Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Features Between Men and Women With Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Specialized Center in Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the frequency of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in women and to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences with respect to men at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of axSpA admitted to the "Reumacheck" SpA program were included between 2017 and 2022. At baseline, all patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and human leukocyte antigen B27, and imaging (plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints, and ultrasound of heel entheses). All evaluators were blinded to the results of the other evaluations. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with a diagnosis of axSpA were included. The frequency at diagnosis in women was 61.55%. In the univariate analysis, the significant differences between women and men at diagnosis of axSpA were good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, elevated C-reactive protein, New York Criteria (+), enthesis ultrasound (+), years of education, number of swollen joints, erythrosedimentation rate, and the very low frequency of bone bridges in the magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints. In the logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable was "men," and the only feature that was independently associated was having radiographic compromise according to the New York criteria (odds ratio, 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of axSpA in women was 61.55%; clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences were observed. Women experienced less radiographic compromise.

Difficult to treat rheumatoid arthritis in a comprehensive evaluation program: frequency according to different objective evaluations.

Difficult-to-treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-D2T) is a condition in which patients do not achieve the treatment target despite multiple advanced therapies, more others features. Aims: to estimate the frequency of RA-D2T in a cohort comprehensively evaluated (clinical, serology, imaging), and to analyze the associated characteristics. In a second part, the frequency of RA-D2T after 1 year of follow-up, analyzing the predictive variables at baseline and therapeutic behavior. Cross-sectional and prospective study, consecutive RA were included, then those who completed the one-year follow-up were evaluated. RA-D2T frequency was estimated (DAS28-CDAI-SDAI-Ultrasonography (US)-HAQ) at baseline and 1 year. The variables associated and those baseline predictive characteristics of D2T at 1 year, and their independent association by logistic regression were analyzed. The treatment approach was described. Two hundred seventy-six patients completed the evaluation, frequency of RA-D2T (all scores): 27.5%. Anemia, RF high titers and higher HAQ score were independent associated. At year, 125 competed follow-up. RA-D2T (all scores): 33%, D2T-US and D2T-HAQ were 14 and 18.4% (p 0.001). Predictive baseline characteristics D2T (all score): ACPA + (OR: 13.7) and X-ray erosion (OR: 2.9). D2T-US: X-ray erosion (OR: 19.7). Conventional DMARDs, corticosteroids and TNF-blockers were the drugs most used by D2T patients, Jaki were the most used in the switch. We showed different frequencies of RA-D2T according to different objective parameters (scores, images) and their association with patient characteristics. In turn, predictive variables (erosions-ACPA) for RA-D2T at 1 year were analyzed. It was shown that the Jaki were the most used drug in these patients.

The Role of HLA-B27 in Argentinian Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) is variable around the world. Our objectives were to estimate the frequency of HLA-B27 in an Argentinian cohort of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), to evaluate the differences between HLA-B27-positive and HLA-B27-negative patients, and to analyze its performance as a diagnostic biomarker. METHODS: Observational study including patients older than 18 years, with axSpA diagnosis assessed in a fast track program (Reuma-Check SpA). All patients underwent the following: blood tests, HLA-B27, sacroiliac images, and enthesitis ultrasound. Sociodemographic data and SpA symptoms were also collected. The clinical assessor was blinded to complementary studies. For the sensitivity and specificity analysis, patients with chronic low back pain without axSpA who performed the same circuit in the same period were used as control, paired 1:1 (sex and age). RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included, 75 axSpA and 75 controls. The frequency of HLA-B27 was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-53). The differences between HLA-B27-positive and HLA-B27-negative patients were observed in age of low back pain onset (36 vs 46 years), BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) (4 vs 5), and extra-articular SpA features such as uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease (29% vs 50%). When this frequency was compared (low back pain control group), the difference was 43% versus 9% (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 2.8-24), and HLA-B27 had a sensitivity of 43%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 85%, negative predictive value of 58%, and likelihood ratio of 4.9 (95% CI, 3-8). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of HLA-B27 in axSpA was 43%; positive patients had an earlier age of onset (36), a higher BASFI, and more SpA features. For the diagnosis of SpA, HLA-B27 had a good specificity but low sensitivity.

