Finding Relevant Retrosynthetic Disconnections for Stereocontrolled Reactions.

Machine learning-driven computer-aided synthesis planning (CASP) tools have become important tools for idea generation in the design of complex molecule synthesis but do not adequately address the stereochemical features of the target compounds. A novel approach to automated extraction of templates used in CASP that includes stereochemical information included in the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and an internal AstraZeneca database containing reactions from Reaxys, Pistachio, and AstraZeneca electronic lab notebooks is implemented in the freely available AiZynthFinder software. Three hundred sixty-seven templates covering reagent- and substrate-controlled as well as stereospecific reactions were extracted from the USPTO, while 20,724 templates were from the AstraZeneca database. The performance of these templates in multistep CASP is evaluated for 936 targets from the ChEMBL database and an in-house selection of 791 AZ designs. The potential and limitations are discussed for four case studies from ChEMBL and examples of FDA-approved drugs.

When Yield Prediction Does Not Yield Prediction: An Overview of the Current Challenges.

Machine Learning (ML) techniques face significant challenges when predicting advanced chemical properties, such as yield, feasibility of chemical synthesis, and optimal reaction conditions. These challenges stem from the high-dimensional nature of the prediction task and the myriad essential variables involved, ranging from reactants and reagents to catalysts, temperature, and purification processes. Successfully developing a reliable predictive model not only holds the potential for optimizing high-throughput experiments but can also elevate existing retrosynthetic predictive approaches and bolster a plethora of applications within the field. In this review, we systematically evaluate the efficacy of current ML methodologies in chemoinformatics, shedding light on their milestones and inherent limitations. Additionally, a detailed examination of a representative case study provides insights into the prevailing issues related to data availability and transferability in the discipline.

Do Chemformers Dream of Organic Matter? Evaluating a Transformer Model for Multistep Retrosynthesis.

Synthesis planning of new pharmaceutical compounds is a well-known bottleneck in modern drug design. Template-free methods, such as transformers, have recently been proposed as an alternative to template-based methods for single-step retrosynthetic predictions. Here, we trained and evaluated a transformer model, called the Chemformer, for retrosynthesis predictions within drug discovery. The proprietary data set used for training comprised ∼18 M reactions from literature, patents, and electronic lab notebooks. Chemformer was evaluated for the purpose of both single-step and multistep retrosynthesis. We found that the single-step performance of Chemformer was especially good on reaction classes common in drug discovery, with most reaction classes showing a top-10 round-trip accuracy above 0.97. Moreover, Chemformer reached a higher round-trip accuracy compared to that of a template-based model. By analyzing multistep retrosynthesis experiments, we observed that Chemformer found synthetic routes, leading to commercial starting materials for 95% of the target compounds, an increase of more than 20% compared to the template-based model on a proprietary compound data set. In addition to this, we discovered that Chemformer suggested novel disconnections corresponding to reaction templates, which are not included in the template-based model. These findings were further supported by a publicly available ChEMBL compound data set. The conclusions drawn from this work allow for the design of a synthesis planning tool where template-based and template-free models work in harmony to optimize retrosynthetic recommendations.

Using test-time augmentation to investigate explainable AI: inconsistencies between method, model and human intuition.

Stakeholders of machine learning models desire explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to produce human-understandable and consistent interpretations. In computational toxicity, augmentation of text-based molecular representations has been used successfully for transfer learning on downstream tasks. Augmentations of molecular representations can also be used at inference to compare differences between multiple representations of the same ground-truth. In this study, we investigate the robustness of eight XAI methods using test-time augmentation for a molecular-representation model in the field of computational toxicity prediction. We report significant differences between explanations for different representations of the same ground-truth, and show that randomized models have similar variance. We hypothesize that text-based molecular representations in this and past research reflect tokenization more than learned parameters. Furthermore, we see a greater variance between in-domain predictions than out-of-domain predictions, indicating XAI measures something other than learned parameters. Finally, we investigate the relative importance given to expert-derived structural alerts and find similar importance given irregardless of applicability domain, randomization and varying training procedures. We therefore caution future research to validate their methods using a similar comparison to human intuition without further investigation. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: In this research we critically investigate XAI through test-time augmentation, contrasting previous assumptions about using expert validation and showing inconsistencies within models for identical representations. SMILES augmentation has been used to increase model accuracy, but was here adapted from the field of image test-time augmentation to be used as an independent indication of the consistency within SMILES-based molecular representation models.

AiZynthFinder 4.0: developments based on learnings from 3 years of industrial application.

We present an updated overview of the AiZynthFinder package for retrosynthesis planning. Since the first version was released in 2020, we have added a substantial number of new features based on user feedback. Feature enhancements include policies for filter reactions, support for any one-step retrosynthesis model, a scoring framework and several additional search algorithms. To exemplify the typical use-cases of the software and highlight some learnings, we perform a large-scale analysis on several hundred thousand target molecules from diverse sources. This analysis looks at for instance route shape, stock usage and exploitation of reaction space, and points out strengths and weaknesses of our retrosynthesis approach. The software is released as open-source for educational purposes as well as to provide a reference implementation of the core algorithms for synthesis prediction. We hope that releasing the software as open-source will further facilitate innovation in developing novel methods for synthetic route prediction. AiZynthFinder is a fast, robust and extensible open-source software and can be downloaded from https://github.com/MolecularAI/aizynthfinder .