RESUMO
To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12 h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, CI95% [77.5 ; 91.8] vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, CI95% [53.7 ; 72.6]; p < 10- 3) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9 h, IQR [2.9; 17.8] vs. 26.4 h, IQR [3.4; 47.5]; p = 0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4 to 8.8% (p = 0.306), with a trend towards a shorter median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p = 0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of 3,065 (p = 0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/economia , Hemocultura/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , França , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/classificaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Prevention strategies implemented by hospitals to reduce nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 sometimes failed. Our aim was to determine the risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control study was conducted (September 1, 2020-January 31, 2021) with adult patients hospitalized in medical or surgical units. Infants or patients hospitalized in ICU were excluded. Cases were patients with nosocomial COVID-19 (clinical symptoms and RT-PCR + for SARS-CoV-2 or RT-PCR + for SARS-CoV-2 with Ct ≤ 28 more than 5 days after admission); controls were patients without infection (RT-PCR- for SARS-CoV-2 > 5 days after admission). They were matched according to length of stay before diagnosis and period of admission. Analyses were performed with a conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 281 cases and 441 controls were included. In the bivariate analysis, cases were older (OR per 10 years: 1.22; 95%CI [1.10;1.36]), had more often shared a room (OR: 1.74; 95%CI [1.25;2.43]) or a risk factor for severe COVID-19 (OR: 1.94; 95%CI [1.09;3.45]), were more often hospitalized in medical units [OR: 1.59; 95%CI [1.12;2.25]), had higher exposure to contagious health care workers (HCW; OR per 1person-day: 1.12; 95%CI [1.08;1.17]) and patients (OR per 1 person-day: 1.11; 95%CI [1.08;1.14]) than controls. In an adjusted model, risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 were exposure to contagious HCW (aOR per 1person-day: 1.08; 95%CI [1.03;1.14]) and to contagious patients (aOR per 1person-day: 1.10; 95%CI [1.07;1.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to contagious professionals and patients are the main risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitais Universitários , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Influenza is a public health issue worldwide. Although antibiotics should not be used to treat viral infections, they are often prescribed to patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Such misuse promotes antibiotic resistance. The role of rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) in preventing antibiotic misuse in adults with ILI symptoms remains relatively unexplored. AIM: To evaluate whether POCT implemented in 2018-2019 to detect influenza viruses led to a decrease in antibiotic prescriptions compared with laboratory-based influenza tests. METHODS: Adult patients with ILI in one emergency department (ED) were retrospectively enrolled over three epidemic seasons (from 2016-2017 to 2018-2019). The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescriptions, which was compared between the three seasons in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Prescriptions for ancillary laboratory tests, chest X-rays and oseltamivir were also compared, along with hospitalizations and length of stay (LOS) at the ED. FINDINGS: Overall, 1849 patients were included. Median age was over 70 years throughout all three seasons. The number of antibiotic prescriptions was significantly different between the three periods in bivariate analysis (48.3% in 2016/2017, 44% in 2017/2018 and 31.1% in 2018/2019; P<0,0001) and in multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.76 for 2018/2019 and aOR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.67-1.46 for 2017/2018, compared with 2016/2017). There were significantly fewer prescriptions of ancillary laboratory tests, X-rays, hospitalizations and more oseltamivir prescriptions in 2018/2019, compared with the previous seasons. LOS was significantly lower in 2018/2019 only for influenza-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: ED influenza POCT decreased antibiotic use and led to less ancillary testing, X-rays and hospitalizations among patients with ILI. However, medico-economic studies are necessary before formulating definite recommendations.
Assuntos
Influenza Humana , Médicos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitais , Humanos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Prescrições , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In healthcare facilities, nosocomial transmissions of respiratory viruses are a major issue. SARS-CoV-2 is not exempt from nosocomial transmission. Our goals were to describe COVID-19 nosocomial cases during the first pandemic wave among patients in a French university hospital and compliance with hygiene measures. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in Grenoble Alpes University Hospital from 01/03/2020 to 11/05/2020. We included all hospitalised patients with a documented SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Nosocomial case was defined by a delay of 5 days between hospitalisation and first symptoms. Hygiene measures were evaluated between 11/05/2020 and 22/05/2020. Lockdown measures were effective in France on 17/03/2020 and ended on 11/05/2020. Systematic wearing of mask was mandatory for all healthcare workers (HCW) and visits were prohibited in our institution from 13/03/2021 and for the duration of the lockdown period. RESULTS: Among 259 patients included, 14 (5.4%) were considered as nosocomial COVID-19. Median time before symptom onset was 25 days (interquartile range: 12-42). Eleven patients (79%) had risk factors for severe COVID-19. Five died (36%) including 4 deaths attributable to COVID-19. Two clusters were identified. The first cluster had 5 cases including 3 nosocomial acquisitions and no tested HCWs were positive. The second cluster had 3 cases including 2 nosocomial cases and 4 HCWs were positive. Surgical mask wearing and hand hygiene compliance were adequate for 95% and 61% of HCWs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of nosocomial COVID-19 cases in our hospital was low. Compliance regarding mask wearing, hand hygiene and lockdown measures drastically reduced transmission of the virus. Monitoring of nosocomial COVID-19 cases during the first wave enabled us to determine to what extent the hygiene measures taken were effective and patients protected. Trial registration Study ethics approval was obtained retrospectively on 30 September 2020 (CECIC Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, IRB 5891).
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virologia , Teste para COVID-19/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Masculino , Máscaras/microbiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare but severe complication. Among 326 patients who underwent TAVI at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, six (1.8%) cases of IE and 11 (3.4%) cases of bacteraemia were identified. No cases of IE were linked to the intervention; one was due to Staphylococcus aureus despite a screening and targeted decolonization strategy. This underscores the need for randomized studies to evaluate the benefit and cost-effectiveness of this policy.