Differential Gene Expression of Lymphocytes Stimulated with Rhinovirus A and C in Children with Asthma.

Rationale: Individuals with asthma have heightened antibody responses to rhinoviruses (RVs), although those specific for RV-C are lower than responses specific for RV-A, suggesting poor immunity to this species.Objectives: To ascertain and compare T-cell memory responses induced by RV-A and RV-C in children with and without asthma.Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 17 children with asthma and 19 control subjects without asthma were stimulated in vitro with peptide formulations to induce representative species-specific responses to RV-A and RV-C. Molecular profiling (RNA sequencing) was used to identify enriched pathways and upstream regulators.Measurements and Main Results: Responses to RV-A showed higher expression of IFNG and STAT1 compared with RV-C, and significant expression of CXCL9, 10, and 11 was not found for RV-C. There was no reciprocal increase of T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) cytokine genes or the Th2 chemokine genes CCL11, CCL17, and CCL22. RV-C induced higher expression of CCL24 (eotaxin-2) than RV-A in the responses of children with and without asthma. Upstream regulator analysis showed both RV-A and, although to a lesser extent, RV-C induced predominant Th1 and inflammatory cytokine expression. The responses of children with asthma compared with those without asthma were lower for both RV-A and RV-C while retaining the pattern of gene expression and upstream regulators characteristic of each species. All groups showed activation of the IL-17A pathway.Conclusions: RV-C induced memory cells with a lower IFN-γ-type response than RV-A without T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) upregulation. Children with asthma had lower recall responses than those without asthma while largely retaining the same gene activation profile for each species. RV-A and RV-C, therefore, induce qualitatively different T-cell responses.

Immunodominant T-Cell Epitopes in the VP1 Capsid Protein of Rhinovirus Species A and C.

Rhinovirus (RV) species A and C are the most frequent cause of respiratory viral illness worldwide, and RV-C has been linked to more severe exacerbations of asthma in young children. Little is known about the immune responses to the different RV species, although studies comparing IgG1 antibody titers found impaired antibody responses to RV-C. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether T-cell immunity to RV-C is similarly impaired. We measured T-cell proliferation to overlapping synthetic peptides covering the entire VP1 capsid protein of an RV-A and RV-C genotype for 20 healthy adult donors. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) was typed in all the donors in order to investigate possible associations between the HLA type and RV peptide recognition. Total and specific IgG1 antibody titers to the VP1 proteins of both RV-A and RV-C were also measured to examine associations between the antibody and T-cell responses. We identified T-cell epitopes that are specific to and representative of each RV-A and RV-C species. These epitopes stimulated CD4+-specific T-cell proliferation, with similar magnitudes of response for both RV species. All the donors, independent of their HLA-DR or -DQ type, were able to recognize the immunodominant RV-A and -C regions of VP1. Furthermore, the presence or absence of specific antibody titers was not related to changes in T-cell recognition. Our results indicate a dissociation between the antibody and T-cell responses to rhinoviruses. The species-representative T-cell epitopes identified in this study are valuable tools for future studies investigating T-cell responses to the different RV species. IMPORTANCE: Rhinoviruses (RVs) are mostly associated with the common cold and asthma exacerbations, although their contributions to most upper and lower respiratory tract diseases have increasingly been reported. Species C (RV-C) has been associated with more frequent and severe asthma exacerbations in young children and, along with RV-A, is the most clinically relevant species. Little is known about how our immune system responds to rhinoviruses, and there are limited tools to study specific adaptive immunity against each rhinovirus species. In this study, we identified immunodominant T-cell epitopes of the VP1 proteins of RV-A and RV-C, which are representative of each species. The study found that T-cell responses to RV-A and RV-C were of similar magnitudes, in contrast with previous findings showing RV-C-specific antibody responses were low. These findings will provide the basis for future studies on the immune response to rhinoviruses and can help elucidate the mechanisms of severity of rhinovirus-induced infections.

T-cell responses against rhinovirus species A and C in asthmatic and healthy children.

BACKGROUND: Infections by rhinovirus (RV) species A and C are the most common causes of exacerbations of asthma and a major cause of exacerbations of other acute and chronic respiratory diseases. Infections by both species are prevalent in pre-school and school-aged children and, particularly for RV-C, can cause severe symptoms and a need for hospitalization. While associations between RV infection and asthma are well established, the adaptive immune-mechanisms by which RV infections influence asthma exacerbations are yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize and compare T-cell responses between RV-A and RV-C and to test the hypothesis that T-cell responses would differ between asthmatic children and healthy controls. METHODS: A multi-parameter flow cytometry assay was used to characterize the in vitro recall T-cell response against RV-A and RV-C in PBMCs from children with acute asthma (n = 22) and controls (n = 26). The responses were induced by pools of peptides containing species-specific VP1 epitopes of RV-A and RV-C. RESULTS: Regardless of children's clinical status, all children that responded to the in vitro stimulation (>90%) had a similar magnitude of CD4+ T-cell responses to RV-A and RV-C. However, asthmatic children had a significantly lower number of circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs), and healthy controls had significantly more Tregs induced by RV-A than RV-C. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The comparable recall memory T-cell responses in asthmatic and control children to both RV-A and RV-C show that differences in the antibody and inflammatory responses previously described are likely to be due to regulation, with a demonstrated candidate being reduced regulatory T-cells. The reduced Treg numbers demonstrated here could explain the asthmatic's inability to appropriately control immunopathological responses to RV infections.