Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 19(3): 248.e1-248.e6, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746718

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy, side effects, and cost-effectiveness between a single-use digital flexible ureteroscope and a reusable flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of paediatric renal stones. METHODS: This analytic, case-control, monocentric study included all patients undergoing flexible ureterosopies for stone treatment. Between April 2016 and February 2019, a reusable (Flex-XC®, Karl Storz) flexible ureteroscope was used (control group), whereas a single-use (Uscope®, PUSEN Medical©) flexible ureteroscope was used in all procedures from March 2019 to April 2021. Clinical and procedural outcomes, operative times, complication rates, hospital stay, and costs per procedure were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-three cases using a reusable flexible ureteroscope and thirty-nine using a single-use flexible ureteroscope were included in the study. Demographic patient characteristics, stone burden, location and composition, preoperative presence of a double-J stent, procedural outcomes, mean length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications (4.6% versus 5%, p = 0.81) were comparable between the two groups. Median operative duration for stone removal was 93 min (20-170) with reusable versus 81 min (55-107) with the single-use scope (p = 0.18). Scope failure occurred four times with the reusable scope and in no case with the single-use. The total cost per procedure associated with the use of single-use scopes (798 Euros) was lower than a reusable scope (1483.23 Euros). DISCUSSION: Single-use flexible ureteroscopes were created to bypass the problems incurred when reusable scopes were damaged and therefore not available for use in surgical procedures. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes are always immediately available and ready to be used, even in urgent cases, as they typically do not require maintenance or sterilization. Compared with their reusable counterparts, single-use flexible ureteroscopes have similar digital performance (270°), image quality and we found no difference in the success and complication rates. Cost analysis of a reusable flexible ureteroscope must consider the purchase price, maintenance and repair costs, and decontamination costs (including handling, detergent, bacterial culture, transportation, and storage costs). In contrast, only purchase price is included in cost analysis for single-use flexible ureteroscopes. Our study suggests that single-use flexible ureteroscopes may be associated with lower costs per procedure than their reusable counterparts. CONCLUSION: Single-use flexible ureteroscopes are an interesting alternative to their reusable counterparts, particularly in terms of material resource management. Cost analyses conducted using a low volume of cases representative of a paediatric urology division favour the use of single-use ureteroscopes.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Urolitíase , Humanos , Criança , Ureteroscópios , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 18(3): 367.e1-367.e7, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35477665

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Refinements in endoscopic instrumentation, the widespread popularization of endourology and the minimal invasiveness of endoscopic approaches have led to evolving interest in expanding applications for their use and now include incision of posterior urethral valves (PUV). We aimed to report our paediatric experience of PUV incision with Holmium:YAG laser updating of the endoscopic technique, how we set parameters for the laser energy and provide some tips and tricks to increase the likelihood of completing treatment. METHODS: A monocentric, prospective, continuous series of boys with PUV were treated endoscopically using a Holmium: YAG laser (1.2 J, 20 Hz, 800 µs). Feasibility was evaluated using operative time in minutes, spontaneous normal micturition after bladder catheter removal, and the duration of bladder catheterization in days in the absence of satisfactory micturition. Peri-operative complications were recorded. A VCUG was performed at 6 weeks postoperatively to exclude residual valves. RESULTS: Since September 2018, 18 children with PUV were included. The median age at the time of endoscopic laser incision was 12 days (1 day-5 years). The median operative duration was 28 min (17-35). The urinary catheter was systematically removed on the first postoperative day. There were no intraoperative or anaesthesia-related complications. More specifically, no urethral injuries and no bleeding were recorded. No incomplete VUP incision was found on follow-up VCUG, and no endoscopic revision was necessary thus far, with a median follow-up of 44 months (6 months-60 months). DISCUSSION: The use of the Holmium: YAG laser introduces new perspectives in the treatment of PUV. Its mechanism of action is considered a photothermic effect with a vapourization effect. The laser energy released by the Holmium: YAG source has a short tissue penetration distance and is strongly absorbed in an aqueous environment and therefore limits thermal tissue damage and favours early tissue re-epithelialization, reducing the risk of urethral stricture and decreasing postoperative oedema. The use of the laser in "incision" mode is the setting that most solicits the capacities of the laser (high energy, high frequency, and long pulse). The use of laser energy has the advantage of allowing tissue vapourization while ensuring maximal haemostasis and the possibility of introducing the laser fibre through the working channels of small, 6-Fr paediatric endoscopes. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endoscopic PUV incision using the Holmium: YAG laser appears to be a safe and efficient technique.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Obstrução Uretral , Criança , Hólmio , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução Uretral/etiologia , Obstrução Uretral/cirurgia
3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 5(12): 1190-2, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437673

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although diverticular disease of the colon is frequent, perforated diverticulitis causing subcutaneous emphysema is a uncommon entity. We wish to present this extremely rare case of perforated colonic diverticulum in the subcutaneous tissue, which is the first one that we have encountered in our practice, along with the accompanying diagnostic and therapeutic issues and a review of the literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of an 83-year-old man who admitted to the emergency room due to an abdominal subcutaneous emphysema. Physical examination revealed a severe subcutaneous emphysema especially in the left iliac fossa and abdominal pain. An urgent contrast enhanced abdominal CT scan showed multiple diverticula in the sigmoid colon and multiple air bubbles in the subcutaneous tissue. The exploratory laparotomy identified a perforation of diverticular in subcutaneous tissue. Forty centimeters of colon were resected. The subcutaneous emphysema resolved without specific treatment. The postoperative period was uncomplicated. DISCUSSION: Subcutaneous emphysema of anterior abdomen wall is an obvious physical sign but its etiology is complex to determine and may be potentially lethal. The pathophysiological mechanism involved is the emergence of a pressure gradient between the peritoneum and surrounding structures, causing rupture of the anterior abdominal wall, allowing gas from a perforation to diffuse along tissue planes. CONCLUSION: This physical sign may be of especial value in elderly patient groups amongst whom perforation may be less clinically obvious. General surgeons should bear in mind this rare complication of colonic diverticulosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA