Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of transradial versus transfemoral access for complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with regard to both complications and long-term outcomes. BACKGROUND: Radial access has been shown to confer superior results in patients undergoing PCI, especially in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, radial access has limitations of sheath and device size, which may increase procedure time and result in inferior outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions, defined as type C according the ACC/AHA classification system, were included in this study. Propensity matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Transradial patients were then compared to transfemoral patients in regard to procedural, in-hospital, and 6-month outcomes. RESULTS: Among 2142 patients with 2591 lesions treated, 1876 had femoral access and 267 had radial access. Radial access patients were more likely to be male (75% vs. 66%, P = 0.003) and less likely to present with acute myocardial infarction (27% vs. 42%, P < 0.001). Procedural characteristics demonstrated lower use of heparin in the femoral group (17% vs. 73%, P < 0.001) with similarly low use of glycoprotein inhibitors (5.6% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.14). Patients in the femoral group had higher rates of transfusions (3.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.004) and vascular complications (1.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.03). Following propensity matching, there was no difference in mid-term outcomes between radial and femoral groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI, the radial approach demonstrates similar mid-term outcomes as the femoral approach with a potentially lower rate of complications. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions from 2002 to 2014: Incidence, outcomes, and associated variables.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are relatively rare complications, but they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Given the evolution of both CVA risk and PCI techniques over time, this study was conducted to evaluate trends in CVA and TIA associated with PCI and to identify variables associated with neurologic events. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the Washington Hospital Center between January 2002 and June 2015 were included. Prespecified data were prospectively collected, including baseline and procedural characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and 1-year mortality. The subjects who had a CVA or TIA during or immediately after PCI were compared with those without procedure-associated CVA or TIA. RESULTS: Overall, 25,626 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 65.0 ± 12.4 years, 16,949 (65.2%) were male, and 7,436 (28.6%) were African American. From 2002 to 2015, 110 neurologic events post-PCI were diagnosed (0.43%); this included 86 CVAs (0.34%) and 24 TIAs (0.09%). The annual rate of postprocedural neurologic events was 0.42% ± 0.12%. There were significant changes in baseline risk factors over time, with increasing age, incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Patients with neurologic events were more often African American (43.6% vs 28.6%, P < .001) with prior history of CVA (24.5% vs 7.8%, P < .001), chronic renal insufficiency (26.6% vs 15.2%, P < .001), and insulin-dependent diabetes (19.1% vs 12.4%, P = .03). Acute myocardial infarction (56% vs 30.4%, P < .001) and cardiogenic shock (20.2% vs 3%, P < .001) were also more common among patients with neurologic events post-PCI. After multivariable adjustment, use of an intraaortic balloon pump was strongly associated with neurologic events (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% CI 2.7-8.8, P < .001), as was prior CVA (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P = .002) and African American race (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.9, P < .001); there was a borderline association with the use of a thrombus extraction device (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.2, P = .09). In-hospital mortality (20.0% vs 1.5%, P < .001) and 1-year mortality (45.0% vs 7.3%, P < .001) were also much higher in patients with neurologic events. CONCLUSION: Neurologic events post-PCI are associated with markedly worse in-hospital outcomes. The incidence of CVA and TIA post-PCI, however, remained stable over the last 12 years despite an increase in risk factors for CVA.

Impact of baseline mitral regurgitation on short- and long-term outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of concomitant significant mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) ranges from 2% to 33%. The impact of significant MR on post-TAVR outcomes remains controversial. METHODS: The data from a cohort of patients with symptomatic severe AS undergoing TAVR at out institution were retrospectively analyzed. The last transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) before the index TAVR procedure was selected as the baseline assessment of the degree of MR. The total study cohort (N = 589) was divided into 2 groups: significant ≥moderate MR (n = 68) versus nonsignificant

