Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 15(5): 675-679, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043334

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although use of the da Vinci robotic platform in bariatric surgery is gaining momentum, there are financial concerns. OBJECTIVES: Our retrospective study evaluated the cost of robotically assisted sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG). SETTING: Center of Excellence bariatric surgery center in Allentown, Pennsylvania. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients who underwent primary R-SG and compared them with L-SG patients. Primary outcomes were overall cost for length of stay, operating time, and supplies. Secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions. RESULTS: We had no adverse events in either group. The overall cost for R-SG and L-SG was not statistically different (mean total cost for R-SG and L-SG was $5308.99 and $4918.88, respectively). Operating time cost was significantly higher for R-SG compared with L-SG ($1340 versus $112 for R-SG and L-SG, respectively). R-SG had a shorter length of stay compared with L-SG (1.4 versus 1.5 d, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed no difference in cost R-SG and L-SG, with a trend toward shorter length of stay for R-SG over time.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/economia , Laparoscopia/economia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Pennsylvania , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Reoperação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA