RESUMO
Baylor Health Care System* has a long history of addressing health disparities at its hospitals and clinics and in the communities it serves. The organization's definition of health equity has evolved from simply providing care that looks the same for all patients to providing care that is tailored to and effective at producing equitable outcomes for the highly diverse populations of North Texas. Baylor's overarching framework for achieving health equity requires work in three dimensions: improving access to care, improving care delivery, and ultimately producing equitable outcomes for patients. The strategies and tactics used by Baylor have also evolved over time and range from initiatives supporting volunteerism and community service to the operation of a network of clinics tailored to meet the needs of uninsured and underinsured patients. The factors contributing to disparities among different populations include a broad range of health system, medical, and societal issues, many of which are outside the direct scope of influence of hospitals and other healthcare organizations. We share how Baylor has proactively addressed disparities within the organization and its community in the hope of encouraging other hospitals and providers to engage in similar efforts to improve care for all patients.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , TexasRESUMO
Primary care practices become patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) to improve care. However, investment costs and opportunities to offset those costs are critical to the decision. We examined potential offsets through commercial payer per-member-per-month (PMPM) payments and the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) for a network that spent $4 818 260 over 4 years obtaining and renewing PCMH recognition for 57 practices. With PMPM payments of $3.37 to $8.98, "breakeven" requires that 2.4% to 6.4% of the network's 1645 commercially insured patients per physician be covered, while applying MIPS incentive payments of half the maximum available each year to the network's average 2016 Medicare reimbursement of $196 812 per physician showed they would exceed PCMH costs by 2022.
Assuntos
Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Medicare , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adults in the United States typically do not receive all recommended clinical preventive services (CPS) for which they are eligible, missing opportunities for prevention and/or early detection. A multi-year quality improvement initiative targeting CPS delivery in a fee-for-service ambulatory care network is described. METHODS: Since 1999, HealthTexas Provider Network (HTPN) has implemented multiple initiatives to increase CPS delivery, including a flowsheet, a physician champion model, physician- and practice-level audit and feedback, and rapid-cycle quality improvement training. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2006, "recommended or done" CPS delivery increased from 68% to 92%, and "done" from 70% to 86% (2001 to 2006). "Perfect care" composite performance increased from 0.19 to 0.51 (2001 to 2006). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, multistrategy approaches can achieve substantial sustained improvement in CPS delivery throughout a large ambulatory care provider network.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Redes Comunitárias/normas , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/organização & administração , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Texas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) shows promise for improving care and reducing costs. We sought to reduce the uncertainty regarding the time and cost of PCMH transformation by quantifying the direct costs of transforming 57 practices in a medical group to National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-recognized Level III PCMHs. METHODS: We conducted structured interviews with corporate leaders, and with physicians, practice administrators, and office managers from a representative sample of practices regarding time spent on PCMH transformation and NCQA application, and related purchases. We then developed and sent a survey to all primary care practices (practice-level response rate: initial recognition-44.6%, renewal-35.7%). Direct costs were estimated as time spent multiplied by average hourly wage for the relevant job category, plus observed expenditures. RESULTS: We estimated HealthTexas' corporate costs for initial NCQA recognition (2010-2012) at $1,508,503; for renewal (2014-2016), $346,617; the Care Coordination resource costs an additional ongoing $390,790/year. A hypothetical 5-physician HealthTexas practice spent another estimated 239.5 hours ($10,669) obtaining, and 110.5 hours ($4,957) renewing, recognition. CONCLUSION: Centralized PCMH support reduces the burden on practices; however, overall time and cost remains substantial, and should be weighed against the mixed evidence regarding PCMH's impact on quality and costs of care.