Effect of marital status on the outcome of patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Marriage confers various health advantages in the general population. However, the added value of marriage among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) beyond the standard cardiovascular risk factors is not clear. This study aimed to assess the effects of marital status on outcomes of patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI. METHODS: Clinical observational analysis of consecutive patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI from 1993 to 2011 was performed. Patients were stratified by marital status, comparing married to unmarried patients. Clinical outcome up to 12 months was obtained by telephone contact or office visit. A total of 11,216 patients were included in the present analysis; 55% were married and 45% unmarried. RESULTS: Significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted, including a lower prevalence of hypertension (86% vs 88%), diabetes (34% vs 38%), and smoking (19% vs 25%) among married vs unmarried patients, respectively (P < .001). However, married patients had a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and family history of coronary artery disease. Early and late major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower for married vs unmarried patients up to 1 year (13.3% vs 8.2%, P < .001). Married status was independently associated with improved outcome in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Married patients who undergo urgent or elective PCI have superior short- and long-term outcomes up to 1 year when compared with unmarried patients. These benefits persist after adjustment for multiple traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Qualitative comparison of coronary angiograms between 4 French catheters with an advanced cardiovascular injection system and 6 French catheters with manual injection.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to test whether advanced cardiovascular injection (ACI) via 4 French (Fr) catheters is more advantageous than manual injection with 6 Fr catheters. BACKGROUND: For coronary angiography, proponents of contrast media ACI believe it utilizes smaller-diameter catheters when compared with manual injection, without compromising the quality of the angiogram, and has the potential to reduce the amount of contrast used and lessen the use of closure devices. METHODS: In a prospective study, 200 consecutive patients referred for elective coronary angiography were randomized to standard 6 Fr catheters with manual injection versus 4 Fr catheters with ACI. The study's primary endpoint is the quality of the coronary angiogram. Secondary endpoints include groin complications, utilization of closure devices, and volume of contrast media. Thirty-six patients who underwent ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: The final analysis included 80 patients treated with 4 Fr catheters with ACI and 84 patients treated with 6 Fr catheters with manual injection. The groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. The quality of the angiogram was similar between groups with the exception of more left coronary sinus flush with 4 Fr catheters (3.57 ± 1.1 vs. 2.98 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and less closure device use with 4 Fr (25 vs. 71.4%, P < 0.01) compared to 6 Fr catheters. The procedure duration, volume of contrast used, vascular complications, and time to ambulation were similar between groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 4 Fr diagnostic catheters with ACI offer similar quality coronary angiograms, similar rates of vascular complications, procedure duration, contrast used, and time to ambulation, but have a significantly lesser need for closure devices compared to the 6 Fr system with manual injection.

Clinical predictors for failure of percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Failed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with adverse outcome. With recent improvements in PCI techniques, the incidence and predictors for failed primary PCI are unclear. METHODS: A clinical database of consecutive patients who underwent primary or rescue PCI from 1993 to 2011 was used to compare patients with successful versus failed PCI. Clinical follow-up was obtained in-hospital, at 30 days and at 1 year. RESULTS: Of 2900 patients fulfilling our inclusion criteria, 111 (3.98%) had failed PCI. Patients who had failed PCI were older (65 vs. 61 years), were more likely to be women (46% vs. 32%), were more likely to have previous peripheral vascular disease (19% vs. 11%), previous PCI (29% vs. 20%), and were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock (25% vs. 11%) (all P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified female gender (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.01-2.38), cardiogenic shock (2.07; 1.22-3.49), previous PCI (1.71; 1.08-2.70), and type C lesion (2.47; 1.60-3.82) as independent predictors of PCI failure. The in-hospital (18% vs. 4%) and long-term mortality (48% vs. 14%) were worse in the failed PCI group compared to the successful group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI, primary PCI failure is uncommon. It is associated with worse short- and long-term clinical outcome compared with a successful procedure. Special care should be taken when PCI is performed in women at higher risk for failure when presenting with STEMI.

Systematic review of thienopyridine discontinuation and its impact upon clinical outcomes.

The optimal length of clopidogrel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes or in those who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We therefore sought to determine the risk of both perioperative and premature discontinuation of clopidogrel. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched January 2000 through March 2010 for articles written in English and reporting adverse clinical events following discontinuation of clopidogrel. Studies of perioperative clopidogrel cessation are mostly observational, but do suggest a hazard for adverse cardiac events. This appears to be especially high in the first month after PCI, but it is unclear whether there is a 'safe' window. Studies of 'premature' clopidogrel discontinuation, although mostly retrospective and statistically flawed, suggest that the first 6 months after stenting are highest risk; discontinuation with drug-eluting stents (DESs) is probably higher risk than with bare metal stents, but most studies are of DESs alone. There are no randomized trials sufficient to determine the optimal length of clopidogrel therapy; future randomized clinical trials may provide more clarity.

