RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adding ocrelizumab to supportive care for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) in Iran. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a lifetime horizon from the payer's perspective, we developed a decision analytic model with Expanded Disability Status Scales (EDSS) as Markov health states while taking transition probabilities and treatment effects into account. Data were sourced from clinical trials and other literature. The target population was PPMS patients receiving either supportive care or ocrelizumab. We assessed cost- effectiveness through total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost- effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainties. RESULTS: The addition of ocrelizumab to supportive care provided an incremental gain of 0.89 QALYs and an additional cost of US$76,771.34, resulting in an ICER of US$86,220.35 compared to supportive care, which is 5.2 times Iran's GDP per capita (US$16,557). Thus, ocrelizumab is not cost-effective at the threshold of one time GDP per capita. However, the probability of cost-effectiveness increases at higher thresholds. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION: While ocrelizumab is not cost-effective at the threshold of one-time GDP per capita, its clinical benefits are significant. Formulating healthcare policies for high-cost medications with low alternatives like ocrelizumab is essential.