Assuntos
Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normasRESUMO
Health information technology shows promise for improving chronic disease care. This study assessed the impact of a diabetes management form (DMF), accessible within an electronic health record. From 2007 to 2009, 2108 diabetes patients were seen in 20 primary care practices; 1103 visits involved use of the DMF in 2008. The primary outcome was "optimal care": HbA1c ≤8%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <100 mg/dL, blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, not smoking, and aspirin prescription in patients ≥40 years. After adjusting for number of visits, age, sex, and insulin use, DMF-exposed patients showed less improvement in attaining "optimal care" (estimated difference-in-difference [DID] = -2.06 percentage points; P < .001), LDL cholesterol (DID = -2.30; P = .023), blood pressure (DID = -3.05; P < .001), and total cholesterol (DID = -0.47; P = .004) targets. Documented microalbumin tests, aspirin prescription, and eye and foot exams increased more. Thus, DMF use was associated with smaller gains in achieving evidence-based targets, but greater improvement in documented delivery of care.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Pressão Sanguínea , Colesterol/sangue , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Testes VisuaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of electronic health record (EHR) implementation on primary care diabetes care. DATA SOURCES: Charts were abstracted semi-annually for 14,051 diabetes patients seen in 34 primary care practices in a large, fee-for-service network from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010. The study sample was limited to patients aged 40 years or older. STUDY DESIGN: A naturalistic experiment in which GE Centricity Physician Office-EMR 2005 was rolled out over a staggered 3-year schedule. DATA COLLECTION: Chart audits were conducted using the AMA/Physician Consortium Adult Diabetes Measure set. The primary outcome was the HealthPartners' "optimal care" measure: HbA1c ≤ 8 percent; LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl; blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg; not smoking; and documented aspirin use in patients ≥ 40 years of age. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After adjusting for patient age, sex, and insulin use, patients exposed to the EHR were significantly more likely to receive "optimal care" when compared with unexposed patients (p < .001), with an estimated difference of 9.20 percent (95% CI: 6.08, 12.33) in the final year between exposed patients and patients never exposed. Components of the optimal care bundle showing positive improvement after adjustment were systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <130 mmHg, aspirin prescription, and smoking cessation. Among patients exposed to EHR, all process and outcome measures except HbA1c and lipid control showed significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a commercially available EHR in primary care practice may improve diabetes care and clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , TexasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of nurse-led transitional care programs to reduce readmission rates for patients with heart failure; the effectiveness of these programs in real-world health care systems is less well understood. METHODS: We performed a prospective study with concurrent controls to test an advanced practice nurse-led transitional care program for patients with heart failure who were 65 years or older and were discharged from Baylor Medical Center Garland (BMCG) from August 24, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We compared the effect of the program on 30-day (from discharge) all-cause readmission rate, length of stay, and 60-day (from admission) direct cost for BMCG with that of other hospitals within the Baylor Health Care System. We also performed a budget impact analysis using costs and reimbursement experience from the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention significantly reduced adjusted 30-day readmission rates to BMCG by 48% during the postintervention period, which was better than the secular reductions seen at all other facilities in the system. The intervention had little effect on length of stay or total 60-day direct costs for BMCG. Under the current payment system, the intervention reduced the hospital financial contribution margin on average $227 for each Medicare patient with heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that transitional care programs reduce 30-day readmission rates for patients with heart failure. This underscores the potential of the intervention to be effective in a real-world setting, but payment reform may be required for the intervention to be financially sustainable by hospitals.
Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Alta do Paciente/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Alta do Paciente/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/tendências , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , TexasRESUMO
As ambulatory care practices face increasing pressure to implement electronic health records (EHRs), there is a growing need to determine the essential elements of a successful implementation strategy. HealthTexas Provider Network is in the process of implementing an EHR system comprising GE Centricity Physician Office-EMR 2005, Clinical Content Consultants (now part of GE), and Kryptiq Secure Messaging throughout all 88 practices in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and is hoping to extend the system to other practices affiliated with Baylor Health Care System as well. We describe the preimplementation clinical process redesign and quality improvement training that has been conducted networkwide in preparation for the introduction of the EHR, as well as the specific steps taken to prepare and train clinic staff for the integration of the EHR into daily workflows. The first pilot site, Family Medical Center at North Garland, implemented the system in May 2006. Based on both the positive aspects of this experience and the challenges we encountered, we identified 20 essential elements for successful implementation in the areas of site selection, implementation strategy, staff education and preparation, team project management, content, hardware and software, and workflow process. Broadly, we determined that 1) a pilot site's understanding of and willingness to work within the fluid nature of the implementation process during what is essentially a testing phase is a key ingredient in achieving success at the pilot site and in improving the process for later sites; 2) input from and representation of viewpoints of all types of EHR users during preimplementation decision making enables customization of the system and sufficient preplanning to ensure minimal workflow disruptions during and after implementation; and 3) a high level of technical and training support during the early days of implementation is invaluable.