Does black ethnicity influence the development of stent thrombosis in the drug-eluting stent era?

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that black race predicts stent thrombosis (ST) after drug-eluting stent implantation. Whether socioeconomic status or comorbid conditions confound the contribution of black race to the development of ST is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared 1594 black patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation with 5642 nonblack patients. Overall, 108 definite STs were reported. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed with adjustment for comorbidities, including median household income as a marker of socioeconomic status, to assess the impact that black race may have on the development of ST. On univariable analysis, black patients were younger (63.43±12.42 versus 65.15±12.59 years; P<0.001) and more likely to have a history of hypertension (89.8% versus 81.7%; P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (45.5% versus 30.8%; P<0.001), chronic renal insufficiency (19.2% versus 10.7%; P<0.001), and congestive heart failure (18.7% versus 13.1%; P<0.001). Clopidogrel compliance at the time of the ST event was higher in the black than in the nonblack population (87.5% versus 77.8%; P=0.068). After multivariable analysis, including adjustment for median income and clopidogrel compliance, black race emerged as a strong predictor of definite late ST. CONCLUSIONS: Black race is an independent predictor of definite drug-eluting stent ST. Because clopidogrel compliance was higher in black patients and socioeconomic status was not associated with ST, further investigation into the potential mechanisms of this influence of race on ST must be pursued.

Correlates and causes of death in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not eligible to participate in a clinical trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is currently being evaluated in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are considered high-risk surgical candidates. This study aimed to detect incidences, causes, and correlates of mortality in patients ineligible to participate in transcatheter aortic valve implantation studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2007 to July 2009, a cohort of 362 patients with severe aortic stenosis were screened and did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria necessary to participate in a transcatheter aortic valve implantation trial. These patients were classified into 2 groups: group 1 (medical): 274 (75.7%): 97 (35.4%) treated medically and 177 (64.6%) treated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty; and group 2 (surgical): 88 (24.3%). The medical/balloon aortic valvuloplasty group had significantly higher clinical risk compared with the surgical group, with significantly higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (12.8±7.0 versus 8.5±5.1; P<0.001) and logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (42.4±22.8 versus 24.4±18.1; P<0.001). The medical/balloon aortic valvuloplasty group had a higher New York Heart Association functional class, incidence of renal failure, and lower ejection fraction. During median follow-up of 377.5 days, mortality in the medical/balloon aortic valvuloplasty group was 102 (37.2%), and during median follow-up of 386 days, mortality in the surgical group was 19 (21.5%). Multivariable adjustment analysis identified renal failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.60), New York Heart Association class IV (HR: 5.88), and aortic systolic pressure (HR: 0.99) as independent correlates for mortality in the medical group, whereas renal failure (HR: 7.45), Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STS; HR: 1.09) and logistic EuroSCORE (HR: 1.45) were correlates of mortality in the in the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis not included in transcatheter aortic valve implantation trials do poorly and have extremely high mortality rates, especially in nonsurgical groups, and loss of quality of life in surgical groups.

Outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction from a saphenous vein graft culprit undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe characteristics of patients presenting with an acute MI from a SVG culprit, compared with a native culprit. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) results in worse outcomes than native vessel PCI, but outcomes of such patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) setting are not well-described. METHODS: Patients presenting with ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation MI undergoing PCI from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed to identify the culprit as a SVG vs. native vessel. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of peak troponin-I level. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: 192 patients underwent PCI for a SVG culprit, compared with 4,001 with a native culprit. After multivariable adjustment, SVG culprit remained significantly associated with lower levels of the logarithm of the peak troponin (ß = -0.17, SE = 0.07, P = 0.02). The likelihood of MACE was higher in SVG vs. native culprits in patients with small to modest troponin elevations. Patients with a SVG culprit also suffered higher unadjusted rates of mortality at 30 days (14.3% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.03) and MACE at 1 year (36.8% vs. 24.5%, P = 0.005); a modest effect upon mortality and MACE remained after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: Even minimal elevations of troponin in patients with a SVG culprit may portend a poorer prognosis than in patients with a native culprit. The risk of PCI in this setting is driven by mortality and arises from both substantial comorbidities and the SVG itself.