"Reuma-Check": Performance of a Comprehensive Fast-Track Program for the Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis in South America.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a comprehensive diagnosis program called "Reuma-check" for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Patients with LBP aged 18 years or older were preselected, and those with at least 1 SpA feature completed the circuit. They were referred after 2 strategies: education for orthopedists and a campaign on social networks. All patients underwent a clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, and imaging (including human leukocyte antigen B27 evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging). The diagnosis of axial SpA was established by an expert rheumatologist opinion. Time from onset of symptoms to "Reuma-check," time from patient referral to admission of the checkup, and time from "Reuma-check" to diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 175 of 246 patients were included, most of them came from the social media campaign (55%). Seventy-five (43%) of 175 patients were diagnosed as axial SpA. The median time from referral (or self-referral) to access to the program was 1.3 months. The median time from symptoms onset to access to the program was 31.7 months, and the median time from the performance of "Reuma-check" to final diagnosis was 2 weeks. Features associated with a diagnosis of axial SpA were as follows: inflammatory LBP (odds ratio [OR], 6.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-28), clinical enthesopathy (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.1-18.4), positive human leukocyte antigen B27 (OR, 23.02; 95% CI, 3.5-58), and positive magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 14.34; 95% CI, 3.5-58). CONCLUSIONS: "Reuma-check" allowed a high frequency of axial SpA diagnosis and improved access to rapid diagnosis, shortening the time from referral to diagnosis with a shorter acquisition time for the ancillary studies. Patients with a final diagnosis of axial SpA presented distinctive features.

Ultrasound tenosynovitis: A differential feature of patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differential features between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: Prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted for polyarthralgia. At baseline was performed: laboratory studies, X-rays of hands and feet, ultrasound of both hands with power Doppler technique, clinical data and clinimetry. In subsequent visits the definitive diagnosis of RA was established or not. It was considered as seronegative RA when patients were negative for both RF and ACPAs. RESULTS: 746 patients were included, of which 128 (17.1%) ended with a final diagnosis of RA. Of these 128 patients, 87 (67.9%) were seropositive RA, while 41 (32%) were seronegative RA. The only feature that showed significant differences was the presence of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound with a positive power Doppler signal, 13.7% of the patients with seropositive RA vs 41.6% of the patients with seronegative RA (p=0.0028). CONCLUSION: The only differential feature of patients with seronegative RA was the higher proportion of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound.

Psoriatic Arthritis: Differential Features at the Time of Clinical Presentation in a Large Cohort of Patients with Polyarthralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with psoriatic arthritis begin with cutaneous psoriasis, which is why all early detection strategies are based on screening in the dermatological consultation and referral to a rheu matologist. However, there are cases of patients who consult initially for musculoskeletal symptoms, mostly joint pain, regardless of family and/or personal history of psoriasis. This study aimed to esti mate the frequency of psoriatic arthritis in a cohort of patients who consulted for polyarthralgia and to determine the differential features, at the time of clinical presentation, in relation to both patients with final diagnosis other than psoriatic arthritis and patients with diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with polyarthralgia (including arthralgia of the hands) were included. Clinical examination, laboratory tests, ultrasound with power Doppler of both hands, and radiography of both hands and feet were performed at baseline. All patients were followed up and the definitive diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was established. RESULTS: A total of 1055 were included, 88 (8.3%) ended with diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was positively associated with a family history of psoriasis (odds ratio=4.14), pso riasis (odds ratio=78.94), radiographic erosions (odds ratio=5.74), and ultrasound with at least 1 joint with positive power Doppler (odds ratio=7.11). In comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was positively associated with psoriasis (odds ratio=433.42) and family history of psoriasis (odds ratio=41.63). On the other hand, it was negatively associated with positivity, for both rheumatoid factor (odds ratio=0.03) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (odds ratio=0.06). CONCLUSION: The frequency of psoriatic arthritis was 8.3% and was associated with a personal and/or family history of psoriasis, radiographic erosions, and inflammatory involvement by Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS). In comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, psoriatic arthritis was associated with a personal and/or family history of psoriasis, while the presence of both rheumatoid factor and/ or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies was shown to be a protective factor for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis monotherapy in the Jak inhibitors Era. Current prevalence and associated factors in a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Combined therapy constitutes the standard of care in RA. Jak inhibitors (Jaki) have shown efficacy in monotherapy, a modality used in cases where it is not possible to use Disease-Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs). OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence (total and by drug), reason for using and the increase over the time of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs as monotherapy after the availability of the Jaki. To analyze the differential characteristics between patients with monotherapy vs combined therapy. METHODS: Cross-sectional multicenter study. Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) under treatment with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs started from 2013 were included. Socio-demographic, clinic, and therapeutic data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 505 RA patients were included. Since 2013, the prevalence of monotherapy usage was (any) 49%. The drugs used as monotherapy were Jaki in 41% and TNF-blockers in 30%. The leading causes of monotherapy use were intolerance/adverse events (62%), medical decision or lack of adherence (37.7%). The highest socioeconomic level and a better functional status at diagnosis were predictors of monotherapy use. The use of the second line of treatments and less polypharmacy were independent factors associated with this therapeutic modality. CONCLUSIONS: The current prevalence of monotherapy in RA was 49%, the Jaki were the most used drug in this modality. Monotherapy increases from year to year. There are differential characteristics in patients using monotherapy.

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in South America. Burden of disease and differential features with respect to ankylosing spondylitis at time of diagnosis. A comprehensive analysis with a focus on images.

BACKGROUND: Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) data from South America are scarce, especially regarding image features. Objective To estimate the frequency of nr-axSpA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a cohort of Argentinian patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) and to analyze the difference between both, with focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, at diagnosis. METHODS: Patients with LBP and a diagnosis of axSpA who participated in a reuma-check program were included. All patients with a suspicion of SpA were evaluated using blood analytics, HLA-B27, and images (MRI). Sociodemographic data, SpA features, diagnostic dela,y and clinimetrics were assessed by an operator who was blinded to the patient's test results. On MRI, the presence of SpA lesions was assessed and a concordance exercise was carried out between rheumatologists and radiologist. RESULT: Of 198 LBP patients, 97 had axSpA, 54% of whom were nr-axSpA. A positive MRI was found in 50%. No difference in terms of disease activity, functional impact, laboratory or treatments between nr-axSpA and AS were found. Higher frequencies of male sex and chronic lesions on sacroiliac MRI were found in AS patients. In the logistic regression, an independent association with AS diagnosis was found: male (odds ratio [OR] 4.8), MRI fat replacement (OR 4.6), MRI sclerosis (OR 7.6), and diagnostic delay of more than 2 years (OR 10). The concordance between rheumatologists and radiologists was considered good to very good (κ 0.7-0.8). CONCLUSION: The frequency of nr-axSpA was 54%. We found a higher frequency of being male, more SpA features, and a longer diagnostic delay in patients with AS. Patients with AS had more structural lesions, with a good concordance between rheumatologist and radiologist.

General characteristics of an early arthritis cohort in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to describe the general characteristics of a cohort of patients with early arthritis in Argentina. METHODS: CONAART (Consorcio Argentino de Artritis Temprana--Argentine Consortium for Early Arthritis) is an initiative of seven rheumatology centres across Argentina. Patients were included if they had at least one or more swollen joints and <2 years of disease duration. Social, demographic, familiar, hereditary, clinical and laboratory data were recollected. At first visit and every year, X-rays of hands and feet were performed and working characteristics and pharmaco-economic data were re-collected. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included. Of them, 327 (79.2%) were women with a median age of 49 years and a median disease duration of 6 months. Of the total, 183 (44.3%) had RA (ACR 1987) and 167 (40.4%) undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Other diagnoses included: 12 crystalics, 11 PsA, 6 uSpA, 6 other CTD, 1 AS and 27 other diagnosis. As 85% of our population had RA and UA, we only compared these two groups of patients. Patients with RA had significantly worse activity parameters of the disease (DAS of 28 joints), functional capacity (HAQ) and quality of life (Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life) than patients with UA. The frequency of RF and anti-CCP, and symmetrical distribution were also significantly higher in patients with RA compared with UA patients. All patients with RA initiated early specific treatment, in a period no longer than 6 months from the beginning of the disease. CONCLUSION: Early arthritis clinics are a useful tool to identify and treat patients with different forms of joint involvement.

