'I make sure my doctor doesn't know that I use meth': perceived barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among community peer educators in Seattle (WA, USA).

Background HIV disproportionately affects cisgender men and transgender people who have sex with men (MSM/TG) and use methamphetamine. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake has been slow in this group. It is important to understand perceptions about PrEP and barriers to its use among MSM/TG who use methamphetamine to reduce new HIV infections. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups with peer educators of a harm reduction program. We assessed their perspectives of PrEP and barriers across the PrEP continuum among MSM/TG who use methamphetamine. RESULTS: Notably, stigma related to the multiple marginalised identities of MSM/TG who use methamphetamine (e.g. MSM/TG-related stigma, methamphetamine-related stigma) was a barrier at each step. We developed a framework that combined the PrEP continuum and a stigma-based treatment cascade to explore these themes and describe the effects of stigma on PrEP engagement. Methamphetamine-related barriers were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study emphasise the importance of incorporating stigma reduction into PrEP delivery for MSM/TG who use methamphetamine.

Development of a targeted educational intervention to increase pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among cisgender men and transgender individuals who have sex with men and use methamphetamine in Seattle (WA, USA).

Background Cisgender men and transgender individuals who have sex with men (MSM/TG) and use methamphetamine are at elevated risk for HIV and have had limited pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake. The aim of this study was to quantify the knowledge and use of PrEP, identify barriers to PrEP use, and develop a targeted educational campaign to promote PrEP among MSM/TG who use methamphetamine. METHODS: We conducted three consultations with peer educators of Project Needle and Sex Education Outreach Network (NEON) to develop and disseminate educational materials. We surveyed the peers' HIV-negative contacts before and after this work to explore knowledge and opinions about PrEP and to assess the effect of our materials. RESULTS: There were 221 respondents at baseline (August 2016) and 100 at follow-up (April-May 2017). At baseline, nearly all participants had 'heard of PrEP' (96%) and were insured (97%). However, only 3% had ever used PrEP. Peers suggested educational cards that included a definition of PrEP, adherence tips and that PrEP does not prevent other sexually transmissible infections. Peers distributed approximately 2560 educational cards. At follow-up, approximately half the respondents (53%) had seen the cards, and those who did reported significantly more agreement with the majority of the card messages about PrEP. Significantly more participants reported ever receiving PrEP at follow-up (21%; P<0.001). There was a trend between seeing the cards and PrEP use (P=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Although we cannot be certain that the effect was due to our intervention, a greater number of the peers' contacts reported receiving PrEP at follow-up, and those who saw our materials were more likely to agree with factual statements about PrEP. There is continued need for PrEP education for MSM/TG who use methamphetamine.