with separate soft tissue attachments, including the capsule-osseous layer of the iliotibial band and the short arm of the biceps femoris. Imaging showed interval healing of the Segond fracture between initial presentation and the performance of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction approximately 4 months later. As intraoperative evaluation demonstrated that anatomic ACL reconstruction restored translational and rotatory knee stability, surgical repair of the Segond fracture, or the anterolateral complex of the knee more broadly, was not required. Maintenance of translational and rotatory knee stability was confirmed at serial post-operative appointments up through final follow-up.Level of evidence Level V.

Knees with straight Blumensaat's line have small volume of femoral intercondylar notch.

PURPOSE: Smaller femoral intercondylar notch volume has been identified as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury. The present study aims to investigate differences in the intercondylar notch volume based on differences in the morphology of Blumensaat's line. METHODS: Eighty-eight (88) subjects (42 male and 46 female: median age 27: range 15-49), were included in this study. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the volume of the intercondylar notch was calculated using a truncated-pyramid shape simulation with the formula: [Formula: see text]. Femoral condyle height (h) was measured in the sagittal plane of the knee in 3D-CT. The area of the intercondylar notch was measured in the axial slice containing the most proximal level (S1) and most distal level (S2) of Blumensaat's line. In the sagittal view of the knee, Blumensaat's line morphology was classified into either straight or hill type. Statistical analysis was performed to compare h, S1, S2, and notch volume between the straight and hill type groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were classified as having straight type morphology and 52 subjects were classified as having hill type morphology. The measured h, S1, and S2, of the straight and hill types were 29 ± 4 and 31 ± 4 mm, 213 ± 72 and 205 ± 51 mm2, 375 ± 114 and 430 ± 94 mm2, respectively. The calculated femoral intercondylar notch volume of the straight and hill types was 8.1 ± 2 and 9.5 ± 2 cm3, respectively. Straight type knees showed significantly smaller S2 (p = 0.04), and notch volume (p = 0.01) when compared with hill type knees. CONCLUSION: Intercondylar notch volume was significantly smaller in knees with straight type Blumensaat's line morphology. Considering that Blumensaat's line represents the roof of the femoral notch, morphological variations in Blumensaat's line are likely to reflect variation in notch volume. For clinical relevance, as a smaller notch volume is a risk factor for ACL injury, straight type Blumensaat's line may also be considered a potential risk factor for ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) detects increased vascularity of the torn anterior cruciate ligament.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a novel microvascular imaging technology which may be useful to assess the vascularity of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as a potential measure of healing potential following surgery. This study aimed to quantify the vascularity of the torn and intact ACL using ultrasound with SMI. METHODS: 23 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 27.1 ± 12.8 years), who were diagnosed with an ACL tear with an intact contralateral ACL were enrolled (ACL injury group). Ten healthy volunteers (36.1 ± 4.9 years) who had intact ACLs in both knees were also recruited (ACL healthy controls). The vascularity of the ACL was assessed using SMI within 15 mm from the tibial insertion in both knees. The amount of the vascular signal was assessed using a semi-quantitative grading scale (vascularity grade: grade 0-3) and a quantified ratio of vascularized area with respect to total area of the region of interest (vascularity ratio). RESULTS: In the ACL injury group, a significantly higher vascularity grade and ratio were observed in the torn ACL (vascularity grade 0-3: 1, 8, 7, and 7 patients, respectively; vascularity ratio: 1.3 ± 1.4%) than the contralateral intact ACL (vascularity grade 0-3: 21, 1, 1, and 0 patients, respectively; vascularity ratio: 0.1 ± 0.5%) (P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between both ACLs in the ACL healthy control group. CONCLUSIONS: SMI was useful to assess the increased vascularity in torn ACL, which may reflect the potential for, or state of, ACL maturation following reconstruction or repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

ACL graft with extra-cortical fixation rotates around the femoral tunnel aperture during knee flexion.