Low-dose protamine to facilitate earlier sheath removal from the femoral artery after peripheral endovascular intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of low-dose protamine administration to facilitate earlier vascular sheath removal. BACKGROUND: Vascular access complications are the most common cause of postprocedural morbidity in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular intervention (PEI). Prolonged manual compression and closure devices do not eliminate these complications. METHODS: A consecutive series of 166 patients who underwent PEI were retrospectively compared to an all-comers control group of 136 patients who did not receive protamine. The study population received an intravenous dose of protamine based upon the dose of heparin received and the length of the procedure. The arterial sheath was removed when activated clotting time was less than 220 seconds. Primary end-points included bleeding complications, comprised of groin hematomas and retroperitoneal bleeding, and vascular complications, comprised of pseudoaneurysms, access vessel thrombosis, and arteriovenous fistula formation. RESULTS: The study population on average was older than the control group (71 vs. 67 years) and had a higher incidence of hypercholesterolemia (89.8% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.002). The average dose of protamine was 1.9 ± 0.83 mg, with a total dose of heparin of 5371 ± 1327 units. The time until sheath removal was 8.9 ± 8.6 minutes in the protamine group versus 188 ± 118 minutes in the control group (P < 0.001). There were no episodes of protamine anaphylaxis or adverse reactions. The access site complication rate between the 2 groups was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy offers an inexpensive, safe, and reliable method to achieve hemostasis and facilitate earlier sheath removal in patients undergoing PEI.

Cellular video-phone assisted transmission and interpretation of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) reduces the time to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the reliability of using cellular video-phone (VP) assisted interpretation of ECG is unknown. METHODS: We studied the interphysician reliability in interpreting the ECG assisted with VP compared to print ECG interpretation. Twenty-seven physicians prospectively interpreted the ECG transmitted from the field in real-time using VP and later using the same printed ECG. The time to completion, accuracy of interpretation, and physician rating of the VP technology were recorded. RESULTS: Similar high interphysician reliability was observed with both VP assisted and printed ECG interpretation including presence of ST-segment elevation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= 0.98 [95% CI 0.96-1] vs. 0.99 [95% CI 0.99-1]) and pathologic Q wave (ICC = 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-1] vs. 1 [95% CI 1]), respectively. The mean time to transmit and interpret the ECG with VP versus printed ECG was 3.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.1 ± 0.9 minutes, respectively, P < 0.01. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the best, the average rating of VP ease of use was 4.4 ± 0.5 and utility to recommend treatment was rated a 5. CONCLUSION: Cellular VP-assisted transmission and interpretation in real-time of prehospital ECG has high interphysician reliability, similar to the printed ECG interpretation. Future studies testing whether VP decreases the ischemic time and expedites the reperfusion of STEMI patients are needed.

Do patients with drug-eluting stent thrombosis have a similar prognosis to patients presenting with st-Elevation myocardial infarction of de novo lesions?

BACKGROUND: Despite significant advances in stent technology and pharmacotherapy, drug-eluting stent thrombosis (DES-ST) remains a major complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and commonly presents as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). There are currently little data comparing the in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI due to DES-ST with those due to de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Our study comprised 985 consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI, 102 of whom were diagnosed as having a definite DES-ST. The primary end-point was the in-hospital composite of death or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary end-point was the in-hospital maximum rise in creatine kinase (myocardial band [MB] fraction) and troponin I. RESULTS: The DES-ST group had a higher proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, history of ischemic heart disease, coronary revascularization, and chronic renal impairment. The adjusted primary end-point was higher in the DES-ST cohort (12.7% vs. 7.4%; P = 0.05). The 2 cohorts did not differ in the secondary end-point. The independent predictors of the primary end-point were age (hazard ratio [HR]= 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.01 - 1.06; P = 0.005), cardiogenic shock (HR = 11.5; 95% CI = 6.38 - 20.07, P < 0.001), and lesions involving the left anterior descending coronary artery (HR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.03 - 3.13, P = 0.04). DES-ST was not an independent predictor of the primary end-point (HR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.53-2.63, P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI secondary to DES-ST have a poorer in-hospital outcome than do patients in whom STEMI is due to de novo CAD. This difference may be predominantly driven by differences in the baseline characteristics between these cohorts. (J Interven Cardiol 2011;24:320-325).