Engagement process for patients with spondyloarthritis: PANLAR early SpA clinics project - centers of excellence.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is one of the most complex rheumatological diseases to diagnose and treat because, in the early stages of the disease, the inflammatory low back pain is often difficult to identify, and patients are diagnosed when they already have advanced structural processes. There is an urgent need to establish healthcare models that allow optimization of the management of these patients. The objective of this work is to propose a care model that is adaptable to the factual realities of Latin America. A systematic search of the literature terms (MeSH) was performed to search associated terms. Taking the model of the REAL-PANLAR project as an example and incorporating some related literature, a model of centers of excellence for SpA in Latin America is proposed that can be reasonably established and implemented. This model proposes 3 types of centers of excellence for SpA according to the level of complexity of each institution, and its criteria are defined based on indicators of structure, processes, and results. This is the first effort in Latin America to try to standardize the care of patients with spondyloarthritis. Key Points • The unmet needs in Latin America in the care of SpondyloArthritis (SpA), demand solutions that facilitate the rapid and assertive access of patients to specialized centers such as Center of Excellence in SpA. • This project facilitates the standardization of high-quality care for patients with SpA, starting from its diagnosis and up to clinical follow-up. • Due to standardization of care, better clinical and safety outcomes are achieved for patients, as well as patient-reported outcomes. • By standardized models of care, will be achieved a reduction in the progress of this pathology and optimization in the use of high-complexity services and high-cost therapies, improving cost-efficiency for public health systems in each country.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) is a noncovalent, oral, and highly selective inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). The efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of fenebrutinib in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were assessed in this phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Patients who had moderately to severely active SLE while receiving background standard therapy were randomized to receive placebo, fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily, or fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily. Glucocorticoid taper was recommended from weeks 0 to 12 and from weeks 24 to 36. The primary end point was the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 48. RESULTS: Patients (n = 260) were enrolled from 44 sites in 12 countries, with the majority from Latin America, the US, and Western Europe. The SRI-4 response rates at week 48 were 51% for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (P = 0.37 versus placebo), 52% for fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (P = 0.34 versus placebo), and 44% for placebo. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment response rates at week 48 were 53% for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (P = 0.086 versus placebo), 42% for fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (P = 0.879 versus placebo), and 41% for placebo. Safety results were similar across all arms, although serious adverse events were more frequent with fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily. By week 48, patients treated with fenebrutinib had reduced levels of a BTK-dependent plasmablast RNA signature, anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies, total IgG, and IgM, as well as increased complement C4 levels, all relative to placebo. CONCLUSION: While fenebrutinib had an acceptable safety profile, the primary end point, SRI-4 response, was not met despite evidence of strong pathway inhibition.

Performance of the RABBIT infection risk score in an Argentinian rheumatoid arthritis cohort.

Patients with rheumatic autoimmune diseases have a higher risk of infections compared with age-and sex-matched controls. In Latin America, there are no validated tools to assess the risk of serious infection. The objectives were to estimate the incidence of serious infections in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed for 12 months and to validate the RABBIT risk score for serious infections. Patients with RA were included and followed for 12 months. Baseline sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, and vaccination status were recorded. The baseline RABBIT risk score was calculated. Serious infections were documented, describing site and time since enrollment. Six hundred five patients were included (13 centers). The incidence of serious infection was 5% (95% CI 3-7). The most frequent sites were respiratory and urinary (90%). Performance of RABBIT risk score: patients with no infection during follow-up had a median score of 1.2 (IQR 0.8-2.1) and patients with infection 5.1 (IQR 2.15-12.6) p 0.00001. ROC curve analysis: AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.8-0.94), best cut-off 2.85 (sensibility 75%, specificity 85%). The incidence of serious infections was 5% during the follow-up. The RABBIT score performed excellently in our patients. Key Points • The RABBIT risk score for serious infections showed an excellent performance in a population different (Latin America) from the original one included in the German registry. • This may assist rheumatologists in selecting drugs for patients according to the individual risk of infection, in a fast and simple way.

Recognition of spondyloarthritis lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Results of an educational intervention.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), allowing us an earlier diagnosis of the disease compared to radiography. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of a recognition test on SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after carrying out an educational intervention (hands-on workshop). We also evaluated whether the successes in the tests were associated with the individual characteristics of the participants. METHODS: A test was carried out involving 10 questions (seven for image recognition and three for theoretical knowledge) before and after the attendance to an MRI workshop in SpA performed in different cities in Argentina. The number of correct answers was assessed before and after the workshop; good performance was defined as the achievement of 6 correct answers on average between the pre- and post-test. Participants' characteristics were collected. RESULTS: A total of 106 participants were evaluated. Average of correct answers before and after the workshop were 5.3 and 6.8, respectively (P = .0001); 65% of participants achieved good performance. Performance is not associated with the characteristics of trained physicians. CONCLUSION: MRI training workshops in SpA allow rheumatologists to improve recognition of acute inflammatory and structural lesions. The long-term effects of such training need further evaluation.