PURPOSE: An understanding of the behavior of a new ACL graft in the femoral tunnel during knee motion and external loading can provide information pertinent to graft healing, tunnel enlargement, and graft failure. The purpose of the study was to measure the percentage of the tunnel filled by the graft and determine the amount and location of the graft-tunnel contact with knee motion and under external knee loads. METHODS: Single bundle anatomical ACL reconstruction was performed on six cadaveric knees. Specimens were positioned with a robotic testing system under: (1) passive flexion-extension, (2) 89-N anterior and posterior tibial loads, (3) 5-N m internal and external torques, and (4) 7-N m valgus moment. The knees were then dissected, repositioned by the robot and the geometry of the femoral tunnel and graft were digitized by laser scanning. The percentage of tunnel filled and the contact region between graft and tunnel at the femoral tunnel aperture were calculated. RESULTS: The graft occupies approximately 70% of the femoral tunnel aperture and anterior tibial loading tended to reduce this value. The graft contacted about 60% of the tunnel circumference and the location of the graft-tunnel contact changed significantly with knee flexion. CONCLUSION: This study found that the graft tends to rotate around the tunnel circumference during knee flexion-extension and contract under knee loading. The "windshield-wiper" and "bungee cord" effect may contribute to femoral tunnel enlargement, affect graft healing, and lead to graft failure. There can be a considerable motion of the graft in the tunnel after surgery and appropriate rehabilitation time should be allowed for graft-tunnel healing to occur. To reduce graft motion, consideration should be given to interference screw fixation or a graft with bone blocks, which may allow an earlier return to activity.

Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors.

PURPOSE: To determine factors that predict return to the same frequency and type of sports participation with similar activity demands as before injury. METHODS: Individuals 1 to 5 years after primary ACL reconstruction completed a comprehensive survey related to sports participation and activity before injury and after surgery. Patient characteristics, injury variables, and surgical variables were extracted from the medical record. Return to preinjury sports (RTPS) was defined as: "Returning to the same or more demanding type of sports participation, at the same or greater frequency with the same or better Marx Activity Score as before injury." Variables were compared between individuals that achieved comprehensive RTPS and those that did not with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-one patients (mean age 26.1 years, SD 9.9) completed the survey at an average of 3.4 years (SD 1.3) after ACL reconstruction. The overall rate of RTPS was 48.6%. Patients were more likely to RTPS if they were younger than 19 years old (OR = 4.07; 95%CI 2.21-7.50; p < 0.01) or if they were competitive athletes (OR = 2.07; 95%CI 1.24-3.46; p = 0.01). Patients were less likely to RTPS if surgery occurred more than 3 months after injury (OR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17-0.58; p < 0.01), if there was a concomitant cartilage lesion (OR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.21-0.70; p < 0.01), and if cartilage surgery was performed (OR = 0.17; 95%CI 0.04-0.80; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Five variables best predicted RTPS including age at time of surgery. Only time from injury to surgery is a potentially modifiable factor to improve RTPS; however, the reasons for which patients delayed surgery may also contribute to them not returning to sports. Regardless, younger patients, those that partake in sports on a competitive level, those that undergo surgery sooner, or do not have a cartilage injury or require cartilage surgery are more likely to return to pre-injury sports participation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.

A trend within the orthopedic community is rejection of the belief that "one size fits all." Freddie Fu, among others, strived to individualize the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries based on the patient's anatomy. Further, during the last two decades, greater emphasis has been placed on improving the outcomes of ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Accordingly, anatomic tunnel placement is paramount in preventing graft impingement and restoring knee kinematics. Additionally, identification and management of concomitant knee injuries help to re-establish knee kinematics and prevent lower outcomes and registry studies continue to determine which graft yields the best outcomes. The utilization of registry studies has provided several large-scale epidemiologic studies that have bolstered outcomes data, such as avoiding allografts in pediatric populations and incorporating extra-articular stabilizing procedures in younger athletes to prevent re-rupture. In describing the anatomic and biomechanical understanding of the ACL and the resulting improvements in terms of surgical reconstruction, the purpose of this article is to illustrate how basic science advancements have directly led to improvements in clinical outcomes for ACL-injured patients.Level of evidenceV.

Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Clinical evaluation and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most widely researched topics in orthopedic sports medicine, giving providers ample data on which to base their practices. The ACL is also the most commonly treated knee ligament. This study reports on current topics and research in clinical management of ACL injury, starting with evaluation, operative versus nonoperative management, and considerations in unique populations. Discussion of graft selection and associated procedures follows. Areas of uncertainty, rehabilitation, and prevention are the final topics before a reflection on the current state of ACL research and clinical management of ACL injury. Level of evidence V.

Stress Shielding of Ligaments Using Nonabsorbable Suture Augmentation May Influence the Biology of Ligament Healing.

Nonabsorbable suture augmentation of ligament reconstruction has seen an increase in use over the past several years with the goal of protecting the newly reconstructed ligament while allowing early rehabilitation for a potential earlier return to activity and sport. By spanning the joint with a durable nonabsorbable suture, this construct shares the stress and load seen by the reconstructed ligament, thereby protecting it from forces that could result in an early failure during the early ligamentization phase of the tendon graft. However, stress shielding of the ligament via nonabsorbable suture augmentation is also a double-edged sword, as a reduction in the stress and load seen by the ligament during this healing phase may ultimately have an impact on the final strength and composition of the reconstructed ligament. Although the long-term effects of this stress shielding have yet to be studied or reported in human subjects, multiple biomechanical and animal studies have demonstrated overall changes in architecture, tensile strength, and mechanical properties of a stress-shielded autograft ligament reconstruction.

Predictions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Dynamics From Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Models and Dynamic Biplane Radiography.

In vivo knee ligament forces are important to consider for informing rehabilitation or clinical interventions. However, they are difficult to directly measure during functional activities. Musculoskeletal models and simulations have become the primary methods by which to estimate in vivo ligament loading. Previous estimates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) forces range widely, suggesting that individualized anatomy may have an impact on these predictions. Using ten subject-specific (SS) lower limb musculoskeletal models, which include individualized musculoskeletal geometry, muscle architecture, and six degree-of-freedom knee joint kinematics from dynamic biplane radiography (DBR), this study provides SS estimates of ACL force (anteromedial-aACL; and posterolateral-pACL bundles) during the full gait cycle of treadmill walking. These forces are compared to estimates from scaled-generic (SG) musculoskeletal models to assess the effect of musculoskeletal knee joint anatomy on predicted forces and the benefit of SS modeling in this context. On average, the SS models demonstrated a double force peak during stance (0.39-0.43 xBW per bundle), while only a single force peak during stance was observed in the SG aACL. No significant differences were observed between continuous SG and SS ACL forces; however, root mean-squared differences between SS and SG predictions ranged from 0.08 xBW to 0.27 xBW, suggesting SG models do not reliably reflect forces predicted by SS models. Force predictions were also found to be highly sensitive to ligament resting length, with ±10% variations resulting in force differences of up to 84%. Overall, this study demonstrates the sensitivity of ACL force predictions to SS anatomy, specifically musculoskeletal joint geometry and ligament resting lengths, as well as the feasibility for generating SS musculoskeletal models for a group of subjects to predict in vivo tissue loading during functional activities.

Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Treatment strategies for ACL injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines to manage ACL injury is largely based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened determine consensus regarding best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field may assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury Level of evidence: Level V.

Editorial Commentary: Remember the Risk Factors During Individualized, Anatomic, Value-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Understanding the etiology behind anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure is a complex topic still being investigated heavily. The 3 classes of failure are technical, traumatic, and biologic. Technical errors are most common and most frequently reflect tunnel malposition. In addition, tibial slope has long been understood to be a risk factor for failed ACL reconstruction. Although not routinely performed at time of primary ACL reconstruction, osteotomy may be considered in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction. Relative quadriceps weakness is a risk factor, and we recommend sport-specific return-to-play testing as well as benchmarks for relative quadriceps strength before full return to activity. Revision ACL reconstruction is associated with both increased costs and worse patient outcomes, so every effort should be made to give patients the best chance of success after the index surgery. Whereas this begins with understanding the patient's history and risk factors for failure, it crescendos with careful attention to the individually variable factors that make each case unique, tailoring one's management to ensure that each patient receives an anatomic, individualized, and value-based ACL reconstruction.

Truncated-pyramid shape simulation for the measurement of femoral intercondylar notch volume can detect the volume difference between ACL-injured and intact subjects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the femoral intercondylar notch volume using a truncated-pyramid shape simulation and compare this volume between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured and intact subjects. METHODS: Forty-seven subjects diagnosed with ACL tear by MRI (22 male and 25 female: median age 26: range 15-49), and 41 subjects in which knee MRI was performed and no ACL injury detected (20 males and 21 females: median age 27: range 16-49), were included in this study. Using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the axial femoral intercondylar notch area was measured in the slice containing the most proximal (S1) and most distal (S2) level of Blumensaat's line. Femoral condyle height (h) was measured using a sagittal view of knees in 3D-CT. The truncated-pyramid shape simulation was calculated as: Volume = [Formula: see text]. Statistical analysis was performed to compare S1, S2, notch height, and notch volume between the ACL-injured and intact groups. RESULTS: The measured S1, S2, and the notch height of the ACL-injured and intact groups were 201 ± 64 and 214 ± 50mm2, 370 ± 91 and 461 ± 94mm2, and 31 ± 3 and 30 ± 4mm, respectively. The calculated femoral intercondylar notch volume of the ACL-injured and intact groups was 8.6 ± 2.2 and 9.9 ± 2.6cm3, respectively. The ACL intact group showed significantly larger S2 and notch volume when compared with the ACL-injured group. CONCLUSION: For clinical relevance, notch volume and most distal axial notch area parameters were significantly larger in ACL intact subjects. The truncated-pyramid shape simulation is an easy and cost-effective method to evaluate intercondylar notch volume. In knees with small femoral intercondylar notch volume, attention is needed to prevent ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

PURPOSE: Preoperative assessment to determine the sizes of potential autografts is necessary for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no study has investigated the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft based upon preoperative imaging. This study investigated the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of a QT autograft and in situ thickness or cross-sectional area (CSA) measured using preoperative MRI. METHODS: Thirty-one knees of 31 patients (mean age 20.9 ± 5.0 years) who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR using all soft tissue QT autograft were included retrospectively. At 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the maximum QT thickness was assessed in the sagittal plane and the CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the QT in the axial plane. The angle between the axial plane and a line perpendicular to the QT longitudinal axis was used to calculate an adjusted CSA using a cosine function. Intraoperatively, each QT autograft was harvested with 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using preoperative MRI were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.833-0.970). Significant correlations were observed between the thickness, CSA, or adjusted CSA, and the intraoperative diameter (R = 0.434, 0.607, and 0.540, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CSA correlated most strongly with the QT autograft diameter. For individualized anatomic ACLR, measuring in situ CSA can be useful for preoperative planning of appropriate graft choices prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Clinical studies of single-stage combined ACL and PCL reconstruction variably report graft tensioning, fixation sequence, and knee flexion angle at time of fixation.