Correlation between light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP-P platelet reactivity assays following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity is an established risk factor for adverse cardiac events in patients taking clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Two hundred patients underwent platelet reactivity testing with VerifyNow P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP), and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with both 5 and 20 µM of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) following PCI. High on-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as a maximum platelet aggregation ≥46% for LTA ADP 5 µM or ≥60% for 20 µM; platelet reactivity index (PRI) ≥50% for VASP; and platelet reactivity units ≥235 for VerifyNow. Correlation between assays was tested using Spearman coefficients (ρ); agreement among tests in regards to high on-treatment platelet reactivity was evaluated with Kappa statistics (κ). RESULTS: All Spearman correlations had P values <0.001, although ρ ranged from 0.60-0.86. The incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity was 39.3% with VASP, 27.3% with VerifyNow, 23.1% with LTA ADP 5 µM, and 16.2% with LTA ADP 20 µM. The strongest correlation was between LTA ADP 5 µM and LTA ADP 20 µM (κ= 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.68); the weakest was between VASP and LTA ADP 5 µM (κ= 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.47). Overall, the level of agreement between assays was in the moderate to poor range. CONCLUSION: Despite evidence that the most commonly used tests are correlated, agreement among tests is modest at best and demonstrates they are not interchangeable.

Novel antiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone of the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes or for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. As the intricacies of platelet biology and mechanisms of thrombus formation are revealed, novel antiplatelet therapies have emerged. Bleeding risk, however, has grown in concert with more potent platelet inhibition. This article reviews platelet biology and receptors to provide a foundation for understanding of antiplatelelet therapy. It also highlights recent advances in antiplatelet therapy, with a focus on mechanisms of action, pharmacodynamic data, and the balance of thrombotic versus bleeding outcomes.

Body mass index and bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: does bivalirudin make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The association between obesity and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well defined. We investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on PCI-related bleeding, and whether bivalirudin, compared to heparin, used as PCI anticoagulant modifies this relationship. METHODS: From 2000 to 2009, 16,783 patients who underwent PCI were grouped according to 6 BMI groups: underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), "normal" weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), class I (30-34.9 kg/m(2)), class II (35-39.9 kg/m(2)), and class III obesity (> or =40 kg/m(2)). Bivalirudin was used in 11,433 patients and heparin in 5,350. In-hospital major bleeding (hematocrit drop > or =15% or gastrointestinal bleeding) and need for transfusion rates were collected. RESULTS: The incidence of major bleeding varied significantly throughout the BMI spectrum (5.6% vs 2.5% vs 1.9% vs 1.6% vs 2.1% vs 1.9%, respectively, from underweight to class III obese patients, P < .001). The incidence of transfusion across BMI followed the same reverse J-shape curve (10.9% vs 6.6% vs 3.6% vs 3.4% vs 3.8% vs 5.6%, P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, underweight patients had neither an increased risk for major bleeding nor an increased risk for transfusion compared with "normal" weight patients. Class I obese patients had a lower risk of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% CI 0.48-0.97]). Overweight, class I, and II obese patients had a lower risk of transfusion (respectively, OR 0.68 [0.55-0.84], 0.68 [0.53-0.87], and 0.66 [0.48-0.92]). The highest BMI patients had neither an increased risk for major bleeding (class II and III obesity) nor an increased risk for transfusion (class III obesity). The same reverse J-shaped relationship to BMI seen in the overall population for the raw incidence of major bleeding was found when the population was divided according to type of anticoagulant used as follows: bivalirudin or heparin. Likewise, the "need for transfusion" relationship to BMI is not altered by bivalirudin use. CONCLUSION: The better outcome for bleeding seen in patients in the middle of the BMI spectrum suggests the existence of a "bleeding obesity paradox," which persists after adjustment by confounding factors and exists irrespective of the anticoagulant used.

