Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: current evidence.

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) is a common and clinically important complication in patients with cancer, contributing to its mortality and morbidity. Direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors, are as effective as vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTED and are associated with less frequent and severe bleeding. They have advantages over low-molecular-weight heparin, but comparative long-term efficacy and safety data are lacking for these compounds. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest a role for DOACs in the treatment of VTED in patients with cancer. This review will discuss the existing evidence and future perspectives on the role of DOACs in the treatment of VTE based on the current evidence about their overall efficacy and safety and the limited information in patients with cancer; in addition, we will briefly review their pharmacokinetic properties with special reference to potential interactions.

SEOM clinical guidelines for anaemia treatment in cancer patients (2020).

Anaemia is defined by the presence of haemoglobin (Hb) levels < 13 g/dL in men and 12 g/dL in women. Up to 39% of cancer patients present it at the time of diagnosis and up to 40% have iron deficiency. Anaemia causes fatigue, functional deterioration and a reduction in the quality of life; it has also been associated with a poorer response to anti-tumour treatment and lower survival. Basic diagnostic tests for anaemia are simple and should be a routine part of clinical practice. These guidelines review the available evidence on the use of different therapies for treating anaemia: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, iron supplements, and transfusion of blood products.

SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

In 2011, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) first published a clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer. This guideline was updated in 2014, and since then, multiple studies and clinical trials have changed the landscape of the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE in cancer patients. To incorporate the most recent evidence, including data from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) randomized clinical trials, SEOM presents a new update of the guideline.

Pleiotropic effects of heparins: does anticoagulant treatment increase survival in cancer patients?

The association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer has been recognized for more than 100 years. Numerous studies have been performed to investigate strategies to decrease VTE incidence and to establish whether treating VTE impacts cancer progression and overall survival. Accordingly, it is important to understand the role of the hemostatic system in tumorigenesis and progression, as there is abundant evidence associating it with cell survival and proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and dissemination, and metastasis formation. In attempts to further the scientific evidence, several studies examine survival benefits in cancer patients treated with anticoagulant therapy, specifically treatment with vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, and low-molecular-weight heparin. Several studies and meta-analyses have been conducted with a special focus on brain tumors. However, no definitive conclusions have been obtained, and more well-designed clinical trials are needed.

Safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients.

Cancer is often complicated by venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common and potentially fatal complication associated with poor prognosis in these patients. An increased incidence of VTE is being observed due to the advanced age of cancer patients, the thrombogenic effect of novel drugs and advances in the diagnosis of related complications. In this review, we look at five different risk groups of cancer patients with an increased probability of developing VTE, including hospitalized patients undergoing chemotherapy, patients undergoing a surgical procedure, ambulatory patients undergoing chemotherapy, patients with a central venous access and patients receiving antiangiogenic drugs or anticoagulant therapy due to previous chronic diseases. The aim of this review is to summarize the most important clinical evidence reported to date on the suitability of primary thromboprophylaxis to cancer patients. Recommendations have drawn up for each group based on current evidence and guidelines to facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.

Antibiotic prophylaxis with meropenem after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

In the present study, we analyze the efficacy of prophylaxis with meropenem in patients receiving a matched related donor allogeneic transplant. In total, 38 patients were sequentially treated with meropenem starting on the day of the first febrile episode (n=17, group A) vs prophylactic meropenem starting on the first day with <500/mm(3) granulocytes (n=21, group B), and maintained until resolution of fever or after granulocyte count >500/mm(3). Of these, 16 (94%) patients in group A developed fever as compared to 16 (76%) in group B (P=0.02). While only one patient in group A did not require first-line antibiotherapy, there were seven (33%) in group B who did not require it (P=0.01) since fever lasted less than 72 h. In addition, 52% patients in group B did not require second-line antibiotics as compared to 11% among patients in group A (P=0.04). In multivariate analysis prophylaxis with meropenem (HR=2.83, 95% CI (1-8.02); P=0.04) and disease status at transplant (HR for early stage=0.15, 95% CI (0.04-0.62); P=0.04) significantly influenced the development of fever. In conclusion, the current pilot study suggests that the use of prophylaxis with meropenem during the period of neutropenia in patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation favorably affects the morbidity of the procedure by reducing febrile episodes.

Therapeutic management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: state of the art and future perspectives.

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a common, often incurable low-grade-B lymphoproliferative disorder. For many years, chlorambucil alone or with steroids has been the drug of choice in treatment-naive patients. Purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies (i.e. rituximab, alemtuzumab), have increased the potential for obtaining complete or even molecular remissions. Despite these advances, recurrent and/or relapsing disease remains a major concern. In this respect, new clinical and biological agents have recently been identified, which may allow a better selection for high-risk patients, who could be offered more aggressive therapies including haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although autologous transplant does not appear to provide additional benefit in advanced refractory disease, allogeneic transplant may offer a chance for cure. Non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant probably has curative potential with a better toxicity profile, and it is actively being investigated. We will review the role of the current therapeutic approach to CLL, focusing on the most recent advances in chemoimmunotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.