Chronic low back pain: diagnostic approach for primary care

Antecedentes: El dolor lumbar es uno de los principales motivos de consulta en el primer nivel de atención, requiere múltiples intervenciones diagnósticas, así como la adopción de conductas terapéuticas, e incluso, conlleva discapacidad en los pacientes adultos. Objetivo: Brindar una aproximación clínica con orientación diagnóstica para el abordaje de los pacientes con un motivo de consulta frecuente en el primer nivel de atención. Resultados: Los autores proponen un algoritmo para el abordaje clínico del paciente con dolor lumbar crónico, orientando, además, hacia generalidades de los exámenes complementarios (química sanguínea, imágenes diagnósticas, entre otros), para evaluar en un primer nivel al paciente que acude por esta patología. Conclusiones: La propuesta presentada en este artículo permite guiar al personal médico de primer nivel de atención a través de una aproximación enfocada en las características semiológicas del dolor, así como poder correlacionar con los diagnósticos más frecuentes, a fin de remitir o dirigir al paciente de acuerdo con las necesidades particulares correspondientes.

Keywords: Background: Low back pain is one of the main complaints in primary care reported by-patients, requiring several diagnostic interventions, therapeutic approaches and even entailing disability in young adults. Objective: To provide a clinical approach, diagnostically oriented, for patients frequently consulting primary care. Results: Of the authors propose a clinical algorithm for the clinical assessment of the patient with chronic low back pain, also considering complementary tests (imaging, blood chemistry, etc.) for the evaluation in primary care of the patient with this pathology. Conclusions: The proposal provided in this article helps guide the primary care physician through an approach focusing on the semiological characteristics of pain, so that they can correlate with the most frequent diagnoses, in order to refer or direct the patient according to their particular needs.

Consenso de inmunizaciones en adultos con enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias crónicas autoinmunes / Consensus on immunizations in adults with autoimmune chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Aumento del riesgo de infecciones prevenibles y sus complicaciones en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias crónicas (ERICA), con y sin tratamiento con inmunosupresores (IS), y beneficios de la vacunación.

Sobrevida, eficacia y seguridad de Golimumab en pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea y Espondiloartritis: Datos de una cohorte argentina / Survival, efficacy and safety of Golimumab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: Data from an Argentine cohort

Objetivos: Golimumab ha sido aprobado para el tratamiento de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea (AR), artritis psoriásica (APs) y espondiloartritis axial. Sin embargo, los datos provenientes de nuestra región son escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia, seguridad y sobrevida acumulada de golimumab en pacientes de la vida real con AR, APs y espondilitis anquilosante (EA) de diferentes centros de Argentina. Material y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio longitudinal, en el que se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico de AR (criterios ACR/EULAR 2010), APs (criterios CASPAR) y Espax (criterios ASAS 2009), que hayan iniciado tratamiento con golimumab de acuerdo a la indicación médica. Se obtuvieron los datos por revisión de historias clínicas. Se consignaron características sociodemográficas, clínicas, comorbilidades y tratamientos previos. Con respecto al golimumab, se registraron fecha de inicio, vía de administración y tratamientos concomitantes. Se determinó la actividad de la enfermedad mediante DAS28 en el caso de la AR, por DAPSA y MDA para APs y por BASDAI en el caso de Espax. Se consignó la presencia de eventos adversos (EA). En el caso de suspensión del tratamiento, se identificaron la fecha y motivo del mismo. Los pacientes fueron seguidos hasta la suspensión del golimumab, pérdida de seguimiento, muerte, o finalización del estudio (30 de noviembre de 2020). Resultados: Se incluyeron 182 pacientes, 116 con diagnóstico de AR, 30 con APs y 36 con Espax. La mayoría de ellos (70.9%) eran mujeres con una edad mediana (m) de 55 años (RIC 43.8-64) y una duración de la enfermedad m de 7 años (RIC 4-12.7) al inicio del tratamiento. El 34.6% de los mismos habían recibido al menos una droga modificadora de la enfermedad (DME) biológica (-b) o sintética dirigida (-sd) previamente. El seguimiento total fue de 318.1 pacientes/año. El tratamiento con golimumab mostró mejoría clínica en los tres grupos de pacientes. La incidencia de eventos adversos fue de 6.6 por 100 pacientes/año, siendo las infecciones las más frecuentes. Durante el seguimiento, 50 pacientes (27.5%) suspendieron golimumab, la causa más frecuente fue el fracaso del tratamiento (68%), seguida de la falta de cobertura (16%) y el desarrollo de eventos adversos (10%). La persistencia de golimumab fue del 76% y 68% a los 12 y 24 meses, respectivamente. Se registró una sobrevida de 50.2 meses (IC 95% 44.4-55.9). Los pacientes que habían recibido tratamiento previo con DME-b y/o -sd mostraron una menor sobrevida (HR 2.4, IC 95% 1.3-4.4). Conclusiones: El tratamiento con golimumab en pacientes de la vida real en Argentina ha demostrado una buena eficacia y seguridad. La sobrevida del fármaco fue de más de 4 años y casi el 80% seguía usando golimumab después de un año. El tratamiento previo con otros DME-b o -sd se asoció con una menor sobrevida al tratamiento.