PURPOSE: In single-stage ACL-PCL reconstruction, there is uncertainty regarding the order of graft tensioning and fixation, as well as the optimal knee flexion angle(s) for graft fixation. A systematic review of clinical studies of single-stage combined ACL-PCL reconstruction was performed to determine whether a particular fixation sequence and/or knee flexion angle is associated with superior outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All levels of evidence were included. All outcome measures were extracted, including physical examination values, radiographic measurements, and objective and subjective outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 19 included studies, 17 tensioned and fixed the PCL before the ACL. Only four studies reported the methods/forces used for graft tensioning. Across studies, the ACL was fixed at variable knee flexion angles, from full extension to 70°. Conversely, 3 studies fixed the PCL at a knee flexion angle < 45°, while the remaining 16 studies fixed the PCL at a flexion angle > 70°. Patient-reported outcomes were qualitatively similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found considerable variability in graft tension, fixation sequence, and knee flexion angle at the time of fixation, with insufficient evidence to support specific surgical practices. Most commonly, the PCL is fixed before the ACL graft, with fixation occurring at a knee flexion angle between 70° and 90° and near full extension, respectively. The methodology for quantifying the forces applied for graft tensioning is rarely described. Given this clinical equipoise, future studies should consistently report these surgical details. Furthermore, prospective, randomized studies on the treatment of multiligament knee injuries are needed to improve outcomes in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Anatomic single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction both restore dynamic knee function: a randomized clinical trial-part II: knee kinematics.

PURPOSE: Compare side-to-side differences for knee kinematics between anatomic single-bundle (SB) and anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR during downhill running at 6 and 24 months post ACLR using high-accuracy dynamic stereo X-ray imaging. It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would better restore tibio-femoral kinematics compared to SB ACLR, based on comparison to the contralateral, uninjured knee. METHODS: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. Dynamic knee function was assessed during treadmill downhill running using a dynamic stereo X-ray tracking system at 6 and 24 months after surgery. Three-dimensional tibio-femoral kinematics were calculated and compared between limbs (ACLR and uninjured contralateral) at each time point. RESULTS: Fifty-seven subjects were randomized (29 DB) and 2-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). No significant differences were found between SB and DB anatomic ACLR for any of the primary kinematic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the study hypothesis, double-bundle reconstruction did not show superior kinematic outcomes compared to the single-bundle ACLR. While neither procedure fully restored normal knee kinematics, both anatomic reconstructions were similarly effective for restoring near-normal dynamic knee function. The findings of this study indicate both SB and DB techniques can be used for patients with average size ACL insertion sites. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial-Part 1: clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Compare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and reduced anterior and rotatory laxity compared to SB ACLR. METHODS: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome measures included the IKDC-SKF and KT-1000 (side to side difference) and pivot shift tests. Other secondary outcomes included measures of sports activity and participation, range of motion (ROM) and re-injury. RESULTS: Enrollment in the study was suspended due to patellar fractures related to harvest of the patellar bone plug. At that time, 57 subjects had been randomized (29 DB) and two-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). At 24-month follow-up there were no between-group differences detected for the primary outcomes. Twenty-one (77.8%) DB's and 20 (83.3%) SB's reported returning to pre-injury sports 2 years after surgery (n.s) Three subjects (2 DB's, 5.3% of total) sustained a graft rupture and 5 individuals (4 SB's, 8.8% of total) had a subsequent meniscus injury. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the early termination of the study, there were no detectable differences in clinical outcome between anatomic SB and DB ACLR when performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in individuals with ACL insertion sites that range from 14 to 18 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Editorial Commentary: The Segond Fracture Has Multiple Attachments: Yet Another Demonstration of the Anatomical Complexity of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee.

The anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee comprises multiple layers, with continued debate on the identity and function of the structures of the ALC. The Segond fracture, long considered pathognomonic of an anterior cruciate ligament injury, has now been shown to have several attachments to soft tissues of the ALC. To the extent that a Segond fracture, or injury to the ALC more broadly, increases knee rotatory instability in vivo is a question of ongoing investigation. By extension, it remains uncertain whether an untreated Segond fracture adversely affects outcomes and therefore warrants consideration for operative intervention. Prospective randomized studies of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without concomitant treatment of Segond fractures are needed to more definitively answer these questions.