Incidence, correlates, and clinical impact of nuisance bleeding after antiplatelet therapy for patients with drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Nuisance bleeding (NB) after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is not well characterized despite its potential to impact patient compliance. We therefore aimed to evaluate the incidence, correlates, and clinical impact of NB after DAPT after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: Included were 2,948 patients with DES implantation who were discharged on DAPT for 12 months. New bleeding classifications were used: alarming bleeding, internal bleeding, and NB. RESULTS: After excluding patients with alarming bleeding (9 [0.3%]) and internal bleeding (128 [4.3%]), the 2,811 remaining patients were divided into 2 groups: those with NB (812 [28.9%]) and those without (1,999 [71.1%]). Patients with NB were significantly younger (63.0 +/- 11.4 vs 65.2 +/- 11.6 years, P < .001), were more often white (82.0% vs 69.6%, P < .001), had lower body mass indices (29.2 +/- 6.1 vs 29.8 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2), P = .01), and a lower prevalence of diabetes (25.5% vs 34.8%, P < .001) compared to those without NB. At 1 year, the rate of major adverse cardiac events was higher in the NB group compared to the nonbleeding group (77 [9.4%] vs 134 [6.7%], P = .02). In the NB group, 46 patients (5.7%) stopped 1 or both antiplatelet therapies. Thirty-five (4.3%) discontinued clopidogrel, 16 (2.0%) stopped aspirin, and 5 (0.61%) stopped both as a result of the reported NB. Multivariable analysis detected younger age, lower body mass index, white race, and without diabetes as correlates associated with NB while on clopidogrel therapy. CONCLUSION: Nuisance bleeding is common in patients on prolonged DAPT post-DES implantation and can impact compliance. Nuisance bleeding appears to have important clinical implications and, if confirmed in prospective trials, should be added to the safety end points assessing new antiplatelet agents.

Does on- versus off-hours presentation impact in-hospital outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients transferred to a tertiary care center?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether in-hospital outcome differs for transferred patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting during business (ON) hours vs. after (OFF) hours. BACKGROUND: Door-to-device (DTD) time is a prognostic factor in patients with STEMI and is longer during OFF hours. However, the in-hospital mortality is controversial. METHODS: This registry study included 786 consecutive patients with STEMI referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention to a tertiary care center with an on-site cardiac catheterization team 24 hrs a day/7 days (24/7) a week. ON hours were defined as weekdays 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., while OFF hours were defined as all other times, including holidays. The primary outcomes were in-hospital death, reinfarction, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: ON hours (29.5%, n = 232) and OFF hours (70.5%, n = 554) groups had similar demographic and baseline characteristics. A significantly higher proportion of patients presenting ON hours had a DTD time ≤120 min compared to OFF hours patients (32.6% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.007). The rates of in-hospital death (8.2% vs. 6%), reinfarction (0% vs. 1.1%), and mean LOS (5.7 ± 6 vs. 5.7 ± 5) were not significantly different in the ON vs. OFF hours groups, all P = nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary care center with an on-site cardiac catheterization team 24/7, there are no differences in in-hospital outcomes of transferred patients with STEMI during ON vs. OFF hours.

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is associated with an increased incidence of restenosis and stent thrombosis. Drug-eluting stents (DES), when compared to bare metal stents (BMS), reduce the incidence of restenosis in these patients. This study aimed to examine whether there are differences in clinical outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with CRI who are subjected to coronary intervention. METHODS: A cohort of 570 patients with CRI who underwent intervention with DES (346 with SES and 224 with PES) were followed clinically up to 1 year and the clinical events were recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS: Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar, with a slightly higher number of diseased vessels in the SES group as compared to the PES group (2.3 +/- 0.9 vs 2.1 +/- 0.9, P = 0.06). The overall rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis were similar. The PES group had lower revascularization rates when compared to the SES group. After covariate adjustment, however, there was no difference seen in target vessel revascularization between stent types (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.3 [0.8-6.2], P = 0.110). The strongest predictor of death and MACE at 1 year was the number of diseased vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRI who undergo PCI with either SES or PES have similar repeat revascularization rates and acceptable stent thrombosis rates, although they continue to have high MACE and death rates.