Objectives: Golimumab is approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. However, data from our region are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cumulative survival of golimumab in real-life patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa) from different rheumatology centers in Argentina. Material and methods: We performed a longitudinal study of consecutive adults with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), PsA (CASPAR criteria) and axSpa (ASAS 2009 criteria), who have started treatment with golimumab according to medical indication. Data was obtained by review of medical records. Sociodemographic and clinical data, musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and previous treatments were recorded. In reference to golimumab treatment, start date, route of administration and concomitant treatments were identified. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 for RA patients, DAPSA and MDA for PsA and BASDAI for axSpa. The presence of adverse events was recorded. If golimumab was stopped, date and cause was documented. Patients were followed up until golimumab discontinuation, loss of follow-up, death, or study completion (November 30, 2020). Results: In total 182 patients were included, 116 with a diagnosis of RA, 30 with PsA and 36 with axSpa. Most of them (70.9%) were female with a median (m) age of 55 years (IQR 43.8-64) and m disease duration of 7 years (IQR 4-12.7) at treatment initiation. Al least one prior biological (-b) and/or targeted synthetic (-ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was received by 63 patients (34.6%). Total follow-up was 318.1 patients/year. Golimumab treatment showed clinical improvement in all three groups of patients. The incidence of AE was 6.6 per 100 patients/year, being infections the most frequents ones. During follow-up, 50 patients (27.5%) discontinued golimumab, the most frequent cause was treatment failure (68%), followed by lack of health insurance (16%) and adverse events (10%). Golimumab persistence was 76% and 68% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Treatment survival was 50.2 months (95% CI 44.4-55.9). Patients who had received prior treatment with b- or ts-DMARDs showed lower survival (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.3-4.4). Conclusions: Golimumab treatment in real life patients in Argentina has shown good efficacy and safety. Drug survival was over 4 years and almost 80% were still using golimumab after one year. Prior treatment with other b- or ts-DMARDs was associated with lower treatment survival.

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Do magnetic resonance training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists for the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más e 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuesta correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuesta correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct)

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Does MRI training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists on the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más de 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuestas correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuestas correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct).

Usefulness of antibodies and minor salivary gland biopsy in the study of sicca syndrome in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between histologic findings in the minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) and anti La (La/SS-B)y antiRo antibodies (Ro/SS-A), antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF),and compare the value of the latter as diagnostic tests with MSGB, considered as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients with suspected Primary Sjögren Syndrome (PSS) referred for MSGB were included. Antibody measurements were performed. Grade III and IV biopsy results were considered positive. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen (218) patients were included, 95% females, with a median age of 54 years and 12 months median duration of sicca symptoms. 36 of the biopsies were positive. 33% of patients had positive anti Ro/SS-A anti La/SS-B antibodies, 62% had positive ANA, and 31% positive RF. A statistically significant association was found between MSGB and anti Ro/SS-A anti La/SS-B, ANA and RF. ANA were the most sensitive antibodies (84%. 95% CI: 75- 92), and the most specific were: Anti Ro/ SS-A and/or anti La/ SS-B (78%. 95% CI: 71-85) and RF (78%. 95% CI: 69-87). CONCLUSION: On PSS clinical suspicion, anti Ro/ SS-A y anti La/ SS-B antibodies have a great value to achieve the diagnosis, with MSGB useful for diagnosis of seronegative patients. The results also suggest the importance of ANA and RF for PSS classification.